Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» 3.6 roentgen not great not terrible
  1. Results 1 to 13 of 13
post 1618039091 09-30-2020, 01:07 PM
-
#1
  1. MikeLowrrrey
  1. MikeLowrrrey
  2. Join Date: Jul 2018
  3. Age: 56
  4. Posts: 35,133
  5. Subscribers: 2
  6. Rep Power: 120067

3.6 roentgen not great not terrible

3.6 roentgen not great not terrible
post 1618039171 09-30-2020, 01:09 PM
-
#2
  1. 2am
  2. )))))))))))))))))))))))))
  1. 2am
  2. )))))))))))))))))))))))))
  3. Join Date: Jan 2013
  4. Posts: 21,153
  5. Rep Power: 196664
It is a moderate dose rate. The US method for measuring dosage is the REM, Roentgen Equivalent Man, and radiation workers are typically allowed 5 REM per year or about 1-1/5 hours exposure to 3.6 Roentgens. It is a moderate dose rate.
No sig crew
post 1618039241 09-30-2020, 01:10 PM
-
#3
  1. kcadrenalin
  2. Permanent Vacation
  1. kcadrenalin
  2. Permanent Vacation
  3. Join Date: Jun 2007
  4. Posts: 24,727
  5. Rep Power: 349124
What if 3.6 is the highest the meter can read?
________

MFC

________
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote. -Benjamin Franklin
Tits and Beer
post 1618039311 09-30-2020, 01:11 PM
-
#4
  1. 2am
  2. )))))))))))))))))))))))))
  1. 2am
  2. )))))))))))))))))))))))))
  3. Join Date: Jan 2013
  4. Posts: 21,153
  5. Rep Power: 196664
Originally Posted By kcadrenalin
What if 3.6 is the highest the meter can read?
It is a moderate dose rate. The US method for measuring dosage is the REM, Roentgen Equivalent Man, and radiation workers are typically allowed 5 REM per year or about 1-1/5 hours exposure to 3.6 Roentgens. It is a moderate dose rate. 3.6 roentgen not great not terrible.
No sig crew
post 1618039751 09-30-2020, 01:17 PM
-
#5
  1. phikappa
  2. I'm not that bright
  1. phikappa
  2. I'm not that bright
  3. Join Date: Jan 2003
  4. Location: CA
  5. Posts: 39,332
  6. Rep Power: 159608
So the Flux Capacitor is good to go?
Jon Cole's Gym: '79 - '85
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=9275071&d=1603917754
post 1618039791 09-30-2020, 01:18 PM
-
#6
  1. kcadrenalin
  2. Permanent Vacation
  1. kcadrenalin
  2. Permanent Vacation
  3. Join Date: Jun 2007
  4. Posts: 24,727
  5. Rep Power: 349124
Originally Posted By 2am
It is a moderate dose rate. The US method for measuring dosage is the REM, Roentgen Equivalent Man, and radiation workers are typically allowed 5 REM per year or about 1-1/5 hours exposure to 3.6 Roentgens. It is a moderate dose rate. 3.6 roentgen not great not terrible.
You're delusional, go to the infirmary.
________

MFC

________
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote. -Benjamin Franklin
Tits and Beer
post 1618040021 09-30-2020, 01:21 PM
-
#7
  1. PepperedAngus
  2. Registered User
  1. PepperedAngus
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2011
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 24,170
  6. Rep Power: 274420
aw fuk

For every man, there is a sentence, a string of words, that has the power to destroy him
"The strong do what they can, and the weak suffer what they must" -Thucydides
Shall not be Infringed. FUK CHINA.
post 1618040211 09-30-2020, 01:23 PM
-
#8
  1. MikeLowrrrey
  1. MikeLowrrrey
  2. Join Date: Jul 2018
  3. Age: 56
  4. Posts: 35,133
  5. Subscribers: 2
  6. Rep Power: 120067
Originally Posted By kcadrenalin
What if 3.6 is the highest the meter can read?
post 1618040331 09-30-2020, 01:25 PM
-
#9
  1. Postmort3m
  2. Chairman of the bored
  1. Postmort3m
  2. Chairman of the bored
  3. Join Date: Apr 2012
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 32,467
  6. Rep Power: 539821
You didn’t see it because it wasn’t there!
post 1618040401 09-30-2020, 01:26 PM
-
#10
  1. headturner1
  2. User title
  1. headturner1
  2. User title
  3. Join Date: Jan 2012
  4. Location: Washington, United States
  5. Age: 18
  6. Height: 6'5"
  7. Weight: 282 lbs
  8. Posts: 22,831
  9. Subscribers: 9
  10. Rep Power: 318078
Originally Posted By Postmort3m
You didn’t see it because it wasn’t there!
Bullchit comrade
post 1618040621 09-30-2020, 01:29 PM
-
#11
  1. TheT800
  2. Registered User
  1. TheT800
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2019
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 357
  6. Rep Power: 477
Originally Posted By kcadrenalin
What if 3.6 is the highest the meter can read?
Impossible
post 1618040651 09-30-2020, 01:29 PM
-
#12
  1. Ken-O
  2. Usuario registrado
  1. Ken-O
  2. Usuario registrado
  3. Join Date: Sep 2008
  4. Location: Chihuahua, Mexico
  5. Posts: 41,198
  6. Rep Power: 243727
whoever was in charge of making that decision is one of the dumbest motherfukers to ever live, and its one of the worst mistakes ive heard of srs.


A kid could have made that conclusion. If the gotdamn device is showing the max radiation it can show after a gotdamn radiation huge accident... surely you going to consider the chance that its actually way more than that and not just a coincidence of it being EXACTLY the number that the device can show at max lmao
"The flowers bloom, then wither... The stars shine and one day become extinct. This earth, the sun, the galaxies and even the big universe, someday will be destroyed. Compared with that, the human life is only a blink, just a little time. In that short time - people are born, laugh, cry, fight, are injured, feel joy, sadness, hate someone, love someone. All in just a moment. And then, are embraced by the eternal sleep called death."
post 1618040851 09-30-2020, 01:32 PM
-
#13
  1. xxAchillesxx
  1. xxAchillesxx
  2. Join Date: Sep 2008
  3. Posts: 19,524
  4. Subscribers: 2
  5. Rep Power: 389868
Originally Posted By kcadrenalin
What if 3.6 is the highest the meter can read?
It means the core is open. It means the fire we're watching with our own eyes is giving off nearly twice the radiation released by the bomb in Hiroshima. And that's every single hour.
"The dildo of consequences rarely arrives lubed."

See OptimusTrajan' sig
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts