Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» News: Three Scientists Discussing COVID Vaccine And The Spike Protein
  1. Results 1 to 30 of 85
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Last
post 1640631793 06-10-2021, 09:07 PM
-
#1
  1. katya422
  1. katya422
  2. Join Date: Dec 2011
  3. Location: United States
  4. Posts: 34,673
  5. Rep Power: 372543

News: Three Scientists Discussing COVID Vaccine And The Spike Protein

2 of the scientists have been vaccinated.

Dr. Bret Weinstein, biologist and professor

Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of Mrna vaccine technology
https://www.emedevents.com/speaker-p...obert-w-malone

Mr. Steve Kirsch
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Kirsch



- refers to FOI document obtained from Japan that detailed where the spike protein was accumulated in the body
- the FDA knew this information, but said the spike protein wasn't biologically active
- says that he sent the FDA info about the spike protein being biologically active
- men seem to agree that the intent was to keep the spike protein trapped within cell via a membrane, but that no animal testing was done

- we have no problem with MRNA vaccines
- the fact that the spike protein cleaves off the cell and goes anywhere and everywhere in the body is the problem
- people speaking against vaccine are being censored; 200K users removed from FB
- mentions of multiple negative medical events taking place, but claims that doctors [patients?] are under pressure to not relate things to the vaccine, mentions heart attacks, tremors, and miscarriages taking place that are not being reported to VAERs

I'm about a half hour in.
INTP Crew
Inattentive ADD Crew
Mom That Miscs Crew
post 1640631983 06-10-2021, 09:11 PM
-
#2
  1. Krackerjacked
  2. GnomeSaiyans Bruh
  1. Krackerjacked
  2. GnomeSaiyans Bruh
  3. Join Date: Dec 2014
  4. Posts: 18,209
  5. Rep Power: 456633
It’s perfectly safe you guise
Srsly

Just take it



Lol no vaccine crew
Sloots Gon Sloot.
post 1640632383 06-10-2021, 09:20 PM
-
#3
  1. ramimotemem
  2. Registered User
  1. ramimotemem
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2016
  4. Posts: 5,641
  5. Rep Power: 48444
katya plz... 3 hours?

At least it's not an attention whoring thread.

Bump for that
post 1640632403 06-10-2021, 09:21 PM
-
#4
  1. katya422
  1. katya422
  2. Join Date: Dec 2011
  3. Location: United States
  4. Posts: 34,673
  5. Rep Power: 372543
VAERs graphic cited about 40 minutes in. Essentially flat from 1990 until it spikes up in 2021:

INTP Crew
Inattentive ADD Crew
Mom That Miscs Crew
post 1640632513 06-10-2021, 09:24 PM
-
#5
  1. katya422
  1. katya422
  2. Join Date: Dec 2011
  3. Location: United States
  4. Posts: 34,673
  5. Rep Power: 372543
Originally Posted By ramimotemem
katya plz... 3 hours?

At least it's not an attention whoring thread.

Bump for that
Well I will give cliffs/highlights. Might take awhile.

First I have heard the actual claim that the spike protein is not being held attached to the cells by the membrane as intended by the makers of the vaccine.

ETA: most interesting bit between the 30 min mark and 40 min was chat of each one of them encountering multiple people that had some kind of unusual health issue around the vaccine. Kirsch said that in an informal survey he found about 3% had lasting problems post vaccine. Malone said that the health effects have been "strangely delayed". He did not say that this meant VAERs is missing events, however I believe VAERs reporting is only out to 30 days post vaccination.
INTP Crew
Inattentive ADD Crew
Mom That Miscs Crew
post 1640632753 06-10-2021, 09:31 PM
-
#6
  1. katya422
  1. katya422
  2. Join Date: Dec 2011
  3. Location: United States
  4. Posts: 34,673
  5. Rep Power: 372543
At about 38 minutes all three men [doctor/Mrna vax guy, biologist, and the engineer/researcher] agree that children and people that have had COVID should not get the vaccine as their risk from the virus is very minimal.
INTP Crew
Inattentive ADD Crew
Mom That Miscs Crew
post 1640633503 06-10-2021, 09:50 PM
-
#7
  1. katya422
  1. katya422
  2. Join Date: Dec 2011
  3. Location: United States
  4. Posts: 34,673
  5. Rep Power: 372543
Probably won't finish watching this tonight.

- strong evidence for the effectiveness of two different existing drugs for txmt [fluvoxamine and ivermectin]
- health dept and Gates foundation are aware, but crickets
- solid study re:ivermectin has been peer reviewed and may be published tomorrow

Link to Kirsch's evolving article:
https://trialsitenews.com/should-you-get-vaccinated/

Just scanned it and these stood out:
At least 6,000 deaths from the vaccine. The OpenVAERS team think it is over 20,000 due to under reporting.

82% miscarriage rate in first 20 weeks (10% is the normal rate). It is baffling that the CDC says the vaccine is safe for pregnant women when it is so clear that this is not the case.

No point vaccinating those who’ve had COVID-19: Findings of Cleveland Clinic study. No benefit, only risk.
Edit to correct drug name.
INTP Crew
Inattentive ADD Crew
Mom That Miscs Crew
post 1640633633 06-10-2021, 09:54 PM
-
#8
  1. JT11RTR
  2. Registered User
  1. JT11RTR
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2011
  4. Posts: 14,108
  5. Rep Power: 87727
Good info thanks
"
post 1640633963 06-10-2021, 10:02 PM
-
#9
  1. MuscleXtreme
  2. INTJ - Christian
  1. MuscleXtreme
  2. INTJ - Christian
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 28,256
  6. Rep Power: 93116
Originally Posted By katya422
Probably won't finish watching this tonight.

- strong evidence for the effectiveness of two different existing drugs for txmt [fluoxetine and ivermectin]
- health dept and Gates foundation are aware, but crickets
- solid study re:ivermectin has been peer reviewed and may be published tomorrow

Link to Kirsch's evolving article:
https://trialsitenews.com/should-you-get-vaccinated/

Just scanned it and these stood out:
Wait, so is this saying that 82% of pregnant women who have had the vaccine are having miscarriages?

I’m not getting the vaccine, but that seems pretty dubious.
post 1640634053 06-10-2021, 10:05 PM
-
#10
  1. nielk
  2. Registered User
  1. nielk
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2010
  4. Location: Canada
  5. Age: 36
  6. Posts: 8,364
  7. Rep Power: 36706
ill show you my spike proteins.

gnomesayin?
post 1640634143 06-10-2021, 10:07 PM
-
#11
  1. katya422
  1. katya422
  2. Join Date: Dec 2011
  3. Location: United States
  4. Posts: 34,673
  5. Rep Power: 372543
Originally Posted By MuscleXtreme
Wait, so is this saying that 82% of pregnant women who have had the vaccine are having miscarriages?

I’m not getting the vaccine, but that seems pretty dubious.
Says women that are in the first 20 weeks of pregnancy, not all pregnant women:

https://onedrive.live.com/view.aspx?...Pbt8mmG0zQO6e8
In table 4, the authors report a rate of spontaneous abortions <20 weeks (SA) of 12.5% (104 abortions/827 completed pregnancies). However, this rate should be based on the number of women who were at risk of an SA due to vaccine receipt and should exclude the 700 women who were vaccinated in their third-trimester (104/127 = 82%). We acknowledge this rate will likely decrease as the pregnancies of women who were vaccinated <20 weeks complete but believe the rate will be higher than 12.5%.
INTP Crew
Inattentive ADD Crew
Mom That Miscs Crew
post 1640634343 06-10-2021, 10:12 PM
-
#12
  1. umop3pisdn
  2. Registered Muser
  1. umop3pisdn
  2. Registered Muser
  3. Join Date: Jan 2009
  4. Posts: 15,406
  5. Rep Power: 77939
I've taken the vaccine and I'm perfectly fine! This is fear mongering... take the vaccine, wear the mask and trust the fking science bigots!
post 1640634783 06-10-2021, 10:20 PM
-
#13
  1. katya422
  1. katya422
  2. Join Date: Dec 2011
  3. Location: United States
  4. Posts: 34,673
  5. Rep Power: 372543
Originally Posted By umop3pisdn
I've taken the vaccine and I'm perfectly fine! This is fear mongering... take the vaccine, wear the mask and trust the fking science bigots!
Not sure if srs.

But I hope you are perfectly fine.

Srs.
INTP Crew
Inattentive ADD Crew
Mom That Miscs Crew
post 1640634923 06-10-2021, 10:23 PM
-
#14
  1. MuscleXtreme
  2. INTJ - Christian
  1. MuscleXtreme
  2. INTJ - Christian
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 28,256
  6. Rep Power: 93116
Originally Posted By katya422
Says women that are in the first 20 weeks of pregnancy, not all pregnant women:

https://onedrive.live.com/view.aspx?...Pbt8mmG0zQO6e8
I just read that link, then followed the source where they pulled the information. The link states in their notes that 124 women did not receive their shots in the third trimester. But the journal from which they quote doesn’t state that. The shot could be in the second trimester as well, but there’s nothing that I can see that can derive the 124 number since the journal just says “mostly”
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33882218/

. Among 3958 participants enrolled in the v-safe pregnancy registry,827 had a completed pregnancy, of which 115 (13.9%) resulted in a pregnancy loss and 712 (86.1%)resulted in a live birth (mostly among participants with vaccination in the third trimester). Adverse neonatal outcomes included preterm birth (in 9.4%) and small size for gestational age (in 3.2%); no neonatal deaths were reported. Although not directly comparable, calculated proportions of adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in persons vaccinated against Covid-19 who had a completed pregnancy were similar to incidences reported in studies involving pregnant women that were conducted before the Covid-19 pandemic.Among 221 pregnancy-related adverse events reported to the VAERS, the most frequently reported event was spontaneous abortion (46 cases).
I find the second bolded more concerning.
post 1640635873 06-10-2021, 10:41 PM
-
#15
  1. GaloisTheory
  2. Registered User
  1. GaloisTheory
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2014
  4. Posts: 13,915
  5. Rep Power: 83343
Originally Posted By MuscleXtreme
I just read that link, then followed the source where they pulled the information. The link states in their notes that 124 women did not receive their shots in the third trimester. But the journal from which they quote doesn’t state that. The shot could be in the second trimester as well, but there’s nothing that I can see that can derive the 124 number since the journal just says “mostly”



I find the second bolded more concerning.
You are not looking at the full paper

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8117969/

Among 827 participants who had a completed pregnancy, the pregnancy resulted in a live birth in 712 (86.1%), in a spontaneous abortion in 104 (12.6%), in stillbirth in 1 (0.1%), and in other outcomes (induced abortion and ectopic pregnancy) in 10 (1.2%). A total of 96 of 104 spontaneous abortions (92.3%) occurred before 13 weeks of gestation (Table 4), and 700 of 712 pregnancies that resulted in a live birth (98.3%) were among persons who received their first eligible vaccine dose in the third trimester.
Physics crew
post 1640636273 06-10-2021, 10:47 PM
-
#16
  1. umop3pisdn
  2. Registered Muser
  1. umop3pisdn
  2. Registered Muser
  3. Join Date: Jan 2009
  4. Posts: 15,406
  5. Rep Power: 77939
Originally Posted By katya422
Not sure if srs.

But I hope you are perfectly fine.

Srs.
Miscarriages mean that it's working.
post 1640636553 06-10-2021, 10:54 PM
-
#17
  1. ispy
  2. ✅ Verified Miscer
  1. ispy
  2. ✅ Verified Miscer
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Location: MISC Island
  5. Posts: 29,853
  6. Rep Power: 233414
this is all a conspiracy theory, right guise? right?
🟩🟩🟩🟩 I am Jack's complete lack of surprise. 🟩🟩🟩🟩
post 1640636813 06-10-2021, 11:02 PM
-
#18
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By katya422
Probably won't finish watching this tonight.

- strong evidence for the effectiveness of two different existing drugs for txmt [fluoxetine and ivermectin]
- health dept and Gates foundation are aware, but crickets
- solid study re:ivermectin has been peer reviewed and may be published tomorrow

Link to Kirsch's evolving article:
https://trialsitenews.com/should-you-get-vaccinated/

Just scanned it and these stood out:
Need to listen to Dr.TenPenney on the vax..

Skip to 32 min in


https://www.bitchute.com/video/9TVdZUefMSDg/

You might like the whole show, guy is funny AF
post 1640637083 06-10-2021, 11:09 PM
-
#19
  1. ikepen
  2. Registered User
  1. ikepen
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2009
  4. Location: Canada
  5. Posts: 4,472
  6. Rep Power: 34558
thanks for sharing, will watch!
*I posted in the Trey Songz thread Crew*

Canadians for Trump, 2020
post 1640638593 06-10-2021, 11:48 PM
-
#20
  1. Contribution05
  2. Registered User
  1. Contribution05
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2011
  4. Location: Illinois, United States
  5. Age: 39
  6. Posts: 6,239
  7. Rep Power: 31631
1:16:30-1:20:00

Talks about a database for vaccine related side effects, deaths, etc that the government wont share with trusted independent 3rd parties.

The guys on this podcast say that there are 3 fundamental principles in western bio-ethics
1. Full and Complete disclosure of risks
2. Ensuring Comprehension of Risks
3. Willing Consent

And that to publish in any journal you would have to allow access to your data, but the government isn't doing that and is instead just saying "trust us" and not following the 3 principles.
post 1640639243 06-11-2021, 12:16 AM
-
#21
  1. Reliance012
  2. Registered User
  1. Reliance012
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2012
  4. Posts: 7,601
  5. Rep Power: 51600
Originally Posted By EnochsProphecy
2:28:40

Bret brought up Geert Vanden Bossche's theory on how vaccinating during a pandemic will cause immune escape variants to emerge, making vaccines futile. Robert then says, "This isn't a theoretical. This is a real....... We are having escape mutants arise all over the place". Basically confirming Geerts hypothesis.



Here is Geert's take on it 3 months ago. He now says it's too late.

That argument is riddled with problems and it isn’t consistent with principles of natural selection.
"Seen in the light of evolution, biology is, perhaps, intellectually the most satisfying and inspiring science. Without that light it becomes a pile of sundry facts -- some of them interesting or curious but making no meaningful picture as a whole."
post 1640639483 06-11-2021, 12:25 AM
-
#22
  1. Glutebrahhh
  2. Glutes of Peace
  1. Glutebrahhh
  2. Glutes of Peace
  3. Join Date: Sep 2020
  4. Posts: 4,079
  5. Rep Power: 16807
Another quality post by Katya.

Good find. Will watch soon
post 1640639853 06-11-2021, 12:43 AM
-
#23
  1. AncientYouth
  2. Registered User
  1. AncientYouth
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2013
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Age: 62
  6. Posts: 22,213
  7. Rep Power: 65479
what you need to know
post 1640639983 06-11-2021, 12:49 AM
-
#24
  1. Reliance012
  2. Registered User
  1. Reliance012
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2012
  4. Posts: 7,601
  5. Rep Power: 51600
Originally Posted By EnochsProphecy
It's already happening. Even the creator of mRNA vaccines Robert Malone confirmed this. Escape mutants are rising all over the place.
Of course escape variants will increase in frequency. That would happen regardless. It happens with infection induced acquired immunity as well. It doesn’t make the vaccines futile.
"Seen in the light of evolution, biology is, perhaps, intellectually the most satisfying and inspiring science. Without that light it becomes a pile of sundry facts -- some of them interesting or curious but making no meaningful picture as a whole."
post 1640640363 06-11-2021, 01:01 AM
-
#25
  1. Reliance012
  2. Registered User
  1. Reliance012
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2012
  4. Posts: 7,601
  5. Rep Power: 51600
Originally Posted By EnochsProphecy
The mutations will outpace the vaccines. Enjoy your booster shots though.

"People who’ve received both doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna coronavirus vaccines will probably need a booster shot this year, top executives for those two pharmaceutical companies said this week"

https://www.webmd.com/vaccines/covid...robably-needed
I would be highly skeptical of anyone who said we would NOT need subsequent vaccinations. We’re dealing with natural selection. That’s not the extent of his argument. His argument is that vaccination during a pandemic (and not before) is worse than not vaccinating at all. That is unfounded both theoretically and empirically.
"Seen in the light of evolution, biology is, perhaps, intellectually the most satisfying and inspiring science. Without that light it becomes a pile of sundry facts -- some of them interesting or curious but making no meaningful picture as a whole."
post 1640641393 06-11-2021, 01:41 AM
-
#26
  1. Obafemi1
  2. Registered User
  1. Obafemi1
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2013
  4. Location: State / Province, Netherlands
  5. Posts: 893
  6. Rep Power: 2229
Just lmao at anyone younger than 70 taking this vaccine (ded fkn srs)
post 1640647613 06-11-2021, 06:15 AM
-
#27
  1. katya422
  1. katya422
  2. Join Date: Dec 2011
  3. Location: United States
  4. Posts: 34,673
  5. Rep Power: 372543
Good morning. Seems like a few of you are ahead of me.

I'm around the hour mark. Panel mentions that the government has commissioned their own study on under reporting of events to the VAERs system and found that there could be up to 100X more events than what is being reported so far. Men agree that is way too high, but that the number of events occurring is under reported to some extent as yet unknown.

Next they compare what is happening around the COVID vaccine to what happened with cancer from smoking- that the population level data is there, but it is being denied though obvious to an honest observer.

Starting to talk about Tess Holiday in the UK who is seeing the same type of obfuscation with UK data that they are seeing with US data.

ETA: 5,000 reported deaths for the US, 12,000 reported to the Yellow Card system in the UK

Around 1:10 Kirsch states that he contacted the people who run Open VAERs and they estimate the number is more like 20,000 which is more than all other vaccines combines for 30 years. Says when you look at adverse events it is also more than all other vaccines for 30 years combines. Says that the effects support the hypothesis that the spike protein is escaping the cells in the muscle tissue and entering circulation through the body.

Malone cautions that the UK system doesn't break out the vaccines separately and has them listed all together.

Follow up by Kirsch who states that Holiday concluded that the vaccines are unsafe and should be stopped. Further concluded that we should be ramping up support for those who have had the vaccine and may need short and long term support.

Kirsch says that he has been in contact with a physician who is seeing patients that did not have COVID, but did have the vaccine and are unwell. Says that the blood work for these patients looks like the blood work of patients with long haul COVID. [Dr. Bruce Patterson who specializes in long haul COVID.]

Weinstein replies that it is becoming clear to clinicians that COVID, long haul COVID, and post-vaccine syndrome are closely related because the spike protein is shared between all of these.

Malone says that is a valid working hypothesis for what is occuring.
INTP Crew
Inattentive ADD Crew
Mom That Miscs Crew
post 1640648253 06-11-2021, 06:26 AM
-
#28
  1. messomi
  2. ▇ █ █ ▇ █ █ ▇
  1. messomi
  2. ▇ █ █ ▇ █ █ ▇
  3. Join Date: Apr 2017
  4. Posts: 20,365
  5. Rep Power: 362412
post 1640649033 06-11-2021, 06:39 AM
-
#29
  1. katya422
  1. katya422
  2. Join Date: Dec 2011
  3. Location: United States
  4. Posts: 34,673
  5. Rep Power: 372543
Originally Posted By Contribution05
1:16:30-1:20:00

Talks about a database for vaccine related side effects, deaths, etc that the government wont share with trusted independent 3rd parties.

The guys on this podcast say that there are 3 fundamental principles in western bio-ethics
1. Full and Complete disclosure of risks
2. Ensuring Comprehension of Risks
3. Willing Consent

And that to publish in any journal you would have to allow access to your data, but the government isn't doing that and is instead just saying "trust us" and not following the 3 principles.
Just hitting this part about the secret data base called VSAFE.

Kirsch speaks of a man who is head of an organization that has vaccinated a million people and is on the CDC calls every week. When asked the man says that he believes the vaccine has only killed about a 100 people. Implication is that this number is from the VSAFE data base, but it isn't open for anyone to analyze.

Malone says that our own data analysts with the FDA are not able to access the data in VSAFE.
INTP Crew
Inattentive ADD Crew
Mom That Miscs Crew
post 1640649113 06-11-2021, 06:40 AM
-
#30
  1. MuscleXtreme
  2. INTJ - Christian
  1. MuscleXtreme
  2. INTJ - Christian
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 28,256
  6. Rep Power: 93116
Originally Posted By GaloisTheory
You are not looking at the full paper

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8117969/

Among 827 participants who had a completed pregnancy, the pregnancy resulted in a live birth in 712 (86.1%), in a spontaneous abortion in 104 (12.6%), in stillbirth in 1 (0.1%), and in other outcomes (induced abortion and ectopic pregnancy) in 10 (1.2%). A total of 96 of 104 spontaneous abortions (92.3%) occurred before 13 weeks of gestation (Table 4), and 700 of 712 pregnancies that resulted in a live birth (98.3%) were among persons who received their first eligible vaccine dose in the third trimester.
Thanks!

It still seems to be correlating the shot with miscarriage rather than proving the shot caused the miscarriage though.

I think we all know that I am against getting the vaccine, but before I start telling others “don’t get the vaccine because of x”, I want to make sure what I am telling them is correct and verifiable, so I need to be rigorous when information such as this comes out.
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts