Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » Quebec judge temporarily suspends visitation rights for unvaccinated father
  1. Results 1 to 30 of 76
  2. Page 1 of 3
  3. 1
  4. 2
  5. 3
  7. Last

Thread: Quebec judge temporarily suspends visitation rights for unvaccinated father

post 1654244193 01-13-2022, 06:12 AM
-
#1
  1. Sublime25
  2. Registered User
  1. Sublime25
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2004
  4. Location: Laval, Qubec, Canada
  5. Age: 39
  6. Posts: 7,667
  7. Rep Power: 7572

Quebec judge temporarily suspends visitation rights for unvaccinated father

French article

https://ici.radio-canada.ca/nouvelle...accin-covid-19
A judge of the Superior Court of Quebec, Montreal district, has temporarily suspended the right of a separated father to see his 12-and-a-half-year-old child due to the man not being vaccinated against COVID- 19 and seems to oppose the health measures imposed by governments to fight the pandemic.
As long as the father will remain unvaccinated, he won't be able to see his child again.

Fck this trash world
post 1654245563 01-13-2022, 06:47 AM
-
#2
  1. sooby
  2. WOATbrah of peace :)
  1. sooby
  2. WOATbrah of peace :)
  3. Join Date: Feb 2015
  4. Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  5. Posts: 43,319
  6. Rep Power: 219409
The fact that the young person at the heart of this cause is himself vaccinated against COVID-19 does not change anything. Indeed, it is legal knowledge that the protection is not total and that it even seems to be reduced in the face of the Omicron variant which is currently spreading in Quebec , writes the magistrate.

However, the suspension of the father's access rights risks being only temporary. The judge specifies in his decision that it should be of short duration and that it could be canceled when the pandemic situation improves or the father decides to be vaccinated and to comply with the recommendations of the health authorities.

lol @ it being temporary, we've been in this clown world for 2 years. what does being a "conspirator" have to do with anything if he hasn't broken any rules? complying with "recommendations" yet can't see his child if he doesn't?

A 12 year old vaccinated child has a statistically zero chance of dying from covid, and vaccinated people are spreading it more than unvaccinated but father not seeing their child is fine. This is the type of chit that makes people blow each other brains out.

Quebec going full retard fascist as of late.
positivity brah crew
dont take my posts too srs crew srs
JFL @ everything crew
lol @ tradies srs crew
BIG LOL @ sky tradies srs crew (RealAesthetic)
indian crew
living in clown world crew so screw it crew
anti-degen crew
post 1654245773 01-13-2022, 06:53 AM
-
#3
  1. CalmWind
  2. Yeshua is Messiah
  1. CalmWind
  2. Yeshua is Messiah
  3. Join Date: Sep 2012
  4. Location: Florida, United States
  5. Posts: 27,975
  6. Rep Power: 143687
imagine thinking it's okay to interfere in another persons family like this
Ave Christus Rex

Toxic Masculinity crew.
Pureblood crew.
Wholesome crew.
post 1654245783 01-13-2022, 06:53 AM
-
#4
  1. Bracket199
  2. Smile Motherfcuker!
  1. Bracket199
  2. Smile Motherfcuker!
  3. Join Date: Feb 2008
  4. Location: Ontario, Canada
  5. Age: 35
  6. Posts: 7,337
  7. Rep Power: 28787
Here's a better article, OP.

https://montreal.ctvnews.ca/it-sets-...hild-1.5737271
The father admitted in court that he was not vaccinated against COVID-19. The judge also described him as a “conspiracy theorist” based on evidence from his ******** page, “so that the Court has strong reasons to doubt that he respects health measures as he claims to do in his written statement,” the ruling stated.

...

Justice Vaillancourt also wanted to take into account the best interests of the 12-year-old’s younger sisters, aged seven months and four years old, since both of them are not eligible for the vaccine in Canada and could potentially be more exposed to the virus if the father had access to his teen son.
Imagine putting your own ego over a shot, and refusing it for your child. Just LMAO.
++ Positive Crew ++

*Go to theme parks and sit with strangers in rides. To get social pics for Tinder Crew*
*Phone the talking clock just to hear someones voice Crew*
post 1654245823 01-13-2022, 06:54 AM
-
#5
  1. rectifryer
  2. enlightened
  1. rectifryer
  2. enlightened
  3. Join Date: Sep 2012
  4. Posts: 25,634
  5. Rep Power: 208783
protip if the system had the power to do it in the first place then it was never temporary
Boycott foodservice industry crew
post 1654245863 01-13-2022, 06:55 AM
-
#6
  1. CalmWind
  2. Yeshua is Messiah
  1. CalmWind
  2. Yeshua is Messiah
  3. Join Date: Sep 2012
  4. Location: Florida, United States
  5. Posts: 27,975
  6. Rep Power: 143687
Originally Posted By Bracket199⏩
Here's a better article, OP.

https://montreal.ctvnews.ca/it-sets-...hild-1.5737271



Imagine putting your own ego over a shot, and refusing it for your child. Just LMAO.
Government is not your daddy. They are not there to micromanage everyone's lives.


Government is only tolerated so we can carry out the required activities of a functioning sovereign state, such as trade, diplomacy, and the national defense.


After that, we are free people under God, and should not live our lives under the tyranny and oppression of others.
Ave Christus Rex

Toxic Masculinity crew.
Pureblood crew.
Wholesome crew.
post 1654246033 01-13-2022, 06:59 AM
-
#7
  1. GuineaDago585
  2. Bert McGirt
  1. GuineaDago585
  2. Bert McGirt
  3. Join Date: Nov 2012
  4. Posts: 40,584
  5. Subscribers: 3
  6. Rep Power: 406124
Been telling beavercels for years they need to tell Quebec to fuk off. Canada is completely cucked by these ass lickers. Should’ve let them break off years ago.
post 1654246043 01-13-2022, 06:59 AM
-
#8
  1. MonsieurWhite
  2. The Most Racist Man Alive
  1. MonsieurWhite
  2. The Most Racist Man Alive
  3. Join Date: Aug 2020
  4. Posts: 3,629
  5. Rep Power: 37104
Originally Posted By Bracket199⏩
Here's a better article, OP.

https://montreal.ctvnews.ca/it-sets-...hild-1.5737271



Imagine putting your own ego over a shot, and refusing it for your child. Just LMAO.
He probably prefers being alive to see his children grow up. He probably prefers resisting any and all forms of government tyranny as he wants his children to never have to suffer the same.

Imagine being a misc poster who thinks he has any insight on what a father should be doing for his children and his own health.
Dear Federal Agents- All my posts are serious and I am a threat to society.
post 1654246213 01-13-2022, 07:02 AM
-
#9
  1. sooby
  2. WOATbrah of peace :)
  1. sooby
  2. WOATbrah of peace :)
  3. Join Date: Feb 2015
  4. Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  5. Posts: 43,319
  6. Rep Power: 219409
Originally Posted By Bracket199⏩
Here's a better article, OP.

https://montreal.ctvnews.ca/it-sets-...hild-1.5737271



Imagine putting your own ego over a shot, and refusing it for your child. Just LMAO.
imagine the government not allowing you to see your child unless you start sucking dink on live television. "omg the ego on the father that wouldn't suck dink to see their children!". That's basically how pointless the stipulation is given the children are not at any more risk than a regular flu season and the vaccines are not stopping omicron at all.
positivity brah crew
dont take my posts too srs crew srs
JFL @ everything crew
lol @ tradies srs crew
BIG LOL @ sky tradies srs crew (RealAesthetic)
indian crew
living in clown world crew so screw it crew
anti-degen crew
post 1654246383 01-13-2022, 07:05 AM
-
#10
  1. Bracket199
  2. Smile Motherfcuker!
  1. Bracket199
  2. Smile Motherfcuker!
  3. Join Date: Feb 2008
  4. Location: Ontario, Canada
  5. Age: 35
  6. Posts: 7,337
  7. Rep Power: 28787
Originally Posted By CalmWind⏩
Government is not your daddy. They are not there to micromanage everyone's lives.


Government is only tolerated so we can carry out the required activities of a functioning sovereign state, such as trade, diplomacy, and the national defense.


After that, we are free people under God, and should not live our lives under the tyranny and oppression of others.
That's very nice, but there's no tyranny and oppression being done here. It's a simple request and he's refusing it over his child because of his ego.

I also don't understand what you're talking about with your "God" line.
Originally Posted By MonsieurWhite⏩
He probably prefers being alive to see his children grow up. He probably prefers resisting any and all forms of government tyranny as he wants his children to never have to suffer the same.

Imagine being a misc poster who thinks he has any insight on what a father should be doing for his children and his own health.
You're going to live even with the vaccine, it adds extra protection. There's no form of tyranny here - just idiorcracy.

Unless he had a medical exemption from his Doctor stating "I'm immunocompromised and cannot take the shot due to an ingredient inside..." the judge would change their response.

Imagine being a misc poster who's so selfish that they won't do what's best for their child, only to jump on the nutz of other miscers to feel good about yourself.
++ Positive Crew ++

*Go to theme parks and sit with strangers in rides. To get social pics for Tinder Crew*
*Phone the talking clock just to hear someones voice Crew*
post 1654246593 01-13-2022, 07:10 AM
-
#11
  1. Bracket199
  2. Smile Motherfcuker!
  1. Bracket199
  2. Smile Motherfcuker!
  3. Join Date: Feb 2008
  4. Location: Ontario, Canada
  5. Age: 35
  6. Posts: 7,337
  7. Rep Power: 28787
Originally Posted By sooby⏩
imagine the government not allowing you to see your child unless you start sucking dink on live television. "omg the ego on the father that wouldn't suck dink to see their children!". That's basically how pointless the stipulation is given the children are not at any more risk than a regular flu season and the vaccines are not stopping omicron at all.
Let's stick to the argument of vaccines, and not the argument of sucking dink.

I can't find any post of yours where you don't go off on tangents when making an argument.
++ Positive Crew ++

*Go to theme parks and sit with strangers in rides. To get social pics for Tinder Crew*
*Phone the talking clock just to hear someones voice Crew*
post 1654246863 01-13-2022, 07:16 AM
-
#12
  1. ezmac31
  1. ezmac31
  3. Join Date: Jun 2009
  4. Location: Michigan, United States
  5. Age: 43
  6. Posts: 20,163
  7. Subscribers: 1
  8. Rep Power: 248294
Originally Posted By Bracket199⏩
Here's a better article, OP.

https://montreal.ctvnews.ca/it-sets-...hild-1.5737271



Imagine putting your own ego over a shot, and refusing it for your child. Just LMAO.
Imagine shilling this hard for a government that hates you. Fuk me harder daddy government!
post 1654247073 01-13-2022, 07:21 AM
-
#13
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Covid infection comes with risk others than death. Odd reductionism.
post 1654247123 01-13-2022, 07:21 AM
-
#14
  1. Slamt
  2. Registered User
  1. Slamt
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2013
  4. Age: 32
  5. Posts: 10,874
  6. Rep Power: 35518
Originally Posted By Bracket199⏩
Here's a better article, OP.

https://montreal.ctvnews.ca/it-sets-...hild-1.5737271



Imagine putting your own ego over a shot, and refusing it for your child. Just LMAO.
Anybody could give his son COVID, even the vaccinated, who are spreading it at higher rate, and the 12 yr old could then pass it on to his 4 year old and 7 month old sisters.

Should we ban everybody from seeing that 12 year old kid? Using that logic to stop an unvaccinated father from seeing his kid makes no sense.

And why the fk are judges in Canada looking at people's ******** posts and claiming they're "conspiracy theorists", just fkin lol...
post 1654247193 01-13-2022, 07:24 AM
-
#15
  1. DrAlchemist
  2. Registered User
  1. DrAlchemist
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2018
  4. Posts: 1,094
  5. Rep Power: 17181
Originally Posted By Bracket199⏩
Imagine putting your own ego over a shot, and refusing it for your child. Just LMAO.
Hope you keep the same energy when your "vaccinated" status is no longer valid unless you have your booster #37 and realize this was never truly about public health.
post 1654247293 01-13-2022, 07:26 AM
-
#16
  1. Bracket199
  2. Smile Motherfcuker!
  1. Bracket199
  2. Smile Motherfcuker!
  3. Join Date: Feb 2008
  4. Location: Ontario, Canada
  5. Age: 35
  6. Posts: 7,337
  7. Rep Power: 28787
Originally Posted By Slamt⏩
Anybody could give his son COVID, even the vaccinated, who are spreading it at higher rate, and the 12 yr old could then pass it on to his 4 year old and 7 month old sisters.

Should we ban everybody from seeing that 12 year old kid? Using that logic to stop an unvaccinated father from seeing his kid makes no sense.

And why the fk are judges in Canada looking at people's ******** posts and claiming they're "conspiracy theorists", just fkin lol...
Anybody could get concussions from wearing helmets; anybody could get injured wearing seatbelts; anybody could get STIs/babies from wearing condoms. Yet we still use them for risk reduction. A vaccine is no different.

The mom is looking out for her family - specifically the 2 unvaxxed people under her care.

The mom used the FB posts as part of her defense to bring to court. That's what you do when you go to court...

Do you think the judge did some google search of these people and made an assessment from that?
++ Positive Crew ++

*Go to theme parks and sit with strangers in rides. To get social pics for Tinder Crew*
*Phone the talking clock just to hear someones voice Crew*
post 1654247363 01-13-2022, 07:27 AM
-
#17
  1. CalmWind
  2. Yeshua is Messiah
  1. CalmWind
  2. Yeshua is Messiah
  3. Join Date: Sep 2012
  4. Location: Florida, United States
  5. Posts: 27,975
  6. Rep Power: 143687
Originally Posted By Slamt⏩
Anybody could give his son COVID, even the vaccinated, who are spreading it at higher rate, and the 12 yr old could then pass it on to his 4 year old and 7 month old sisters.

Should we ban everybody from seeing that 12 year old kid? Using that logic to stop an unvaccinated father from seeing his kid makes no sense.

And why the fk are judges in Canada looking at people's ******** posts and claiming they're "conspiracy theorists", just fkin lol...
Thats actually a great point lol.

when the kid steps outside, he's meeting unvaxxed strangers.

but brb his own dad can't see him unless he bends the knee.
Ave Christus Rex

Toxic Masculinity crew.
Pureblood crew.
Wholesome crew.
post 1654247373 01-13-2022, 07:27 AM
-
#18
  1. extendlol
  2. Registered User
  1. extendlol
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Location: Ontario, Canada
  5. Age: 33
  6. Posts: 4,114
  7. Rep Power: 4747
Originally Posted By Bracket199⏩
Imagine putting your own ego over a shot, and refusing it for your child. Just LMAO.
lol @ being ok with the government being able to restrict family visit when the person has not committed a crime.
*Voices opinion without fear of being negged crew*


*SHAME 🔔 SHAME 🔔 SHAME 🔔 SHAME 🔔 SHAME 🔔 SHAME 🔔 SHAME 🔔 Crew*
post 1654247543 01-13-2022, 07:29 AM
-
#19
  1. chaunce54
  2. Platinum User
  1. chaunce54
  2. Platinum User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2010
  4. Age: 50
  5. Posts: 32,523
  6. Rep Power: 202517
Originally Posted By Bracket199⏩
Let's stick to the argument of vaccines, and not the argument of sucking dink.

I can't find any post of yours where you don't go off on tangents when making an argument.
OK, the vaccine doesn't stop you from catching and spreading the virus, so even if the father is vaccinated, he could still give the children COVID...
^^Former 300+lb Crew^^

WWPB2D

Nothing worthwile is ever easy.

The beatings will continue until morale improves.
post 1654247683 01-13-2022, 07:34 AM
-
#20
  1. Slamt
  2. Registered User
  1. Slamt
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2013
  4. Age: 32
  5. Posts: 10,874
  6. Rep Power: 35518
Originally Posted By Bracket199⏩
Anybody could get concussions from wearing helmets; anybody could get injured wearing seatbelts; anybody could get STIs/babies from wearing condoms. Yet we still use them for risk reduction. A vaccine is no different.

The mom is looking out for her family - specifically the 2 unvaxxed people under her care.
Risk reduction, how? There is no less risk of you getting covid interacting with a vaccinated person vs non. Everything around you and the data from Ontario is showing this...

This is like you wearing 2 condoms for "extra protection" and pretending that it works and telling other people that it's a good idea.

Also, people calling others "conspiracy theorists" these days = somebody said something I don't agree with so I'm going to lump them in with flat earthers and moon landing deniers, it's a crock of chit.

The conspiracy theorists are batting nearly 1.000 regarding COVID.
post 1654247793 01-13-2022, 07:38 AM
-
#21
  1. yewotm8
  2. Registered User
  1. yewotm8
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2017
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 17,781
  6. Rep Power: 50628
Originally Posted By Bracket199⏩
Here's a better article, OP.

https://montreal.ctvnews.ca/it-sets-...hild-1.5737271



Imagine putting your own ego over a shot, and refusing it for your child. Just LMAO.
"Just keep cucking so that the government will let you see your kids!"
post 1654247843 01-13-2022, 07:38 AM
-
#22
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By chaunce54⏩
OK, the vaccine doesn't stop you from catching and spreading the virus, so even if the father is vaccinated, he could still give the children COVID...
Stop? No. Reduce the chances? Yes
Originally Posted By Slamt⏩
Risk reduction, how? There is no less risk of you getting covid interacting with a vaccinated person vs non. Everything around you and the data from Ontario is showing this...
Vaccination does reduce the risk of infection according to the data from Ontario.
post 1654247883 01-13-2022, 07:40 AM
-
#23
  1. CalmWind
  2. Yeshua is Messiah
  1. CalmWind
  2. Yeshua is Messiah
  3. Join Date: Sep 2012
  4. Location: Florida, United States
  5. Posts: 27,975
  6. Rep Power: 143687
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Stop? No. Reduce the chances? Yes



Vaccination does reduce the risk of infection according to the data from Ontario.
The kid is going to be exposed to unvaccinated kids and adults when he goes outside in public.

but brb his own dad cant see him


The psychological and emotional trauma inflicted upon this family is worse than any COVID risk. Especially since the kid himself is vaxxed.
Ave Christus Rex

Toxic Masculinity crew.
Pureblood crew.
Wholesome crew.
post 1654247933 01-13-2022, 07:42 AM
-
#24
  1. chaunce54
  2. Platinum User
  1. chaunce54
  2. Platinum User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2010
  4. Age: 50
  5. Posts: 32,523
  6. Rep Power: 202517
Originally Posted By CalmWind⏩
The kid is going to be exposed to unvaccinated kids and adults when he goes outside in public.

but brb his own dad cant see him


The psychological and emotional trauma inflicted upon this family is worse than any COVID risk. Especially since the kid himself is vaxxed.
I guess we need to put all kids in bubbles to protect them from a cold.

^^Former 300+lb Crew^^

WWPB2D

Nothing worthwile is ever easy.

The beatings will continue until morale improves.
post 1654248303 01-13-2022, 07:50 AM
-
#25
  1. EagleOfWar
  2. Registered User
  1. EagleOfWar
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2011
  4. Posts: 15,643
  5. Rep Power: 107090
Originally Posted By Bracket199⏩
That's very nice, but there's no tyranny and oppression being done here. It's a simple request and he's refusing it over his child because of his ego.

I also don't understand what you're talking about with your "God" line.



You're going to live even with the vaccine, it adds extra protection. There's no form of tyranny here - just idiorcracy.

Unless he had a medical exemption from his Doctor stating "I'm immunocompromised and cannot take the shot due to an ingredient inside..." the judge would change their response.

Imagine being a misc poster who's so selfish that they won't do what's best for their child, only to jump on the nutz of other miscers to feel good about yourself.
Wut?? You are part of the problem numbskull. “ItS a SiMpLe ReQuEsT” bullchit. It’s tyranny period. The government has no place “requesting” someone put experimental drugs in their body by using their children as collateral. What’s best for the child is him able to see his father, this bullchit shot has nothing to do with it. I hope the father takes matters into his own hands. You halfwits supporting this are in for a rude awakening when it comes to something that will effect you, though I highly doubt you won’t roll over and take that too because you stand for nothing.
This body holding me, be my reminder here that I am not alone.
Makes me feel eternal, all this Pain is an Illusion.
post 1654248353 01-13-2022, 07:52 AM
-
#26
  1. Schnitzl
  2. calf of peace
  1. Schnitzl
  2. calf of peace
  3. Join Date: Nov 2011
  4. Posts: 20,067
  5. Rep Power: 183416
Fkin lol @ this news, I remember watching some Stephen Crowder bits video from exactly a month ago where a guy made a joke about this exact topic and they all laughed. Whose laughing now?

00:41 - 00:50

post 1654248523 01-13-2022, 07:57 AM
-
#27
  1. sooby
  2. WOATbrah of peace :)
  1. sooby
  2. WOATbrah of peace :)
  3. Join Date: Feb 2015
  4. Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  5. Posts: 43,319
  6. Rep Power: 219409
Originally Posted By Bracket199⏩
Let's stick to the argument of vaccines, and not the argument of sucking dink.

I can't find any post of yours where you don't go off on tangents when making an argument.
The argument was that is how pointless it is. I just made a comparison because alot of miscers quite literally have dick for brains so maybe it would be easier to understand. Read the rest of my post. Not seeing the bigger picture and shifting arguments is a theme of your posts. Case in point it's not about "well why doesn't he just comply get the vaccine!". It's about the idea of courts forcing/imposing intrusive and non-sensical stipulations on people's families that have no bearing on what the reality is. It's "victim blaming" logic. Maybe you just don't understand that but that is okay.

You made the point that he is going to live even with the vaccine. So are the children, whether he is vaccinated or not so what's your point? "It's a pandemic!" is not a reasonable argument anymore. It's on the courts to show and demonstrate that an unvaccinated father is a threat to children, not the other way around. Are they, or are they not? Have fathers not been able to see their children over flu shots? There would maybe be an argument if vaccines actually stopped or significantly reduced the spread and if the children were immunocompromised in any way. None of that is present. Are the courts just going to take away people's children for being unvaccinated and making ******** posts because they are deemed a danger and a public health risk.
positivity brah crew
dont take my posts too srs crew srs
JFL @ everything crew
lol @ tradies srs crew
BIG LOL @ sky tradies srs crew (RealAesthetic)
indian crew
living in clown world crew so screw it crew
anti-degen crew
post 1654248673 01-13-2022, 08:01 AM
-
#28
  1. lightsarefallin
  2. Nukem
  1. lightsarefallin
  2. Nukem
  3. Join Date: Oct 2010
  4. Location: Canada
  5. Posts: 57,269
  6. Rep Power: 504833
I wonder if the mom had something to do with this. It would be a great angle to exploit if you wanted to do some damage to the father and prevent him from seeing his own children.
*Look at reflection in car window and flex every time crew*
*Use half the roll to wipe after a poo crew*
*Fart in the gym and blame rotten smell on faulty ventilation crew*
*Fart at home and blame it on the dog crew*
*Watch neutron-star density poop mock me as water flushes around it and it stays put crew*
*Drive 2 minutes in the summer and back of shirt gets completely wet crew*
*Coffee black as midnight on a moonless night crew*
*Fat shame my cat on a daily basis crew*
post 1654248683 01-13-2022, 08:02 AM
-
#29
  1. dannyg1217
  2. Registered User
  1. dannyg1217
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2007
  4. Location: Greeley, Colorado, United States
  5. Age: 45
  6. Posts: 14,987
  7. Rep Power: 62602
Originally Posted By Bracket199⏩
That's very nice, but there's no tyranny and oppression being done here. It's a simple request and he's refusing it over his child because of his ego.

I also don't understand what you're talking about with your "God" line.



You're going to live even with the vaccine, it adds extra protection. There's no form of tyranny here - just idiorcracy.

Unless he had a medical exemption from his Doctor stating "I'm immunocompromised and cannot take the shot due to an ingredient inside..." the judge would change their response.

Imagine being a misc poster who's so selfish that they won't do what's best for their child, only to jump on the nutz of other miscers to feel good about yourself.
wut? Forcing injections and medical choices is exactly tyranny, then basically holding the kid hostage as bait. Get a grip on reality, grow a set, then get a booster.
Yellow fever crew
High test Manlet crew
EE master race

5'7" @ 175
PRs, B325 S405 D405
post 1654248723 01-13-2022, 08:03 AM
-
#30
  1. ymer
  1. ymer
  3. Join Date: Feb 2005
  4. Posts: 24,422
  5. Rep Power: 85485
Post deleted by user
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts