https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=noj4phMT9OE

"Based on new evidence and knowledge that functioning proteins are extremely rare, should Darwin’s theory of evolution be dismissed, dissected, developed or replaced with a theory of intelligent design?

Has Darwinism really failed? Peter Robinson discusses it with David Berlinski, David Gelernter, and Stephen Meyer, who have raised doubts about Darwin’s theory in their two books and essay, respectively The Deniable Darwin, Darwin’s Doubt, and “Giving Up Darwin” (published in the Claremont Review of Books).

Robinson asks them to convince him that the term “species” has not been defined by the authors to Darwin’s disadvantage. Gelernter replies to this and explains, as he expressed in his essay, that he sees Darwin’s theory as beautiful (which made it difficult for him to give it up): “Beauty is often a telltale sign of truth. Beauty is our guide to the intellectual universe—walking beside us through the uncharted wilderness, pointing us in the right direction, keeping us on track—most of the time.” Gelernter notes that there’s no reason to doubt that Darwin successfully explained the small adjustments by which an organism adapts to local circumstances: changes to fur density or wing style or beak shape. Yet there are many reasons to doubt whether Darwin can answer the hard questions and explain the big picture—not the fine-tuning of existing species but the emergence of new ones. Meyer explains Darwinism as a comprehensive synthesis, which gained popularity for its appeal. Meyer also mentions that one cannot disregard that Darwin’s book was based on the facts present in the 19th century."

evolution is fake news.

all beings were designed a certain way. we all didn't evolve from one organism. If so then we would have fossils that show the supposed changes over time.

Wrekt

Bump, for the intellectual advancement of the Misc.

Das it mane

Bump, contemplate this on the Tree of Woe, Misc.

"I have a mathematical challenge to Darwin's evolution"

Ok, what is it?

"Muh sky wizard made things. It's math."

LOL, OK.

I get a feeling you didn't listen to the video.

They never do. They just mention sky wizard or flying spaghetti monster and think those words make them intelligent, thus making the opposing arguments null and void.

Atheists now are even worse than the churchian bible thumpers. That's saying A LOT.

'Every person in that video looks like a malformed gimp'

Charles Darwin - 1860

^This

No publication, no care.


Also,

Dismissed? No


What bothers me is evolutionary theory is taught as fact in public schooling despite having no real supporting evidence(same for global warming)

That's the issue with all of man's science, it's all theory & no one actually knows beyond a best guess



What I am certain of is that we don't "evolve" & that humanity hasn't existed for nearly as long as we like to think

The Earth was created as a Petri dish & man was made to live in it

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Berlinski

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Gelernter

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_C._Meyer

Look through their solid academic/education backgrounds and then look at their publications. Listen to the video. They absolutely mog two worthless failures of lifeAnd that is with the biased and prejudiced Wikipedia editors/contributors.

Too much truth in your post. We have so many repulsive atheists in the misc.

There's a ton of supporting evidence. Consider downloading a book on evolution and reading it before opining.

Wow please publish your findings and revolutionalize the field of biology.

Didn't read.

But also

I looked through their records, and I see they are useless philosophy people. I do in fact mog them FYI. And none of them have Biology PhDs fuking lol. No publication no care. Science is not a democracy, and it isn't decided by the opinion of laymen pseudoscience philosophy wastes of life. fking lol

fkin lmao @ this pseudoscientific philosophy major bible thumping hick

Wanna know how I know you are lying? Hint: actually go read through their backgrounds and publications.

Also, a mentally ill retarded failure of life who will never accomplish anything says he mogs three of the most well-known and intelligent men in academia/public intellectuals. You are delusional, stupid, and an absolutely worthless creature. A parasite that your parents can't get rid of and sadly, never will.

ded

Of course not, because as always wincel--you are wrong. How many times have i slapped you around now? I've lost track.

you even stand like a bugman lmao

LOL McFail tricked me? He is just as stupid as wincel and so I may have been confusing the two

You should probably try and avoid putting your foetal alcohol syndrome on full display, when frauding about a PhD

Even on a forum like this no one is going to take you seriously

oh dear, we have an angry fraud who was outed a couple years ago taking his cuck rage out on me. Sad.

The projection is incredibly strong, since we've never once previously had a public spat over my credentials (or yours). But every one of your retard tier posts tell us that you aren't in any higher education program, let alone a PhD, let alone a STEM PhD

You should be embarrassed at frauding something like this on a dying forum full of racist trolls. Pathetic, srs.

It's amazing how they think if they convince enough retards to believe it, it will be taken seriously. You're all free to do LARP science all you want. Real scientists will continue their work unhindered because it has value and offers insight into the real world. The theory of evolution holds. There is an overwhelming amount of evidence to support it, and it can be learned in any sophomore or junior college course on evolution. It's an exciting topic, and I'd encourage everyone to study it.

He claims to be a philosophy major, which is among the only disciplines intellectually bankrupt enough to host this tripe. Incidentally, 2 of his 3 stooges are also from that discipline, and the other is a computer scientist. None of these disciplines involve natural science or are constrained by that measly thing we call reality.

OP lmk when they publish in a respected journal of biology. Look forward to seeing this revolutionary new theory. They surely aren't just crackpots trying to recruit support from the media because they lost the debate in the arena of science would they? Who would do that? Gee golly.

You were outed a few years ago by a couple miscers for frauding an MS in physics. Anyone actually in a doctoral program will know I am in one by our conversations, just like I know they are in one. That is how I knew Fraudhy was lying, and you were lying about the Master's when reading the couple dudes tearing you to pieces. There are things that can't be lied about and experiences and knowledge of those programs that can only come from being in one, or having gone through one.

Like wincel you are a worthless failure and you have to fraud about an education like Fraudhy (and apparently wincel according to some). You have no employment, no education, no possibility of reproducing/marriage/family. Sad

Hard to think intelligent design is very likely when you consider childhood leukemia.

The Phd of two of them is Philosophy, which if you knew anything about education/academia is not what you think when dealing with philosophy of science or philosophy of math (because you are an idiot wincel). Those two have undergrad degrees in Physics and Math if I recall correctly Berlinski (math) and Meyer (physics), whereas you barely got a HS diploma wincel

So Sad!!!!