Thoughts?

Either way it's what a hostile foreign group do to assert dominance over another group

Circumcision is almost as brutal as castration, in both cases you can't call yourself a real man anymore. Sorry circumcels.

The difference is that when youre circumcised they leave some parts so you can always look and remember what you've lost and cry and fist yourself to sleep in tears.

When your castrated they take all of it and in couple weeks you will forget anything was ever there and go on with your business as a happy man.

Lol @ circumcised cucks
Lol @ me
Lol @ my naive parents scammed by a Jewish doctor

Too many to post



Male Circumcision Affects Female Sexual Enjoyment

A survey ofwomen who have had sexual experience with circumcised and anatomically complete partners showed that the anatomically complete penis was preferred over the circumcised penis.Without the foreskin to provide a movable sleeve of skin, intercourse with a circumcised penis resulted in female discomfort from increased friction, abrasion, and loss of natural secretions. Respondents overwhelmingly concurred that the mechanics of coitus were different for the two groups of men. Unaltered men tended to thrust more gently with shorter strokes.http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/1...830s1079.x/pdf

O’Hara, K. and O’Hara, J., "The Effect of Male Circumcision on the Sexual Enjoyment of the Female Partner," BJU 83 (1999): suppl. 1: 79–84

[QUOTE=****inator post_id=1665334903]Too many to post

[IMG]https://i0.wp.com/sidriinternational.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/16-functions-lost-to-male-circumcision-1.jpg?fit=800%2C800&ssl=
/IMG]

Male Circumcision Affects Female Sexual Enjoyment

A survey of[b]women who have had sexual experience with circumcised and anatomically complete partners showed that the anatomically complete penis was preferred over the circumcised penis.[/b]Without the foreskin to provide a movable sleeve of skin, intercourse with a circumcised penis resulted in female discomfort from increased friction, abrasion, and loss of natural secretions. Respondents overwhelmingly concurred that the mechanics of coitus were different for the two groups of men. Unaltered men tended to thrust more gently with shorter strokes. [url]http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/1...830s1079.x/pdurl]

O’Hara, K. and O’Hara, J., "The Effect of Male Circumcision on the Sexual Enjoyment of the Female Partner," BJU 83 (1999): suppl. 1: 79–84[/QUOTE]The fact that this needs proof is very sad. Its like asking 'prove me that cutting your fingers makes it hard to grab things (like bf's cock)"

There's so many nerve endings there that some scientists reckon it can cause neurological and psychological problems.

brutal

No difference, removing/altering the male genitalia without consent.