Forum
»
It's mindblowing you are probably top 1% of all men if...
05-31-2021, 01:37 PM
-
#1
05-31-2021, 01:39 PM
-
#2
05-31-2021, 01:45 PM
-
#3
05-31-2021, 01:48 PM
-
#4
- BaseJumper
- Lean mean cutting machine
-
- BaseJumper
- Lean mean cutting machine
- Join Date: Nov 2009
- Posts: 357
- Rep Power: 526
-
-
Originally Posted By sapdori⏩
I just check the height in the list.-You make $200k+
-6 ft+
-Works out and in decent shape.
-6 ft+
-Works out and in decent shape.
My whey or the highway!
October 08th 2017
05-31-2021, 01:49 PM
-
#5
05-31-2021, 01:51 PM
-
#6
05-31-2021, 01:51 PM
-
#7
05-31-2021, 01:52 PM
-
#8
- deltakappabrah
- Registered Phago
-
- deltakappabrah
- Registered Phago
- Join Date: Apr 2015
- Posts: 2,506
- Rep Power: 12479
-
-
200k+ puts you in the top 3%
Spoiler!
6'+ puts you around +1 standard deviation, or around the top 16%
Spoiler!
Let's call "works out and in decent shape" 1 standard deviations above the average (in the US, average is a fatcel so I'd argue you should be 2 standard deviations above the mean but let's be generous); this is top 16% again
Assuming these three traits are uncorrelated and calculating as probabilities (likely not correct assumptions), having all three is 0.03*0.16*0.16 = 0.08% or ~0.1%
conclusion: ShakeBrah, repped
Spoiler!

6'+ puts you around +1 standard deviation, or around the top 16%
Spoiler!

Let's call "works out and in decent shape" 1 standard deviations above the average (in the US, average is a fatcel so I'd argue you should be 2 standard deviations above the mean but let's be generous); this is top 16% again
Assuming these three traits are uncorrelated and calculating as probabilities (likely not correct assumptions), having all three is 0.03*0.16*0.16 = 0.08% or ~0.1%
conclusion: ShakeBrah, repped
*AP5 crew*
*ex-flipphone crew*
*we're all gonna make it brahs crew*
*neg all reddit posts on sight crew*
*super straight crew*
05-31-2021, 01:52 PM
-
#9
- ChrisLS8
- Registered User
-
- ChrisLS8
- Registered User
- Join Date: Aug 2011
- Location: Roseville, California, United States
- Posts: 20,549
- Rep Power: 149080
-
-
Almost there, 6'2 but only made 140 last year but I was off Mar-begining of may
Thanks for your input, you frauding fat slampig-Sirfapsalot '20
Certified Jimmy Rustler
!!Misc Firearms Crew😌!!
Fuarked Crew
Tradie Crew
LOL @ Tradies Crew
Toxic Male Energy Crew
JayDawg is a ****git Crew
Sock with slip on Sandals Crew
05-31-2021, 01:53 PM
-
#10
- Fuggettabowteet
- Join Date: Jul 2020
- Age: 56
- Posts: 3,035
- Rep Power: 13623
-
-
Too bad face and dick size mogs all.
05-31-2021, 01:56 PM
-
#11
05-31-2021, 01:57 PM
-
#12
- SmillironS
- Registered User
-
- SmillironS
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2012
- Location: South Dakota
- Age: 41
- Height: 6'8"
- Weight: 350 lbs
- Posts: 11,296
- Subscribers: 2
- Rep Power: 189689
-
-
Originally Posted By sapdori⏩
2 out of 3 ain’t bad.-You make $200k+
-6 ft+
-Works out and in decent shape.
The bar's never been lower to become a high value male.
-6 ft+
-Works out and in decent shape.
The bar's never been lower to become a high value male.
05-31-2021, 01:58 PM
-
#13
- ilovetradies
- Registered User
-
- ilovetradies
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2020
- Age: 56
- Posts: 1,054
- Rep Power: 1444
-
-
too bad you cant get in good shape because the goverment is lowering ur test levels.
05-31-2021, 01:58 PM
-
#14
- Fuggettabowteet
- Join Date: Jul 2020
- Age: 56
- Posts: 3,035
- Rep Power: 13623
-
-
Originally Posted By sapdori⏩
Wrong. A poor aesthetic midget is somewhere smashing your girl right now.Ain't no girl fantasizing about some midget with a 9-incher.
05-31-2021, 01:59 PM
-
#15
05-31-2021, 02:00 PM
-
#16
05-31-2021, 02:02 PM
-
#17
05-31-2021, 02:14 PM
-
#18
- sapdori
- Registered User
-
- sapdori
- Registered User
- Join Date: Feb 2009
- Location: United States
- Age: 29
- Posts: 4,089
- Rep Power: 19094
-
-
Originally Posted By SuperHercules⏩
LolololMoney is cope for ugly *******s
Top 1% = at least 6'4", in great shape, high IQ, and good looking
Top 1% = at least 6'4", in great shape, high IQ, and good looking
Sounds like you are the one coping here ****git
05-31-2021, 02:15 PM
-
#19
- Fuggettabowteet
- Join Date: Jul 2020
- Age: 56
- Posts: 3,035
- Rep Power: 13623
-
-
Daniel Craig. The best James Bond ever.
5'10"
Chiseled
spymaxxing ultramogger
5'10"
Chiseled
spymaxxing ultramogger
05-31-2021, 02:20 PM
-
#20
05-31-2021, 02:23 PM
-
#21
Originally Posted By deltakappabrah⏩
you are not factoring in age, as you are only competing with males 20-40 so income percentiles will be in your favor. but since avg height is increasing that will be slightly against you. but id say it is even lower than .08%200k+ puts you in the top 3%
Spoiler!
6'+ puts you around +1 standard deviation, or around the top 16%
Spoiler!
Let's call "works out and in decent shape" 1 standard deviations above the average (in the US, average is a fatcel so I'd argue you should be 2 standard deviations above the mean but let's be generous); this is top 16% again
Assuming these three traits are uncorrelated and calculating as probabilities (likely not correct assumptions), having all three is 0.03*0.16*0.16 = 0.08% or ~0.1%
conclusion: ShakeBrah, repped
Spoiler!

6'+ puts you around +1 standard deviation, or around the top 16%
Spoiler!

Let's call "works out and in decent shape" 1 standard deviations above the average (in the US, average is a fatcel so I'd argue you should be 2 standard deviations above the mean but let's be generous); this is top 16% again
Assuming these three traits are uncorrelated and calculating as probabilities (likely not correct assumptions), having all three is 0.03*0.16*0.16 = 0.08% or ~0.1%
conclusion: ShakeBrah, repped
05-31-2021, 02:37 PM
-
#22
- sapdori
- Registered User
-
- sapdori
- Registered User
- Join Date: Feb 2009
- Location: United States
- Age: 29
- Posts: 4,089
- Rep Power: 19094
-
-
Originally Posted By SuperHercules⏩
Oh yes completely. I should've posted a pic that 'shows' a low IQ instead to cover up my insecurity lolololI see now, it was the height thing that triggered you
Stay mad manlet lol
Stay mad manlet lol
Good luck with your minimum wage goal for the rest of your life ****git Lolol
edit: bahahaha negging me like a true butthurt lil boy. You little cutie.
05-31-2021, 02:38 PM
-
#23
- Silencespeaks
- Banned
-
- Silencespeaks
- Banned
- Join Date: Aug 2015
- Posts: 114,138
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Post deleted by user
05-31-2021, 02:43 PM
-
#24
- rectifryer
- enlightened
-
- rectifryer
- enlightened
- Join Date: Sep 2012
- Posts: 25,634
- Rep Power: 208783
-
-
Originally Posted By deltakappabrah⏩
nah that's bad math.200k+ puts you in the top 3%
Spoiler!
6'+ puts you around +1 standard deviation, or around the top 16%
Spoiler!
Let's call "works out and in decent shape" 1 standard deviations above the average (in the US, average is a fatcel so I'd argue you should be 2 standard deviations above the mean but let's be generous); this is top 16% again
Assuming these three traits are uncorrelated and calculating as probabilities (likely not correct assumptions), having all three is 0.03*0.16*0.16 = 0.08% or ~0.1%
conclusion: ShakeBrah, repped
Spoiler!

6'+ puts you around +1 standard deviation, or around the top 16%
Spoiler!

Let's call "works out and in decent shape" 1 standard deviations above the average (in the US, average is a fatcel so I'd argue you should be 2 standard deviations above the mean but let's be generous); this is top 16% again
Assuming these three traits are uncorrelated and calculating as probabilities (likely not correct assumptions), having all three is 0.03*0.16*0.16 = 0.08% or ~0.1%
conclusion: ShakeBrah, repped
Stats have to be modeled correctly in the first place if you're to trust their conclusions.
For example, you can be in the top 1% by simply being in the top 1% of any individual category according to your method. The truth is, you're calculating what percentage of the population HAS thatspecificset of traits, but you're not adding up everyone that could have every possible combination of those 3 traits then normalizing it for the actual value.
Normalize your data *******. I could be top 1% of height , make no money, and be 400lbs of fat and still be top 1% according to you.
Boycott foodservice industry crew
05-31-2021, 02:50 PM
-
#25
- ralphlaurenbrah
- Registered User
-
- ralphlaurenbrah
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2013
- Age: 36
- Posts: 10,357
- Rep Power: 31773
-
-
Face is almost everything honestly. I say that as a 6’2 200k+ earner with a 99.7 percentile dick size. I also have ~155 IQ.
Face >>>> everything else unless you’re worth like 50+ mill SRS.
Face >>>> everything else unless you’re worth like 50+ mill SRS.
05-31-2021, 02:50 PM
-
#26
05-31-2021, 02:51 PM
-
#27
- sapdori
- Registered User
-
- sapdori
- Registered User
- Join Date: Feb 2009
- Location: United States
- Age: 29
- Posts: 4,089
- Rep Power: 19094
-
-
Originally Posted By ralphlaurenbrah⏩
You must be one ugly muddafuka.Face is almost everything honestly. I say that as a 6’2 200k+ earner with a 99.7 percentile dick size. I also have ~155 IQ.
Face >>>> everything else unless you’re worth like 50+ mill SRS.
Face >>>> everything else unless you’re worth like 50+ mill SRS.
05-31-2021, 02:59 PM
-
#28
- Ravishing_Rick
- A Registered Mesomorph
-
- Ravishing_Rick
- A Registered Mesomorph
- Join Date: Oct 2008
- Posts: 115,847
- Rep Power: 279082
-
-
that feel when 5'11
*۩*legendary misc status*۩*
No Sloot Can Hurt A Man With Options~ Ravishing_Rick
all my bishes foreign PSN Ravishing_Rick
*No Porn Crew*
onlyfans/ricosmoovey
05-31-2021, 03:00 PM
-
#29
- steeler505
- 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺
-
- steeler505
- 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺
- Join Date: Nov 2016
- Location: Denmark
- Posts: 22,068
- Rep Power: 156449
-
-
200k+ is already top 1% on a global scale
**Misc. Pureblood Crew**
**No Hymen No Diamond Crew**
**Russia/anti-degen Crew**
**Her anus tint tells you everything you need to about her Crew**
Auto-negging posts with instagram/tiktok links and not embedding a single image
05-31-2021, 03:22 PM
-
#30
- deltakappabrah
- Registered Phago
-
- deltakappabrah
- Registered Phago
- Join Date: Apr 2015
- Posts: 2,506
- Rep Power: 12479
-
-
Originally Posted By rectifryer⏩
yes, I addressed that, obviously my post was an extreme shorthand version: "Assuming these three traits are uncorrelated and calculating as probabilities (likely not correct assumptions)"nah that's bad math.
Stats have to be modeled correctly in the first place if you're to trust their conclusions.
For example, you can be in the top 1% by simply being in the top 1% of any individual category according to your method. The truth is, you're calculating what percentage of the population HAS thatspecificset of traits, but you're not adding up everyone that could have every possible combination of those 3 traits then normalizing it for the actual value.
Normalize your data *******. I could be top 1% of height , make no money, and be 400lbs of fat and still be top 1% according to you.
Stats have to be modeled correctly in the first place if you're to trust their conclusions.
For example, you can be in the top 1% by simply being in the top 1% of any individual category according to your method. The truth is, you're calculating what percentage of the population HAS thatspecificset of traits, but you're not adding up everyone that could have every possible combination of those 3 traits then normalizing it for the actual value.
Normalize your data *******. I could be top 1% of height , make no money, and be 400lbs of fat and still be top 1% according to you.
brb digging up correlations and normalizing all the traits, aint nobody got that much time lol
*AP5 crew*
*ex-flipphone crew*
*we're all gonna make it brahs crew*
*neg all reddit posts on sight crew*
*super straight crew*
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
