Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» Misc are you a fascist on accident?
  1. Results 1 to 16 of 16
post 1629123833 01-20-2021, 01:34 AM
-
#1
  1. TomWanks
  2. vocaroo.com/18BduFIdv7YR
  1. TomWanks
  2. vocaroo.com/18BduFIdv7YR
  3. Join Date: Sep 2020
  4. Posts: 21,621
  5. Rep Power: 202087

Misc are you a fascist on accident?

Given these dangerous times, Kamala Harris has requested that you *******s please submit your results ASAP so we can determine which miscers need to be reeducated in the coming months (wincel is of course exempt as we already know he a good boy).

F-Test:https://www.anesi.com/fscale.htm

Context:
The California F-scale is a 1947 personality test, designed by Theodor W. Adorno and others to measure the authoritarian personality.[1] The "F" stands for "fascist". The F-scale measures responses on several different components of authoritarianism, such as conventionalism, authoritarian aggression, anti-intraception, superstition and stereotypy, power and "toughness," destructiveness and cynicism, projectivity, and sex.[2] Scores acquired from the F-scale could be directly associated with background components, educational level, and intellectual capacity.[3] It is an indirect type of test that ensures the result would not be due to the individual's fake responses; this is possible because the purpose of the measurement and which attitude is being measured are initially concealed from the participants.[4] The existence of this correlation could possibly affect the way in which the F-scale accurately measures the authoritarian personality syndrome.[3] The F-Test has two principal purposes: it aims to measure prejudice and anti-democratic tendencies at the personality level.[4]
My results (inb4 Bradley smugly tells me I just answered the questions how I thought I ought to because of how I wanted to appear in front of miscers-- Toronto cucks can GTFO):
Spoiler!
post 1629124383 01-20-2021, 01:45 AM
-
#2
  1. xbit7
  2. Registered User
  1. xbit7
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2017
  4. Age: 29
  5. Posts: 2,055
  6. Rep Power: 6642
no, im one on purpose
Best dyslexia on the misc
Making Progress Crew
post 1629124673 01-20-2021, 01:53 AM
-
#3
  1. ziggurat
  2. eurobrah
  1. ziggurat
  2. eurobrah
  3. Join Date: Feb 2015
  4. Posts: 881
  5. Rep Power: 2954
lol not by accident

Your Overall F Score is: 4.90
You should practice doing things with your left hand
182cm
78kg
post 1629124823 01-20-2021, 01:57 AM
-
#4
  1. MrSchons
  2. Welsh Brah
  1. MrSchons
  2. Welsh Brah
  3. Join Date: Dec 2015
  4. Location: Wales, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 13,274
  6. Rep Power: 141586
Your Overall F Score is: 5.23
You should practice doing things with your left hand

Das it mane, es ist zeit für Rache!
post 1629125333 01-20-2021, 02:09 AM
-
#5
  1. Kewbrah
  2. Deathcon 3
  1. Kewbrah
  2. Deathcon 3
  3. Join Date: Jul 2012
  4. Location: Australia
  5. Posts: 23,606
  6. Rep Power: 213822
Very old fashioned. Calls me a "liberal airhead" even though my views which were liberal airhead views a few years ago and haven't changed since now make me a Q-anon believing white supremacist transphobe in 2021. The goalposts have moved a LONG way in the last few years.
post 1629125383 01-20-2021, 02:10 AM
-
#6
  1. Jandels
  2. Yep
  1. Jandels
  2. Yep
  3. Join Date: Oct 2020
  4. Posts: 23,933
  5. Subscribers: 2
  6. Rep Power: 112895
Your Overall F Score is: 3.87
You are disciplined but tolerant; a true American.

Scores for Personality Variables:Conventionalism:4.00
Authoritarian
Submission:4.00
Authoritarian
Aggression:3.88
Anti-intraception:3.75
Superstition and Stereotypy:2.33
Power and "Toughness":4.00
Destructiveness and Cynicism:5.50
Projectivity:3.80
Sex:3.67

Within normal limits; an appropriate score for an American. (The overall average score for groups tested in the original study is listed in the 1950 publication as 3.84, with men averaging somewhat higher and women somewhat lower.)
Damn
post 1629125463 01-20-2021, 02:12 AM
-
#7
  1. tnel00
  2. Registered User
  1. tnel00
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2005
  4. Location: Florida, United States
  5. Posts: 29,202
  6. Rep Power: 51727
4.07

Guarantee the average american score is well below 3 in 2020
| ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄|
..Make the Misc Great..
.Again - Donald Trump.
|___________|
`````\ (•◡•) /
``````` \ /
``````` ---
``````` | |
post 1629126043 01-20-2021, 02:31 AM
-
#8
  1. PenorBrahNoHomo
  2. R1b
  1. PenorBrahNoHomo
  2. R1b
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 28,218
  6. Rep Power: 130149
Only 4.1 but would throw Adorno in an oven. What does that make me?
post 1629128313 01-20-2021, 03:54 AM
-
#9
  1. TomWanks
  2. vocaroo.com/18BduFIdv7YR
  1. TomWanks
  2. vocaroo.com/18BduFIdv7YR
  3. Join Date: Sep 2020
  4. Posts: 21,621
  5. Rep Power: 202087
Originally Posted By PenorBrahNoHomo
Only 4.1 but would throw Adorno in an oven. What does that make me?
LMFAO, had you in mind when I heard about this test.

Did you have to check Wikipedia or did you know about this already?
post 1629128373 01-20-2021, 03:57 AM
-
#10
  1. PenorBrahNoHomo
  2. R1b
  1. PenorBrahNoHomo
  2. R1b
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 28,218
  6. Rep Power: 130149
Originally Posted By TomWanks
LMFAO, had you in mind when I heard about this test.
I'm really more of a Hoppean style far-rightist, libertarian at heart, but not ideological.
post 1629128403 01-20-2021, 03:58 AM
-
#11
  1. ClivesTriceps
  2. Indian troll farm bot
  1. ClivesTriceps
  2. Indian troll farm bot
  3. Join Date: Nov 2019
  4. Posts: 19,776
  5. Rep Power: 330918
In b4 Chomo Joe reopens the FDR Japanese internment camps to try and "re-educate" conservatives.
Wort ew in th wold.
post 1629128523 01-20-2021, 04:03 AM
-
#12
  1. PenorBrahNoHomo
  2. R1b
  1. PenorBrahNoHomo
  2. R1b
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 28,218
  6. Rep Power: 130149
Originally Posted By TomWanks
Did you have to check Wikipedia or did you know about this already?
Never heard of it before no
post 1629128843 01-20-2021, 04:12 AM
-
#13
  1. TomWanks
  2. vocaroo.com/18BduFIdv7YR
  1. TomWanks
  2. vocaroo.com/18BduFIdv7YR
  3. Join Date: Sep 2020
  4. Posts: 21,621
  5. Rep Power: 202087
Originally Posted By PenorBrahNoHomo
Never heard of it before no
It's been almost entirely discredited in the political science community because the primary signal it tries to detect in order to diagnose "fascist" tendencies is traditionalism (called "conventionalism") paired with "authoritarian aggression"-- which means "a general aggressiveness directed against deviants, outgroups and other people that are perceived to be targets according to established authorities."

One prominent right-wing political scientist at the time trolled the creators by changing a bit of the language around the conventionalism metric towards "progressivism" and demonstrated that based on the same criteria the left averaged a far higher tendency towards authoritarian aggression. I think the average for right-wingers was ~3.5 (i.e. not fascist) and for left-wingers it averaged ~5 (i.e. fascist) LMFAO.
post 1629129173 01-20-2021, 04:23 AM
-
#14
  1. PenorBrahNoHomo
  2. R1b
  1. PenorBrahNoHomo
  2. R1b
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 28,218
  6. Rep Power: 130149
Originally Posted By TomWanks
It's been almost entirely discredited in the political science community because the primary signal it tries to detect in order to diagnose "fascist" tendencies is traditionalism (called "conventionalism") paired with "authoritarian aggression"-- which means "a general aggressiveness directed against deviants, outgroups and other people that are perceived to be targets according to established authorities."

One prominent right-wing political scientist at the time trolled the creators by changing a bit of the language around the conventionalism metric towards "progressivism" and demonstrated that based on the same criteria the left averaged a far higher tendency towards authoritarian aggression. I think the average for right-wingers was ~3.5 (i.e. not fascist) and for left-wingers it averaged ~5 (i.e. fascist) LMFAO.



Makes sense since fascism was largely a reaction to communist authoritarian aggression.
post 1629129963 01-20-2021, 04:46 AM
-
#15
  1. notbadnotbrad
  1. notbadnotbrad
  2. Join Date: Jul 2012
  3. Posts: 39,818
  4. Subscribers: 3
  5. Rep Power: 346827


Also lol at you for not answering questions objectively

Most people answer these based on how they want to be or perceived

A better test would be to have someone you know answer the questions and word the questions in that way

I answered mine objectively tho
post 1629130283 01-20-2021, 04:55 AM
-
#16
  1. ClivesTriceps
  2. Indian troll farm bot
  1. ClivesTriceps
  2. Indian troll farm bot
  3. Join Date: Nov 2019
  4. Posts: 19,776
  5. Rep Power: 330918
Originally Posted By notbadnotbrad


Also lol at you for not answering questions objectively

Most people answer these based on how they want to be or perceived

A better test would be to have someone you know answer the questions and word the questions in that way

I answered mine objectively tho
I scored a 4.17
Wort ew in th wold.
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts