Forum
»
The only way earning 1M/year or more would be worth it is if you didn't actually have to work for it
The only way earning 1M/year or more would be worth it is if you didn't actually have to work for it
- Results 1 to 4 of 4
-
Page 1 of 1
Thread:
The only way earning 1M/year or more would be worth it is if you didn't actually have to work for it
Yesterday, 01:23 AM
-
#1
The only way earning 1M/year or more would be worth it is if you didn't actually have to work for it
Such as if it was completely passive income or through a trust fund
Even if you had to work the basic 40 hours/week and made 1M or more per year it still wouldn't be worth it in terms of time
Because you'd still have to trade those 40 hours/week of your life for that money
Realistically, you'd probably be working more than 40/hours a week if you were making 1M+ a year, so you'd probably be trading 50 or more hours of your life per week for it
There's a finite amount of time in a lifetime and it's something that you can never get back no matter how much money you make
And it's not something you can "make up for" later when you're old
Such as people who work hard and long hours during the prime years of their life believing they'll make up for it when they finally retire when they're 60+
The only other way it would be worth is if you absolutely loved your job that you actually rather show up to it for 40+ hours a week rather than do something else or just chill, which is probably something like 0.001% of the population who like their work that much
Even if you had to work the basic 40 hours/week and made 1M or more per year it still wouldn't be worth it in terms of time
Because you'd still have to trade those 40 hours/week of your life for that money
Realistically, you'd probably be working more than 40/hours a week if you were making 1M+ a year, so you'd probably be trading 50 or more hours of your life per week for it
There's a finite amount of time in a lifetime and it's something that you can never get back no matter how much money you make
And it's not something you can "make up for" later when you're old
Such as people who work hard and long hours during the prime years of their life believing they'll make up for it when they finally retire when they're 60+
The only other way it would be worth is if you absolutely loved your job that you actually rather show up to it for 40+ hours a week rather than do something else or just chill, which is probably something like 0.001% of the population who like their work that much
Yesterday, 01:26 AM
-
#2
- DrugsToGetHigh
- Join Date: Jan, 2026
- Posts: 1,624
- Subscribers: 2
- Rep Power: 19928
-
-
Yesterday, 01:59 AM
-
#3
- LargePeter
- Fuck off, Lahey!
-
- LargePeter
- Fuck off, Lahey!
- Join Date: Aug 2011
- Location: Kuntstralia, Australia
- Posts: 41,385
- Subscribers: 5
- Rep Power: 568253
-
-
Originally Posted By GMiscer⏩
Work 10 whole years, invest intelligently, never work again
Such as if it was completely passive income or through a trust fund
Even if you had to work the basic 40 hours/week and made 1M or more per year it still wouldn't be worth it in terms of time
Because you'd still have to trade those 40 hours/week of your life for that money
Realistically, you'd probably be working more than 40/hours a week if you were making 1M+ a year, so you'd probably be trading 50 or more hours of your life per week for it
There's a finite amount of time in a lifetime and it's something that you can never get back no matter how much money you make
And it's not something you can "make up for" later when you're old
Such as people who work hard and long hours during the prime years of their life believing they'll make up for it when they finally retire when they're 60+
The only other way it would be worth is if you absolutely loved your job that you actually rather show up to it for 40+ hours a week rather than do something else or just chill, which is probably something like 0.001% of the population who like their work that much
Even if you had to work the basic 40 hours/week and made 1M or more per year it still wouldn't be worth it in terms of time
Because you'd still have to trade those 40 hours/week of your life for that money
Realistically, you'd probably be working more than 40/hours a week if you were making 1M+ a year, so you'd probably be trading 50 or more hours of your life per week for it
There's a finite amount of time in a lifetime and it's something that you can never get back no matter how much money you make
And it's not something you can "make up for" later when you're old
Such as people who work hard and long hours during the prime years of their life believing they'll make up for it when they finally retire when they're 60+
The only other way it would be worth is if you absolutely loved your job that you actually rather show up to it for 40+ hours a week rather than do something else or just chill, which is probably something like 0.001% of the population who like their work that much
Fuck off
RAW DOG CREW LIEUTENANT
ALL ROADS LEAD TO MENTZER
President Donald J Trump Crew
Steroids Crew
Growth Hormone Crew
Miscers Who Lift Crew
Robert Pickton Hooker Disposal Crew
Mustang Crew
No Alcohol Crew
Gay Phaggot Crew:
Papi Cholo
Yesterday, 02:21 AM
-
#4
- imbored21
- SoCal Sick Cunt
-
- imbored21
- SoCal Sick Cunt
- Join Date: Oct 2015
- Posts: 37,846
- Rep Power: 171
-
-
American making $400k/yr:
“If I grind for 30 years and make enough money I can retire and spend my afternoons sipping espressos on the mediterranean”
French guy living on $23k/yr and benefits:
“I should get some coffee this afternoon. Maybe I’ll walk around on the beach.”
“If I grind for 30 years and make enough money I can retire and spend my afternoons sipping espressos on the mediterranean”
French guy living on $23k/yr and benefits:
“I should get some coffee this afternoon. Maybe I’ll walk around on the beach.”
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-
- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts