Forum
»
America cucks to Russia
- Results 1 to 15 of 15
-
Page 1 of 1
Thread: America cucks to Russia
02-02-2023, 02:19 PM
-
#1
- moosik85
- Registered User
-
- moosik85
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2011
- Posts: 14,890
- Rep Power: 81638
-
-
America cucks to Russia
David Ignatius has been a career-long mouthpiece for the US State Department. He has just been called in by the current Secretary of State Antony Blinken to convey an urgent new message to President Vladimir Putin, the Security Council, and the General Staff in Moscow.
For the first time since the special military operation began last year, the war party in Washington is offering terms of concession to Russia’s security objectives explicitly and directly, without the Ukrainians in the way.
The terms Blinken has told Ignatius to print appeared in the January 25 edition of the Washington Post.
The territorial concessions Blinken is tabling include Crimea, the Donbass, and the Zaporozhye, Kherson “land bridge that connects Crimea and Russia”. West of the Dnieper River, north around Kharkov, and south around Odessa and Nikolaev, Blinken has tabled for the first time US acceptance of “a demilitarized status” for the Ukraine. Also, US agreement to restrict the deployment of HIMARS, US and NATO infantry fighting vehicles, and the Abrams and Leopard tanks to a point in western Ukraine from which they can “manoeuvre…as a deterrent against future Russian attacks.”
This is an offer for a tradeoff – partition through a demilitarized zone (DMZ) in the east of the Ukraine in exchange for a halt to the planned Russian offensive destroying the fortifications, rail hubs, troop cantonments, and airfields in the west, between the Polish and Romanian borders, Kiev and Lvov, and an outcome Blinken proposes for both sides to call “a just and durable peace that upholds Ukraine’s territorial integrity”.
Also in the proposed Blinken deal there is the offer of a direct US-Russian agreement on “an eventual postwar military balance”; “no World War III”; and no Ukrainian membership of NATO with “security guarantees similar to NATO’s Article 5.”
Blinken has also told the Washington Post to announce the US will respect “Putin’s tripwire for nuclear escalation”, and accept the Russian “reserve force includ[ing] strategic bombers, certain precision-guided weapons and, of course, tactical and strategic nuclear weapons.”
How many wars is that lost in a row now lmao… at least they aren’t goat herders this time I guessFor the first time since the special military operation began last year, the war party in Washington is offering terms of concession to Russia’s security objectives explicitly and directly, without the Ukrainians in the way.
The terms Blinken has told Ignatius to print appeared in the January 25 edition of the Washington Post.
The territorial concessions Blinken is tabling include Crimea, the Donbass, and the Zaporozhye, Kherson “land bridge that connects Crimea and Russia”. West of the Dnieper River, north around Kharkov, and south around Odessa and Nikolaev, Blinken has tabled for the first time US acceptance of “a demilitarized status” for the Ukraine. Also, US agreement to restrict the deployment of HIMARS, US and NATO infantry fighting vehicles, and the Abrams and Leopard tanks to a point in western Ukraine from which they can “manoeuvre…as a deterrent against future Russian attacks.”
This is an offer for a tradeoff – partition through a demilitarized zone (DMZ) in the east of the Ukraine in exchange for a halt to the planned Russian offensive destroying the fortifications, rail hubs, troop cantonments, and airfields in the west, between the Polish and Romanian borders, Kiev and Lvov, and an outcome Blinken proposes for both sides to call “a just and durable peace that upholds Ukraine’s territorial integrity”.
Also in the proposed Blinken deal there is the offer of a direct US-Russian agreement on “an eventual postwar military balance”; “no World War III”; and no Ukrainian membership of NATO with “security guarantees similar to NATO’s Article 5.”
Blinken has also told the Washington Post to announce the US will respect “Putin’s tripwire for nuclear escalation”, and accept the Russian “reserve force includ[ing] strategic bombers, certain precision-guided weapons and, of course, tactical and strategic nuclear weapons.”
Plant the trees in whose shade your grandchildren will play
02-02-2023, 02:22 PM
-
#2
- kcadrenalin
- Permanent Vacation
-
- kcadrenalin
- Permanent Vacation
- Join Date: Jun 2007
- Posts: 24,727
- Rep Power: 349124
-
-
LOL
Hollywood on suicide watch.
Hollywood on suicide watch.
________
MFC
________
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote. -Benjamin Franklin
Tits and Beer
02-02-2023, 02:27 PM
-
#3
02-02-2023, 02:35 PM
-
#4
02-02-2023, 02:36 PM
-
#5
02-02-2023, 02:40 PM
-
#6
- Uhyeahokay
- Banned
-
- Uhyeahokay
- Banned
- Join Date: Aug 2016
- Age: 40
- Posts: 21,371
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
I think too much blood has been spilled at this point by both parties for it just to halt now. Biden and his crew made a mess of the situation.
02-02-2023, 02:45 PM
-
#7
- N0stradamus
- The Blackpill Prophet
-
- N0stradamus
- The Blackpill Prophet
- Join Date: Oct 2020
- Posts: 24,839
- Rep Power: 96971
-
-
This war was nothing more than a giant money laundering scheme just like all modern wars. It seems that it's dragged on long enough and now the US is ready to offer terms to Russia as a way for them to save face.
As I've said many times: The US would pick a Russian boogeyman over a Ukrainian ally any day of the week. Without a boogeyman like Russia, how else can US politicians drum up support for more defense spending?
It's sad that the Ukrainians were dumb enough to elect Zelensky and let their country get obliterated just so the elites can get even richer.
Nukes aren't incoming and they never were... the elites can't get rich if nukes start going off... Babayagawick85's fantasy of nuclear WWIII has come to a disappointing (but predictable) end....
As I've said many times: The US would pick a Russian boogeyman over a Ukrainian ally any day of the week. Without a boogeyman like Russia, how else can US politicians drum up support for more defense spending?
It's sad that the Ukrainians were dumb enough to elect Zelensky and let their country get obliterated just so the elites can get even richer.
Nukes aren't incoming and they never were... the elites can't get rich if nukes start going off... Babayagawick85's fantasy of nuclear WWIII has come to a disappointing (but predictable) end....
Everything I post is satire.
Tricknology Grand Master.
02-02-2023, 02:50 PM
-
#8
02-02-2023, 02:52 PM
-
#9
- redmelly
- Registered User
-
- redmelly
- Registered User
- Join Date: Aug 2011
- Posts: 13,367
- Rep Power: 144618
-
-
Originally Posted By lockdev⏩
Here's a source. Is it legit?Legit source?
This is what SHOULD happen, but I don't expect the stupid juice leader to concede anything.
This is what SHOULD happen, but I don't expect the stupid juice leader to concede anything.
https://www.americanpartisan.org/202...s-war-is-lost/
Can't end soon enough. Going to st. Petersburg in june and don't want to have issues accessing money.
02-02-2023, 03:08 PM
-
#10
02-02-2023, 03:21 PM
-
#11
02-02-2023, 03:30 PM
-
#12
- Ironmanlet
- Adamantium User
-
- Ironmanlet
- Adamantium User
- Join Date: Aug 2009
- Location: Cajun Country
- Age: 40
- Height: 5'7"
- Weight: 185 lbs
- Posts: 52,657
- Subscribers: 4
- Rep Power: 418919
-
-
Originally Posted By N0stradamus⏩
100%This war was nothing more than a giant money laundering scheme just like all modern wars. It seems that it's dragged on long enough and now the US is ready to offer terms to Russia as a way for them to save face.
As I've said many times: The US would pick a Russian boogeyman over a Ukrainian ally any day of the week. Without a boogeyman like Russia, how else can US politicians drum up support for more defense spending?
It's sad that the Ukrainians were dumb enough to elect Zelensky and let their country get obliterated just so the elites can get even richer.
Nukes aren't incoming and they never were... the elites can't get rich if nukes start going off... Babayagawick85's fantasy of nuclear WWIII has come to a disappointing (but predictable) end....
As I've said many times: The US would pick a Russian boogeyman over a Ukrainian ally any day of the week. Without a boogeyman like Russia, how else can US politicians drum up support for more defense spending?
It's sad that the Ukrainians were dumb enough to elect Zelensky and let their country get obliterated just so the elites can get even richer.
Nukes aren't incoming and they never were... the elites can't get rich if nukes start going off... Babayagawick85's fantasy of nuclear WWIII has come to a disappointing (but predictable) end....
They are all working on the same side to achieve the same goals. The ending of this story, just like every conflict after deviating from the gold standard and the concept of infinite money became a thing, was decided long before the fighting even started.
This is not a war between Russia and Ukraine, or even a proxy war with America.
This is the global elitist conducting another massive transfer of wealth from the taxpayer, to themselves, using the US government (along with other governments), to do so.
Again.
All while the population argues about the meaningless bs they want us to worry about.
“The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.“
PS: Don't eat poop, just don't let the idea of it stop you from living life to its fullest.
02-02-2023, 03:36 PM
-
#13
- Maestrobater
- Registered User
-
- Maestrobater
- Registered User
- Join Date: Dec 2013
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 401
- Rep Power: 1727
-
-
Originally Posted By redmelly⏩
Chit tier source.Here's a source. Is it legit?
https://www.americanpartisan.org/202...s-war-is-lost/
Can't end soon enough. Going to st. Petersburg in june and don't want to have issues accessing money.
https://www.americanpartisan.org/202...s-war-is-lost/
Can't end soon enough. Going to st. Petersburg in june and don't want to have issues accessing money.
02-02-2023, 03:58 PM
-
#14
- redmelly
- Registered User
-
- redmelly
- Registered User
- Join Date: Aug 2011
- Posts: 13,367
- Rep Power: 144618
-
-
Originally Posted By QuickShotSteve⏩
I can change some money in Istanbul, and in Russia, of course. They will take USD. But I'm only carrying so much cash with me. I need to probably set up a bank acct in a bank that's not sanctioned in a friendly country before I go.Super jelly, have fun man. Change money to something that they still accept first, UAE dirhams are still accepted and you can get at any layover point.
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-
- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts