Forum
»
[SLOOTS] Violent crime against women gets the same status as terrorist attacks
- Results 1 to 22 of 22
-
Page 1 of 1
11-25-2021, 12:59 AM
-
#1
- TomWanks
- vocaroo.com/18BduFIdv7YR
-
- TomWanks
- vocaroo.com/18BduFIdv7YR
- Join Date: Sep 2020
- Posts: 21,621
- Rep Power: 202087
-
-
[SLOOTS] Violent crime against women gets the same status as terrorist attacks
Cliffs:
- Rape convictions at historically low levels
- Clearly due to muh sexism rather than decreasing violent crime rates in all categories
- Sloots demand justice (aka the right to jail more men based on their fee fees)
- Undercover police to patrol nightclubs to catch potential grapists (still not enough)
- Constabulary vows to increase conviction rate because Believe All Women
- Sloot endangerment to be given the same priority as cheese pizza, terrorism, and organized crime
- Rape convictions at historically low levels
- Clearly due to muh sexism rather than decreasing violent crime rates in all categories
- Sloots demand justice (aka the right to jail more men based on their fee fees)
- Undercover police to patrol nightclubs to catch potential grapists (still not enough)
- Constabulary vows to increase conviction rate because Believe All Women
- Sloot endangerment to be given the same priority as cheese pizza, terrorism, and organized crime
Violence against women and girls will be elevated to the same status as terrorism under a proposed government directive, The Times has learnt.
Chief constables will be mandated to increase resources and combine capabilities in a drastic effort to drive up rape convictions, which have reached historically low levels.
Violence against women and girls is set to be added to the strategic policing requirement, meaning that police will be required by government to treat it as a major priority. It is an acknowledgement by ministers that there is an epidemic of violence against women that needs to be one of the most urgent national crimefighting priorities.
There has been a national outcry about the response to levels of violence against women since the Metropolitan Police officer Wayne Couzens abused his powers to abduct, rape and murder Sarah Everard in March.
Police faced criticism for their response after the onus was placed on women to check the credentials of officers who spoke to them on the street.
Government announcements such as placing undercover police officers in nightclub districts were criticised as not robust enough.
In 2019-20 57,000 rapes were reported to police but there were only 1,109 convictions, the lowest in history. Three quarters of domestic abuse cases result in no further action. The majority of stalking and harassment offenders have escaped prosecution in recent years, instead handed informal punishments such as rehabilitation courses or an apology to the victim.
The Home Office will add violence against women and girls to the strategic policing requirement, a national initiative that sets out what resources police forces must deploy to respond effectively to specific crimes.It means that female violence has been elevated to an urgent national priority alongside terrorism, serious and organised crime and child sexual abuse.
Policing priorities are published annually by the home secretary. The requirements that will be placed on forces to tackle violence against women and girls are unclear.
However, the focus of the requirement is to ensure forces work in collaboration to tackle shared threats, and that adequate amounts of money and manpower are focused on the most serious criminal issues.
The proposed directive came after police forces were accused of a “male brotherhood” culture that ignored female violence and harassment.
Dame Vera Baird, the victims commissioner, claimed last week that police were protective of each other because of male “bonding” and said that rape investigation units looked into the credibility of complainants more than the offences of perpetrators. She told senior officers at a conference that offenders were emboldened by the “essentially male brotherhood culture” in policing.
Maggie Blyth, the deputy chief constable of Hampshire police and the new national police lead for violence against women and girls, said police forces would put a “relentless focus on perpetrators”.
Chief constables will be mandated to increase resources and combine capabilities in a drastic effort to drive up rape convictions, which have reached historically low levels.
Violence against women and girls is set to be added to the strategic policing requirement, meaning that police will be required by government to treat it as a major priority. It is an acknowledgement by ministers that there is an epidemic of violence against women that needs to be one of the most urgent national crimefighting priorities.
There has been a national outcry about the response to levels of violence against women since the Metropolitan Police officer Wayne Couzens abused his powers to abduct, rape and murder Sarah Everard in March.
Police faced criticism for their response after the onus was placed on women to check the credentials of officers who spoke to them on the street.
Government announcements such as placing undercover police officers in nightclub districts were criticised as not robust enough.
In 2019-20 57,000 rapes were reported to police but there were only 1,109 convictions, the lowest in history. Three quarters of domestic abuse cases result in no further action. The majority of stalking and harassment offenders have escaped prosecution in recent years, instead handed informal punishments such as rehabilitation courses or an apology to the victim.
The Home Office will add violence against women and girls to the strategic policing requirement, a national initiative that sets out what resources police forces must deploy to respond effectively to specific crimes.It means that female violence has been elevated to an urgent national priority alongside terrorism, serious and organised crime and child sexual abuse.
Policing priorities are published annually by the home secretary. The requirements that will be placed on forces to tackle violence against women and girls are unclear.
However, the focus of the requirement is to ensure forces work in collaboration to tackle shared threats, and that adequate amounts of money and manpower are focused on the most serious criminal issues.
The proposed directive came after police forces were accused of a “male brotherhood” culture that ignored female violence and harassment.
Dame Vera Baird, the victims commissioner, claimed last week that police were protective of each other because of male “bonding” and said that rape investigation units looked into the credibility of complainants more than the offences of perpetrators. She told senior officers at a conference that offenders were emboldened by the “essentially male brotherhood culture” in policing.
Maggie Blyth, the deputy chief constable of Hampshire police and the new national police lead for violence against women and girls, said police forces would put a “relentless focus on perpetrators”.
11-25-2021, 01:10 AM
-
#2
- propreffered7
- Registered User
-
- propreffered7
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2010
- Posts: 36,839
- Rep Power: 86393
-
-
why did i know this was british just from reading the bullet points?
11-25-2021, 01:30 AM
-
#3
- MisquePhaggot
- Join Date: May 2013
- Posts: 12,035
- Rep Power: 47685
-
-
no fappers this is your future
11-25-2021, 01:38 AM
-
#4
11-25-2021, 01:47 AM
-
#5
- TomWanks
- vocaroo.com/18BduFIdv7YR
-
- TomWanks
- vocaroo.com/18BduFIdv7YR
- Join Date: Sep 2020
- Posts: 21,621
- Rep Power: 202087
-
-
Originally Posted By nielk⏩
The pissening thing is that there is an increase in grapes. From a very specific demographic.this is why you really got to watch out who you stick your dik in. ded fkn srs
never stick your dik into crazy
never stick your dik into crazy
Instead of openly saying that though (because muh racism) we’re going to LARP that this is a crisis caused by all men and empower sloots to send sub-Chads to jail because she had had two crantinis before being smashed.
Ideology had become more important than facts. It’s only a matter of time before ideology fails, objective truth and the rule of law never fail.
11-25-2021, 02:29 AM
-
#6
- PenorBrahNoHomo
- R1b
-
- PenorBrahNoHomo
- R1b
- Join Date: Aug 2011
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 28,218
- Rep Power: 130149
-
-
In light of the Sarah Everard case I have taken to going out every night and closely following lone women as their protector. Rest assured ladies, no harm shall come to you in my presence. I'm the hero the UK deserves, and the one it needs right now, a silent guardian, a watchful protector. A white knight.
They don't seem to appreciate it though, stupid sloots.
They don't seem to appreciate it though, stupid sloots.
11-25-2021, 02:40 AM
-
#7
- jimbob007
- Keep The Red Flag Flying
-
- jimbob007
- Keep The Red Flag Flying
- Join Date: Mar 2007
- Location: From Anywhere He Darn Well Pleases, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 99,476
- Rep Power: 275015
-
-
The same overreaction that happened post Savile-with the witch hunts against celebrities, often based on zero evidence & in at least one case the accuser himself being a kiddie fiddler, who got compensation for his invented abuse before they worked out he was making it all up-a simple check of the armed forces boss he claimed molested him would have shown that at the time he was being guarded in a compound after the IRA had made threats on his life. This makes it more likely men will be convicted if women get blotto & then get morning after regret.
11-25-2021, 03:24 AM
-
#8
11-25-2021, 03:33 AM
-
#9
11-25-2021, 04:12 AM
-
#10
- hackerwacker
- Registered User
-
- hackerwacker
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2011
- Age: 35
- Posts: 11,669
- Rep Power: 62380
-
-
They are half right. They've got themselves stuck in a real tough pickle
Thee IS an increase in rape and assaults against women in Britain, and there IS a decrease in prosecution of those crimes. Both have the same cause; the perpetrators are immigrants of a privileged skin tone. They flood England with third world 80 iq migrants, they cause crime, then they sweep it under the rug because it's terrible optics for their plan to *enrich* England. Then they turn around and blame ENGLISH men for the sins committed by foreigners
6/5 honks
Thee IS an increase in rape and assaults against women in Britain, and there IS a decrease in prosecution of those crimes. Both have the same cause; the perpetrators are immigrants of a privileged skin tone. They flood England with third world 80 iq migrants, they cause crime, then they sweep it under the rug because it's terrible optics for their plan to *enrich* England. Then they turn around and blame ENGLISH men for the sins committed by foreigners
6/5 honks
11-25-2021, 05:15 AM
-
#11
- PenorBrahNoHomo
- R1b
-
- PenorBrahNoHomo
- R1b
- Join Date: Aug 2011
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 28,218
- Rep Power: 130149
-
-
Originally Posted By TomWanks⏩
Sloots are pretty based and eugenic in a way, is it really best that inferior men reproduce? While it was sloots who tore us from the blessed state of nature in the first place, perhaps they will send us back to the stone age. Do we not want to return to the Garden of Eden? I was listening to a lecture about the epic of Gilgamesh and the plight of Enkidu is similar to that of Adam, he lives like a wild man until he is seduced by a sacred temple harlot sent to civilize him. Then he becomes depressed and regrets leaving his wild life before he dies of sickness. Maybe the destruction of civilization is a good thing, it breeds bugmen and tyranny. It was monogamy and civilization which kept sloots safest in the first place, although obviously they don't realise it. What sloots say they want is more civilization and safety, but what their actions produce is the exact opposite. It's a real mindfuk how lacking in self-awareness and thought they are.Negged. We have a lot of work to do bigot. Until all non-Chad men are castrated and enslaved, sloots can never feel safe.
11-25-2021, 05:24 AM
-
#12
- phaginator
- Ayyy lmao
-
- phaginator
- Ayyy lmao
- Join Date: Apr 2013
- Posts: 36,761
- Rep Power: 122033
-
-
Originally Posted By PenorBrahNoHomo⏩
Women choosing their partners is far from eugenic. Even the ugliest sloots with **** genes still reproduce.Sloots are pretty based and eugenic in a way, is it really best that inferior men reproduce? While it was sloots who tore us from the blessed state of nature in the first place, perhaps they will send us back to the stone age. Do we not want to return to the Garden of Eden? I was listening to a lecture about the epic of Gilgamesh and the plight of Enkidu is similar to that of Adam, he lives like a wild man until he is seduced by a sacred temple harlot sent to civilize him. Then he becomes depressed and regrets leaving his wild life before he dies of sickness. Maybe the destruction of civilization is a good thing, it breeds bugmen and tyranny. It was monogamy and civilization which kept sloots safest in the first place, although obviously they don't realise it. What sloots say they want is more civilization and safety, but what their actions produce is the exact opposite. It's a real mindfuk how lacking in self-awareness and thought they are.
11-25-2021, 05:30 AM
-
#13
- PenorBrahNoHomo
- R1b
-
- PenorBrahNoHomo
- R1b
- Join Date: Aug 2011
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 28,218
- Rep Power: 130149
-
-
Originally Posted By ****inator⏩
An ugly or average sloot reproducing with a Chad is more eugenic than her reproducing with a Timmy. Contraception means this point is invalid anyway I guess. I'm not saying they are eugenic in practice, just that their instincts are.Women choosing their partners is far from eugenic. Even the ugliest sloots with **** genes still reproduce.
11-25-2021, 05:35 AM
-
#14
- phaginator
- Ayyy lmao
-
- phaginator
- Ayyy lmao
- Join Date: Apr 2013
- Posts: 36,761
- Rep Power: 122033
-
-
Originally Posted By PenorBrahNoHomo⏩
Timmy reproducing with a hot Stacy sloot is also eugenic by your logic.An ugly or average sloot reproducing with a Chad is more eugenic than her reproducing with a Timmy. Contraception means this point is invalid anyway I guess. I'm not saying they are eugenic in practice, just that their instincts are.
But yes their instincts are wanting the best in their eyes, doesn't mean that's purely physcial. Enough sloots having kids with ugly rich men.
11-25-2021, 05:41 AM
-
#15
- PenorBrahNoHomo
- R1b
-
- PenorBrahNoHomo
- R1b
- Join Date: Aug 2011
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 28,218
- Rep Power: 130149
-
-
Originally Posted By ****inator⏩
Yeah, more so. There should be some sort of eugenic council to match up the Chads with a few Stacys each while Timmys and Beckys work to support them. Brads can be the enforcers and they get a go on some of the Stacys once they're past their prime.Timmy reproducing with a hot Stacy sloot is also eugenic by your logic.
But yes their instincts are wanting the best in their eyes, doesn't mean that's purely physcial. Enough sloots having kids with ugly rich men.
But yes their instincts are wanting the best in their eyes, doesn't mean that's purely physcial. Enough sloots having kids with ugly rich men.
If their instinct is the alpha fux, beta bux theory then that is eugenic. Peter Jones was voted most desirable husband in the UK, he's 6'7", reasonably handsome and a billionaire.
11-25-2021, 06:26 AM
-
#16
- FrankCostanza
- Serenity Now!
-
- FrankCostanza
- Serenity Now!
- Join Date: Sep 2019
- Posts: 17,091
- Rep Power: 48469
-
-
Thank God this is in England and not America.
I'm not here for rage. I'm here for revenge!
Anti Covid VAX Superhero
Mein power
Mein pleasure
Mein pain
Trump 2020
Trump 2024
11-25-2021, 06:26 AM
-
#17
11-25-2021, 06:38 AM
-
#18
- jimbob007
- Keep The Red Flag Flying
-
- jimbob007
- Keep The Red Flag Flying
- Join Date: Mar 2007
- Location: From Anywhere He Darn Well Pleases, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 99,476
- Rep Power: 275015
-
-
Originally Posted By hackerwacker⏩
Not true-it was determined that most grooming gangs/perpetrators are white males a while back & it was just right wing media & people that made all that up.They are half right. They've got themselves stuck in a real tough pickle
Thee IS an increase in rape and assaults against women in Britain, and there IS a decrease in prosecution of those crimes. Both have the same cause; the perpetrators are immigrants of a privileged skin tone. They flood England with third world 80 iq migrants, they cause crime, then they sweep it under the rug because it's terrible optics for their plan to *enrich* England. Then they turn around and blame ENGLISH men for the sins committed by foreigners
6/5 honks
Thee IS an increase in rape and assaults against women in Britain, and there IS a decrease in prosecution of those crimes. Both have the same cause; the perpetrators are immigrants of a privileged skin tone. They flood England with third world 80 iq migrants, they cause crime, then they sweep it under the rug because it's terrible optics for their plan to *enrich* England. Then they turn around and blame ENGLISH men for the sins committed by foreigners
6/5 honks
https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/ent...b6218b42ecd70f
11-25-2021, 07:57 AM
-
#19
- PenorBrahNoHomo
- R1b
-
- PenorBrahNoHomo
- R1b
- Join Date: Aug 2011
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 28,218
- Rep Power: 130149
-
-
Originally Posted By jimbob007⏩
Wow, a report headed up by Priti and Sajid finds that brown people are not to blame for grooming gangs, and it is white people who are bad, truly a shocking development. Arj from the Huffington Post is good enough to write this article to reassure us, bless his heart.Not true-it was determined that most grooming gangs/perpetrators are white males a while back & it was just right wing media & people that made all that up.
https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/ent...b6218b42ecd70f
https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/ent...b6218b42ecd70f
11-25-2021, 08:01 AM
-
#20
- TomWanks
- vocaroo.com/18BduFIdv7YR
-
- TomWanks
- vocaroo.com/18BduFIdv7YR
- Join Date: Sep 2020
- Posts: 21,621
- Rep Power: 202087
-
-
Originally Posted By penorbrahnohomo⏩
lmaowow, a report headed up by priti and sajid finds that brown people are not to blame for grooming gangs, and it is white people who are bad, truly a shocking development. Arj from the huffington post is good enough to write this article to reassure us, bless his heart.
11-25-2021, 08:13 AM
-
#21
- jimbob007
- Keep The Red Flag Flying
-
- jimbob007
- Keep The Red Flag Flying
- Join Date: Mar 2007
- Location: From Anywhere He Darn Well Pleases, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 99,476
- Rep Power: 275015
-
-
Originally Posted By PenorBrahNoHomo⏩
I had to struggle to find a gallery of them with a white person in it & she was a victim of grooming gangs herself.Wow, a report headed up by Priti and Sajid finds that brown people are not to blame for grooming gangs, and it is white people who are bad, truly a shocking development. Arj from the Huffington Post is good enough to write this article to reassure us, bless his heart.
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-
- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts