Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » The illegitimate administration further attempting to phase out gas engines 40MPG '26
  1. Results 1 to 22 of 22
  2. Page 1 of 1

Thread: The illegitimate administration further attempting to phase out gas engines 40MPG '26

post 1659021523 04-02-2022, 09:30 PM
-
#1
  1. HairyWBush
  2. Democrats are terrorists
  1. HairyWBush
  2. Democrats are terrorists
  3. Join Date: Oct 2012
  4. Location: Florida, United States
  5. Posts: 20,103
  6. Rep Power: 77712

The illegitimate administration further attempting to phase out gas engines 40MPG '26

https://www.ocregister.com/2022/04/0...-about-24-mpg/
40 mpg by 2026. Illogical and impractical for a manufactured crisis. You've got California dumping their water supply and crying water shortage, elites flying planes, investing in EVs for the great reset and pushing for electric vehicles. BUY ELECTRIC AND YOU WON'T PAY FOR GAS! Then they'll raise that...getting played.
They don't fukin care about you. They don't actually care about the environment. More laws, more restrictions, more taxes, more screwing the american people.
How the fuk is forcing auto manufacturers to struggle to meet an unrealistic MPG figure, so they cancel models and invest MORE into a car so now it COSTS MORE, thereby having no affordable car or variety HELPING AMERICA
I can't wait till this guy just fukin hangs himself. That will save the country. Him and Peter Puffer Buttjudge need to be hung off of a crane.
R 135
L├┼┤
246

"Slide down your throat?? We chew them, savor them, suck up the little juice left behind in the shell then swallow them. Only amateurs try to swallow them whole."
-Kingfabian: BBC loads: https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=181634953&p=1666337753&viewfull=1#post1666337753
"America lost pretty much every war in history lol" -pandaboy89
as seen here: https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=180019913&p=1636230303&viewfull=1#post1636230303
post 1659021853 04-02-2022, 09:42 PM
-
#2
  1. nickh04
  2. Registered User
  1. nickh04
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2011
  4. Location: Sacramento, California, United States
  5. Posts: 25,770
  6. Rep Power: 211884
yea but mean tweets were way worse
-MS Paint/Chop crew
-GIF crew
-Tradie crew
-No mask/vaccine crew


Neg on site for reddit and tiktok threads dedsrs
post 1659021993 04-02-2022, 09:45 PM
-
#3
  1. HairyWBush
  2. Democrats are terrorists
  1. HairyWBush
  2. Democrats are terrorists
  3. Join Date: Oct 2012
  4. Location: Florida, United States
  5. Posts: 20,103
  6. Rep Power: 77712
Originally Posted By nickh04⏩
yea but mean tweets were way worse
that damn NAZI TYRANT Trump! i remember some stupid ped0crat fuk on this forum charaded around getting trump removed. he said something like we avoided a dictatorship with a stroke of a pen and we'll do it again with a vote. what a stupid lowlife low iq brainwashed dumb mother fukker. I wanted to do more than neg him. my blood boils at just the reminder that this nation's fate is determined by people like that, to vote for someone that campaigned on TELLING YOU, ADMITTING that he will destroy the wellbeing of this country. HE OPENLY DISCUSSED IT
AND PEOPLE VOTED FOR HIM
R 135
L├┼┤
246

"Slide down your throat?? We chew them, savor them, suck up the little juice left behind in the shell then swallow them. Only amateurs try to swallow them whole."
-Kingfabian: BBC loads: https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=181634953&p=1666337753&viewfull=1#post1666337753
"America lost pretty much every war in history lol" -pandaboy89
as seen here: https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=180019913&p=1636230303&viewfull=1#post1636230303
post 1659022433 04-02-2022, 10:09 PM
-
#4
  1. propreffered7
  2. Registered User
  1. propreffered7
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2010
  4. Posts: 36,839
  5. Rep Power: 86393
one thing i don't understand is like.. ok, gas emissions will be lower

but if everybody is going electric

doesn't that mean more electricity has to be produced? and the main source of electricity is oil... so you'll need more oil consumption for more electricity. sooooo didn't really change anything

i'll admit im unaware of the significance in c02 emissions from gas compared to battery. guess it's possible gas would be way more, but still..
post 1659047483 04-03-2022, 01:14 PM
-
#5
  1. ChewYourFood
  2. ▪█───────█▪
  1. ChewYourFood
  2. ▪█───────█▪
  3. Join Date: Aug 2012
  4. Posts: 10,731
  5. Rep Power: 89931
Originally Posted By propreffered7⏩
one thing i don't understand is like.. ok, gas emissions will be lower

but if everybody is going electric

doesn't that mean more electricity has to be produced? and the main source of electricity is oil... so you'll need more oil consumption for more electricity. sooooo didn't really change anything

i'll admit im unaware of the significance in c02 emissions from gas compared to battery. guess it's possible gas would be way more, but still..
Very shortsighted and lots of unintended consequences.

More demand for electricity = price goes up for literally everything.
post 1659047663 04-03-2022, 01:19 PM
-
#6
  1. propreffered7
  2. Registered User
  1. propreffered7
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2010
  4. Posts: 36,839
  5. Rep Power: 86393
Originally Posted By ChewYourFood⏩
Very shortsighted and lots of unintended consequences.

More demand for electricity = price goes up for literally everything.
yea, i reckon they'll parrot it's the "green movement" so it's larger than just oil production for electricity

there's coal, hydro, wind, solar, nuclear, etc.

but oil is still the main component. nuclear is being more implemented but not in such a short time frame, and hydro, solar, wind are pretty inefficient. nuclear i think also has very high start up costs but then once running is super efficient. massive solar farms taking up tons of land only power a fraction from the electrical grid.

so increased electric vehicles still means increased oil production imo

and we're not even going into the other deleterious effects for EV's
post 1659047783 04-03-2022, 01:22 PM
-
#7
  1. saltypits
  1. saltypits
  3. Join Date: Feb 2016
  4. Posts: 14,085
  5. Rep Power: 54189
Very little oil is used to generate electricity.

Coal is still used lots worldwide. China has over a thousand. The USA has about 200.
post 1659047803 04-03-2022, 01:23 PM
-
#8
  1. DolphinPilot
  1. DolphinPilot
  3. Join Date: May 2015
  4. Posts: 49,469
  5. Rep Power: 367822
This is all about optics. The can will continue to be kicked down the road almost indefinitely on this issue.
post 1659047833 04-03-2022, 01:24 PM
-
#9
  1. GooBaaa
  1. GooBaaa
  3. Join Date: Sep 2011
  4. Location: Buffalo NY
  5. Posts: 58,796
  6. Subscribers: 5
  7. Rep Power: 435492
Originally Posted By propreffered7⏩
yea, i reckon they'll parrot it's the "green movement" so it's larger than just oil production for electricity

there's coal, hydro, wind, solar, nuclear, etc.

but oil is still the main component. nuclear is being more implemented but not in such a short time frame, and hydro, solar, wind are pretty inefficient. nuclear i think also has very high start up costs but then once running is super efficient. massive solar farms taking up tons of land only power a fraction from the electrical grid.

so increased electric vehicles still means increased oil production imo

and we're not even going into the other deleterious effects for EV's
Hydro doesn't belong in the same sentence as solar and wind.....
post 1659047993 04-03-2022, 01:28 PM
-
#10
  1. propreffered7
  2. Registered User
  1. propreffered7
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2010
  4. Posts: 36,839
  5. Rep Power: 86393
Originally Posted By saltypits⏩
Very little oil is used to generate electricity.

Coal is still used lots worldwide. China has over a thousand. The USA has about 200.
i wasn't really speaking worldwide. in the u.s. oil is the most used

i feel like i've read sources with more but natural gas (fossil fuel) is about 40% while coal is 22%. again, that's the u.s.
Total - all sources 4,116
Fossil fuels (total) 2,504 60.8%
Natural gas 1,575 38.3%
Coal 899
21.8%
Petroleum (total) 19
0.5%
Petroleum liquids 11 0.3%
Petroleum coke 7 0.2%
Other gases3 11 0.3%
Nuclear 778 18.9%
Renewables (total) 826 20.1%
Wind 380
9.2%
Hydropower 260 6.3%
Solar (total)
115
2.8%
Photovoltaic 112
2.8%
Solar thermal 3
0.1%
Biomass (total) 55 1.3%
Wood 37 0.9%
Landfill gas 10 0.2%
Municipal solid waste (biogenic) 6
0.2%
Other biomass waste 2
0.1%
https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=427&t=3

so.. take gas stations and all that fuel. but replace them with ev charging stations

the ev charging stations will require more electricity which will require more oil

UNLESS they can get the other sources more efficient. but i dont think they're there. possibly if they switched to mostly nuclear but a) not sure people want it b) not sure we're there
post 1659048723 04-03-2022, 01:48 PM
-
#11
  1. turdburglar9021
  2. Registered User
  1. turdburglar9021
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2013
  4. Posts: 1,709
  5. Rep Power: 6847
It's muh right to buy a gas guzzler then blame prez bidet for spending $75 week to roll coal on pedestrians
post 1659050543 04-03-2022, 02:26 PM
-
#12
  1. EDcellent
  2. You too
  1. EDcellent
  2. You too
  3. Join Date: May 2009
  4. Location: Connecticut, United States
  5. Posts: 14,086
  6. Rep Power: 140306
With the relatively big demand for SUVs and trucks in the US, I doubt we won't feasibly see those numbers anytime soon.
post 1659051183 04-03-2022, 02:36 PM
-
#13
  1. saltypits
  1. saltypits
  3. Join Date: Feb 2016
  4. Posts: 14,085
  5. Rep Power: 54189
Originally Posted By propreffered7⏩
i wasn't really speaking worldwide. in the u.s. oil is the most used

i feel like i've read sources with more but natural gas (fossil fuel) is about 40% while coal is 22%. again, that's the u.s.



https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=427&t=3

so.. take gas stations and all that fuel. but replace them with ev charging stations

the ev charging stations will require more electricity which will require more oil

UNLESS they can get the other sources more efficient. but i dont think they're there. possibly if they switched to mostly nuclear but a) not sure people want it b) not sure we're there
Do you even remember what you wrote?
post 1659051213 04-03-2022, 02:36 PM
-
#14
  1. MikeLowrrrey
  1. MikeLowrrrey
  3. Join Date: Jul 2018
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 35,133
  6. Subscribers: 2
  7. Rep Power: 120067
They won't outlaw gas engines, they simply won't sell them.

95% of the population see cars as A to B options. They don't care if it runs on gas or electricity.
post 1659051533 04-03-2022, 02:42 PM
-
#15
  1. katya422
  1. katya422
  3. Join Date: Dec 2011
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 34,673
  6. Rep Power: 372543
Originally Posted By lexbishop⏩
Hypothetically speaking, if Biden and all the Commies got flushed down the toilet, and an America first candidate got elected, could this be reversed? Are these just executive orders?
I think so. I believe that the target was higher and Trump lowered it.

Practically speaking I would expect it to make big trucks and SUVs even more expensive if manufacturers have to hit a high fleet average as they will need to subsidize the high MPG vehicles with profits from the low MPG vehicles if consumers continue to prefer trucks/SUVs over sedans and compact cars.
INTP Crew
Inattentive ADD Crew
Mom That Miscs Crew
post 1659051623 04-03-2022, 02:44 PM
-
#16
  1. HairyWBush
  2. Democrats are terrorists
  1. HairyWBush
  2. Democrats are terrorists
  3. Join Date: Oct 2012
  4. Location: Florida, United States
  5. Posts: 20,103
  6. Rep Power: 77712
Originally Posted By MikeLowrrrey⏩
They won't outlaw gas engines, they simply won't sell them.

95% of the population see cars as A to B options. They don't care if it runs on gas or electricity.
because the commies have infiltrated and conditioned americans to be fat lazy bland useless tasteless emasculated biches
R 135
L├┼┤
246

"Slide down your throat?? We chew them, savor them, suck up the little juice left behind in the shell then swallow them. Only amateurs try to swallow them whole."
-Kingfabian: BBC loads: https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=181634953&p=1666337753&viewfull=1#post1666337753
"America lost pretty much every war in history lol" -pandaboy89
as seen here: https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=180019913&p=1636230303&viewfull=1#post1636230303
post 1659052313 04-03-2022, 02:58 PM
-
#17
  1. Zere0wn
  1. Zere0wn
  3. Join Date: Jun 2006
  4. Posts: 11,630
  5. Rep Power: 44327
They trying to make it too difficult for us to leave the house?
My ALT is elevated. 75.
post 1659052363 04-03-2022, 02:58 PM
-
#18
  1. dogorman7
  2. Banned
  1. dogorman7
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Nov 2014
  4. Posts: 25,849
  5. Rep Power: 0
Joe Biden and Gavin Gruesome can suck my cock

Just lol if think I’m not gonna take my sweet time paying my 700$ annual registration for my old f-250 either

Lol if you think a majority of the state will stand for this

What will you do when most of the masses refuse to stop driving their big gas guzzling trucks or diesel guzzling coal rollers ?

Send in the National Gaurd to kill your own citizens ? Lmao

You’re not my daddy

**** you

I’m not abiding by your rules bitch

Come put a bullet in my skull **** face DFS
post 1659053633 04-03-2022, 03:20 PM
-
#19
  1. Leonydus
  2. Registered User
  1. Leonydus
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2007
  4. Location: North Carolina, United States
  5. Posts: 23,260
  6. Rep Power: 156188
Originally Posted By propreffered7⏩
one thing i don't understand is like.. ok, gas emissions will be lower

but if everybody is going electric

doesn't that mean more electricity has to be produced? and the main source of electricity is oil... so you'll need more oil consumption for more electricity. sooooo didn't really change anything

i'll admit im unaware of the significance in c02 emissions from gas compared to battery. guess it's possible gas would be way more, but still..
co2 is good for plants and trees. plants are literally made of co2

converting everything to batterys wont save anything anyways, its just moving the co2 production and is less efficient. the earth goes through cooling and heating phases naturally.








then you have the paris climate accord that joe biden re-signed us up for, which will only further increase inflation as we are sending trillions to China and India, while shrinking our jobs and GDP in america.
post 1659053773 04-03-2022, 03:22 PM
-
#20
  1. rectifryer
  2. enlightened
  1. rectifryer
  2. enlightened
  3. Join Date: Sep 2012
  4. Posts: 25,634
  5. Rep Power: 208783
april fools article
Boycott foodservice industry crew
post 1659054193 04-03-2022, 03:29 PM
-
#21
  1. propreffered7
  2. Registered User
  1. propreffered7
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2010
  4. Posts: 36,839
  5. Rep Power: 86393
Originally Posted By saltypits⏩
Do you even remember what you wrote?
yes, i do.

natural gas, coal and oil are fossil fuels used for electricity. and fossil fuels are sediment from decaying organisms
Originally Posted By Leonydus⏩
co2 is good for plants and trees. plants are literally made of co2

converting everything to batterys wont save anything anyways, its just moving the co2 production and is less efficient. the earth goes through cooling and heating phases naturally.








then you have the paris climate accord that joe biden re-signed us up for, which will only further increase inflation as we are sending trillions to China and India, while shrinking our jobs and GDP in america.
agreed. i don't believe it for a second

the last ice age lasted 2 million years. but a few years in comparison DRASTICALLY alter the planet. my butthole
post 1659059063 04-03-2022, 05:07 PM
-
#22
  1. HairyWBush
  2. Democrats are terrorists
  1. HairyWBush
  2. Democrats are terrorists
  3. Join Date: Oct 2012
  4. Location: Florida, United States
  5. Posts: 20,103
  6. Rep Power: 77712
Originally Posted By rectifryer⏩
april fools article
chit, doesn't sound far fetched from them. if it is i fell for it
R 135
L├┼┤
246

"Slide down your throat?? We chew them, savor them, suck up the little juice left behind in the shell then swallow them. Only amateurs try to swallow them whole."
-Kingfabian: BBC loads: https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=181634953&p=1666337753&viewfull=1#post1666337753
"America lost pretty much every war in history lol" -pandaboy89
as seen here: https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=180019913&p=1636230303&viewfull=1#post1636230303
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts