Forum
»
TradCuck Matt Walsh back at it again.
- Results 1 to 12 of 12
-
Page 1 of 1
01-23-2023, 07:44 PM
-
#1
- cavillac
- Registered User
-
- cavillac
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2010
- Location: Eliot, Maine, United States
- Posts: 3,335
- Rep Power: 20401
-
-
TradCuck Matt Walsh back at it again.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mNjGiTyrGJ0&t=609s
After he completely threw his single male audience under the bus for not wanting to get married and completely disregarding the womens role in the problem Walsh came back to point out womens misbehavior.
Seems backward. The time to go after women was on the marriage bit from last week and the time to go after "men" would be in addressing the thot gym culture because all these simps keep these womens ego so inflated that they know if they dress like a prostitute at the gym and hit the record button on their phone they are going to get some prime rejection clout to post all over their social media.
Walsh's woman documentary was a banger but I think he is so out of touch with culture that it shows through whenever he tries to address it.
After he completely threw his single male audience under the bus for not wanting to get married and completely disregarding the womens role in the problem Walsh came back to point out womens misbehavior.
Seems backward. The time to go after women was on the marriage bit from last week and the time to go after "men" would be in addressing the thot gym culture because all these simps keep these womens ego so inflated that they know if they dress like a prostitute at the gym and hit the record button on their phone they are going to get some prime rejection clout to post all over their social media.
Walsh's woman documentary was a banger but I think he is so out of touch with culture that it shows through whenever he tries to address it.
Live & Direct from rural Iowa- GBR
01-23-2023, 07:49 PM
-
#2
- DeadlyStriker
- Registered User
-
- DeadlyStriker
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2011
- Location: United States
- Posts: 24,113
- Rep Power: 302177
-
-
I've seen this guy and randomly hear his name, especially since his famous women documentary came out (haven't watched it), but what does he stand for? Just curious.
All I know is that if he's religious and still works for the daily wire...he is indeed a giant cuck.
All I know is that if he's religious and still works for the daily wire...he is indeed a giant cuck.
01-23-2023, 08:03 PM
-
#3
- cavillac
- Registered User
-
- cavillac
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2010
- Location: Eliot, Maine, United States
- Posts: 3,335
- Rep Power: 20401
-
-
Originally Posted By DeadlyStriker⏩
He stands for traditional Christian conservative values. Im totally fine with that but I draw the line when they start trying to shame men for not conforming with their values and completely sidestepping the actual issues with the culture. Jordan Peterson fits pretty well with at Daily wire because he does the same **** when he isnt schilling for Isreal.but what does he stand for? Just curious.
All I know is that if he's religious and still works for the daily wire...he is indeed a giant cuck.
All I know is that if he's religious and still works for the daily wire...he is indeed a giant cuck.
Live & Direct from rural Iowa- GBR
01-23-2023, 08:04 PM
-
#4
I was pretty disappointed with him on JRE. He couldn't logically explain his stance on marriage and kept trying to link it up to procreation for some reason. For someone to have just produced an entire documentary about women, he couldn't answer a simple question.
01-23-2023, 08:07 PM
-
#5
- MyGhettoFantasy
- Registered User
-
- MyGhettoFantasy
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2016
- Age: 42
- Posts: 12,838
- Rep Power: 162504
-
-
Originally Posted By cavillac⏩
He didn't throw his single male audience under the bus. He acknowledged the landscape and concluded you have to take a risk in life, and that he advocates for risking it all on marriage.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mNjGiTyrGJ0&t=609s
After he completely threw his single male audience under the bus for not wanting to get married and completely disregarding the womens role in the problem Walsh came back to point out womens misbehavior.
Seems backward. The time to go after women was on the marriage bit from last week and the time to go after "men" would be in addressing the thot gym culture because all these simps keep these womens ego so inflated that they know if they dress like a prostitute at the gym and hit the record button on their phone they are going to get some prime rejection clout to post all over their social media.
Walsh's woman documentary was a banger but I think he is so out of touch with culture that it shows through whenever he tries to address it.
After he completely threw his single male audience under the bus for not wanting to get married and completely disregarding the womens role in the problem Walsh came back to point out womens misbehavior.
Seems backward. The time to go after women was on the marriage bit from last week and the time to go after "men" would be in addressing the thot gym culture because all these simps keep these womens ego so inflated that they know if they dress like a prostitute at the gym and hit the record button on their phone they are going to get some prime rejection clout to post all over their social media.
Walsh's woman documentary was a banger but I think he is so out of touch with culture that it shows through whenever he tries to address it.
The closer we approach the uncertainty of life's ending the more we wish to trade all of the things we have acquired in exchange for all of the things we have lost: wealth for youth, knowledge for fresh curiosity, resignation for hope. We'd trade our wisdom for new experiences, but it is wisdom that will teach us that at the end of the road the only new experience is death.
01-23-2023, 08:11 PM
-
#6
- DeadlyStriker
- Registered User
-
- DeadlyStriker
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2011
- Location: United States
- Posts: 24,113
- Rep Power: 302177
-
-
Originally Posted By cavillac⏩
Yea sounds like your typical tradcuck now in 2023. Brutal.He stands for traditional Christian conservative values. Im totally fine with that but I draw the line when they start trying to shame men for not conforming with their values and completely sidestepping the actual issues with the culture. Jordan Peterson fits pretty well with at Daily wire because he does the same **** when he isnt schilling for Isreal.
01-23-2023, 08:14 PM
-
#7
- cavillac
- Registered User
-
- cavillac
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2010
- Location: Eliot, Maine, United States
- Posts: 3,335
- Rep Power: 20401
-
-
Originally Posted By MyGhettoFantasy⏩
There is quite a large difference between taking risk and taking a fools bet.He acknowledged the landscape and concluded you have to take a risk in life, and that he advocates for risking it all on marriage.
Live & Direct from rural Iowa- GBR
01-23-2023, 08:19 PM
-
#8
- MyGhettoFantasy
- Registered User
-
- MyGhettoFantasy
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2016
- Age: 42
- Posts: 12,838
- Rep Power: 162504
-
-
Originally Posted By cavillac⏩
About as large of a difference between wagering a risk and throwing an entire group under the bus.There is quite a large difference between taking risk and taking a fools bet.
You made it sound like he scapegoated men, which he did not.
Post the clip.
The closer we approach the uncertainty of life's ending the more we wish to trade all of the things we have acquired in exchange for all of the things we have lost: wealth for youth, knowledge for fresh curiosity, resignation for hope. We'd trade our wisdom for new experiences, but it is wisdom that will teach us that at the end of the road the only new experience is death.
01-23-2023, 08:27 PM
-
#9
- GuineaDago585
- Bert McGirt
-
- GuineaDago585
- Bert McGirt
- Join Date: Nov 2012
- Posts: 40,547
- Subscribers: 3
- Rep Power: 404777
-
-
Originally Posted By MetroBrah⏩
Agreed. It’s a shame because he’s right on a lot of issues but this is what happens when someone with a relatively low average IQ is catapulted into the public eye with the expectation of presenting an intellectual argument for their views.I was pretty disappointed with him on JRE. He couldn't logically explain his stance on marriage and kept trying to link it up to procreation for some reason. For someone to have just produced an entire documentary about women, he couldn't answer a simple question.
01-23-2023, 08:30 PM
-
#10
- cavillac
- Registered User
-
- cavillac
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2010
- Location: Eliot, Maine, United States
- Posts: 3,335
- Rep Power: 20401
-
-
Originally Posted By MyGhettoFantasy⏩
Search my posts, I covered it already in there.About as large of a difference between wagering a risk and throwing an entire group under the bus.
You made it sound like he scapegoated men, which he did not.
Post the clip.
You made it sound like he scapegoated men, which he did not.
Post the clip.
From what I discerned the TLDR of the clip was Andrew Tate says a few good things but a lifestyle based on hedonics is not as fulfilling as being married, granted it can ruin your life but it is worth the risk. The data is clear that it is more likely to end in divorce than not at some point. So while he may not overtly have thrown men under the bus in that sense it certainly came off as him encouraging men to take a bad deal where there is at least a 50% chance of them getting thrown under the bus in divorce. Perhaps feeding men to the wolves would have been a more proper euphemism so I'll grant you the symantics
Live & Direct from rural Iowa- GBR
01-23-2023, 08:42 PM
-
#11
- MyGhettoFantasy
- Registered User
-
- MyGhettoFantasy
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2016
- Age: 42
- Posts: 12,838
- Rep Power: 162504
-
-
Originally Posted By cavillac⏩
He acknowledged that men, women, and society are collectively responsible for the current landscape. He sympathized with single men and their struggles. He admitted that in spite of one's best efforts bad things happen to good people, and you can be terribly wrong about whom you think is a worthy partner.Search my posts, I covered it already in there.
From what I discerned the TLDR of the clip was Andrew Tate says a few good things but a lifestyle based on hedonics is not as fulfilling as being married, granted it can ruin your life but it is worth the risk. The data is clear that it is more likely to end in divorce than not at some point. So while he may not overtly have thrown men under the bus in that sense it certainly came off as him encouraging men to take a bad deal where there is at least a 50% chance of them getting thrown under the bus in divorce. Perhaps feeding men to the wolves would have been a more proper euphemism so I'll grant you the symantics
From what I discerned the TLDR of the clip was Andrew Tate says a few good things but a lifestyle based on hedonics is not as fulfilling as being married, granted it can ruin your life but it is worth the risk. The data is clear that it is more likely to end in divorce than not at some point. So while he may not overtly have thrown men under the bus in that sense it certainly came off as him encouraging men to take a bad deal where there is at least a 50% chance of them getting thrown under the bus in divorce. Perhaps feeding men to the wolves would have been a more proper euphemism so I'll grant you the symantics
He then explains that, despite the odds, men have to stake their life on something and that he believes marriage, and by extension a family, is worth the risk.
This is what amounts to throwing men to the wolves?
It was a hard talk about a difficult subject that didn't conclude with some milktoast assertion that it's whatever you want to make of it. He actually believes successful families are a necessary component of a successful society.
He took a hardline. He wasn't calling anyone a cuck, that's for sure.
The closer we approach the uncertainty of life's ending the more we wish to trade all of the things we have acquired in exchange for all of the things we have lost: wealth for youth, knowledge for fresh curiosity, resignation for hope. We'd trade our wisdom for new experiences, but it is wisdom that will teach us that at the end of the road the only new experience is death.
01-23-2023, 08:52 PM
-
#12
- Bigbuster1
- 41oz King
-
- Bigbuster1
- 41oz King
- Join Date: Aug 2013
- Posts: 10,571
- Rep Power: 86766
-
-
Originally Posted By MetroBrah⏩
Pretty easy to logically explain the importance of marriage. A child needs both a male and female presence in its life. The point of a marriage is that both the man and the female with work together to sacrifice their own desires for the sake of the child’s benefit. The marriage is to provide a stable environment for the child.I was pretty disappointed with him on JRE. He couldn't logically explain his stance on marriage and kept trying to link it up to procreation for some reason. For someone to have just produced an entire documentary about women, he couldn't answer a simple question.
There is no logical explanation for marriage without children that I can think of. It’s just a choice at that point.
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts