Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » Ivermectin Worked LOL 70% reduction in Mortality for tiny dose
  1. Results 1 to 29 of 29
  2. Page 1 of 1

Thread: Ivermectin Worked LOL 70% reduction in Mortality for tiny dose

post 1657479333 03-07-2022, 04:42 AM
-
#1
  1. AncientYouth
  2. Registered User
  1. AncientYouth
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2013
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Age: 62
  6. Posts: 22,213
  7. Rep Power: 65479

Ivermectin Worked LOL 70% reduction in Mortality for tiny dose

Hey Vaxcels just realise how cucked you were and everyone else how fckd we all now are economically

Ivermectin is practically free to make!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rfyOihhAD4A&t=854s
post 1657479663 03-07-2022, 04:54 AM
-
#2
  1. r32gojirra
  2. Registered NEET
  1. r32gojirra
  2. Registered NEET
  3. Join Date: Feb 2013
  4. Location: East Coast, Australia
  5. Posts: 39,473
  6. Subscribers: 6
  7. Rep Power: 592342
Can confirm

My girl didn’t want to take ivermectin so I hid it in her burgers

She didn’t get Covid

post 1657479683 03-07-2022, 04:55 AM
-
#3
  1. AncientYouth
  2. Registered User
  1. AncientYouth
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2013
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Age: 62
  6. Posts: 22,213
  7. Rep Power: 65479
Originally Posted By r32gojirra⏩
Can confirm

My girl didn’t want to take ivermectin so I hid it in her burgers

She didn’t get Covid
lucky girl
post 1657480153 03-07-2022, 05:16 AM
-
#4
  1. iabs
  2. General
  1. iabs
  2. General
  3. Join Date: Jan 2010
  4. Posts: 22,709
  5. Rep Power: 156138
If there's anything this pandemic as shown us is that the people in charge are beyond corrupt, morally bankrupt and frankly evil.

There was an obvious concerted global effort to suppress existing (effective) medications for the prevention of hospitalization and mortality from COVID, instead they pushed for Remdisivir and the jab as the cure to end the pandemic. Why else if not to line their own pockets from big pharma? All at the costs of millions of lives.

Evil.
300 Forever
post 1657480283 03-07-2022, 05:21 AM
-
#5
  1. AncientYouth
  2. Registered User
  1. AncientYouth
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2013
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Age: 62
  6. Posts: 22,213
  7. Rep Power: 65479
Originally Posted By iabs⏩
If there's anything this pandemic as shown us is that the people in charge are beyond corrupt, morally bankrupt and frankly evil.

There was an obvious concerted global effort to suppress existing (effective) medications for the prevention of hospitalization and mortality from COVID, instead they pushed for Remdisivir and the jab as the cure to end the pandemic. Why else if not to line their own pockets from big pharma? All at the costs of millions of lives.

Evil.
let alone , losing weight, eating healthy, Vitamin D ..which is Huge, exercise and a positive mental outlook
post 1657480813 03-07-2022, 05:38 AM
-
#6
  1. 128
  2. We on TV?
  1. 128
  2. We on TV?
  3. Join Date: Mar 2005
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 64,672
  6. Rep Power: 351111
The truth will leak out over time but liberals won't care, they'll be evil and stupid and authoritarian every time they feel it'll give them social credits
post 1657481503 03-07-2022, 06:03 AM
-
#7
  1. HayZues Christi
  2. Registered User
  1. HayZues Christi
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2007
  4. Age: 40
  5. Posts: 33,178
  6. Rep Power: 232547
What I don't get is why you guys see the same (actually more) effectiveness from the vaccine as "ineffective?"


When bias interferes with the consistency of logic, you've reached low iq territory.
Ol' 71st street. The devil that birthed me.

606 G0D.
post 1657481593 03-07-2022, 06:05 AM
-
#8
  1. HMFIC_BROWSIN
  2. Buy high, sell higher.
  1. HMFIC_BROWSIN
  2. Buy high, sell higher.
  3. Join Date: Feb 2009
  4. Location: Arizona, United States
  5. Posts: 73,524
  6. Rep Power: 348838
Originally Posted By HayZues
What I don't get is why you guys see the same (actually more) effectiveness from the vaccine as "ineffective?"


When bias interferes with the consistency of logic, you've reached low iq territory.
Because the myocarditis side effects of the vax are 14x higher than from a covid infection.... But not for ivermectin.
post 1657481683 03-07-2022, 06:07 AM
-
#9
  1. AncientYouth
  2. Registered User
  1. AncientYouth
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2013
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Age: 62
  6. Posts: 22,213
  7. Rep Power: 65479
Originally Posted By HayZues
What I don't get is why you guys see the same (actually more) effectiveness from the vaccine as "ineffective?"


When bias interferes with the consistency of logic, you've reached low iq territory.
ivermectin has one of the lowest risk factors of any drug , you could take it for decades with literally no side effects, its almost impossibe to overdose on............you cannot say that about these vaccines that can and do fck people up
post 1657481933 03-07-2022, 06:12 AM
-
#10
  1. JayJ350
  1. JayJ350
  3. Join Date: Sep 2017
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 38
  6. Posts: 73,290
  7. Rep Power: 273505
The only reason the media hated it was because it challenged the left's narrative.
post 1657482453 03-07-2022, 06:25 AM
-
#11
  1. jeshelton
  2. Registered User
  1. jeshelton
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2013
  4. Age: 43
  5. Posts: 11,801
  6. Rep Power: 267554
Originally Posted By HMFIC_BROWSIN⏩
Because the myocarditis side effects of the vax are 14x higher than from a covid infection.... But not for ivermectin.
445/340/545
post 1657482603 03-07-2022, 06:30 AM
-
#12
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By HMFIC_BROWSIN⏩
Because the myocarditis side effects of the vax are 14x higher than from a covid infection.... But not for ivermectin.
That'd be a strong argument if it were true.
post 1657482723 03-07-2022, 06:31 AM
-
#13
  1. AncientYouth
  2. Registered User
  1. AncientYouth
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2013
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Age: 62
  6. Posts: 22,213
  7. Rep Power: 65479
Originally Posted By HMFIC_BROWSIN⏩
Because the myocarditis side effects of the vax are 14x higher than from a covid infection.... But not for ivermectin.
i think it may be 133x higher
post 1657483953 03-07-2022, 06:59 AM
-
#14
  1. ParsleyTea
  2. Registered User
  1. ParsleyTea
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2009
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 13,588
  6. Rep Power: 50203
I wish Ivermectin had been readily available when asked for, for COVID patients. It's a shame.

Along these lines, read a troubling article this morning on how the Biden administration has been paying corporate media companies to promote the COVID vaccines and to silence critics.

"How the federal government bought pro-Covid vax propaganda (and silenced critical voices)"

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog...al_voices.html

excerpt:

Voices urging caution over the experimental mRNA shots that were relentlessly promoted throughout the media (and by the medical establishment) were confined to independent media like American Thinker until quite recently, when the evidence of adverse effects and lack of efficacy became almost impossible to ignore. How did such media uniformity, encompassing all ideological stripes from Fox News and Newsmax to MSNBC and the Washington Post, come about?



According to reports by Chris Pandolfo in The Blaze and Emerald Robinson in Substack, taxpayers financed an unprecedented advertising campaign in virtually every major national media outlet that resulted in uniformly positive coverage of the vaccines rushed to market to combat COVID. Not just the ads themselves, but the news coverage offered by these outlets positively covered the jabs, and suppressed questions about them from skeptics.

If these charges are true, they amount to an abdication of independent journalism and membership in a propaganda machine on the part of outlets that claim advertising does not affect their editorial stances.

Pandolfo writes:....
post 1657485203 03-07-2022, 07:28 AM
-
#15
  1. SUPERH0T
  2. Registered User
  1. SUPERH0T
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2018
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 4,663
  6. Rep Power: 18810
Originally Posted By AncientYouth⏩
ivermectin has one of the lowest risk factors of any drug , you could take it for decades with literally no side effects, its almost impossibe to overdose on............you cannot say that about these vaccines that can and do fck people up
Plus if you did have any parasites you didn't know about, they would be gone too.

Cats on suicide watch
SUPERHOT SUPERHOT SUPERHOT SUPERHOT

If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.

SUPERHOT SUPERHOT SUPERHOT SUPERHOT
post 1657486843 03-07-2022, 07:57 AM
-
#16
  1. Midi77
  2. Registered User
  1. Midi77
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2014
  4. Posts: 2,584
  5. Rep Power: 9426
Originally Posted By HayZues
What I don't get is why you guys see the same (actually more) effectiveness from the vaccine as "ineffective?"


When bias interferes with the consistency of logic, you've reached low iq territory.
When information about Ivermectin was repressed during a point when the vaccine WASN'T available, there is definitely an issue with that, its happened, and there was a coordinated effort to do so. Also, areas where the vaccine isn't readily available, Ivermectin is cheap and easy to produce, think how many lives COULD have been saved if not for the campaign to repress, it is truly evil.
post 1657487083 03-07-2022, 08:03 AM
-
#17
  1. dabbmw2002
  2. Trolling the trolls.....
  1. dabbmw2002
  2. Trolling the trolls.....
  3. Join Date: Jan 2007
  4. Location: Maryland, United States
  5. Posts: 73,334
  6. Rep Power: 713784
Post deleted by user
Original Ruckus
post 1657488863 03-07-2022, 08:28 AM
-
#18
  1. EdwardTheGreat
  2. Registered User
  1. EdwardTheGreat
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2013
  4. Age: 52
  5. Posts: 9,092
  6. Rep Power: 235009
Originally Posted By HayZues
What I don't get is why you guys see the same (actually more) effectiveness from the vaccine as "ineffective?"


When bias interferes with the consistency of logic, you've reached low iq territory.
The irony of this post is almost of biblical proportion.
post 1657489253 03-07-2022, 08:34 AM
-
#19
  1. Fang2
  1. Fang2
  3. Join Date: Feb 2013
  4. Posts: 73,545
  5. Subscribers: 2
  6. Rep Power: 1102150
No sht
RIP Pedro Suarez Vertiz. Te queremos Hermano

If your right leg is Thanksgiving and your left leg is Christmas, can I come and visit you between the holidays?
post 1657489323 03-07-2022, 08:35 AM
-
#20
  1. SuperHercules
  1. SuperHercules
  3. Join Date: Jun 2014
  4. Height: 6'5"
  5. Posts: 32,363
  6. Subscribers: 6
  7. Rep Power: 566098
Hopefully this somehow advanced real science for mRNA tech, otherwise jabbies got tricked for no good reason
See Shakebrah's sig
post 1657489413 03-07-2022, 08:36 AM
-
#21
  1. kcadrenalin
  2. Permanent Vacation
  1. kcadrenalin
  2. Permanent Vacation
  3. Join Date: Jun 2007
  4. Posts: 24,727
  5. Rep Power: 349124
At least Pfizer was nice enough to repackage it so the Corona-bros could take it if needed and not feel like sell-outs to the cause. At only a 40,000% cost increase mind you.....

________

MFC

________
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote. -Benjamin Franklin
Tits and Beer
post 1657489903 03-07-2022, 08:44 AM
-
#22
  1. superman704
  2. Registered User
  1. superman704
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2019
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 16,891
  6. Rep Power: 17137
Originally Posted By iabs⏩
If there's anything this pandemic as shown us is that the people in charge are beyond corrupt, morally bankrupt and frankly evil.

There was an obvious concerted global effort to suppress existing (effective) medications for the prevention of hospitalization and mortality from COVID, instead they pushed for Remdisivir and the jab as the cure to end the pandemic. Why else if not to line their own pockets from big pharma? All at the costs of millions of lives.

Evil.
Pure evil, illuminati kind of evil
John 3:16

Natty for life
Red for life
I'm not really 50, I'm 47, idk how to change the age
Autism crew (Asperger's syndrome)
High test crew
Bald crew
MAGA crew
Guys stop making me green! I actually enjoy being red! It's more alpha!
Born again Christian crew
Heavy metal crew
Sometimes the stuff I say is just ''trolling''
post 1657491043 03-07-2022, 09:02 AM
-
#23
  1. StonedDreams
  2. Registered User
  1. StonedDreams
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2014
  4. Age: 37
  5. Posts: 296
  6. Rep Power: 8814
link to study
post 1657491733 03-07-2022, 09:13 AM
-
#24
  1. katya422
  1. katya422
  3. Join Date: Dec 2011
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 34,673
  6. Rep Power: 372543


Cliffs:

- 44% reduction in infection rate
- 68% reduction in mortality for those who were infected
- 56% reduction in hospitalization



Oh, and super safe, must be approaching ZERO severe adverse effects vs. perhaps 4% to 5% of recipients experiencing symptoms severe enough to trigger seeking medical care.
Originally Posted By 128⏩
The truth will leak out over time but liberals won't care, they'll be evil and stupid and authoritarian every time they feel it'll give them social credits
I hate that I mostly agree with this. Not all liberals...
Originally Posted By ParsleyTea⏩
I wish Ivermectin had been readily available when asked for, for COVID patients. It's a shame.

Along these lines, read a troubling article this morning on how the Biden administration has been paying corporate media companies to promote the COVID vaccines and to silence critics.

"How the federal government bought pro-Covid vax propaganda (and silenced critical voices)"

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog...al_voices.html

excerpt:

Voices urging caution over the experimental mRNA shots that were relentlessly promoted throughout the media (and by the medical establishment) were confined to independent media like American Thinker until quite recently, when the evidence of adverse effects and lack of efficacy became almost impossible to ignore. How did such media uniformity, encompassing all ideological stripes from Fox News and Newsmax to MSNBC and the Washington Post, come about?



According to reports by Chris Pandolfo in The Blaze and Emerald Robinson in Substack, taxpayers financed an unprecedented advertising campaign in virtually every major national media outlet that resulted in uniformly positive coverage of the vaccines rushed to market to combat COVID. Not just the ads themselves, but the news coverage offered by these outlets positively covered the jabs, and suppressed questions about them from skeptics.

If these charges are true, they amount to an abdication of independent journalism and membership in a propaganda machine on the part of outlets that claim advertising does not affect their editorial stances.

Pandolfo writes:....
Saw that last night myself. The US paid off the media, Canada paid off the media...Australia? That is without even touching on the monopolization of media ownership.
INTP Crew
Inattentive ADD Crew
Mom That Miscs Crew
post 1657491783 03-07-2022, 09:15 AM
-
#25
  1. AncientYouth
  2. Registered User
  1. AncientYouth
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2013
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Age: 62
  6. Posts: 22,213
  7. Rep Power: 65479
Originally Posted By StonedDreams⏩
link to study
watch the video
post 1657493603 03-07-2022, 09:50 AM
-
#26
  1. HayZues Christi
  2. Registered User
  1. HayZues Christi
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2007
  4. Age: 40
  5. Posts: 33,178
  6. Rep Power: 232547
Originally Posted By EdwardTheGreat⏩
The irony of this post is almost of biblical proportion.
Please explain where the irony is. Srs.
Ol' 71st street. The devil that birthed me.

606 G0D.
post 1657493783 03-07-2022, 09:53 AM
-
#27
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Are vaccines and ivermectin contraindicated?
post 1657493843 03-07-2022, 09:54 AM
-
#28
  1. AncientYouth
  2. Registered User
  1. AncientYouth
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2013
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Age: 62
  6. Posts: 22,213
  7. Rep Power: 65479
Originally Posted By HayZues
Please explain where the irony is. Srs.
LOL there is no help for you
post 1657494853 03-07-2022, 10:12 AM
-
#29
  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Posts: 43,432
  5. Rep Power: 198579
Originally Posted By AncientYouth⏩
Hey Vaxcels just realise how cucked you were and everyone else how fckd we all now are economically

Ivermectin is practically free to make!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rfyOihhAD4A&t=854s
Ah yes, it's about time we get to hear more from people like this. Nurse teachers have been ignored by the covid experts long enough!
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts