Forum
»
Vaxcels can't catch a break (the science says it's not looking good)
Vaxcels can't catch a break (the science says it's not looking good)
- Results 1 to 7 of 7
-
Page 1 of 1
11-15-2021, 03:35 AM
-
#1
- umop3pisdn
- Registered Muser
-
- umop3pisdn
- Registered Muser
- Join Date: Jan 2009
- Posts: 15,406
- Rep Power: 77939
-
-
Vaxcels can't catch a break (the science says it's not looking good)
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-...r-fda-approval
One third of FDA drugs have unexpected long term side effects and safety problems develop well after approval.
For double vaxxed vaxcels who are on a bi-annual roster of booster shots, they're looking at a one in three chance of developing serious, potentially life threatening side effects down the line, all the while not even being immune from covid itself lmao.
Imagine surrendering your bodily autonomy over to the government and big pharma for a one in three chance of getting fked. It really is over for vaxcels. Their lack of reasoning and ability to weigh risk vs reward is dumbfounding.
One third of FDA drugs have unexpected long term side effects and safety problems develop well after approval.
It took a median of 4.2 years after the drugs were approved for these safety concerns to come to light, the study found, and issues were more common among psychiatric drugs, biologic drugs,drugs that were granted "accelerated approval"and drugs that were approved near the regulatory deadline for approval.
For the majority of us on the Misc who are presumably fit, not old, with no underlying health issues, we are looking at a .02% of dying if we caught covid.For double vaxxed vaxcels who are on a bi-annual roster of booster shots, they're looking at a one in three chance of developing serious, potentially life threatening side effects down the line, all the while not even being immune from covid itself lmao.
Imagine surrendering your bodily autonomy over to the government and big pharma for a one in three chance of getting fked. It really is over for vaxcels. Their lack of reasoning and ability to weigh risk vs reward is dumbfounding.
11-15-2021, 03:40 AM
-
#2
- 1hardgainer
- Registered User
-
- 1hardgainer
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2004
- Posts: 18,084
- Rep Power: 144300
-
-
Pretty scary stuff
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wh1VU-_OF98
11-15-2021, 03:41 AM
-
#3
- Slamt
- Registered User
-
- Slamt
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2013
- Age: 32
- Posts: 10,874
- Rep Power: 35518
-
-
Sadly there's a bunch of people who believe the FDA is out there protect them. They never once bother to look and find out that the people in charge of the FDA usually always go to pharmaceutical companies for a cozy "board advisor" job afterwards when they finish helping to get a drug passed.
11-15-2021, 03:54 AM
-
#4
- Unstumpable
- Registered User
-
- Unstumpable
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2016
- Age: 34
- Posts: 26,131
- Rep Power: 219983
-
-
Sad. Truly.
But they can’t say we didn’t warn them.
But they can’t say we didn’t warn them.
11-15-2021, 03:57 AM
-
#5
- umop3pisdn
- Registered Muser
-
- umop3pisdn
- Registered Muser
- Join Date: Jan 2009
- Posts: 15,406
- Rep Power: 77939
-
-
Biological products include a wide range of products such asvaccines, blood and blood components, allergenics, ****tic cells, gene therapy, tissues, and recombinant therapeutic proteins.
Fk boyos it just keeps getting worse.
11-15-2021, 06:03 AM
-
#6
Originally Posted By umop3pisdn⏩
How many of those 33% of drugs were non-live vaccines?https://www.npr.org/sections/health-...r-fda-approval
One third of FDA drugs have unexpected long term side effects and safety problems develop well after approval.
For the majority of us on the Misc who are presumably fit, not old, with no underlying health issues, we are looking at a .02% of dying if we caught covid.
For double vaxxed vaxcels who are on a bi-annual roster of booster shots, they're looking at a one in three chance of developing serious, potentially life threatening side effects down the line, all the while not even being immune from covid itself lmao.
Imagine surrendering your bodily autonomy over to the government and big pharma for a one in three chance of getting fked. It really is over for vaxcels. Their lack of reasoning and ability to weigh risk vs reward is dumbfounding.
One third of FDA drugs have unexpected long term side effects and safety problems develop well after approval.
For the majority of us on the Misc who are presumably fit, not old, with no underlying health issues, we are looking at a .02% of dying if we caught covid.
For double vaxxed vaxcels who are on a bi-annual roster of booster shots, they're looking at a one in three chance of developing serious, potentially life threatening side effects down the line, all the while not even being immune from covid itself lmao.
Imagine surrendering your bodily autonomy over to the government and big pharma for a one in three chance of getting fked. It really is over for vaxcels. Their lack of reasoning and ability to weigh risk vs reward is dumbfounding.
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-
- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts