Forum
»
You Should Mate With Short People to Fight Climate Change, Expert Says
- Results 1 to 10 of 10
-
Page 1 of 1
01-19-2023, 08:50 PM
-
#1
- Islandboyo
- Registered User
-
- Islandboyo
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2022
- Age: 56
- Posts: 9,976
- Rep Power: 17123
-
-
You Should Mate With Short People to Fight Climate Change, Expert Says
In a New York Times op-ed, author Mara Altman lays out several benefits of being small, but none bigger than this one: The shorter you are, the more you’ll help save the planet from peril.
Altman highlights the calculations of the researcher Thomas Samaras, who once estimated that if all citizens of the United State were just 10 percent shorter, and with our same proportions, we’d save 87 million tons of food per year. And that’s just the food.
In short, size matters. If you’re naturally smaller, logic dictates that you’ll use up fewer precious resources, and you’re better suited for long-term survival than your taller counterparts. Mating with someone short, then, may help your kids’ chances at survival, and their kids’ chances, and, well, you get the point.
Imagine a catastrophic event that limits resources. The big people die first, because they have the most needs. Altman cites Yuval Noah Harari’s book Sapiens, about a population of early humans inhabiting the Indonesian island of Flores who became cut off from land masses. In the book, the population of Flores—a well-studied location in the world of paleoanthropology—shrinks in height over time. The inhabitants can still perform the same functions, just in smaller physical packages. They become well suited for the limited resources on the island.
So, while big is considered better by today’s societal norms (and not just in Texas) short just may be safer—both for the world and your chances at personal long-term survival.
https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/m...133000636.html
Altman highlights the calculations of the researcher Thomas Samaras, who once estimated that if all citizens of the United State were just 10 percent shorter, and with our same proportions, we’d save 87 million tons of food per year. And that’s just the food.
In short, size matters. If you’re naturally smaller, logic dictates that you’ll use up fewer precious resources, and you’re better suited for long-term survival than your taller counterparts. Mating with someone short, then, may help your kids’ chances at survival, and their kids’ chances, and, well, you get the point.
Imagine a catastrophic event that limits resources. The big people die first, because they have the most needs. Altman cites Yuval Noah Harari’s book Sapiens, about a population of early humans inhabiting the Indonesian island of Flores who became cut off from land masses. In the book, the population of Flores—a well-studied location in the world of paleoanthropology—shrinks in height over time. The inhabitants can still perform the same functions, just in smaller physical packages. They become well suited for the limited resources on the island.
So, while big is considered better by today’s societal norms (and not just in Texas) short just may be safer—both for the world and your chances at personal long-term survival.
https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/m...133000636.html
01-19-2023, 08:59 PM
-
#2
- Goodguy03
- Registered Diabetic
-
- Goodguy03
- Registered Diabetic
- Join Date: Sep 2019
- Posts: 9,000
- Rep Power: 35583
-
-
but manlets fart more than lanklets
Alpha crew
High Test crew
MAGA crew
Pureblood crew
LDAR crew
FA crew
NoFap Day 1 crew
2012 Theory crew
LOL @ Tradies crew
Autism crew
Useless Degree crew
Disowned by Family crew
Monster Zero Sugar crew
Low IQ crew
Clown World crew
01-19-2023, 08:59 PM
-
#3
- proudmanlet
- Registered Weapon
-
- proudmanlet
- Registered Weapon
- Join Date: Oct 2011
- Height: 5'5"
- Posts: 65,139
- Subscribers: 4
- Rep Power: 1172588
-
-
save the planet, ride a manlet
01-19-2023, 09:00 PM
-
#4
- bsrkoacar2
- Registered User
-
- bsrkoacar2
- Registered User
- Join Date: Dec 2020
- Age: 56
- Posts: 16,614
- Rep Power: 113438
-
-
I will continue to be a 260+ pound lean powerlifter and eat enough beef to feed a 6 person family of manlets. Doing my best to offset the soy
01-19-2023, 09:01 PM
-
#5
- TheAdlerian
- Registered User
-
- TheAdlerian
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2007
- Posts: 44,596
- Rep Power: 96349
-
-
Originally Posted By Islandboyo⏩
Mara is a five foot tall jew.In a New York Times op-ed, author Mara Altman lays out several benefits of being small, but none bigger than this one: The shorter you are, the more you’ll help save the planet from peril.
Altman highlights the calculations of the researcher Thomas Samaras, who once estimated that if all citizens of the United State were just 10 percent shorter, and with our same proportions, we’d save 87 million tons of food per year. And that’s just the food.
In short, size matters. If you’re naturally smaller, logic dictates that you’ll use up fewer precious resources, and you’re better suited for long-term survival than your taller counterparts. Mating with someone short, then, may help your kids’ chances at survival, and their kids’ chances, and, well, you get the point.
Imagine a catastrophic event that limits resources. The big people die first, because they have the most needs. Altman cites Yuval Noah Harari’s book Sapiens, about a population of early humans inhabiting the Indonesian island of Flores who became cut off from land masses. In the book, the population of Flores—a well-studied location in the world of paleoanthropology—shrinks in height over time. The inhabitants can still perform the same functions, just in smaller physical packages. They become well suited for the limited resources on the island.
So, while big is considered better by today’s societal norms (and not just in Texas) short just may be safer—both for the world and your chances at personal long-term survival.
https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/m...133000636.html
Altman highlights the calculations of the researcher Thomas Samaras, who once estimated that if all citizens of the United State were just 10 percent shorter, and with our same proportions, we’d save 87 million tons of food per year. And that’s just the food.
In short, size matters. If you’re naturally smaller, logic dictates that you’ll use up fewer precious resources, and you’re better suited for long-term survival than your taller counterparts. Mating with someone short, then, may help your kids’ chances at survival, and their kids’ chances, and, well, you get the point.
Imagine a catastrophic event that limits resources. The big people die first, because they have the most needs. Altman cites Yuval Noah Harari’s book Sapiens, about a population of early humans inhabiting the Indonesian island of Flores who became cut off from land masses. In the book, the population of Flores—a well-studied location in the world of paleoanthropology—shrinks in height over time. The inhabitants can still perform the same functions, just in smaller physical packages. They become well suited for the limited resources on the island.
So, while big is considered better by today’s societal norms (and not just in Texas) short just may be safer—both for the world and your chances at personal long-term survival.
https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/m...133000636.html
If you want to ask me a question:
Ask: TheAdlerian
http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=150655983&p=1000366043#post1000366043
Read my science fiction novel:
http://www.amazon.com/Echelon-Adlerian-ebook/dp/B00RCFFTKC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1419640250&sr=8-1&keywords=Echelon+the+adlerian
01-19-2023, 09:12 PM
-
#6
01-19-2023, 09:19 PM
-
#7
01-19-2023, 09:25 PM
-
#8
- Ravishing_Rick
- A Registered Mesomorph
-
- Ravishing_Rick
- A Registered Mesomorph
- Join Date: Oct 2008
- Posts: 115,847
- Rep Power: 279082
-
-
I just got rid of a wanna be stay at home mom womanlet because i know my kids would be short and lazy af
*۩*legendary misc status*۩*
No Sloot Can Hurt A Man With Options~ Ravishing_Rick
all my bishes foreign PSN Ravishing_Rick
*No Porn Crew*
onlyfans/ricosmoovey
01-19-2023, 09:27 PM
-
#9
- Looksmaxxer101
- Registered User
-
- Looksmaxxer101
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2020
- Age: 56
- Posts: 2,933
- Rep Power: 14789
-
-
They want to create an army of future manlet kings
01-19-2023, 09:45 PM
-
#10
- SuperHercules
- Join Date: Jun 2014
- Height: 6'5"
- Posts: 32,341
- Subscribers: 6
- Rep Power: 565773
-
-

See Shakebrah's sig
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts