In the earliest trial of Moderna’s mRNA-based vaccine, study participants received one of three dose levels: 25, 100 or 250 micrograms3.The top dose proved too toxic.The low dose elicited the weakest immune response. The middle dose seemed to offer the best balance: it triggered strong immunity and had acceptable side effects.

That 100-microgram dose ultimately became the one authorized for mass use in dozens of countries. But Moderna scientists later showed that a half-dose seemed to be just as good as the standard dose at stimulating immune protection4.

To find out whether a low dose might offer protection, scientists analysed blood from 35 participants in the original trial. Each had received two 25-microgram jabs of vaccine 28 days apart.

Six months after the second shot, nearly all of the 35 participants had ‘neutralizing’ antibodies, which block the virus from infecting cells, the researchers reported in a preprint published on 5 July1. Participants’ blood also contained an armada of different T cells, both ‘killer’ cells that can destroy infected cells and a variety of ‘helper’ cells that aid in general immune defence.

Had COVID? You’ll probably make antibodies for a lifetime

Levels of both antibodies and T cells were comparable to those found in people who have recovered from COVID-19.

“It is quite remarkable — and quite promising — that you can easily detect responses for that long a time,” says Daniela Weiskopf, an immunologist at the La Jolla Institute for Immunology (LJI) in California and a co-author of the study, which has not yet been peer reviewed.

Corine Geurts van Kessel, a clinical virologist at the Erasmus University Medical Center in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, who was not involved in the study, agrees. “It’s rather good news,” she says. “Even with a low dose, you can prime your own immune system in quite a nice way.”

Weiskopf and her study co-author Shane Crotty, also at the LJI, are among the scientists who would prefer carefully planned trials to confirm the efficacy of reduced vaccine doses before any such regimen is widely deployed. One such trial is ongoing: a study in Belgium is comparing a lower-dose version of the vaccine from Pfizer–BioNTech against the standard dose.

But Sarah Cobey, an infectious-disease researcher at the University of Chicago in Illinois and a co-author of a 5 July Nature Medicine commentary5 supporting dose ‘fractionation’, disagrees about the need for time-consuming data collection.

“We shouldn’t wait that long,” she says. “People are dying, and we have historical precedent for making very well-reasoned guesses that we think are going to save lives.”

Less is more
Even if the immune responses spurred by the low-dose strategy are only moderately effective at keeping SARS-CoV-2 at bay, it could still be worth giving quarter doses to speed up the pace of vaccination around the world, argues Tabarrok.

According to a modelling study published by Tabarrok and other economists, such an approach would reduce infections and COVID-19-linked deaths more than current policies6. The study has not yet been peer reviewed.

A half-dose now is more useful to an unvaccinated person than a full dose a year from now, Tabarrok says, which means that dose-stretching “is a way of promoting vaccine equity.”

Originally Posted By katya422⏩

Originally Posted By ThisIsMyAlias⏩