Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» Alternative Energy

View Poll Results: Future of Energy

Voters: 14.
No energy
1 7%
Drill, baby, drill
0 0%
Nuclear
8 57%
Other
1 7%
Solar/Wind/Geothermal
2 14%
It's over
2 14%
  1. Results 1 to 13 of 13
post 1642836773 07-14-2021, 12:46 PM
-
#1
  1. mesobuild
  2. Premium User
  1. mesobuild
  2. Premium User
  3. Join Date: May 2020
  4. Posts: 17,953
  5. Rep Power: 44402

Alternative Energy

What do you think makes the most sense for the future?

Oil and natural gas?
Solar?
Geothermal?
Wind?
Nuclear?
post 1642836823 07-14-2021, 12:46 PM
-
#2
  1. RealLifeAlpha
  2. i swear im an alpha
  1. RealLifeAlpha
  2. i swear im an alpha
  3. Join Date: Jun 2020
  4. Posts: 12,159
  5. Rep Power: 242567
coom
chit
piss




what do you think? (ded fkn Srs)
~focus on what you can control crew~
~flaccid cummer crew~
~you are who you surround yourself with crew~
~mum was an escort crew~
~nothing is permanent so just enjoy the ride crew~
~2.5 inch dink crew~
~Forgive yourself crew~
~Accused of incest by extended family crew~
~It's up to you to fix your life crew~
~deep, sustained sexual eye contact with your own nephew crew~
post 1642836913 07-14-2021, 12:47 PM
-
#3
  1. volleys
  2. hit me up on myspace
  1. volleys
  2. hit me up on myspace
  3. Join Date: Dec 2011
  4. Posts: 11,785
  5. Rep Power: 104626
Nuclear is best. Solar is kind of a waste.
post 1642836993 07-14-2021, 12:50 PM
-
#4
  1. Shortfuze
  2. "Your one f*ck fantasy"
  1. Shortfuze
  2. "Your one f*ck fantasy"
  3. Join Date: Feb 2004
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 31,897
  6. Rep Power: 179945
In South Korea, some inventor made a toilet that turns poop into electricity. One dump would provide enough power to run a dishwasher.

source:https://soranews24.com/2021/07/14/so...-for-deposits/
*Simplicity is the key to life*

Thanks ZBlacktt for the mod rep!
Thanks ForumSentinel for the admin rep!
Thanks Gxp23 for the mod rep!
Thanks 400LB Gorilla for the mod rep!
Thanks CountryMike for admin rep!
Thanks Nics1246 for mod rep!

I got married on August 24, 2013!!
ლ(╹◡╹ლ)
post 1642837183 07-14-2021, 12:53 PM
-
#5
  1. JayJ350
  1. JayJ350
  2. Join Date: Sep 2017
  3. Location: United States
  4. Age: 38
  5. Posts: 73,290
  6. Rep Power: 273505
Solar and wind is a joke, but geothermal is good, but limited in range of application.
post 1642837313 07-14-2021, 12:54 PM
-
#6
  1. 78novacaine
  2. Registered User
  1. 78novacaine
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2019
  4. Posts: 15,477
  5. Rep Power: 176552
Nuclear > all other "clean" energy sources given our current tech, but the libtards don't want to use it because nuclear is scary...
Permabulk/bloatlord Crew
Tradie Crew
HTC
post 1642837913 07-14-2021, 01:04 PM
-
#7
  1. dingler
  2. Registered User
  1. dingler
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2012
  4. Location: District Of Columbia, United States
  5. Posts: 8,920
  6. Rep Power: 53570
Originally Posted By JayJ350
Solar and wind is a joke, but geothermal is good, but limited in range of application.
What do you think is good about it?

I run the national geothermal program for the DOI, one of several programs I run, so I'm genuinely curious.

Currently on a call with a bunch of departments discussing carbon capture, working on a report to congress.
no crew crew
post 1642838353 07-14-2021, 01:11 PM
-
#8
  1. MirinCanadian99
  2. Registered User
  1. MirinCanadian99
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2018
  4. Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  5. Age: 27
  6. Posts: 3,501
  7. Rep Power: 32847
I personally feel that Geothermal and Nuclear are the way of the future.
post 1642838433 07-14-2021, 01:13 PM
-
#9
  1. xxAchillesxx
  1. xxAchillesxx
  2. Join Date: Sep 2008
  3. Posts: 19,521
  4. Subscribers: 2
  5. Rep Power: 389868
Always been a fan of nuclear. Most opposition's modern conception of it is 50 year old technology and safety which is ridiculous.
"The dildo of consequences rarely arrives lubed."

See OptimusTrajan' sig
post 1642838463 07-14-2021, 01:14 PM
-
#10
  1. BigDeeps01
  2. Registered User
  1. BigDeeps01
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2019
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 26,735
  6. Rep Power: 169715
Nuclear but it's ****ing expensive
post 1642838573 07-14-2021, 01:16 PM
-
#11
  1. Destor
  2. Registered User
  1. Destor
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2012
  4. Location: Alberta, Canada
  5. Age: 41
  6. Posts: 43,481
  7. Rep Power: 254906
All of the above in reality
post 1642838583 07-14-2021, 01:17 PM
-
#12
  1. JayJ350
  1. JayJ350
  2. Join Date: Sep 2017
  3. Location: United States
  4. Age: 38
  5. Posts: 73,290
  6. Rep Power: 273505
Originally Posted By xxAchillesxx
Always been a fan of nuclear. Most opposition's modern conception of it is 50 year old technology and safety which is ridiculous.
Yeah the biggest problem with nuclear power is the first generation power plants they were building after WWII, modern power plants are many times safer and cleaner. If we put in new nuclear power plants it would probably be best off that way.
post 1642839953 07-14-2021, 01:35 PM
-
#13
  1. Destor
  2. Registered User
  1. Destor
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2012
  4. Location: Alberta, Canada
  5. Age: 41
  6. Posts: 43,481
  7. Rep Power: 254906
On the nuclear side, Small Modular Reactors might be the wave of the future (but I'm not an expert)
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts