Forum
»
The prosecutor in the Casey Anthony case 10 years ago was a complete moron
- Results 1 to 11 of 11
-
Page 1 of 1
02-04-2021, 10:45 AM
-
#1
- JewishSuperHero
- Registered User
-
- JewishSuperHero
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2012
- Location: Oklahoma, United States
- Posts: 6,126
- Rep Power: 27454
-
-
The prosecutor in the Casey Anthony case 10 years ago was a complete moron
They charged her with first degree murder. But they didn’t even have a cause of death!
She lied to the police during her initial interview. And there was a lot of stuff that made her look shady. But they didn’t have a single piece of concrete evidence to convict her on.
It’s crazy that the DA took this case and it’s even more crazy that the judge didn’t talk them out of it.
I kind of remember the case when it was going on but didn’t pay attention to it. And I remember everyone freaking out when she was found not guilty. But damn... in hindsight this was a no-brainer.
She lied to the police during her initial interview. And there was a lot of stuff that made her look shady. But they didn’t have a single piece of concrete evidence to convict her on.
It’s crazy that the DA took this case and it’s even more crazy that the judge didn’t talk them out of it.
I kind of remember the case when it was going on but didn’t pay attention to it. And I remember everyone freaking out when she was found not guilty. But damn... in hindsight this was a no-brainer.
02-04-2021, 10:48 AM
-
#2
02-04-2021, 10:50 AM
-
#3
02-04-2021, 11:03 AM
-
#4
- guest89
- Forever aBOARD
-
- guest89
- Forever aBOARD
- Join Date: Sep 2003
- Location: United States
- Posts: 41,691
- Rep Power: 169649
-
-
You do realize that having 'concrete evidence' is a pretty rare thing right? They most likely had more evidence/information which was inadmissible/with-held.
Its pretty rare when police don't know who a murderer is. Its just a matter of being able to prove it. They thought they had a case. They went with it.
Its pretty rare when police don't know who a murderer is. Its just a matter of being able to prove it. They thought they had a case. They went with it.
02-04-2021, 11:04 AM
-
#5
- SmashinYoungVag
- Registered User
-
- SmashinYoungVag
- Registered User
- Join Date: Dec 2019
- Age: 56
- Posts: 15,669
- Rep Power: 103186
-
-
Originally Posted By guest89⏩
And if she was a guy she would’ve been found guiltyYou do realize that having 'concrete evidence' is a pretty rare thing right? They most likely had more evidence/information which was inadmissible/with-held.
Its pretty rare when police don't know who a murderer is. Its just a matter of being able to prove it. They thought they had a case. They went with it.
Its pretty rare when police don't know who a murderer is. Its just a matter of being able to prove it. They thought they had a case. They went with it.
02-04-2021, 11:06 AM
-
#6
- darkninja67
- The Dark Lord
-
- darkninja67
- The Dark Lord
- Join Date: Aug 2009
- Posts: 87,403
- Rep Power: 802217
-
-
anyone remember Jon Benet??
rumpler of stiltskins
"I'm not afraid to die, I'm afraid I'll survive and have to watch you suffer" - Thy Art Is Murder
"Life will cease so breathe deep" - Lorna Shore
02-04-2021, 11:07 AM
-
#7
- Soonerjohn
- Registered User
-
- Soonerjohn
- Registered User
- Join Date: May 2011
- Posts: 8,725
- Rep Power: 27852
-
-
First degree had some risk associated with it, but still should have been a slam dunk.
Baffling she got off.
Baffling she got off.
02-04-2021, 11:10 AM
-
#8
- MuzzieChik786
- Registered User
-
- MuzzieChik786
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2013
- Posts: 28,332
- Rep Power: 274026
-
-
Yes he was.
She got off because she's an attractive white woman. I think she got richer in jail from simps sending her money than she was when she was outside.
She got off because she's an attractive white woman. I think she got richer in jail from simps sending her money than she was when she was outside.
Thus let me live, unseen, unknown;
Thus unlamented let me die;
Steal from the world, and not a stone
Tell where I lie.
2/17/15 - Dunk Tank Results: 15% bf (Omron said 18.6%) - 123.4 lbs LBM
02-04-2021, 11:18 AM
-
#9
- jstn0127
- Registered User
-
- jstn0127
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2007
- Age: 40
- Posts: 10,826
- Rep Power: 65411
-
-
- She searched the phrase “fool-proof suffication” on the family computer.
- The father of Casey found maggots and smelled "something that you never forget" when he opened the trunk of his daughter's car.
- Authorities say an air sample test from Anthony’s car indicate there were human remains in the trunk.
This vid is good
- The father of Casey found maggots and smelled "something that you never forget" when he opened the trunk of his daughter's car.
- Authorities say an air sample test from Anthony’s car indicate there were human remains in the trunk.
This vid is good
*MFC*
*AP4C*
*HTC*
02-04-2021, 11:20 AM
-
#10
02-04-2021, 11:26 AM
-
#11
- JewishSuperHero
- Registered User
-
- JewishSuperHero
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2012
- Location: Oklahoma, United States
- Posts: 6,126
- Rep Power: 27454
-
-
Originally Posted By guest89⏩
There might’ve been more inadmissible evidence. But they should’ve talked this stuff through with the judge ahead of time.You do realize that having 'concrete evidence' is a pretty rare thing right? They most likely had more evidence/information which was inadmissible/with-held.
Its pretty rare when police don't know who a murderer is. Its just a matter of being able to prove it. They thought they had a case. They went with it.
Its pretty rare when police don't know who a murderer is. Its just a matter of being able to prove it. They thought they had a case. They went with it.
I mean, what the DA presented to the court was no cause of death and a a 4 week window of when Caylee died. That’s pretty weak all around.
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts