Both can not be proven 100% with current evidents that is right.

I guess best arguement simulation theorists can give is that if it is doable, than there is a chance it has already been done and oh boy it is doable.


What about Abrahamic religions? Judaism, Chris and Islam. Can anyone actually proove any of these are real? 'Holy' books don't count.

Could you elaborate?

Both can not be proven 100% with current evidents that is right.

I guess best arguement simulation theorists can give is that if it is doable, than there is a chance it has already been done and oh boy it is doable.


What about Abrahamic religions? Judaism, Chris and Islam. Can anyone actually proove any of these are real? 'Holy' books don't count.

INtredasting.

Could you elaborate further?

The Abrahamic religions are as real as voter fraud is real. Essentially, one person convinced a small amount of simpletons that his version of the truth is correct despite all the massive holes in the story and the simpletons are so loud and puffed up on pride that they can’t admit they’re wrong so they just made crap up to further embellish the story.

Oh, and the origin of consciousness in the breakdown of the bicameral mind explains everything.

In some ways the simulation hypothesis is a new religion of the 21st century.

There does not seem to be much evidence for either.

To the Abrahamic religions, of course words in a text are not in themselves evidence of something happening, especially regarding supernatural events. If I wrote that God in a burning bush was talking to me last night in my back yard, I hope no one would accept this as evidence. To further complicate this, the texts can contradict each other in places or go against what we understand about history, geography, and science. If I wrote down a burning bush was talking to me last night I hope you would not believe me; if I wrote down a burning bush was talking to me, and somewhere else in my narrative I mentioned that Earth is larger in mass than the sun, or some other falsehood, you should not only not believe it, but consider this evidence that the text is actually not true.

I guess one counterpoint is that some obvious, almost impossible scientific foreknowledge appearing in some ancient text could make anyone raise an eyebrow: humans (usually) possess 46 linear chromosomes made up of a DNA molecule in the nuclei of their diploid cells. Or something like that. We do not see this sort of thing in ancient texts like the Bible though.