08-04-2020, 06:31 PM
-
#1
- Tomohokk
- Registered User
-
- Tomohokk
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2011
- Age: 38
- Posts: 7,123
- Rep Power: 22563
-
-
LOL at getting married if you're rich
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩۞۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
...............................R.I.P.................................
.............Aziz "Zyzz" Sergeyevich Shavershian.........
.................₪₪₪₪₪₪1989-2011₪₪₪₪₪₪.............
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩۞۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
08-04-2020, 06:36 PM
-
#2
- FrankCostanza
- Serenity Now!
-
- FrankCostanza
- Serenity Now!
- Join Date: Sep 2019
- Posts: 17,091
- Rep Power: 48469
-
-
only get married to people who have more money than you. IMO being long term unmarried partners
shows commitment to one another more than when there's pressure from marriage papers.
shows commitment to one another more than when there's pressure from marriage papers.
I'm not here for rage. I'm here for revenge!
Anti Covid VAX Superhero
Mein power
Mein pleasure
Mein pain
Trump 2020
Trump 2024
08-04-2020, 06:37 PM
-
#3
- Silencespeaks
- Banned
-
- Silencespeaks
- Banned
- Join Date: Aug 2015
- Posts: 114,138
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Post deleted by user
08-04-2020, 06:37 PM
-
#4
- savageoldman
- Registered User
-
- savageoldman
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2019
- Age: 56
- Posts: 2,674
- Rep Power: 17973
-
-
"she does not want the prenup enforced but he does"
women really out here being delusional
women really out here being delusional
08-04-2020, 06:42 PM
-
#5
Originally Posted By savageoldman⏩
My ex was really upset that I suggested a prenup, and wouldn't have agreed."she does not want the prenup enforced but he does"
women really out here being delusional
women really out here being delusional
I get it in the sense that it may indicate a lack of commitment, but I'm just a realist.
We never married anyway.
𝕮𝖍𝖆𝖘𝖊 𝖆 𝖈𝖍𝖊𝖈𝕶, 𝖓𝖊𝖛𝖊𝖗 𝖈𝖍𝖆𝖘𝖊 𝖆 𝖇𝖎𝖙𝖈𝖍
█▓▒▒░░🧵Make trolls invisible: https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=180234573 ░░▒▒▓█
08-04-2020, 07:26 PM
-
#6
- Silencespeaks
- Banned
-
- Silencespeaks
- Banned
- Join Date: Aug 2015
- Posts: 114,138
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Post deleted by user
08-04-2020, 07:27 PM
-
#7
- Silencespeaks
- Banned
-
- Silencespeaks
- Banned
- Join Date: Aug 2015
- Posts: 114,138
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Post deleted by user
08-04-2020, 07:28 PM
-
#8
- thenightskies
- chocolate rain
-
- thenightskies
- chocolate rain
- Join Date: Sep 2011
- Age: 38
- Posts: 4,646
- Rep Power: 8582
-
-
shes not getting chit. she admitted to prenup
ripping up paper doesnt mean crap and he gonna deny it. a court document isnt invalid if ripped up LOL
he just played her dumbass
she just wasting money on lawyers
ripping up paper doesnt mean crap and he gonna deny it. a court document isnt invalid if ripped up LOL
he just played her dumbass
she just wasting money on lawyers
08-04-2020, 07:38 PM
-
#9
- AgentSkyhawk
- healthy eating disorder
-
- AgentSkyhawk
- healthy eating disorder
- Join Date: Feb 2010
- Age: 35
- Posts: 12,543
- Rep Power: 28865
-
-
Originally Posted By FrankCostanza⏩
I agree with the unmarried part. But Dr Dre's wife took a page out of your book with this one and look what's happening nowonly get married to people who have more money than you.IMO being long term unmarried partners
shows commitment to one another more than when there's pressure from marriage papers.
shows commitment to one another more than when there's pressure from marriage papers.
Originally Posted By Luc1fer⏩
Good job on not marrying her. It's not a lack of commitment otherwise you wouldn't have been in a relationship with her, it's being safe. That would be like if she got in your new whip and get mad at you for suggesting to her to wear a seatbelt. If you didn't want in the car you wouldn't have let her in. You're being safe.My ex was really upset that I suggested a prenup, and wouldn't have agreed.
I get it in the sense that it may indicate a lack of commitment, but I'm just a realist.
We never married anyway.
I get it in the sense that it may indicate a lack of commitment, but I'm just a realist.
We never married anyway.
Originally Posted By Silencespeaks⏩
More like men, when the majority of divorces are initiated by women, and even the women is rare.Naw that’s the risk you take when you get married.
Goes the same way if the wife earned more. Like Jessica Simpson losing half to Nick Lachey.
Goes the same way if the wife earned more. Like Jessica Simpson losing half to Nick Lachey.
"You can trai as had as you want to, but witout the right fel supporting your training and recovery, you will never see the resuts that you should."-ron Man
Oh by the wy...Size f*ckng matters, in everything. Don't believe the hype. Size f*ckin maters. Size DOESN'T matter to peope who dont have any size, that's why they'r like "oh size doesn't mater". SIZE, GIRTH, THICKNESS, EVERYTHING. Its a game of inches in life..add up all those inche, Victory muthaf*cker!-Gre Pitt
08-04-2020, 07:40 PM
-
#10
- BigElephant
- Join Date: Nov 2012
- Posts: 13,745
- Rep Power: 71403
-
-
Post deleted by user
08-04-2020, 07:53 PM
-
#11
- ErnieMccracken
- Join Date: Nov 2013
- Posts: 100,062
- Rep Power: 330290
-
-
I hope Sedale Threatt is at least getting a laugh. Here's part of the letter Dre wrote to this bitch while she was married to other dude.
“Hopefully you doing well and you realized you need to quit fukking with Sedale and come home to your doctor. I will take care of you baby girl.”
08-04-2020, 08:01 PM
-
#12
- irollurmom
- anti-miscer
-
- irollurmom
- anti-miscer
- Join Date: Oct 2010
- Location: Canada
- Posts: 16,615
- Rep Power: 33474
-
-
damn, why even get a prenup if a woman can just claim it was done "under pressure" and have it thrown out?
I'd rather get cucked by child support than alimony tbh
I'd rather get cucked by child support than alimony tbh
RIP Lil Peep
RIP XXXTentacion
RIP Mac Miller
RIP Nipsey Hussle
RIP Juice WRLD
RIP Neil Peart
RIP Kobe Bryant
RIP Pop Smoke
08-04-2020, 08:02 PM
-
#13
08-04-2020, 08:03 PM
-
#14
- propreffered7
- Registered User
-
- propreffered7
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2010
- Posts: 36,839
- Rep Power: 86393
-
-
yea, i think the thing that's blinding is obviously you can't predict the future.
chit gets messy and THEN for revenge they start doing that chit
for a while things are going well, then something happens and then things get vengeful, dirty and below the belt
chit gets messy and THEN for revenge they start doing that chit
for a while things are going well, then something happens and then things get vengeful, dirty and below the belt
08-04-2020, 08:06 PM
-
#15
- ErnieMccracken
- Join Date: Nov 2013
- Posts: 100,062
- Rep Power: 330290
-
-
Originally Posted By fishnbrah⏩
How did he manage to pull that off?My buddy is getting married next month. He is broke and jobless. His old lady takes care of him.
08-04-2020, 08:06 PM
-
#16
- propreffered7
- Registered User
-
- propreffered7
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2010
- Posts: 36,839
- Rep Power: 86393
-
-
Originally Posted By irollurmom⏩
lol judges awarded girlsdoporn sloots (the girls that did the vids) when they agreed to do porn (granted under shady operations) but they still went through with it and flew out to a city under the premise of gettinf fuked, signed a contract which said it'd be shared on the internet (not exactly where)damn, why even get a prenup if a woman can just claim it was done "under pressure" and have it thrown out?
I'd rather get cucked by child support than alimony tbh
I'd rather get cucked by child support than alimony tbh
and not only is that contract null but they were also awarded AGAIN for doing porn
08-04-2020, 08:08 PM
-
#17
- Ratfish
- Join Date: Jul 2009
- Location: Portland, Oregon, United States
- Posts: 113,850
- Rep Power: 576095
-
-
still waiting to hear a legit reason why it's necessary to involve the government in your relationships and why adding a legal and financial contract is a good idea
Make Europe Germany Again
08-04-2020, 08:12 PM
-
#18
- Silencespeaks
- Banned
-
- Silencespeaks
- Banned
- Join Date: Aug 2015
- Posts: 114,138
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Post deleted by user
08-04-2020, 08:13 PM
-
#19
- Silencespeaks
- Banned
-
- Silencespeaks
- Banned
- Join Date: Aug 2015
- Posts: 114,138
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Post deleted by user
08-04-2020, 08:13 PM
-
#20
- Ratfish
- Join Date: Jul 2009
- Location: Portland, Oregon, United States
- Posts: 113,850
- Rep Power: 576095
-
-
Originally Posted By Silencespeaks⏩
how does government involvement enhance a nuclear family?For men who don’t want kids there’s really no reason to get married. But if you want kids you should marry and have a traditional nuclear family imo.
Another issue is that women do want marriage. So most gf will only hang around a few years and then move on if you still don’t want marriage. When you’re younger you can just replace them with new gf but as you age that will get progressively harder. Unless you’re on that CEO 10k a day time where you can just buy new gf.
Another issue is that women do want marriage. So most gf will only hang around a few years and then move on if you still don’t want marriage. When you’re younger you can just replace them with new gf but as you age that will get progressively harder. Unless you’re on that CEO 10k a day time where you can just buy new gf.
Make Europe Germany Again
08-04-2020, 08:14 PM
-
#21
- ErnieMccracken
- Join Date: Nov 2013
- Posts: 100,062
- Rep Power: 330290
-
-
Originally Posted By Ratfish⏩
2 scenarios:still waiting to hear a legit reason why it's necessary to involve the government in your relationships and why a legal and financial contract is a good idea
1. She is a much higher earner and thus receives no legal leverage over you
2. You are part of an old money family and gramps won't will you his steel mill conglomerate and country club membership until you marry
08-04-2020, 08:17 PM
-
#22
- ErnieMccracken
- Join Date: Nov 2013
- Posts: 100,062
- Rep Power: 330290
-
-
Originally Posted By Silencespeaks⏩
I was thinking 8" tongue and can breathe through his earsGood looking or tall probably
08-04-2020, 08:18 PM
-
#23
- Silencespeaks
- Banned
-
- Silencespeaks
- Banned
- Join Date: Aug 2015
- Posts: 114,138
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Post deleted by user
08-04-2020, 08:22 PM
-
#24
- JoshSP1985
- Anti-Circumcision
-
- JoshSP1985
- Anti-Circumcision
- Join Date: Aug 2009
- Location: Franklin, Indiana, United States
- Posts: 66,936
- Rep Power: 214514
-
-
Yep people will try to rip you down for it just point out the endless list of divorces as your evidence.
*PUREBLOOD CREW*
*DAD CREW*
*SUPER STRAIGHT*
*NATURAL DICK CREW*
*CCW*
08-04-2020, 10:56 PM
-
#25
Originally Posted By Ratfish⏩
To play devil's advocate it is certainly notnecessary, especially, for example in the past, whensocialcontracts were more binding.still waiting to hear a legit reason why it's necessary to involve the government in your relationships and why adding a legal and financial contract is a good idea
However in modern society people give up on marriage far too easily. If there are kids involved, it is beneficial for the child to have both parents present to enable better bonding and support mechanisms.
Without any sort of incentive to stay together (i.e. a socially or legally binding contract), children would suffer. Ask anyone in a long term marriage if they had challenges and hurdles. It's possible to work through many of those roadblocks, but people just quit before trying.
In a LTR, especially in modern times, people would certainly just leave give the lack of either social or legal incentive to stay and fight for the marriage.
On the financial side, the person who quits their career in order to be the homemaker (typically the mother) is sacrificing something for both people. Practically speaking, if the man were to just walk out on the marriage at random 3 years in, the women is screwed. In order to protect that vulnerability, financial contracts are often included. I think they are often abused, but there is an argument there.
tldr; since social contracts have diminished in society, legal contracts replace them.
𝕮𝖍𝖆𝖘𝖊 𝖆 𝖈𝖍𝖊𝖈𝕶, 𝖓𝖊𝖛𝖊𝖗 𝖈𝖍𝖆𝖘𝖊 𝖆 𝖇𝖎𝖙𝖈𝖍
█▓▒▒░░🧵Make trolls invisible: https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=180234573 ░░▒▒▓█
08-04-2020, 11:07 PM
-
#26
- Ratfish
- Join Date: Jul 2009
- Location: Portland, Oregon, United States
- Posts: 113,850
- Rep Power: 576095
-
-
Originally Posted By Luc1fer⏩
it's not an incentive if you stay together, it's a punishment if you don't, and divorces aren't exactly difficult to get. if anything it's just another punishment as people hemorrhage wealth to the divorce industryTo play devil's advocate it is certainly notnecessary, especially, for example in the past, whensocialcontracts were more binding.
However in modern society people give up on marriage far too easily. If there are kids involved, it is beneficial for the child to have both parents present to enable better bonding and support mechanisms.
Without any sort of incentive to stay together (i.e. a socially or legally binding contract), children would suffer. Ask anyone in a long term marriage if they had challenges and hurdles. It's possible to work through many of those roadblocks, but people just quit before trying.
In a LTR, especially in modern times, people would certainly just leave give the lack of either social or legal incentive to stay and fight for the marriage.
On the financial side, the person who quits their career in order to be the homemaker (typically the mother) is sacrificing something for both people. Practically speaking, if the man were to just walk out on the marriage at random 3 years in, the women is screwed. In order to protect that vulnerability, financial contracts are often included. I think they are often abused, but there is an argument there.
tldr; since social contracts have diminished in society, legal contracts replace them.
However in modern society people give up on marriage far too easily. If there are kids involved, it is beneficial for the child to have both parents present to enable better bonding and support mechanisms.
Without any sort of incentive to stay together (i.e. a socially or legally binding contract), children would suffer. Ask anyone in a long term marriage if they had challenges and hurdles. It's possible to work through many of those roadblocks, but people just quit before trying.
In a LTR, especially in modern times, people would certainly just leave give the lack of either social or legal incentive to stay and fight for the marriage.
On the financial side, the person who quits their career in order to be the homemaker (typically the mother) is sacrificing something for both people. Practically speaking, if the man were to just walk out on the marriage at random 3 years in, the women is screwed. In order to protect that vulnerability, financial contracts are often included. I think they are often abused, but there is an argument there.
tldr; since social contracts have diminished in society, legal contracts replace them.
is it really better for kids to be in a home with a failed relationship that has a tenuous legal punishment holding it together?
the incentive to remain with someone is that you get to spend your life with them. if your desire to do that goes away, then you should definitely not choose misery over freedom
the beauty of a long term relationship is that it is held together purely by mutual affection. there is zero point if that's not present
Make Europe Germany Again
08-04-2020, 11:20 PM
-
#27
- AriesTH
- Certified User
-
- AriesTH
- Certified User
- Join Date: Apr 2013
- Location: Vancouver, B.C, Canada
- Posts: 2,115
- Rep Power: 30930
-
-
Originally Posted By irollurmom⏩
Well, when people get a prenup the correct way to go about doing it is forbothparties to get legal their own separate legal advice explaining the prenup to them. If both parties have received this advice and are walked through it with a lawyer, then continue to want to sign, there's pretty much no chance it is getting thrown out in court.damn, why even get a prenup if a woman can just claim it was done "under pressure" and have it thrown out?
I'd rather get cucked by child support than alimony tbh
I'd rather get cucked by child support than alimony tbh
The issue is when one gets it and one doesn't, or no lawyer is ever even involved in the process (idk if this is even possible).
Also note, if your partner can't afford the legal advice, you NEED to buy it for them as a safety measure. The "she (or I) couldn't afford it" excuse won't hold up in court. It's very very important for both to get independent legal advice in regards to the prenup.
ASOT Crew
BLM Crew (Bang Local MILFs)
08-04-2020, 11:22 PM
-
#28
- Ratfish
- Join Date: Jul 2009
- Location: Portland, Oregon, United States
- Posts: 113,850
- Rep Power: 576095
-
-
Originally Posted By AriesTH⏩
if your partner can't afford legal advice, that might be a sign that you're about to marry a peasantWell, when people get a prenup the correct way to go about doing it is forbothparties to get legal their own separate legal advice explaining the prenup to them. If both parties have received this advice and are walked through it with a lawyer, then continue to want to sign, there's pretty much no chance it is getting thrown out in court.
The issue is when one gets it and one doesn't, or no lawyer is ever even involved in the process (idk if this is even possible).
Also note, if your partner can't afford the legal advice, you NEED to buy it for them as a safety measure. The "she (or I) couldn't afford it" excuse won't hold up in court. It's very very important for both to get independent legal advice in regards to the prenup.
The issue is when one gets it and one doesn't, or no lawyer is ever even involved in the process (idk if this is even possible).
Also note, if your partner can't afford the legal advice, you NEED to buy it for them as a safety measure. The "she (or I) couldn't afford it" excuse won't hold up in court. It's very very important for both to get independent legal advice in regards to the prenup.
Make Europe Germany Again
08-04-2020, 11:25 PM
-
#29
- A-GAME
- Pedicabo ego vos et irrum
-
- A-GAME
- Pedicabo ego vos et irrum
- Join Date: Nov 2006
- Posts: 47,648
- Rep Power: 280053
-
-
Originally Posted By Luc1fer⏩
No way I'd marry a woman that refused to sign a prenup. GTFO of here you green eyed whore lmaoMy ex was really upset that I suggested a prenup, and wouldn't have agreed.
I get it in the sense that it may indicate a lack of commitment, but I'm just a realist.
We never married anyway.
I get it in the sense that it may indicate a lack of commitment, but I'm just a realist.
We never married anyway.
Still Cuckin On Four Fours, Wrapped In Four Voes
08-04-2020, 11:26 PM
-
#30
- AriesTH
- Certified User
-
- AriesTH
- Certified User
- Join Date: Apr 2013
- Location: Vancouver, B.C, Canada
- Posts: 2,115
- Rep Power: 30930
-
-
Originally Posted By Ratfish⏩
This is true lol (and beyond the point). The point I was trying to make is, don't let them weasel their way out of not showing up to the meeting with the lawyer under any circumstances.if your partner can't afford legal advice, that might be a sign that you're about to marry a peasant
ASOT Crew
BLM Crew (Bang Local MILFs)
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-
- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts