dude is obnoxious af with a very fukking dubious background

after watching a couple of his vids, he seems more interested in flaunting how great he thinks he is and his supposed wealth than actually trying to aid people

also people who smoke cigars and wear sunglasses indoors just scream "i'm a massive *******"

Tell me you don't have a bugatti without telling me you don't have a bugatti

Join date: November 2022
Posts: 421

tell me you don't have a life without telling me you don't have a life

If you had a bugatti, you would not be making this thread or reply

I hate the way he talks. It sounds like he's talking with his mouth full. Also his tone makes him sound like he's fired up over a banal topic

Agreed but he does say the obvious when it comes to slaying women/being a man he's atleast improving the new generations of simp soyboy cuhks to some extent.

He's a grifter, but his attempts to empower men in contrast to the tsunami of corporate media's and the left's blatant suppression of such justifies any of his monetary brashness. Jordan Peterson does it better in this regard.

Inb4 Tatecel cawk riders

He can be funny. Tell me this doesn’t make you laugh : “all of the world’s problems would be fixed if we tattooed women’s body counts on their foreheads”.

Not having fathers

He's a scam artist. He rehashes the same talking points that miscers are already aware of. Things like sloots gonna sloot, libs are insufferable, the covid scamdemic, we all know this. But his stupid fans think this chit is groundbreaking and revolutionary and they get suckered into buying his merch and stupid mugs JFL

I may not have a Bugatti, but I do have a chin.

This guy would definitely let the Top G fuk his girl.

I like him, hes a man's man and I prefer him influencing the incel community as opposed to Milo, Kevin Samuels or any other light in the loafers guy.

Heard him refer to people without massive amounts of money as "brokies". That really riled me up.

who?

The guy figured out how to outplay the social media companies earning hundreds of millions in the process and he's an accomplished fighter. Plenty to respect in those two things alone even if you don't agree with everything he says.

Most people don't realise that his entire online persona is a calculated performance to get people talking abt him. He knows pha g gots that dislike him just end up giving him free attention anyway

Andrew Tate is a complete ****g0t and anyone who listens to him is also a complete ****g0t.

A chinless loser that needs to have sunglasses on with his shirt off and smoking a cigar 24/7 to appeal to the same crowd of men that wears fedoras.

The guys who don't like Tate are typically beta losers. Srs. Take Jordan Peterson for example. I dislike JBP and think he is just an addict who uses word salad to take money from people. I used to listen to him and even bought his book and read a lot of it. Part way through his book though I just stopped, closed it, and never listened to him again.

The reason I bring that up is because I still got value from him. I recognize how some of what he has said has helped people. I personally took some value from some of his older talks on YouTube. I have the ability to recognize and appreciate that from him and I don't hate him.

Now, if I was a beta ******* like OP I would spew hatred for JBP and only undercut him at every chance, talk like me not caring about him and hating him makes me superior, and make threads saying how nothing of value comes from him.

If you don't have the ability to take information or appreciate messages from someone that is better than you in those respective areas, then it is YOU who is the problem. You're telling me you get nothing from a man that has generated hundreds of millions of dollars, became the most popular man in the world, and have created an impact on an entire world population enough to get canceled for speaking words? This makes you feel good about yourself or as if you're superior? You can not like him or think he is a clown or something, but to discredit him completely and speak of him as if he has nothing of value to add makes you a low IQ and low vibrational as a person. It means you can't intake data and information and process it for some sort of benefit towards yourself.

The ego stroking people get from discrediting Tate is extremely laughable. Absolutely beta low test mentality. We get it, you don't like him. Why are you making this thread that has been made 100 times? "I watched 3 vids and he's a clown. LOL at losers that listen to him!"

I don't want to even know what guys and podcasts/information you listen to on a daily basis. If you ever wore a mask or took the vax your opinion doesn't matter anyways.

I believe it's a reaction to the left-wing saturation in modern media/social media. He's a counter-alternative who's more extreme ideas people normally wouldn't countenance but when they've had enough of left-wing extremism from every corner of their life it's somewhat pleasant to hear an opposing viewpoint for a change

Bro...

Attention spans dwindle, people don't read and this is what happens. The degradation of men continues. We had the drug addict Jordan Peterson and his very usual self-help advice tinged with Christian fanaticism start the journey to complete brain rot. Then 2022 gifted us Andrew Tate. We're peaking, never mind the great philosophers of our time, or our past. Armed with our low IQs and illiterate ways, we can just pay $49.99 to transform our lives. Simply watch these videos and change our mindset to become alpha trad men. An army of moronic men elevate the grifters and sing their praises because they are detritus who have walked freely into the land of stupidity.Critique is important, even if people can't quite articulate why they have such issues with a grifter like Tate.

You'll have to excuse my scattered thoughts. I rarely do impromptu responses to posts like this.

Cliffs
-I don't deny his money, talent in boxing, or success
-With the above being said, that doesn't mean he's fit to be a role model for young men today
-The only reason he's gained a following and people listen to him is because his status
-However his status and being the loudest in the room doesn't make him alpha, fit to lead, or a decent role model for young men who need a strong male role model in their life
-I don't like him. His loud mouthed demeanor, the way he talks, all of that. And even if he didn't conduct himself that way at his core he's a grifter, and grifters aren't fit to lead or be role models for this lost generation of men struggling today.
-While you believe we should try to extract value from what he's saying maybe you should sit back and critique why he might be wrong or the wrong man to listen to

Because they're betas and only have the most cartoonish idea of what an alpha man is.

Also lack of real life strong male role models.

I literally have no idea who he even is, I just see his name posted on the misc a lot

I think he’s making them more insecure tbh

srs question. Would Tate be as famous and have a big of following as he does right now if Kevin Samuels didn't pass away?

I've never once heard Tate mentioned outside of the misc.


He only exists to beta incels who exist solely online.

Yeah, but I mean being on tucker carlson and piers morgan has certainly expanded his fameand following to some degree i would think

Yeah, but I mean being on tucker carlson and piers morgan has certainly expanded his fame and following to some degree i would think