Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» Most men in human history didn't have any children
  1. Results 1 to 19 of 19
post 1622691181 11-15-2020, 10:34 AM
-
#1
  1. phaginator
  2. Ayyy lmao
  1. phaginator
  2. Ayyy lmao
  3. Join Date: Apr 2013
  4. Posts: 36,761
  5. Rep Power: 122033

Most men in human history didn't have any children

While it’s true that about half of all the people who ever lived were men, the typical male was much more likely than the typical woman to die without reproducing. Citing recent DNA research, Dr. Baumeister explained that today’s human population is descended from twice as many women as men. Maybe 80 percent of women reproduced, whereas only 40 percent of men did.

Source:https://tierneylab.blogs.nytimes.com...cky-questions/

Thought it would be even lower than 40%
post 1622691561 11-15-2020, 10:40 AM
-
#2
  1. PenorBrahNoHomo
  2. R1b
  1. PenorBrahNoHomo
  2. R1b
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 28,218
  6. Rep Power: 130149
40% thought they reproduced but actually half of them got cucked. 80/20 rule strikes again.
post 1622691751 11-15-2020, 10:43 AM
-
#3
  1. DrugsToGetBig
  2. So it begins
  1. DrugsToGetBig
  2. So it begins
  3. Join Date: Jun 2012
  4. Location: New Jersey, United States
  5. Age: 33
  6. Height: 6'1"
  7. Weight: 220 lbs
  8. Posts: 38,445
  9. Subscribers: 4
  10. Rep Power: 411648
brb conquering foreign land and battling relentless enemies

how many of these men were going around impregnating other nations women?
*Forever Alone Crew*
*Neg FireofAss Crew on SIGHT Crew*
post 1622691761 11-15-2020, 10:43 AM
-
#4
  1. climberbrah
  2. Banned
  1. climberbrah
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Aug 2013
  4. Posts: 5,282
  5. Rep Power: 0
Nytimes reports that current anthropologists have narrowed down 30% of modern DNA to one male source


post 1622691841 11-15-2020, 10:44 AM
-
#5
  1. wasp9166
  2. straight out da bronx
  1. wasp9166
  2. straight out da bronx
  3. Join Date: Nov 2008
  4. Location: NY
  5. Posts: 52,577
  6. Subscribers: 3
  7. Rep Power: 511073
40% of women reproduced without men then

Interesting
post 1622692401 11-15-2020, 10:53 AM
-
#6
  1. phaginator
  2. Ayyy lmao
  1. phaginator
  2. Ayyy lmao
  3. Join Date: Apr 2013
  4. Posts: 36,761
  5. Rep Power: 122033
Originally Posted By Anachron
So how does it feel to be in the lower 40%, OP?
Feels good mang, value freedom more than anything else at this moment in my life.
post 1622692691 11-15-2020, 10:58 AM
-
#7
  1. phaginator
  2. Ayyy lmao
  1. phaginator
  2. Ayyy lmao
  3. Join Date: Apr 2013
  4. Posts: 36,761
  5. Rep Power: 122033
Originally Posted By Anachron
That's a good coping mechanism.
Happy I'm not a woman with a biological clock that loses 90% of her eggs by age 30. And life is one big cope
post 1622692881 11-15-2020, 11:00 AM
-
#8
  1. propreffered7
  2. Registered User
  1. propreffered7
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2010
  4. Posts: 36,839
  5. Rep Power: 86393
Originally Posted By wasp9166
40% of women reproduced without men then

Interesting
more like they reproduced with the same men.

some other tidbits this might not account for, though.

how does it account for cuckoldry? cause this means women could have sex with one guy but tell the other guy they're the father. in that case, the guy who actually had the sex might not be accounted for . i'm willing to bet their dna sample doesn't extend this far and there's some extrapolation from data they have in front of them

what about those who had sex but no kids?

what about the avg. lifespan and age??

undoubtedly there are a number of them that didn't have sex by choice


but yea, it's pretty well known women can have sex easier than men
post 1622693621 11-15-2020, 11:11 AM
-
#9
  1. Weezy32
  2. Registered User
  1. Weezy32
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2010
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 14,375
  6. Rep Power: 68868
Only retards care if they reproduce or not. Do you even care about your dead great grandpa ? Heck most people don’t even care about their dead grandpa I never even met either one of mine.
Atlanta Falcons!!!
post 1622697001 11-15-2020, 11:51 AM
-
#10
  1. 5x10
  2. Banned
  1. 5x10
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Apr 2007
  4. Age: 47
  5. Posts: 49,580
  6. Rep Power: 0
Sounds like Incels have been around since the beginning of man
Dallas Cowboys

Lifted for 30 years

Ass > tits
No Debt Crew
post 1622697581 11-15-2020, 11:59 AM
-
#11
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2017
  4. Posts: 6,938
  5. Rep Power: 51915
Originally Posted By ****inator
Maybe 80 percent of women reproduced, whereas only 40 percent of men did.
Originally Posted By Anachron
So how does it feel to be in the lower 40%, OP?
....
∫∫ Mathematics crew ∑∑

♫1:2:3:4 Pythagoras crew ♫ ♫ 🧮

Nullius in verba
post 1622697691 11-15-2020, 12:00 PM
-
#12
  1. FAPhaggot
  2. Hawaiian shirt hoarder
  1. FAPhaggot
  2. Hawaiian shirt hoarder
  3. Join Date: Nov 2015
  4. Posts: 24,226
  5. Rep Power: 185354
Enforced monogamy in the West was the norm from ~500 AD to 1960. That's a pretty big slice of space and time, but there's still a whole world outside of it, and unfortunately it's all that most people are familiar with. Miscers, bluepillers, everyone. They've watched one scene and think that's the whole movie.
FA Crew
Always Pick 1 Crew

"Experience is something you get right after you need it."
post 1622697871 11-15-2020, 12:03 PM
-
#13
  1. Ken-O
  2. Usuario registrado
  1. Ken-O
  2. Usuario registrado
  3. Join Date: Sep 2008
  4. Location: Chihuahua, Mexico
  5. Posts: 41,198
  6. Rep Power: 243727
We are going back to that. Its our nature, you can mask it with religion and society's standards of whats morally correct, but eventually we will follow what is biologically programmed in our brians.

You cant change the course of the river, you may stop it for a while, you may reroute it for a while etc but sooner or later, its going to keep its course and keep flowing the way its intended to.
"The flowers bloom, then wither... The stars shine and one day become extinct. This earth, the sun, the galaxies and even the big universe, someday will be destroyed. Compared with that, the human life is only a blink, just a little time. In that short time - people are born, laugh, cry, fight, are injured, feel joy, sadness, hate someone, love someone. All in just a moment. And then, are embraced by the eternal sleep called death."
post 1622698281 11-15-2020, 12:07 PM
-
#14
  1. propreffered7
  2. Registered User
  1. propreffered7
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2010
  4. Posts: 36,839
  5. Rep Power: 86393
Originally Posted By FA*******
Enforced monogamy in the West was the norm from ~500 AD to 1960. That's a pretty big slice of space and time, but there's still a whole world outside of it, and unfortunately it's all that most people are familiar with. Miscers, bluepillers, everyone. They've watched one scene and think that's the whole movie.
im quite positive though. you start going back there it's pretty hard to compare.

first of all, rape was prevalent and sexual strategy men used.

also, the organization of those small groups + the travelling make it distinctly different. imagine having a group of 10 to 20 people travelling all around earth. with civilizations hardly defined keeping all groups on edge as to intruders, conquerors, etc.

THEN you also have sex for different reasons AND you don't have things like birth control

i just studied environmental science and feel like there's a good point here, but actually don't have my notes with me

like maybe a number about human birthrate throughout history, which is pretty low. i believe evidence points towards humans always keeping birth rate in check
post 1622698421 11-15-2020, 12:09 PM
-
#15
  1. Ken-O
  2. Usuario registrado
  1. Ken-O
  2. Usuario registrado
  3. Join Date: Sep 2008
  4. Location: Chihuahua, Mexico
  5. Posts: 41,198
  6. Rep Power: 243727
Originally Posted By Anachron
That's a sad outlook on life.
Well, depends on who is looking


But yeah life can be cruel. We were raised believing that everything would be perfect and all right at the end, which only makes it worse. Nature doesnt care about happiness, it just cares about keeping **** alive. Doesnt mean you cant enjoy the ride though, thats up to you
"The flowers bloom, then wither... The stars shine and one day become extinct. This earth, the sun, the galaxies and even the big universe, someday will be destroyed. Compared with that, the human life is only a blink, just a little time. In that short time - people are born, laugh, cry, fight, are injured, feel joy, sadness, hate someone, love someone. All in just a moment. And then, are embraced by the eternal sleep called death."
post 1622699021 11-15-2020, 12:15 PM
-
#16
  1. meanstringbean
  2. Registered User
  1. meanstringbean
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2019
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 11,550
  6. Rep Power: 58418
Originally Posted By Anachron
That's a sad outlook on life.
Not if you’re riding the waves
post 1622756791 11-16-2020, 12:39 AM
-
#17
  1. phaginator
  2. Ayyy lmao
  1. phaginator
  2. Ayyy lmao
  3. Join Date: Apr 2013
  4. Posts: 36,761
  5. Rep Power: 122033
Also let's be serious here, who are the ones these days having childre? It's mostly lower class and absolute retards if you look around.
post 1622759141 11-16-2020, 01:50 AM
-
#18
  1. Supaduck0
  2. Person
  1. Supaduck0
  2. Person
  3. Join Date: Nov 2013
  4. Posts: 9,493
  5. Rep Power: 52341
Originally Posted By ****inator
Also let's be serious here, who are the ones these days having childre? It's mostly lower class and absolute retards if you look around.
This is true. In times gone by, idiots being culled was acceptable, or natural selection took it's toll, but now we basically are allowing a mass scale retard cucking of high IQ people on a global scale
Person
post 1622759351 11-16-2020, 01:58 AM
-
#19
  1. banks13
  2. Registered User
  1. banks13
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2010
  4. Age: 35
  5. Posts: 2,403
  6. Rep Power: 3825
Chad’s rule the world
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts