Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » Pfizer data due today
  1. Results 1 to 30 of 31
  2. Page 1 of 2
  3. 1
  4. 2
  6. Last

Thread: Pfizer data due today

post 1657133733 03-01-2022, 12:07 PM
-
#1
  1. Joseph1990
  2. Keto shill
  1. Joseph1990
  2. Keto shill
  3. Join Date: Nov 2010
  4. Location: Canada
  5. Posts: 18,531
  6. Rep Power: 75714

Pfizer data due today

Anyone paying attention to this?

Related: 11% effective in 5-11 yr old's.

Inb4 JLC.

adverse effects begin on page 30. seen below

Spoiler!

https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads...experience.pdf




Dr. Ruben on FDA Meeting To Discuss Covid-19 Vaccines For 5 TO 12 Year-Old Children
"We're never gonna learn about how safe the vaccine is until we start giving it."





https://lynnwoodtimes.com/2022/01/31...zer-may220131/
Control group crew membership revoked 7/5/2022 1:50pm PST not proud.

Inb4 honorable FDA/CDC/NIH/WHO representatives

J.L.C,
NextPound,
mgftp,
SillieBazzillie.
post 1657134083 03-01-2022, 12:12 PM
-
#2
  1. AncientYouth
  2. Registered User
  1. AncientYouth
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2013
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Age: 62
  6. Posts: 22,213
  7. Rep Power: 65479
just 2 more.............................................. .......
post 1657134543 03-01-2022, 12:19 PM
-
#3
  1. multiplemiggs
  2. P E R V E R T
  1. multiplemiggs
  2. P E R V E R T
  3. Join Date: Nov 2019
  4. Posts: 57,385
  5. Rep Power: 568972
Originally Posted By TugOfPeace⏩
"None of the deaths were considered related to vaccination"

Gee how convenient. If the only difference between the vaccinated and placebo group is the vaccine, what else would explain the increase in mortality?
And yet if you get in a car accident and die they report your death as covid positive.
SPOT SOLD TO FROGTECH - 100% NATURAL GENETIC FROG FIBRES

see Krackerjacked's sig

never underestimate the slootiness of a sloot
-DrugsToGetBig

ratchet girls love the ebt flex
-havoc00
post 1657135733 03-01-2022, 12:39 PM
-
#4
  1. Joseph1990
  2. Keto shill
  1. Joseph1990
  2. Keto shill
  3. Join Date: Nov 2010
  4. Location: Canada
  5. Posts: 18,531
  6. Rep Power: 75714
bump
Control group crew membership revoked 7/5/2022 1:50pm PST not proud.

Inb4 honorable FDA/CDC/NIH/WHO representatives

J.L.C,
NextPound,
mgftp,
SillieBazzillie.
post 1657136573 03-01-2022, 12:56 PM
-
#5
  1. katya422
  1. katya422
  3. Join Date: Dec 2011
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 34,673
  6. Rep Power: 372543
According to court documents, the FDA originally only “allocated the equivalent of nearly 11 full-time staff to this project.”

Then, to meet the demand of reviewing so many papers, “The FDA […] plans to hire 15 contractors, ‘detail’ 8 agency employees, and assign 5.5 of its normal review staff to the project, for a total of 28.5 reviewers.” It seems a daunting task, then, to have less than 30 workers review 55,000 pages in one month.

As a result, the FDA “insists it must delay its first 55,000-page production until May 1, 2022 – four months after the Court entered its order.”

However, the FDA received Pfizer’s Biologics License Application (BLA) in May of 2021, which, again, included more than 450,000 pages, and was able to review and approve the application by August that same year according to the administration’s approval letter.To accomplish this task, the FDA would have had to examine roughly 112,500 pages a month.
Oh sure, I'm totally buying that they had plenty of qualified staff to make a careful review of the 450,000 pages in order to approve a novel genetic therapy to prime the immune system, a technology previously never approved, in only 4 months...

BUT they need to have all of those documents carefully reviewed [redacted???] prior to releasing them to the public.

Is there an entity in existence with the power to force the release of the information? Unreviewed, unredacted, raw, as is???

Perhaps an attorney could file suit stating that the FDA is compromised in this issue [they get about half their budget from pharmaceutical companies] and that asking them nicely to turn over these documents is the equivalent of requesting that they give testimony against themselves?

Just because I'm here and this is regarding legal stuff, here is a link to the opening statement in the case being prosecuted in the international criminal court. I haven't found time to watch it yet.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/rkYufI53tfvJ/
INTP Crew
Inattentive ADD Crew
Mom That Miscs Crew
post 1657136633 03-01-2022, 12:56 PM
-
#6
  1. Skeptical_Hippo
  2. Banned
  1. Skeptical_Hippo
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Dec 2009
  4. Location: Los Angeles, California, United States
  5. Posts: 26,147
  6. Rep Power: 0
Just LMAO @ jabcells
post 1657138333 03-01-2022, 01:23 PM
-
#7
  1. Joseph1990
  2. Keto shill
  1. Joseph1990
  2. Keto shill
  3. Join Date: Nov 2010
  4. Location: Canada
  5. Posts: 18,531
  6. Rep Power: 75714
Propaganda incoming
Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine gave children 5 and older strong protection against hospitalization and death even during the omicron surge that hit youngsters especially hard, U.S. health officials reported Tuesday.
https://apnews.com/article/coronavir...source=Twitter
Control group crew membership revoked 7/5/2022 1:50pm PST not proud.

Inb4 honorable FDA/CDC/NIH/WHO representatives

J.L.C,
NextPound,
mgftp,
SillieBazzillie.
post 1657139373 03-01-2022, 01:38 PM
-
#8
  1. Joseph1990
  2. Keto shill
  1. Joseph1990
  2. Keto shill
  3. Join Date: Nov 2010
  4. Location: Canada
  5. Posts: 18,531
  6. Rep Power: 75714
Control group crew membership revoked 7/5/2022 1:50pm PST not proud.

Inb4 honorable FDA/CDC/NIH/WHO representatives

J.L.C,
NextPound,
mgftp,
SillieBazzillie.
post 1657169793 03-01-2022, 09:05 PM
-
#9
  1. Joseph1990
  2. Keto shill
  1. Joseph1990
  2. Keto shill
  3. Join Date: Nov 2010
  4. Location: Canada
  5. Posts: 18,531
  6. Rep Power: 75714
bump, op updated with adverse effects page collage.
Control group crew membership revoked 7/5/2022 1:50pm PST not proud.

Inb4 honorable FDA/CDC/NIH/WHO representatives

J.L.C,
NextPound,
mgftp,
SillieBazzillie.
post 1657170523 03-01-2022, 09:17 PM
-
#10
  1. moosik85
  2. Registered User
  1. moosik85
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2011
  4. Posts: 14,890
  5. Rep Power: 81638
Originally Posted By Joseph1990⏩
Propaganda incoming


https://apnews.com/article/coronavir...source=Twitter
Funny how kids were untouched by covid till they started mass vaccinations of 5-11 year olds
Plant the trees in whose shade your grandchildren will play
post 1657171383 03-01-2022, 09:37 PM
-
#11
  1. katya422
  1. katya422
  3. Join Date: Dec 2011
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 34,673
  6. Rep Power: 372543
Originally Posted By Joseph1990⏩
bump, op updated with adverse effects page collage.
Print too too tiny.

Sort of surprised the chart going against the vax was published in the NYT.
INTP Crew
Inattentive ADD Crew
Mom That Miscs Crew
post 1657171473 03-01-2022, 09:39 PM
-
#12
  1. Ratfish
  1. Ratfish
  3. Join Date: Jul 2009
  4. Location: Portland, Oregon, United States
  5. Posts: 113,850
  6. Rep Power: 576095
negative efficacy means it's working
Make Europe Germany Again
post 1657171643 03-01-2022, 09:42 PM
-
#13
  1. Joseph1990
  2. Keto shill
  1. Joseph1990
  2. Keto shill
  3. Join Date: Nov 2010
  4. Location: Canada
  5. Posts: 18,531
  6. Rep Power: 75714
Originally Posted By katya422⏩
Print too too tiny.

Sort of surprised the chart going against the vax was published in the NYT.
I linked the PDF under it.

https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads...experience.pdf

Starts at page 30. They still have till the end of the day to release the other 10k pages.
Control group crew membership revoked 7/5/2022 1:50pm PST not proud.

Inb4 honorable FDA/CDC/NIH/WHO representatives

J.L.C,
NextPound,
mgftp,
SillieBazzillie.
post 1657173683 03-01-2022, 10:17 PM
-
#14
  1. katya422
  1. katya422
  3. Join Date: Dec 2011
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 34,673
  6. Rep Power: 372543
Originally Posted By TugOfPeace⏩
Why do skeptics keep calling the vaccines gene therapy.. makes them sound uneducated

"gene therapy"
Not sure if srs, but that is what it was previously called. Some months back I even linked an article by a trade group [gene therapy] that referred to the mRNA shots as gene therapy.

It is a multi-dose injection treatment that utilizes genetic material [mRNA] in a therapeutic way to prime the immune system to recognize the spike protein portion of COVID-19.

But they just went with "vaccine" because people think vaccines are good [they are generally].
INTP Crew
Inattentive ADD Crew
Mom That Miscs Crew
post 1657190593 03-02-2022, 07:59 AM
-
#15
  1. 5x10
  2. Banned
  1. 5x10
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Apr 2007
  4. Age: 47
  5. Posts: 49,580
  6. Rep Power: 0
1200 deaths in 3 months
Dallas Cowboys

Lifted for 30 years

Ass > tits
No Debt Crew
post 1657190633 03-02-2022, 07:59 AM
-
#16
  1. IronFeta
  2. Preregistered User
  1. IronFeta
  2. Preregistered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2020
  4. Posts: 15,572
  5. Rep Power: 95979
Originally Posted By TugOfPeace⏩
"None of the deaths were considered related to vaccination"

Gee how convenient. If the only difference between the vaccinated and placebo group is the vaccine, what else would explain the increase in mortality?
What increase in mortality, the 21 versus 17?

How do you know this is statistically relevant and not mere chance? Probability not even once


Not sure if you're referring to something else.
post 1657190813 03-02-2022, 08:01 AM
-
#17
  1. IronFeta
  2. Preregistered User
  1. IronFeta
  2. Preregistered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2020
  4. Posts: 15,572
  5. Rep Power: 95979
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
Now apply this line of thought to the other side.
What other side?

Strong failed rebuttal
post 1657190903 03-02-2022, 08:04 AM
-
#18
  1. IronFeta
  2. Preregistered User
  1. IronFeta
  2. Preregistered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2020
  4. Posts: 15,572
  5. Rep Power: 95979
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
I mean, if you're that dumb, you wouldn't even know that you are.
Ok

So you can't debate, just poorly troll

Cheers
post 1657191863 03-02-2022, 08:22 AM
-
#19
  1. sooby
  2. WOATbrah of peace :)
  1. sooby
  2. WOATbrah of peace :)
  3. Join Date: Feb 2015
  4. Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  5. Posts: 43,319
  6. Rep Power: 219409
didn't that same study in 5-11 year olds also show a negative efficacy after 40+ days?

fukn lol.
positivity brah crew
dont take my posts too srs crew srs
JFL @ everything crew
lol @ tradies srs crew
BIG LOL @ sky tradies srs crew (RealAesthetic)
indian crew
living in clown world crew so screw it crew
anti-degen crew
post 1657192973 03-02-2022, 08:42 AM
-
#20
  1. IronFeta
  2. Preregistered User
  1. IronFeta
  2. Preregistered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2020
  4. Posts: 15,572
  5. Rep Power: 95979
Originally Posted By TugOfPeace⏩
Extrapolate that 21 vs 17 mortality to 7.5 billion people and tell me it's statistically irrelevant

Furthermore explain why there is zero reduction in mortality? If more people are dying in the vaccine group, what's the point?
How are you extrapolating that?

It's a sample, where the null hypothesis (ie, that there is no statistical significance and that the difference is mere chance) hasn't been disproved. So you can't take another random population sample and say for certainty or with high probability that you'd get similar results (ie 21 vaccinated deaths to 17 unvaccinated deaths).

That's what is meant by statistical relevance. It doesn't mean that the volume of people dying is relevant or irrelevant, it's concerning the chance of the sample occurring.

This is why I say probability = not even once



As for reduction in mortality, I'm not arguing about cause of death or efficacy. I'm arguing that attributing the several increased deaths to the vaccine when you don't even know if it's a significant result is a mistake.
post 1657193423 03-02-2022, 08:50 AM
-
#21
  1. IronFeta
  2. Preregistered User
  1. IronFeta
  2. Preregistered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2020
  4. Posts: 15,572
  5. Rep Power: 95979
Originally Posted By TugOfPeace⏩
derp

Vaccines are 95% effective

BRB 21 deaths in vaccine group and 17 deaths in placebo group

95% effective...
I said nothing about vaccine efficacy.

Attributing the deaths to the vaccine is a mistake.

Very strong miscer logic today
post 1657194083 03-02-2022, 09:04 AM
-
#22
  1. IronFeta
  2. Preregistered User
  1. IronFeta
  2. Preregistered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2020
  4. Posts: 15,572
  5. Rep Power: 95979
Originally Posted By TugOfPeace⏩
Of course none of the deaths were vaccine related, they are safe and effective

And of course a 23% increase in mortality from the placebo group compared to the vaccine group in a study of 40,000+ participants is statistically irrelevant. The study needs to be performed several times so that the numbers switch and more people die in the placebo group than the vaccine group, then the study is fair. That's how SCIENCE works.
>a 23% increase

Picture this

If one person died in the placebo group, and two in the vaccine group, that'd be a 100% increase. Is it then reasonable to extrapolate out to double the number of people with vaccines die than without, no matter how far you extrapolate, and it is definitely caused by the vaccine?
post 1657194353 03-02-2022, 09:08 AM
-
#23
  1. IronFeta
  2. Preregistered User
  1. IronFeta
  2. Preregistered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2020
  4. Posts: 15,572
  5. Rep Power: 95979
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
Pick and choose what data you want to use, standard vaxcuck tactic.
What data I want to use? We're looking at the same data. I see an erroneous conclusion being drawn, and refuted it.

Miscers are as bad about being rabidly anti-vaccine and illogical about it as twitter people are about the opposite.
post 1657194793 03-02-2022, 09:13 AM
-
#24
  1. batmanman
  2. Rep Power: 696969
  1. batmanman
  2. Rep Power: 696969
  3. Join Date: Oct 2006
  4. Location: Manhattan, Kansas, United States
  5. Age: 36
  6. Posts: 29,598
  7. Rep Power: 55554
Looks like the ugly people lost again
post 1657194973 03-02-2022, 09:15 AM
-
#25
  1. IronFeta
  2. Preregistered User
  1. IronFeta
  2. Preregistered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2020
  4. Posts: 15,572
  5. Rep Power: 95979
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
Please show me how the Pfizer vaccine is 95% effective, with two doses administered at a 21 day interval.

I'll wait.
Show me where I made any claim about vaccine efficacy.

I said there isn't a connection between vaccination and death due to vaccination supported by this data. Read the original post I replied to.

Not sheriff you're trolling or braindead. Probably both.
post 1657195943 03-02-2022, 09:29 AM
-
#26
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Wouldn't cause of death info be helpful?
post 1657196893 03-02-2022, 09:40 AM
-
#27
  1. IronFeta
  2. Preregistered User
  1. IronFeta
  2. Preregistered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2020
  4. Posts: 15,572
  5. Rep Power: 95979
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
No, but Pfizer did. Are you saying they presented data that is not correct?

Or do you admit to picking and choosing which data is correct.

Thank you!
You are denser than a dumbbell
Originally Posted By TugOfPeace⏩
I'm not sure what you're asking. The only question I see is how far you could extrapolate that data, and the answer would be that it's limited by the population size. Extrapolation is a fairly simple concept so I don't see why you can't extrapolate until the population limit is reached. It's not like this study was biased towards a particular age, race, or gender, so...???
Extrapolation is inaccurate. You'd have to have an incredibly strong correlation between being vaccinated & dying by vaccine to say a similar proportion of people would die in the vaccinated versus non-vaccinated groups on the scale of billions of people.

Attributing the vaccines to being the 'cause' of several extra deaths is a mistake because that there isn't an analysis on causality here, just raw data showing 23 vs 17 deaths. Whether that result is even significant statistically, (ie there is an actual reason for the difference in deaths rather than mere chance) hasn't been demonstrated at all.

The last sentence is the primary thing I'm trying to convey.
post 1657197053 03-02-2022, 09:43 AM
-
#28
  1. Pterodactyl314
  2. See you tomorrow
  1. Pterodactyl314
  2. See you tomorrow
  3. Join Date: Apr 2015
  4. Location: Dirty South
  5. Posts: 19,745
  6. Rep Power: 163712
I keep seeing people talking about these documents released. Isn’t this the same batch that was released 2 months ago?

https://yournews.com/2021/12/05/2261...about-pfizers/
See you tomorrow
post 1657207323 03-02-2022, 12:42 PM
-
#29
  1. CrimsonSteel
  1. CrimsonSteel
  3. Join Date: Oct 2005
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 23,808
  6. Rep Power: 162304
Over-state the COVID mortality rate.

Hide all vaccine deaths.

Still convinced this is a depopulation initiative.
post 1657235083 03-02-2022, 08:15 PM
-
#30
  1. gixxer0.6g
  2. Maximum Effort
  1. gixxer0.6g
  2. Maximum Effort
  3. Join Date: Apr 2008
  4. Location: Montana, United States
  5. Posts: 43,865
  6. Rep Power: 266599
9 pages of side effects? Is that every one? I dodmt know there were 9 pages of side effects that existed
Toxic Masculinity
  1. Page 1 of 2
  2. 1
  3. 2
  5. Last
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts