Forum
»
Average down payment on a house or condo is 12%. FTHB: 6%
- Results 1 to 17 of 17
-
Page 1 of 1
06-17-2021, 12:30 PM
-
#1
Average down payment on a house or condo is 12%. FTHB: 6%
In 2019, the National Association of Realtors found that the average down payment on a house or condo was just 12%. For first-time home buyers, that number drops to 6%.
Sauce:https://themortgagereports.com/60543...yment-benefits
Sauce:https://themortgagereports.com/60543...yment-benefits
The average American pays about 6% for their down payment, according to data from Attom Data Solutions.
Sauce:https://www.rocketmortgage.com/learn...ent-on-a-house
Sauce:https://www.rocketmortgage.com/learn...ent-on-a-house
According to a recent survey, the average down payment for a home was between $10,000 and $15,000, or about 5 percent-6 percent of the total purchase price for a typical US home, according to thelendersnetwork.com.
Sauce:https://www.amfam.com/resources/arti...e-down-payment
Mind = Blown. I would've thought more people would be closer to 20%. I have coworkers who had darn near 0%-3% down on theirs, accepting PMI in their lives, and obviously that turned out well for them given that their house value went up $50k-150k in the last few years. I thought they were a minority.Sauce:https://www.amfam.com/resources/arti...e-down-payment

Maybe I shouldn't wait to save up $90k for a $450k house after all when $27k does the job lol.
06-17-2021, 12:33 PM
-
#2
06-17-2021, 12:35 PM
-
#3
- JoshSP1985
- Anti-Circumcision
-
- JoshSP1985
- Anti-Circumcision
- Join Date: Aug 2009
- Location: Franklin, Indiana, United States
- Posts: 66,936
- Rep Power: 214514
-
-
Not surprising at all, most people literally don't have savings.
*PUREBLOOD CREW*
*DAD CREW*
*SUPER STRAIGHT*
*NATURAL DICK CREW*
*CCW*
06-17-2021, 12:35 PM
-
#4
- DizzySmalls
- Fast Misc
-
- DizzySmalls
- Fast Misc
- Join Date: May 2012
- Location: United States
- Posts: 23,894
- Rep Power: 82068
-
-
Don't wait to save for a down payment when prices increase faster than your savings potential. Take on the debt at low interest and gain equity instead. This environment punishes anyone who doesn't utilize leverage
06-17-2021, 12:37 PM
-
#5
- Winston56432
- Banned
-
- Winston56432
- Banned
- Join Date: Dec 2020
- Age: 56
- Posts: 4,472
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Im not suprised
phuck paying rent instead of a morgage
phuck paying rent instead of a morgage
06-17-2021, 12:38 PM
-
#6
- eatmycrackers
- lol @ nocoincels; 118 IQ
-
- eatmycrackers
- lol @ nocoincels; 118 IQ
- Join Date: Aug 2012
- Location: United States
- Posts: 8,772
- Rep Power: 37689
-
-
I bought my duplex 5% down ($400k TV)
spent another ~$20k on renovations
I reckon value is up nearly $200k over the past 3 years
stop waiting around like a ******* a pull the trigger already
spent another ~$20k on renovations
I reckon value is up nearly $200k over the past 3 years
stop waiting around like a ******* a pull the trigger already
Posts are for fun, not to be taken seriously or as truth.
Angie Varona Appreciation Club Founder
06-17-2021, 12:43 PM
-
#7
- WellHungOver
- Join Date: Nov 2005
- Location: Washington, United States
- Posts: 15,339
- Rep Power: 125879
-
-
The first house I bought I didn’t have chit so I don’t think we put anything down. Put $100k down on the house we bought 2 years ago because we had equity in the one we sold.
06-17-2021, 12:46 PM
-
#8
- OntheClockNE
- Cornbrah
-
- OntheClockNE
- Cornbrah
- Join Date: Aug 2017
- Posts: 5,541
- Rep Power: 47948
-
-
We are building and put 25% down. FHA is only 3%, good luck having a seller not throw your offer in the fireplace in this market with FHA.
*MAGA crew*
Mod Neg Survivor
AP4C
<HTC>
*6'4" Crew*
*Misc. Old Geezer Crew - 54*
06-17-2021, 12:52 PM
-
#9
- BuckNakedinBama
- hell yeah brother
-
- BuckNakedinBama
- hell yeah brother
- Join Date: Aug 2011
- Posts: 19,855
- Rep Power: 142836
-
-
6 figure home equity crew checking in
feels good
feels good
-
06-17-2021, 01:04 PM
-
#10
- BeanGainClovis
- Registered User
-
- BeanGainClovis
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2021
- Age: 56
- Posts: 10,696
- Rep Power: 58476
-
-
What is crazy is that in some countries it is not normal to get a home loan or take on large amounts of debt. It is more normal there that renting is the most affordable long-term solution and saving a lot is typical. High savings and having zero large debts means that everyone enjoys a higher pay and higher standard of living.
In the US, there is no problem with being a rich man in a poor country. In fact, the owning class would prefer to be miles above 99% of people in terms of standard of living. While the average person can only save up 10k for a home, probably even less for a 40k car, taking on huge debts with very small deposits, the owning class just collects all these ridiculous lifetime payments from millions of people.
I believe the reason for this is because the average American wants to live or appear to live as close as possible to the lifestyle of the owning class. Have the best possible house your debt can buy without owning it, have the best possible car without actually having it. It's like a facade on a bare wood frame, ready to collapse at any moment if the paychecks stopped flowing.
I may be the odd one out for striving to accept a simple life and save more than half my income, but it allows you to very rapidly build capital and avoid the debt trap entirely. If only 1% of Americans are not approaching money in the typical way, then of course they are going to stand out as unusual. That is fine by me.
In the US, there is no problem with being a rich man in a poor country. In fact, the owning class would prefer to be miles above 99% of people in terms of standard of living. While the average person can only save up 10k for a home, probably even less for a 40k car, taking on huge debts with very small deposits, the owning class just collects all these ridiculous lifetime payments from millions of people.
I believe the reason for this is because the average American wants to live or appear to live as close as possible to the lifestyle of the owning class. Have the best possible house your debt can buy without owning it, have the best possible car without actually having it. It's like a facade on a bare wood frame, ready to collapse at any moment if the paychecks stopped flowing.
I may be the odd one out for striving to accept a simple life and save more than half my income, but it allows you to very rapidly build capital and avoid the debt trap entirely. If only 1% of Americans are not approaching money in the typical way, then of course they are going to stand out as unusual. That is fine by me.
Beans. Cleans. Gasoline.
06-17-2021, 01:21 PM
-
#11
- eatmycrackers
- lol @ nocoincels; 118 IQ
-
- eatmycrackers
- lol @ nocoincels; 118 IQ
- Join Date: Aug 2012
- Location: United States
- Posts: 8,772
- Rep Power: 37689
-
-
Originally Posted By TugOfPeace⏩
brb save a $3k in PMI annually to miss $30k in equity value gains instead just think of the bigger picture brahsyea if I'm being real I used to be of the mindset that having 20% down was a good idea, but if you're saving JUST for that and you have no other savings, putting down 3% and investing the rest in an index fund or something seems like a smarter path to go down.
especially now that real estate is being bought up, better to own a house with 3% down and ride the equity gains rather than not own anything to save PMI
especially now that real estate is being bought up, better to own a house with 3% down and ride the equity gains rather than not own anything to save PMI
Posts are for fun, not to be taken seriously or as truth.
Angie Varona Appreciation Club Founder
06-17-2021, 01:23 PM
-
#12
- textgod
- Registered User
-
- textgod
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2017
- Location: United States
- Age: 39
- Posts: 678
- Rep Power: 5783
-
-
Originally Posted By BeanGainClovis⏩
That's a reasonable assessment but the issue you don't SPECIFICALLY address what you/people outside of the US do with the money they are saving by not going into enormous debt? Simple responses such as "investing" are bare bones and usually not accurate. Most people do NOT invest, especially beyond the bare minimum 401K/IRA. So if all you are doing is putting money in your bank account instead of into a physical/usable asset (home, car, business, etc...) then the argument could be made that YOU are doing it wrong even if your aspirations are more noble than the "average American"What is crazy is that in some countries it is not normal to get a home loan or take on large amounts of debt. It is more normal there that renting is the most affordable long-term solution and saving a lot is typical. High savings and having zero large debts means that everyone enjoys a higher pay and higher standard of living.
In the US, there is no problem with being a rich man in a poor country. In fact, the owning class would prefer to be miles above 99% of people in terms of standard of living. While the average person can only save up 10k for a home, probably even less for a 40k car, taking on huge debts with very small deposits, the owning class just collects all these ridiculous lifetime payments from millions of people.
I believe the reason for this is because the average American wants to live or appear to live as close as possible to the lifestyle of the owning class. Have the best possible house your debt can buy without owning it, have the best possible car without actually having it. It's like a facade on a bare wood frame, ready to collapse at any moment if the paychecks stopped flowing.
I may be the odd one out for striving to accept a simple life and save more than half my income, but it allows you to very rapidly build capital and avoid the debt trap entirely. If only 1% of Americans are not approaching money in the typical way, then of course they are going to stand out as unusual. That is fine by me.
In the US, there is no problem with being a rich man in a poor country. In fact, the owning class would prefer to be miles above 99% of people in terms of standard of living. While the average person can only save up 10k for a home, probably even less for a 40k car, taking on huge debts with very small deposits, the owning class just collects all these ridiculous lifetime payments from millions of people.
I believe the reason for this is because the average American wants to live or appear to live as close as possible to the lifestyle of the owning class. Have the best possible house your debt can buy without owning it, have the best possible car without actually having it. It's like a facade on a bare wood frame, ready to collapse at any moment if the paychecks stopped flowing.
I may be the odd one out for striving to accept a simple life and save more than half my income, but it allows you to very rapidly build capital and avoid the debt trap entirely. If only 1% of Americans are not approaching money in the typical way, then of course they are going to stand out as unusual. That is fine by me.
06-17-2021, 01:25 PM
-
#13
- BeanGainClovis
- Registered User
-
- BeanGainClovis
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2021
- Age: 56
- Posts: 10,696
- Rep Power: 58476
-
-
Originally Posted By TugOfPeace⏩
You can save even more than 20%, you can even buy it all in cash or get a government subsidy with no deposit. Additionally, you can invest in lands outside the suburbs that provide income and pay for themselves or even profit.yea if I'm being real I used to be of the mindset that having 20% down was a good idea, but if you're saving JUST for that and you have no other savings, putting down 3% and investing the rest in an index fund or something seems like a smarter path to go down.
especially now that real estate is being bought up, better to own a house with 3% down and ride the equity gains rather than not own anything to save PMI
especially now that real estate is being bought up, better to own a house with 3% down and ride the equity gains rather than not own anything to save PMI
Also, the saving does not end if you take on a large debt. You should be able to save even more with a lower monthly payment. I think it is best to look at the long term rather than current economic trends. All these options can seem overwhelming to many, so they just choose to follow the typical path with maybe some variations.
Yet everyday there are people here complaining that the average American life is in decline and everything is going down the toilet. It's because people can't let go of the past and have idealized the mid-20th century American life. This century is far more complex and challenging, if we do not adapt then we will be left behind, clinging to visions of the past.
I can't even imagine a life without internet, I was born into it. Not sure why I would want a 20th century life.
Beans. Cleans. Gasoline.
06-17-2021, 01:30 PM
-
#14
- BeanGainClovis
- Registered User
-
- BeanGainClovis
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2021
- Age: 56
- Posts: 10,696
- Rep Power: 58476
-
-
Originally Posted By textgod⏩
My aspirations are not more noble, I am just not striving to live a mid-20th century lifestyle, something that everyone here and elsewhere says has faded away.That's a reasonable assessment but the issue you don't SPECIFICALLY address what you/people outside of the US do with the money they are saving by not going into enormous debt? Simple responses such as "investing" are bare bones and usually not accurate. Most people do NOT invest, especially beyond the bare minimum 401K/IRA. So if all you are doing is putting money in your bank account instead of into a physical/usable asset (home, car, business, etc...) then the argument could be made that YOU are doing it wrong even if your aspirations are more noble than the "average American"
Investing covers any profitable venture.
In those countries, successful first world countries outside the US, they are just saving the money in their bank account. That allows their banks to save more and lend more to domestic businesses, growing the economy. Then again, their banks and businesses are not screwing over the people with large profit margins. Mostly because they were bombed to hell during WWII and had to rebuild.
There is no "doing it right" or "doing it wrong" when it comes to this. There is only "doing what you are told" and "making your own judgments". Both options carry their own risks and benefits.
Beans. Cleans. Gasoline.
06-17-2021, 01:37 PM
-
#15
- FastBack6
- Registered User
-
- FastBack6
- Registered User
- Join Date: Aug 2015
- Age: 34
- Posts: 3,946
- Rep Power: 11960
-
-
Originally Posted By BeanGainClovis⏩
Lol this is the misc bro. Miscers buy rental properties and a new AMG every year with cash when they’re not busy banging models.What is crazy is that in some countries it is not normal to get a home loan or take on large amounts of debt. It is more normal there that renting is the most affordable long-term solution and saving a lot is typical. High savings and having zero large debts means that everyone enjoys a higher pay and higher standard of living.
In the US, there is no problem with being a rich man in a poor country. In fact, the owning class would prefer to be miles above 99% of people in terms of standard of living. While the average person can only save up 10k for a home, probably even less for a 40k car, taking on huge debts with very small deposits, the owning class just collects all these ridiculous lifetime payments from millions of people.
I believe the reason for this is because the average American wants to live or appear to live as close as possible to the lifestyle of the owning class. Have the best possible house your debt can buy without owning it, have the best possible car without actually having it. It's like a facade on a bare wood frame, ready to collapse at any moment if the paychecks stopped flowing.
I may be the odd one out for striving to accept a simple life and save more than half my income, but it allows you to very rapidly build capital and avoid the debt trap entirely. If only 1% of Americans are not approaching money in the typical way, then of course they are going to stand out as unusual. That is fine by me.
In the US, there is no problem with being a rich man in a poor country. In fact, the owning class would prefer to be miles above 99% of people in terms of standard of living. While the average person can only save up 10k for a home, probably even less for a 40k car, taking on huge debts with very small deposits, the owning class just collects all these ridiculous lifetime payments from millions of people.
I believe the reason for this is because the average American wants to live or appear to live as close as possible to the lifestyle of the owning class. Have the best possible house your debt can buy without owning it, have the best possible car without actually having it. It's like a facade on a bare wood frame, ready to collapse at any moment if the paychecks stopped flowing.
I may be the odd one out for striving to accept a simple life and save more than half my income, but it allows you to very rapidly build capital and avoid the debt trap entirely. If only 1% of Americans are not approaching money in the typical way, then of course they are going to stand out as unusual. That is fine by me.
06-17-2021, 01:39 PM
-
#16
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts