Forum
»
How is Michael Avenatti tweeting from prison?
- Results 1 to 12 of 12
-
Page 1 of 1
03-24-2023, 07:51 PM
-
#1
03-24-2023, 08:07 PM
-
#2
- SaltyDog920
- Certified jawstethics
-
- SaltyDog920
- Certified jawstethics
- Join Date: Feb 2014
- Posts: 14,309
- Subscribers: 1
- Rep Power: 161966
-
-
Lmfao... the man that was going to bring down drumph tweeting from prison. Lol.
And if course there's "damning evidence" that just hasn't been shown yet (right next to the pee pee tapes, omarosaa n word tapes, Russia Russia Russia, Cohen n word tapes etc...)
Just 2 more weeks!!11!
And if course there's "damning evidence" that just hasn't been shown yet (right next to the pee pee tapes, omarosaa n word tapes, Russia Russia Russia, Cohen n word tapes etc...)
Just 2 more weeks!!11!
03-24-2023, 08:10 PM
-
#3
- gwg77
- Join Date: Oct 2017
- Location: United States
- Posts: 20,489
- Subscribers: 20
- Rep Power: 1095324
-
-
Originally Posted By SaltyDog920⏩
Read it again. He is saying texts and emails will be damaging toprosecution, not Trump.Lmfao... the man that was going to bring down drumph tweeting from prison. Lol.
And if course there's "damning evidence" that just hasn't been shown yet (right next to the pee pee tapes, omarosaa n word tapes, Russia Russia Russia, Cohen n word tapes etc...)
Just 2 more weeks!!11!
And if course there's "damning evidence" that just hasn't been shown yet (right next to the pee pee tapes, omarosaa n word tapes, Russia Russia Russia, Cohen n word tapes etc...)
Just 2 more weeks!!11!
He said you can't trust Stormy or Michael Cohen.
03-24-2023, 08:20 PM
-
#4
- Noliberals4
- Registered User
-
- Noliberals4
- Registered User
- Join Date: Aug 2015
- Location: United States
- Age: 37
- Posts: 34,396
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By gwg77⏩
You think SaltyDog can read? I'm shocked the guy remembers to breathe, much less read.Read it again. He is saying texts and emails will be damaging toprosecution, not Trump.
He said you can't trust Stormy or Michael Cohen.
He said you can't trust Stormy or Michael Cohen.
Republicans are weak men who pretend to be strong
Democrats are strong men who pretend to be weak
03-24-2023, 08:24 PM
-
#5
03-24-2023, 08:32 PM
-
#6
- superman704
- Registered User
-
- superman704
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2019
- Age: 56
- Posts: 16,891
- Rep Power: 17137
-
-
My ******
John 3:16
Natty for life
Red for life
I'm not really 50, I'm 47, idk how to change the age
Autism crew (Asperger's syndrome)
High test crew
Bald crew
MAGA crew
Guys stop making me green! I actually enjoy being red! It's more alpha!
Born again Christian crew
Heavy metal crew
Sometimes the stuff I say is just ''trolling''
03-24-2023, 08:34 PM
-
#7
03-24-2023, 08:37 PM
-
#8
- BuckNakedinBama
- hell yeah brother
-
- BuckNakedinBama
- hell yeah brother
- Join Date: Aug 2011
- Posts: 19,855
- Rep Power: 142836
-
-
The Brady rule requires the government hand over any exculpatory evidence which may help the defense to show the trial jury.
BUT... this rule doesn't apply (IIRC - I don't practice criminal law) to evidence shown to a grand jury. A grand jury just determines whether there is probable cause to indict. I don't think the prosecutor has to show exculpatory evidence to the grand jury. So the grand jury could find probable cause without ever seeing the exculpatory evidence.
There is NO RIGHT of a defense counsel in a grand jury.
So... Bragg is trying to dupe this grand jury into finding probable cause to indict by hiding all the exculpatory evidence.
Absolute clown car political prosecution being performed by an overenthusiastic attorney who thinks he's found this loophole in the rules and intends to exploit it for political points. But he's going to get his absolute ass handed to him in real court which is how these things normally go.
BUT... this rule doesn't apply (IIRC - I don't practice criminal law) to evidence shown to a grand jury. A grand jury just determines whether there is probable cause to indict. I don't think the prosecutor has to show exculpatory evidence to the grand jury. So the grand jury could find probable cause without ever seeing the exculpatory evidence.
There is NO RIGHT of a defense counsel in a grand jury.
So... Bragg is trying to dupe this grand jury into finding probable cause to indict by hiding all the exculpatory evidence.
Absolute clown car political prosecution being performed by an overenthusiastic attorney who thinks he's found this loophole in the rules and intends to exploit it for political points. But he's going to get his absolute ass handed to him in real court which is how these things normally go.
-
03-24-2023, 10:03 PM
-
#9
- gwg77
- Join Date: Oct 2017
- Location: United States
- Posts: 20,489
- Subscribers: 20
- Rep Power: 1095324
-
-
Originally Posted By BuckNakedinBama⏩
Yeah, that makes sense. They just want to keep Trump jammed up for the next year or two with a criminal case. The outcome of the case isn't what's important, just that he's under indictment leading up to the 2024 election.The Brady rule requires the government hand over any exculpatory evidence which may help the defense to show the trial jury.
BUT... this rule doesn't apply (IIRC - I don't practice criminal law) to evidence shown to a grand jury. A grand jury just determines whether there is probable cause to indict. I don't think the prosecutor has to show exculpatory evidence to the grand jury. So the grand jury could find probable cause without ever seeing the exculpatory evidence.
There is NO RIGHT of a defense counsel in a grand jury.
So... Bragg is trying to dupe this grand jury into finding probable cause to indict by hiding all the exculpatory evidence.
Absolute clown car political prosecution being performed by an overenthusiastic attorney who thinks he's found this loophole in the rules and intends to exploit it for political points. But he's going to get his absolute ass handed to him in real court which is how these things normally go.
BUT... this rule doesn't apply (IIRC - I don't practice criminal law) to evidence shown to a grand jury. A grand jury just determines whether there is probable cause to indict. I don't think the prosecutor has to show exculpatory evidence to the grand jury. So the grand jury could find probable cause without ever seeing the exculpatory evidence.
There is NO RIGHT of a defense counsel in a grand jury.
So... Bragg is trying to dupe this grand jury into finding probable cause to indict by hiding all the exculpatory evidence.
Absolute clown car political prosecution being performed by an overenthusiastic attorney who thinks he's found this loophole in the rules and intends to exploit it for political points. But he's going to get his absolute ass handed to him in real court which is how these things normally go.
Bragg should be disbarred and thrown in jail for his corruption and weaponization of his office.
03-24-2023, 10:42 PM
-
#10
- frankdtank20
- Registered User
-
- frankdtank20
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2020
- Posts: 27,464
- Rep Power: 171374
-
-
How? The prison guards' dicks ain't gonna suck themselves.
Yeah Buddyyy! Light weight! Light weight baby!!!!
03-25-2023, 07:15 AM
-
#11
03-25-2023, 08:06 AM
-
#12
- bpatel82
- Fuk BLM
-
- bpatel82
- Fuk BLM
- Join Date: Sep 2010
- Location: Illinois, United States
- Posts: 5,243
- Rep Power: 40972
-
-
DAs and AGs hate this simple trick Geotus uses to stay out of the jail...
https://babylonbee.com/news/trump-ex...itting-a-crime
https://babylonbee.com/news/trump-ex...itting-a-crime
Michael Schumacher is GOAT
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts


