Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
ยป Is the misc wrong? Statistics on lifetime sexual partners
  1. Results 1 to 30 of 42
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Last
post 1614895191 08-28-2020, 10:00 AM
-
#1
  1. JaxBrah
  2. KAG
  1. JaxBrah
  2. KAG
  3. Join Date: Apr 2010
  4. Posts: 16,521
  5. Rep Power: 49594

Is the misc wrong? Statistics on lifetime sexual partners

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nsfg/key_statistics/n.htm

Males : 6.1 partners
Females: 4.2

Percentage who have had 15 or more partners:

Males: 21%
Females: 10%


Idk bruhs, looks like most women arent whores after all?
Certified 1200 ng/l T
post 1614895411 08-28-2020, 10:03 AM
-
#2
  1. ThisIsMyAlias
  2. Registered Loser
  1. ThisIsMyAlias
  2. Registered Loser
  3. Join Date: Oct 2012
  4. Posts: 10,923
  5. Rep Power: 71373
Self reported numbers lol
post 1614895421 08-28-2020, 10:03 AM
-
#3
  1. GlassMoon
  2. Negged srs
  1. GlassMoon
  2. Negged srs
  3. Join Date: Apr 2012
  4. Posts: 28,993
  5. Rep Power: 129907
jfl if you believe that
See user title srs
post 1614895801 08-28-2020, 10:07 AM
-
#4
  1. headturner1
  2. User title
  1. headturner1
  2. User title
  3. Join Date: Jan 2012
  4. Location: Washington, United States
  5. Age: 18
  6. Height: 6'5"
  7. Weight: 282 lbs
  8. Posts: 22,831
  9. Subscribers: 9
  10. Rep Power: 318078
6.1 is a big number for the average chitbag miscer.
post 1614896441 08-28-2020, 10:13 AM
-
#5
  1. Workout4ever
  1. Workout4ever
  2. Join Date: Apr 2009
  3. Location: Miami, Florida, United States
  4. Age: 33
  5. Posts: 43,720
  6. Rep Power: 58689
they're lying

i've had multiple girls say things like 'they don't count certain lays because of abc or xyz'

always multiply their numbers by x3 for the truth
post 1614896911 08-28-2020, 10:18 AM
-
#6
  1. Scottybby
  2. Registered User
  1. Scottybby
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2020
  4. Posts: 7,316
  5. Rep Power: 43097
4.2 * 3 = 12.6

There you go opie
post 1614897021 08-28-2020, 10:19 AM
-
#7
  1. DesiredUserphag
  2. 1:12TilTheDayIFukinDie
  1. DesiredUserphag
  2. 1:12TilTheDayIFukinDie
  3. Join Date: Sep 2014
  4. Posts: 40,176
  5. Rep Power: 397140
Oh good, I'm above average with ~70
๐—ฃ๐—จ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—•๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—ข๐——
ฯ‰ฯƒัโ„“โˆ‚ ั‚ัฮฑฮฝั”โ„“ั”ั ศผัั”ฯ‰ โ‚…โ‚€/โ‚โ‚‰โ‚…
๐•ฌ๐–Š๐–˜๐–™๐–๐–Š๐–™๐–Ž๐–ˆ๐–†๐–‘๐–‘๐–ž ๐•ฎ๐–š๐–™ ๐•ธ๐–†๐–˜๐–™๐–Š๐–— ๐•ฝ๐–†๐–ˆ๐–Š ยฎ
แ—ชIแ”•แ‘•แ–‡Iแ—ฐIแ‘Žแ—ฉTIOแ‘Ž Eแ™ญแ‘•แ’ชแ‘Œแ”•IOแ‘Ž Iแ‘Žแ—ชOแ‘•Tแ–‡Iแ‘Žแ—ฉTIOแ‘Ž
post 1614897231 08-28-2020, 10:22 AM
-
#8
  1. GlassMoon
  2. Negged srs
  1. GlassMoon
  2. Negged srs
  3. Join Date: Apr 2012
  4. Posts: 28,993
  5. Rep Power: 129907
Originally Posted By Rabbitjb
Which miscers allocation did you get?
.
See user title srs
post 1614897341 08-28-2020, 10:23 AM
-
#9
  1. jizzfarmer
  1. jizzfarmer
  2. Join Date: Mar 2015
  3. Posts: 11,395
  4. Rep Power: 51859
Yes, cuz sloots never lie about this type of thing right?

Yellow Fever Crew -- https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=176364181
whoremaxxing crew
ooohh I'm a ghost crew
show me your credentials crew
mod negged X 5 crew
banned camp X 22 crew
dead by 40 crew, pussied out of dead by 30 crew
post 1614897421 08-28-2020, 10:24 AM
-
#10
  1. lockdev
  1. lockdev
  2. Join Date: Nov 2012
  3. Posts: 15,303
  4. Rep Power: 135360
Just fuarking LOL@that "study".

If we all self-reported, the average dink size would be 8.2".

Average for a 25 year old is easily 10, and really probably closer to 20.

Lifetime? Chit, probably 30 for the average 35 year old spinster.
Misc Entrepreneur Crew
post 1614897541 08-28-2020, 10:26 AM
-
#11
  1. JStrez
  2. Breaker of Gains
  1. JStrez
  2. Breaker of Gains
  3. Join Date: May 2010
  4. Location: New York, United States
  5. Posts: 9,748
  6. Rep Power: 54369
I don't think these are too far off. They are averages, and when I think of the average male or female, they are pretty docile. I'm at 28ish now, but I'm trying to slow down.
*Mechanical Engineering Crew*
*6'3" Master Race Crew*
*6 Figs Crew*

"Because the thing about repairing, maintaining, and cleaning is itโ€™s not an adventure. Thereโ€™s no way to do it so wrong you might die. Itโ€™s just work. And the bottom line is, some people are okay going to work, and some people โ€ฆ well, some people would rather die. Each of us gets to choose.โ€
post 1614898081 08-28-2020, 10:31 AM
-
#12
  1. newbuck
  2. Registered User
  1. newbuck
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2015
  4. Location: New Jersey, United States
  5. Age: 29
  6. Posts: 2,756
  7. Rep Power: 10015
Women regularly lie about body count lol.
Besides that, the stats are from 2011-2015.
2015 was the tipping point into the degeneracy of today especially with online dating
certified sp driller
post 1614898231 08-28-2020, 10:33 AM
-
#13
  1. IlChosenOne
  2. Biggest loads in the NW
  1. IlChosenOne
  2. Biggest loads in the NW
  3. Join Date: Jan 2015
  4. Location: Idaho, United States
  5. Posts: 20,788
  6. Rep Power: 259729
You need to multiple both the female numbers by 10


Originally Posted By JaxBrah
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nsfg/key_statistics/n.htm

Males : 6.1 partners
Females: 42 partners

Percentage who have had 15 or more partners:

Males: 21%
Females: 100%


Idk bruhs, looks like most women arent whores after all?
There you go mane
* Rawdog crew * Creampie crew * Poverty crew *

Haven't worn a condom since middle school crew

* HTC crew *
post 1614898241 08-28-2020, 10:33 AM
-
#14
  1. LukeS1
  2. Luke
  1. LukeS1
  2. Luke
  3. Join Date: Apr 2012
  4. Age: 32
  5. Posts: 13,210
  6. Rep Power: 55417
The male number is weighted down by virgins (the 80%)

The female number is weighted down because lies. The fact that the average is so much lower than for men shows there has to be some lying in there, it dont add up
6'1, 205 lbs

Luke
post 1614899191 08-28-2020, 10:44 AM
-
#15
  1. gmenfan40
  1. gmenfan40
  2. Join Date: Mar 2007
  3. Location: Fuck Israel
  4. Posts: 37,517
  5. Subscribers: 5
  6. Rep Power: 156673
Originally Posted By LukeS1
The male number is weighted down by virgins (the 80%)

The female number is weighted down because lies. The fact that the average is so much lower than for men shows there has to be some lying in there, it dont add up
Strong this. Thanks to apps, my number is way beyond the "average."

No brag, as i'm over that part of my life. But in my early to mid 20s, i was an animal that didn't care. It wasn't hard to, having profiles on multiple dating apps.
post 1614899501 08-28-2020, 10:49 AM
-
#16
  1. TBO1313
  2. Never Registered
  1. TBO1313
  2. Never Registered
  3. Join Date: Dec 2013
  4. Posts: 28,898
  5. Rep Power: 342064
Originally Posted By LukeS1
The male number is weighted down by virgins (the 80%)

The female number is weighted down because lies. The fact that the average is so much lower than for men shows there has to be some lying in there, it dont add up
Both of these. I've had an embarrassing number of ONS. I'm a decent looking guy but not exactly gigachad. If they hooked up with me on a ONS they did that chit with a bunch of other dudes too. Even "good girls" these days have slay counts around 5, virgins are damn near unheard of and then the supersloots with 200+ should be driving that average sky high.


TLDR; hoes lyin
6'2"

OMAD results: 2/15/19-235, 10/13/19-190

OHP-205 Bench- 245 Squat - 405 C&J - 245

2021 Spring cut: 195lbs starting weight
post 1614899541 08-28-2020, 10:49 AM
-
#17
  1. MIKES3
  2. GO HEAVY OR GO HOME!!!
  1. MIKES3
  2. GO HEAVY OR GO HOME!!!
  3. Join Date: Dec 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 4,700
  6. Rep Power: 8561
I'm 38, I lost count after 40
Chicago Crew



"ITS OK MIKE"
post 1614899941 08-28-2020, 10:53 AM
-
#18
  1. lockdev
  1. lockdev
  2. Join Date: Nov 2012
  3. Posts: 15,303
  4. Rep Power: 135360
Originally Posted By gmenfan40
Strong this. Thanks to apps, my number is way beyond the "average."

No brag, as i'm over that part of my life. But in my early to mid 20s, i was an animal that didn't care. It wasn't hard to, having profiles on multiple dating apps.
Apps have a lot to do with the numbers increase.

Back in my dating days, I met most women from websites where people were looking for actual relationships.

Even those sloots had high numbers.

It's definitely not normal, but if I was starting to catch feelings, I'd casually bring up the "what are your numbers" talk before moving further.

The honest average among about 10 women was 10-15. These were not women who were flirty or presented themselves as sloots, or just looking for fun. These were women serious about finding a relationship.

Even then, I still think many were lying.

The ultimate redpill for me was when just about every one of them had had a fwb or ons.

Good luck out there with western women brahs.

I ended up meeting a women overseas during my travels and she's 10000x better than anyone I dated from the states.
Misc Entrepreneur Crew
post 1614900281 08-28-2020, 10:55 AM
-
#19
  1. Kaliconic
  2. Registered User
  1. Kaliconic
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2019
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 5,211
  6. Rep Power: 26799
I think it's wrong but it might be closer to reality than you think. If you pursue random hookups your perception is going to be warped because you'll never encounter the girls who aren't down with that. I think there are a lot of girls who just move from one long-term relationship to another. A women has to reach a serious level of degeneracy before she's willing to sleep with random men.
post 1614900421 08-28-2020, 10:57 AM
-
#20
  1. MFarrar74
  2. Registered User
  1. MFarrar74
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2008
  4. Location: Delray Beach, Florida, United States
  5. Age: 45
  6. Posts: 5,149
  7. Rep Power: 21957
man, i am not a womanizer any anyway. like, ive never gone out to bars for the purpose of getting poosie. I dont run game, im not a chad (though i am tall). but i have fooked WAY WAY WAY WAY more chicks than that. i dont buy those numbers from either side.
I know dudes and chicks that have been with literally hundreds of people, they would skew the average so much it would mean a TON of folks must have only been with 1 or ZERO.
post 1614900731 08-28-2020, 11:00 AM
-
#21
  1. wave_length
  2. Retired at 42
  1. wave_length
  2. Retired at 42
  3. Join Date: Dec 2008
  4. Location: Vienna, Austria
  5. Age: 53
  6. Posts: 18,041
  7. Rep Power: 68853
Thatโ€˜s literally the only argument the redpill has: all scientific studies showing theyโ€˜re wrong are false. Because all sloots sloot and lie about it. Anecdotal trumps scientific. Hereโ€˜s my anecdote: from the couples I know, over 50% are in happy LTRs (>10y), from the ones that broke up, well over 50% broke up because the man cheated.
How to lose fat for Noobs: http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=129247741
post 1614901021 08-28-2020, 11:04 AM
-
#22
  1. W1LLW
  2. Enlightened Miscer
  1. W1LLW
  2. Enlightened Miscer
  3. Join Date: Jan 2011
  4. Posts: 27,700
  5. Rep Power: 229291
Yeah Iโ€™m one of those dudes that gets called โ€œhandsomeโ€ rather than โ€œhotโ€ because Iโ€™m only slightly above average looking and even I can knock down 6 in a year with minimal effort.
Kobe Forever
Black Crew
Bucks N 6
post 1614901291 08-28-2020, 11:08 AM
-
#23
  1. Zackad
  2. Keanu Reeves Checking In
  1. Zackad
  2. Keanu Reeves Checking In
  3. Join Date: Nov 2010
  4. Location: California, Uganda
  5. Posts: 25,380
  6. Rep Power: 219281
Originally Posted By Workout4ever
they're lying

i've had multiple girls say things like 'they don't count certain lays because of abc or xyz'

always multiply their numbers by x3 for the truth
this lol

they don't count poor lays, a lot of drunken ones, ones they didn't really want to have in the first place, etc.

that being said, I don't think it's as bad as misc makes it out to be. certainly not that innocent, but I think, like mainstream media, it's pushed on misc so often that it's what we hear/read the most, so it seems more apparent. I also think a lot of miscers are well built dudes who probably encounter this stuff more often than the average citizen, so there's more exposure.

Remember these are averages of the nation. Not averages of everyone who fuks consistently lol.
"So t
post 1614901471 08-28-2020, 11:09 AM
-
#24
  1. ANumber1
  2. Duke of New York
  1. ANumber1
  2. Duke of New York
  3. Join Date: Jul 2013
  4. Location: New York, United States
  5. Posts: 18,570
  6. Rep Power: 128694
Originally Posted By JaxBrah
Males : 6.1 partners

Percentage who have had 15 or more partners:

Males: 21%
Statistically, I must be the only male Miscer who smashes consistently. It's the only explanation.
Nah, fukk that. Iโ€™m not doing that.
post 1614901631 08-28-2020, 11:12 AM
-
#25
  1. roughinhouse
  2. Registered User
  1. roughinhouse
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 4,237
  6. Rep Power: 11089
Where did they get these results? I don't remember participating in something like this.
post 1614901821 08-28-2020, 11:15 AM
-
#26
  1. keyboardworkout
  2. ChatGPT4.5 Bot
  1. keyboardworkout
  2. ChatGPT4.5 Bot
  3. Join Date: Jul 2009
  4. Posts: 36,953
  5. Rep Power: 416934
โ–ชโ–ˆโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ–ˆโ–ช Equipment Crew #53 โ–ชโ–ˆโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ–ˆโ–ช
^^^^^^^ 6' 6" and Over Crew ^^^^^^^
------------- No Vax Crew ----------------
post 1614902331 08-28-2020, 11:21 AM
-
#27
  1. Eggiesinabasket
  2. With a side of silly
  1. Eggiesinabasket
  2. With a side of silly
  3. Join Date: Sep 2013
  4. Location: Canada
  5. Posts: 2,602
  6. Rep Power: 91590
Hmmm I don't think those are right.

Knew a girl that once she got tinder, slept with 20 different guys in a month or so.

Have coworkers say they can't go more than a week without sex, yet not in a relationship. Been told of at least 3 guys one girl slept with from work, not including her tinder escapades/guys she's dated.
The other coworkers have a list of online dating stories to tell me.

With guys, I've heard from a lot of them at least 20+ girls.

I don't think those numbers are accurate, or maybe its the people I work with.
Go Jets Go
Lurk Alert: If you've seen me post once, I've watched your posts 20 times more
Final Form Goal: 2 Door Fridge Mode
All paths set, final destination: Entropy
post 1614902441 08-28-2020, 11:22 AM
-
#28
  1. TBO1313
  2. Never Registered
  1. TBO1313
  2. Never Registered
  3. Join Date: Dec 2013
  4. Posts: 28,898
  5. Rep Power: 342064
Originally Posted By ANumber1
Statistically, I must be the only male Miscer who smashes consistently. It's the only explanation.
After you get above 20 or so who really keeps count? I can recall a lot of the individual stories because some of them are so absurd but no way I could remember every single one even if I wanted to which I absolutely do not. I used to drink way too much and do other substances that greatly hindered my ability to make good decisions. If I was forced to recall some of those women I'd likely need to be treated for PTSD
6'2"

OMAD results: 2/15/19-235, 10/13/19-190

OHP-205 Bench- 245 Squat - 405 C&J - 245

2021 Spring cut: 195lbs starting weight
post 1614902701 08-28-2020, 11:26 AM
-
#29
  1. katya422
  1. katya422
  2. Join Date: Dec 2011
  3. Location: United States
  4. Posts: 34,673
  5. Rep Power: 372543
Originally Posted By lockdev
Apps have a lot to do with the numbers increase.

Back in my dating days, I met most women from websites where people were looking for actual relationships.

Even those sloots had high numbers.

It's definitely not normal, but if I was starting to catch feelings, I'd casually bring up the "what are your numbers" talk before moving further.

The honest average among about 10 women was 10-15. These were not women who were flirty or presented themselves as sloots, or just looking for fun. These were women serious about finding a relationship.

Even then, I still think many were lying.

The ultimate redpill for me was when just about every one of them had had a fwb or ons.

Good luck out there with western women brahs.

I ended up meeting a women overseas during my travels and she's 10000x better than anyone I dated from the states.
Originally Posted By Kaliconic
I think it's wrong but it might be closer to reality than you think.If you pursue random hookups your perception is going to be warped because you'll never encounter the girls who aren't down with that. I think there are a lot of girls who just move from one long-term relationship to another. A women has to reach a serious level of degeneracy before she's willing to sleep with random men.
Possibly true.

Says this was 2011-2015. And would include older people right?

I know misc standards and all, but for me it was 3 for high school/college age then first and second husband. That's it. Not virginal and not slutty either; probably common if you include married people and not just long term singles.
INTP Crew
Inattentive ADD Crew
Mom That Miscs Crew
post 1614904851 08-28-2020, 11:48 AM
-
#30
  1. AAGP14
  2. Registered User
  1. AAGP14
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2011
  4. Age: 41
  5. Posts: 626
  6. Rep Power: 1411
The study has to be wrong no way the number could be different.

The number would be the same for guys and girls unless guys are sleeping with other guys. Statistically it would have to be the same.
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. Last
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts