Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» I was asked, "Why does the act of measuring a quantum particle affect its behavior?"
  1. Results 1 to 14 of 14
post 1610885221 07-17-2020, 12:46 PM
-
#1
  1. Gt3x24x7
  2. Registered User
  1. Gt3x24x7
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2009
  4. Location: California, United States
  5. Posts: 12,125
  6. Rep Power: 24163

I was asked, "Why does the act of measuring a quantum particle affect its behavior?"

Was having a conversation with a younger family member about quantum physics while driving. He found out I know Hermetic science and asked me a question and said no one has been able to answer him. I read up on what they, scientists, are guessing now. Question he asked me is, "Why does the act of measuring a quantum particle affect its behavior?" Or in other words, observer effect. I told him this.

Infinite intelligence is like a little matrix of information. That information gets activated by wavelengths and frequencies. You observe that energy, that particle is just condensed waves and next thing you observe it, putting your mental frequency through it. It’s like throwing a pebble into a pond and causing a ripple. Pebble causes the ripple. Suddenly turns into waves. Imagine that waves can cause more waves. Everything has that type of energetic connection, like taking a breath. Doesn’t have to be higher or lower density, only thing dense is you. They shoot out particles and suddenly its being observed. When you observe, you’re putting out a wavelength. When observing you are putting out a wavelength.

You’re sending a frequency to that particle. After all, your interaction with the world is inside. Never outside. Your body may sense it and thinks its outside, but the processes are always inside. See the way how its interrelated. Particle responds to the mental frequency you send out; particle is just out there waiting for a wavelength to observe it. Waiting for something to put out a wavelength upon it, when you observe it, its waiting for you to validate its existence within your own firmament. With your own firmament, your own inner processing foundation. Firmament is a foundational. Within your own firmament, it’s not your own mind, its whatever that intelligence is inside of you.

It’s all about the way how frequencies come and go and affect each other. Whole idea about the observant. Means using the same type of wavelength that you’re putting out through your own intelligence. The interactions within the highly intelligent firmament of creation, in other words reality itself is a frequency you’re observing. In that observation within your mind’s eye, you’re creating it within yourself. Observing is just nothing more receiving information and processing inside through interpretation. That interpretation is just one limitless possibility of each perception observing it. Whatever it is, things just happen to spring right into life, and we observe it. If you add nothing to it, all it is just a bunch of particles floating around in nothing. Things are just particles floating around doing nothing.

Will write more later. Stream of information is done for now lol
post 1610885761 07-17-2020, 12:52 PM
-
#2
  1. tk217
  2. Methodological Naturalism
  1. tk217
  2. Methodological Naturalism
  3. Join Date: Jan 2010
  4. Posts: 55,496
  5. Rep Power: 57514
The observer doesn't need to be a conscious mind.

OP is a bit overboard....
post 1610885971 07-17-2020, 12:53 PM
-
#3
  1. Gt3x24x7
  2. Registered User
  1. Gt3x24x7
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2009
  4. Location: California, United States
  5. Posts: 12,125
  6. Rep Power: 24163
Originally Posted By tk217
The observer doesn't need to be a conscious mind.

OP is a bit overboard....
Just know, when you observe something, you’re adding your wavelength into the field. That can cause ripples into the field. And it responds to you that you get to observe. Hermetic Principles 101 yo
post 1610886151 07-17-2020, 12:54 PM
-
#4
  1. davik
  2. Interlinked
  1. davik
  2. Interlinked
  3. Join Date: Sep 2013
  4. Location: Australia
  5. Posts: 16,052
  6. Rep Power: 40443
isaac casaubon exposed corpus as one big joke 400 years ago!
post 1610886181 07-17-2020, 12:55 PM
-
#5
  1. paulinkansas
  1. paulinkansas
  2. Join Date: Sep 2018
  3. Posts: 9,780
  4. Rep Power: 110307
It's like observing animals in the wild to record their behavior. Just the act of observing them will alter their behavior. So you don't really know how they act when you are not observing them.
post 1610886221 07-17-2020, 12:55 PM
-
#6
  1. tk217
  2. Methodological Naturalism
  1. tk217
  2. Methodological Naturalism
  3. Join Date: Jan 2010
  4. Posts: 55,496
  5. Rep Power: 57514
Originally Posted By Gt3x24x7
Just know, when you observe something, you’re adding your wavelength into the field. That can cause ripples into the field. And it responds to you that you get to observe
...

OP - was the wave function waiting to jump for thousands of millions of years until a single-celled living creature appeared? Or did it have to wait a little longer for some highly qualified measurer - with a misc account?
post 1610886231 07-17-2020, 12:55 PM
-
#7
  1. Coal Man
  2. snailsrus
  1. Coal Man
  2. snailsrus
  3. Join Date: Jul 2006
  4. Posts: 56,588
  5. Rep Power: 653846
Originally Posted By tk217
The observer doesn't need to be a conscious mind.

OP is a bit overboard....
This....
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩۞۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
......................
post 1610886561 07-17-2020, 12:59 PM
-
#8
  1. dopamine72
  2. Endorphin Junkie
  1. dopamine72
  2. Endorphin Junkie
  3. Join Date: Apr 2009
  4. Location: California, United States
  5. Posts: 32,991
  6. Rep Power: 228656
For those unaware:

Journal: https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=139898123&page=240
post 1610886691 07-17-2020, 12:59 PM
-
#9
  1. quadfecta
  2. Registered User
  1. quadfecta
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2015
  4. Age: 36
  5. Posts: 23,282
  6. Rep Power: 100308
That’s quite a novel to say you believe in conscious manifestation and law of attraction
post 1610886971 07-17-2020, 01:02 PM
-
#10
  1. Lawlstud
  2. Dr.Phil of Misc.
  1. Lawlstud
  2. Dr.Phil of Misc.
  3. Join Date: Jan 2012
  4. Location: Houston, Texas, United States
  5. Age: 36
  6. Posts: 15,880
  7. Rep Power: 68010
Originally Posted By tk217
The observer doesn't need to be a conscious mind.

OP is a bit overboard....
/thread
Belief without evidence is a fools game.

Listen Crew - Anything on your mind, want someone to talk to? Hit that PM button brah
5 * Thread Maker
Lone Star State Crew
Diesel Life Crew
Lol @ Trumplets Crew
Lol @ CEO of Exxon for SoS, GoldmanSachs for Treasury, and Creationist for Education Crew
Lol @ Drain the Swamp Crew
Reps for life: stfaulk89
post 1610887671 07-17-2020, 01:07 PM
-
#11
  1. Miked1978
  2. Registered User
  1. Miked1978
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2007
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 47
  6. Posts: 9,952
  7. Rep Power: 32887
I waited until 30 when I could afford one and I did everything I wanted to do without kids.
LOL @ people who follow politics
post 1610887931 07-17-2020, 01:09 PM
-
#12
  1. tk217
  2. Methodological Naturalism
  1. tk217
  2. Methodological Naturalism
  3. Join Date: Jan 2010
  4. Posts: 55,496
  5. Rep Power: 57514
Originally Posted By Miked1978
I waited until 30 when I could afford one and I did everything I wanted to do without kids.
Wrong thread bro - that is the children's thread. This is the observer effect thread.
post 1610888121 07-17-2020, 01:11 PM
-
#13
  1. gtg
  1. gtg
  2. Join Date: Jun 2008
  3. Posts: 23,632
  4. Rep Power: 132597
.:Foot Fetish Club:.
post 1610925391 07-17-2020, 07:50 PM
-
#14
  1. Gt3x24x7
  2. Registered User
  1. Gt3x24x7
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2009
  4. Location: California, United States
  5. Posts: 12,125
  6. Rep Power: 24163
Originally Posted By tk217
...

OP - was the wave function waiting to jump for thousands of millions of years until a single-celled living creature appeared? Or did it have to wait a little longer for some highly qualified measurer - with a misc account?
Idk wtf you're asking lol
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts