Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum ยป New Army fitness tests are creating even MORE barriers to success for women
  1. Results 1 to 6 of 6
  2. Page 1 of 1

Thread: New Army fitness tests are creating even MORE barriers to success for women

post 1638239623 05-10-2021, 05:59 PM
-
#1
  1. Devin459
  2. Registered User
  1. Devin459
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2010
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 2,545
  6. Rep Power: 15073

New Army fitness tests are creating even MORE barriers to success for women

This is nothing short of institutionalized sexism


LTC crew, Superbike crew, BMW crew, M Performance crew, Mountain bike crew, Firearms crew
post 1638239743 05-10-2021, 06:01 PM
-
#2
  1. DoYouEvenNEM
  2. Registered User
  1. DoYouEvenNEM
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2015
  4. Age: 43
  5. Posts: 6,078
  6. Rep Power: 6728
Anytime the army increases their fitness requirements you know WW3 isn't happening.

Remember during the Afghan invasion and Iraq invasion they were tossing out the fitness requirements out and sending BloatLords into battle. Look up the YouTuber TimK - he's obese now and in his old military photos he was obese back then and they still sent him off to Iraq.
post 1638240053 05-10-2021, 06:06 PM
-
#3
  1. insidemane
  2. Banned
  1. insidemane
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Feb 2019
  4. Posts: 10,458
  5. Rep Power: 0
Post the pass requirements then dummy
post 1638240463 05-10-2021, 06:13 PM
-
#4
  1. InstantLoser
  2. #1 Pimp Korea
  1. InstantLoser
  2. #1 Pimp Korea
  3. Join Date: Jan 2013
  4. Location: Louisville, Kentucky, United States
  5. Posts: 34,072
  6. Rep Power: 206818
Gosh golly gee willickers.. I thought women and men were the same? I thought there was no physical advantage to being male?
"That boulder is too large. I could lift a smaller one."

-Hercules

Starting Weight (July 2018) - 362
Current Weight (July 2019) - 268
post 1638240743 05-10-2021, 06:19 PM
-
#5
  1. DoYouEvenNEM
  2. Registered User
  1. DoYouEvenNEM
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2015
  4. Age: 43
  5. Posts: 6,078
  6. Rep Power: 6728
Originally Posted By monster0ultra⏩
Modern warfare is interesting. It now pays to be a manlet, smaller target, eats less food. Fitness standards really ought to reflect that.

Women are all manlets but they just don't have the aggression needed. This is true of a lot of men too but it's true of 99.99% of women.
AFAIK in a lot of countries there height ceilings if you want to operate vehicles. Likewise being a manlet probably minimizes the chance of you being shot or being hit by a stray shrapnel.

Don't think it has paid off to be a manmore in war since the 1600s.
post 1638240833 05-10-2021, 06:20 PM
-
#6
  1. lawlessly
  2. maid man
  1. lawlessly
  2. maid man
  3. Join Date: Sep 2020
  4. Posts: 2,010
  5. Rep Power: 7757
Hell yeah, brother!!!!
Walkin' the dog

B: 265lbs S: 225lbs D: 275lbs x2

Prison Bitch Crew
Terry Crews Crew
Crew crew
2020 Crew
Takes glucose orally Crew
Lone Ranger Crew
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts