06-09-2022, 05:30 PM
-
#1
- iputyouatapoint
- Registered User
-
- iputyouatapoint
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2020
- Posts: 4,939
- Rep Power: 12259
-
-
Assassin's Creed Valhalla is really cool
Watching a playthrough now. It's really good!
06-09-2022, 07:44 PM
-
#2
- EagleOfWar
- Registered User
-
- EagleOfWar
- Registered User
- Join Date: Feb 2011
- Posts: 15,643
- Rep Power: 107090
-
-
Originally Posted By iputyouatapoint⏩
I played it when it came out. I beat the main game (not dlc). Tried to go back and do another play through and didn’t like it at all for some reason. Like every other AC it’s really repetitive.Watching a playthrough now. It's really good!
This body holding me, be my reminder here that I am not alone.
Makes me feel eternal, all this Pain is an Illusion.
06-09-2022, 07:56 PM
-
#3
- bongowongo
- Join Date: Jan 2011
- Posts: 40,346
- Rep Power: 184703
-
-
It's crap
The first 10 hours or so are good, but then it gets really repetitive, the story goes nowhere, the characters are horrible, sidequests are non-existent.
The first 10 hours or so are good, but then it gets really repetitive, the story goes nowhere, the characters are horrible, sidequests are non-existent.
Sig line can't be a novel
06-09-2022, 08:18 PM
-
#4
- ScramFranklin
- Registered User
-
- ScramFranklin
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2017
- Age: 36
- Posts: 19,925
- Rep Power: 147928
-
-
glad you are liking (watching) it.
seems kind of bloated to me. I heard Origins is the best in the new trilogy. Will probably give that a try soon.
seems kind of bloated to me. I heard Origins is the best in the new trilogy. Will probably give that a try soon.
-Engineering Crew
-Self Improvement Crew
-Third Position Crew
-Keith Woods Crew
-Consolecel Crew
-Dr. Edward Dutton Crew
06-09-2022, 10:09 PM
-
#5
06-09-2022, 11:29 PM
-
#6
- Manglet
- Registered User
-
- Manglet
- Registered User
- Join Date: Aug 2016
- Location: United States
- Age: 33
- Posts: 6,260
- Rep Power: 32032
-
-
I like the combat in Valhalla more than Odyssey (enemies seem less spongy) but the exploration in Odyssey was more fun because of the vibrant Mediterranean scenery. In Valhalla its mostly drab forests and snowy areas.
America is the number one clown show
India > China
Stay home, save lives.....UNTIL THE END OF TIME
Come for the sloot threads, stay for the riveting social commentary
06-09-2022, 11:48 PM
-
#7
- AD117
- ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
-
- AD117
- ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
- Join Date: Aug 2014
- Location: United States
- Posts: 8,860
- Rep Power: 42683
-
-
Originally Posted By ScramFranklin⏩
It is, by a long shot. It's the only one I'd describe as "great". Odyssey and Valhalla are both trash, unfortunately. I had high hopes for this new style of AC. :/glad you are liking (watching) it.
seems kind of bloated to me. I heard Origins is the best in the new trilogy. Will probably give that a try soon.
seems kind of bloated to me. I heard Origins is the best in the new trilogy. Will probably give that a try soon.
06-10-2022, 07:00 PM
-
#8
Dude it's the worst one yet lol
PC specs
i9 9900k/AMD RX 6800 16 GB/16 GB RAM/LG BX 65'' OLED/Gigabyte GS27QC 27''
OLED Master Race crew
1440p 120+ fps only crew
6'2 master race crew
Audiophile crew
Metal crew
Introvert/INTJ crew
German crew
If you aren't getting stronger you aren't getting bigger crew
06-10-2022, 09:30 PM
-
#9
- MiamiLife305
- Registered User
-
- MiamiLife305
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2013
- Age: 36
- Posts: 18,052
- Rep Power: 41951
-
-
Originally Posted By Manglet⏩
Odyssey was breath takingI like the combat in Valhalla more than Odyssey (enemies seem less spongy) but the exploration in Odyssey was more fun because of the vibrant Mediterranean scenery. In Valhalla its mostly drab forests and snowy areas.
LOVED exploring the game and seeing the temples and cities. Getting on top of a mountain and seeing the nearby islands
I'm a fan of classical history and the game was just amazing for the exploration alone
Future P.A in progress
We're all gonna make it
sleep tight pupper
06-11-2022, 04:37 AM
-
#10
- iputyouatapoint
- Registered User
-
- iputyouatapoint
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2020
- Posts: 4,939
- Rep Power: 12259
-
-
Originally Posted By Manglet⏩
Yeah, the combat's not bad.I like the combat in Valhalla more than Odyssey (enemies seem less spongy) but the exploration in Odyssey was more fun because of the vibrant Mediterranean scenery. In Valhalla its mostly drab forests and snowy areas.
06-11-2022, 04:40 AM
-
#11
06-11-2022, 04:41 AM
-
#12
- iputyouatapoint
- Registered User
-
- iputyouatapoint
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2020
- Posts: 4,939
- Rep Power: 12259
-
-
Originally Posted By wasp9166⏩
No, they're not. ;(They're all the same
06-11-2022, 05:13 AM
-
#13
- BraneyGumble
- Registered User
-
- BraneyGumble
- Registered User
- Join Date: May 2013
- Age: 41
- Posts: 25,426
- Rep Power: 248871
-
-
Originally Posted By bongowongo⏩
This, the beginning is a massive bait and switch.It's crap
The first 10 hours or so are good, but then it gets really repetitive, the story goes nowhere, the characters are horrible, sidequests are non-existent.
The first 10 hours or so are good, but then it gets really repetitive, the story goes nowhere, the characters are horrible, sidequests are non-existent.
Norway is awesome but then you sail off to England and after that is just an absolutely ungodly amount of padded bullchit among drab landscapes with a revolving door of mostly forgettable one off characters. Don't know how they did it, but it is a massive step back in all regards compared to Odyssey. And it simply refuses to end. I reached my breaking point after the first Asgard segment - found out there's another one - and rescuing a certain dikhead from captivity. Seriously, why is everyone a dik to Eivor?
Combat is crap, Zealots and some bosses are fuking annoying, raven is now useless, parkour felt more chitty, the retard who came up with the flying papers should be tarred and feathered.
Orlog and flyting were cool, though. Druid DLC was great besides the ending - also finally the areas were gorgeous - and Petra's quest was a riot.
06-11-2022, 05:26 AM
-
#14
- iputyouatapoint
- Registered User
-
- iputyouatapoint
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2020
- Posts: 4,939
- Rep Power: 12259
-
-
Originally Posted By BraneyGumble⏩
That's true. Eivor gets treated like chit, but I think it's because he's so nice to people. I can relate.This, the beginning is a massive bait and switch.
Norway is awesome but then you sail off to England and after that is just an absolutely ungodly amount of padded bullchit among drab landscapes with a revolving door of mostly forgettable one off characters. Don't know how they did it, but it is a massive step back in all regards compared to Odyssey. And it simply refuses to end. I reached my breaking point after the first Asgard segment - found out there's another one - and rescuing a certain dikhead from captivity. Seriously, why is everyone a dik to Eivor?
Combat is crap, Zealots and some bosses are fuking annoying, raven is now useless, parkour felt more chitty, the retard who came up with the flying papers should be tarred and feathered.
Orlog and flyting were cool, though. Druid DLC was great besides the ending - also finally the areas were gorgeous - and Petra's quest was a riot.
Norway is awesome but then you sail off to England and after that is just an absolutely ungodly amount of padded bullchit among drab landscapes with a revolving door of mostly forgettable one off characters. Don't know how they did it, but it is a massive step back in all regards compared to Odyssey. And it simply refuses to end. I reached my breaking point after the first Asgard segment - found out there's another one - and rescuing a certain dikhead from captivity. Seriously, why is everyone a dik to Eivor?
Combat is crap, Zealots and some bosses are fuking annoying, raven is now useless, parkour felt more chitty, the retard who came up with the flying papers should be tarred and feathered.
Orlog and flyting were cool, though. Druid DLC was great besides the ending - also finally the areas were gorgeous - and Petra's quest was a riot.
06-11-2022, 08:16 PM
-
#15
- RayBoccini
- Registered User
-
- RayBoccini
- Registered User
- Join Date: Dec 2012
- Posts: 6,010
- Rep Power: 19091
-
-
Meh it's alright but it's setting is very boring.
Odyssey superior in most ways.
Plus Kassandra > Eivor
Odyssey superior in most ways.
Plus Kassandra > Eivor
06-11-2022, 08:25 PM
-
#16
06-11-2022, 08:57 PM
-
#17
- TheAdlerian
- Registered User
-
- TheAdlerian
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2007
- Posts: 44,596
- Rep Power: 96349
-
-
Question:
Why are most games like this using swords instead of modern or future settings using guns?
I would like a similar big world type of game using guns. I played a Tom Clancy game about South America that was like that and loved it.
However, I do not like using swords in these games because it's something I can set up and there isn't as much skill as shooting. It seems like for years there's all of these games set in ancient times and almost none in the future and few in the present.
Why do you think that is?
Why are most games like this using swords instead of modern or future settings using guns?
I would like a similar big world type of game using guns. I played a Tom Clancy game about South America that was like that and loved it.
However, I do not like using swords in these games because it's something I can set up and there isn't as much skill as shooting. It seems like for years there's all of these games set in ancient times and almost none in the future and few in the present.
Why do you think that is?
If you want to ask me a question:
Ask: TheAdlerian
http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=150655983&p=1000366043#post1000366043
Read my science fiction novel:
http://www.amazon.com/Echelon-Adlerian-ebook/dp/B00RCFFTKC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1419640250&sr=8-1&keywords=Echelon+the+adlerian
06-11-2022, 09:15 PM
-
#18
- MiamiLife305
- Registered User
-
- MiamiLife305
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2013
- Age: 36
- Posts: 18,052
- Rep Power: 41951
-
-
Originally Posted By TheAdlerian⏩
Because I like swordsQuestion:
Why are most games like this using swords instead of modern or future settings using guns?
I would like a similar big world type of game using guns. I played a Tom Clancy game about South America that was like that and loved it.
However, I do not like using swords in these games because it's something I can set up and there isn't as much skill as shooting. It seems like for years there's all of these games set in ancient times and almost none in the future and few in the present.
Why do you think that is?
Why are most games like this using swords instead of modern or future settings using guns?
I would like a similar big world type of game using guns. I played a Tom Clancy game about South America that was like that and loved it.
However, I do not like using swords in these games because it's something I can set up and there isn't as much skill as shooting. It seems like for years there's all of these games set in ancient times and almost none in the future and few in the present.
Why do you think that is?
Future P.A in progress
We're all gonna make it
sleep tight pupper
06-11-2022, 09:23 PM
-
#19
- TheAdlerian
- Registered User
-
- TheAdlerian
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2007
- Posts: 44,596
- Rep Power: 96349
-
-
Originally Posted By MiamiLife305⏩
That's not an answer.Because I like swords
I asked why the industry keeps making the same type of time period games.
If you want to ask me a question:
Ask: TheAdlerian
http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=150655983&p=1000366043#post1000366043
Read my science fiction novel:
http://www.amazon.com/Echelon-Adlerian-ebook/dp/B00RCFFTKC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1419640250&sr=8-1&keywords=Echelon+the+adlerian
06-12-2022, 02:59 AM
-
#20
- iputyouatapoint
- Registered User
-
- iputyouatapoint
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2020
- Posts: 4,939
- Rep Power: 12259
-
-
Originally Posted By TheAdlerian⏩
Because ancient times were more interesting.Question:
Why are most games like this using swords instead of modern or future settings using guns?
I would like a similar big world type of game using guns. I played a Tom Clancy game about South America that was like that and loved it.
However, I do not like using swords in these games because it's something I can set up and there isn't as much skill as shooting. It seems like for years there's all of these games set in ancient times and almost none in the future and few in the present.
Why do you think that is?
Why are most games like this using swords instead of modern or future settings using guns?
I would like a similar big world type of game using guns. I played a Tom Clancy game about South America that was like that and loved it.
However, I do not like using swords in these games because it's something I can set up and there isn't as much skill as shooting. It seems like for years there's all of these games set in ancient times and almost none in the future and few in the present.
Why do you think that is?
06-12-2022, 02:59 AM
-
#21
- iputyouatapoint
- Registered User
-
- iputyouatapoint
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2020
- Posts: 4,939
- Rep Power: 12259
-
-
Originally Posted By RayBoccini⏩
Ay, I like Eivor.Meh it's alright but it's setting is very boring.
Odyssey superior in most ways.
Plus Kassandra > Eivor
Odyssey superior in most ways.
Plus Kassandra > Eivor
06-12-2022, 10:18 AM
-
#22
- TheAdlerian
- Registered User
-
- TheAdlerian
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2007
- Posts: 44,596
- Rep Power: 96349
-
-
Originally Posted By iputyouatapoint⏩
Really?Because ancient times were more interesting.
I hate ancient times and fantasy stories because most of it didn't happen, was horrible to live in, and magic and so on never happened and is not real.
In ancient times, you would have been toothless by 30 and have ten different diseases and your education would be that you know how to talk, lol.
Magic in these stories is about wanting to have cool events happen that never did and couldn't happen, so that's kind of sad.
Meanwhile, with some science fiction, maybe it could happen, but with magic and stuff, it never will.
Everyone can enjoy what they want but when I was younger people liked science fiction and thought fantasy was dumb. Now, you can barely find any science fiction or even modern games like I've said.
If you want to ask me a question:
Ask: TheAdlerian
http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=150655983&p=1000366043#post1000366043
Read my science fiction novel:
http://www.amazon.com/Echelon-Adlerian-ebook/dp/B00RCFFTKC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1419640250&sr=8-1&keywords=Echelon+the+adlerian
06-12-2022, 10:21 AM
-
#23
- ScramFranklin
- Registered User
-
- ScramFranklin
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2017
- Age: 36
- Posts: 19,925
- Rep Power: 147928
-
-
I started AC: Origins and it's pretty fun so far. on game pass and recently got a 60fps bump.
first AC I have played since II, and no desire to play Odyssey or Valhalla
first AC I have played since II, and no desire to play Odyssey or Valhalla
-Engineering Crew
-Self Improvement Crew
-Third Position Crew
-Keith Woods Crew
-Consolecel Crew
-Dr. Edward Dutton Crew
06-12-2022, 10:34 AM
-
#24
06-12-2022, 10:39 AM
-
#25
06-12-2022, 11:08 AM
-
#26
- iputyouatapoint
- Registered User
-
- iputyouatapoint
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2020
- Posts: 4,939
- Rep Power: 12259
-
-
Originally Posted By TheAdlerian⏩
I like sci-fi too, but fantasy is where it's at. See sig.Really?
I hate ancient times and fantasy stories because most of it didn't happen, was horrible to live in, and magic and so on never happened and is not real.
In ancient times, you would have been toothless by 30 and have ten different diseases and your education would be that you know how to talk, lol.
Magic in these stories is about wanting to have cool events happen that never did and couldn't happen, so that's kind of sad.
Meanwhile, with some science fiction, maybe it could happen, but with magic and stuff, it never will.
Everyone can enjoy what they want but when I was younger people liked science fiction and thought fantasy was dumb. Now, you can barely find any science fiction or even modern games like I've said.
I hate ancient times and fantasy stories because most of it didn't happen, was horrible to live in, and magic and so on never happened and is not real.
In ancient times, you would have been toothless by 30 and have ten different diseases and your education would be that you know how to talk, lol.
Magic in these stories is about wanting to have cool events happen that never did and couldn't happen, so that's kind of sad.
Meanwhile, with some science fiction, maybe it could happen, but with magic and stuff, it never will.
Everyone can enjoy what they want but when I was younger people liked science fiction and thought fantasy was dumb. Now, you can barely find any science fiction or even modern games like I've said.
06-12-2022, 11:09 AM
-
#27
- iputyouatapoint
- Registered User
-
- iputyouatapoint
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2020
- Posts: 4,939
- Rep Power: 12259
-
-
Originally Posted By freeburn⏩
True. Shadow of Mordor was awesome.Shadow of mordor series absolutely ruined assassins creed for me. Can't go back to the sub par ac series after playing the masterpiece that is shadow of mordor 1 and 2.
06-12-2022, 03:10 PM
-
#28
- MiamiLife305
- Registered User
-
- MiamiLife305
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2013
- Age: 36
- Posts: 18,052
- Rep Power: 41951
-
-
Originally Posted By TheAdlerian⏩
Ok let me try it thisThat's not an answer.
I asked why the industry keeps making the same type of time period games.
I asked why the industry keeps making the same type of time period games.
Gamers like swords, so industry make sword based games
Better?
Future P.A in progress
We're all gonna make it
sleep tight pupper
06-12-2022, 03:19 PM
-
#29
- TheAdlerian
- Registered User
-
- TheAdlerian
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2007
- Posts: 44,596
- Rep Power: 96349
-
-
Originally Posted By MiamiLife305⏩
So when did the "industry" ask you what kind of game you like?Ok let me try it this
Gamers like swords, so industry make sword based games
Better?
Gamers like swords, so industry make sword based games
Better?
Instead, you will buy what's out and looks good, no one is asking you.
Swords have no control and take no planning or skill to use so I get very bored with that type of combat.
I think the industry is pushing the setting too much.
Meanwhile, most movies are not set in ancient times and when they are they don't do well. Military, crime, and science fiction movies do the best, so I don't get why games are fantasy oriented now.
When I was younger they were SF or military.
If you want to ask me a question:
Ask: TheAdlerian
http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=150655983&p=1000366043#post1000366043
Read my science fiction novel:
http://www.amazon.com/Echelon-Adlerian-ebook/dp/B00RCFFTKC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1419640250&sr=8-1&keywords=Echelon+the+adlerian
06-12-2022, 03:27 PM
-
#30
- havoc00
- Former 40OZ King
-
- havoc00
- Former 40OZ King
- Join Date: Mar 2009
- Posts: 141,934
- Subscribers: 9
- Rep Power: 567216
-
-
Originally Posted By ScramFranklin⏩
Origins >>> Odyssey >>>>>> ValhallaI started AC: Origins and it's pretty fun so far. on game pass and recently got a 60fps bump.
first AC I have played since II, and no desire to play Odyssey or Valhalla
first AC I have played since II, and no desire to play Odyssey or Valhalla
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts