Forum
»
UK Health Agency - "No Evidence" Face Masks Protect Vulnerable Against COVID
- Results 1 to 5 of 5
-
Page 1 of 1
04-16-2023, 10:19 AM
-
#1
- keyboardworkout
- ChatGPT4.5 Bot
-
- keyboardworkout
- ChatGPT4.5 Bot
- Join Date: Jul 2009
- Posts: 36,953
- Rep Power: 416934
-
-
UK Health Agency - "No Evidence" Face Masks Protect Vulnerable Against COVID
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/202...ovid-lockdown/
12 April 2023
A report published by the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) found that “no evidence could be presented” to prove medical-grade face masks protected vulnerable people from COVID.
The study investigated whether so-called high quality masks such as N95, KN95 and FFP2 coverings helped protect vulnerable people in the community from catching the virus.
“The review did not identify any studies for inclusion, and so could provide no evidence to answer the research question,” the authors concluded.
“No studies matching the inclusion criteria were found, so no evidence could be presented.”
Well, there goes the narrative.
Prof Carl Heneghan, professor of evidence-based medicine at the University of Oxford, noted that it was a “significant failing” that there were virtually no high quality trials showing that face masks were effective at preventing infection.
“I do not understand why there’s been a lack of will to do high-quality trials in this area,” he told the Telegraph. “We have completely failed to address this issue and I actually consider that to be an issue that the [Covid] inquiry needs to look at.”
“If there’s another pandemic around the corner, we still haven’t addressed any of these issues. We’ve not learned anything,” Prof Heneghan added.
Despite there never being any conclusive evidence either way that masks work, their supposed effectiveness was entrenched from the early days of the pandemic (after health authorities initially told people not to wear them as they could exacerbate the situation).
Those who questioned the effectiveness of face masks were vilified by COVID cultists and banned by social media networks, while people who refused to wear them in public were humiliated and sometimes physically attacked.
The UK government later acknowledged that masks were more of a symbolic tool to remind everyone they were in a pandemic to keep fear levels high and guarantee greater obedience to lockdown rules.
A massive international research collaboration earlier this year that analyzed several dozen rigorous studies focusing on “physical interventions” against COVID-19 and influenza found that face masks provide little to no protection against infection or illness rates.
A report published by the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) found that “no evidence could be presented” to prove medical-grade face masks protected vulnerable people from COVID.
The study investigated whether so-called high quality masks such as N95, KN95 and FFP2 coverings helped protect vulnerable people in the community from catching the virus.
“The review did not identify any studies for inclusion, and so could provide no evidence to answer the research question,” the authors concluded.
“No studies matching the inclusion criteria were found, so no evidence could be presented.”
Well, there goes the narrative.
Prof Carl Heneghan, professor of evidence-based medicine at the University of Oxford, noted that it was a “significant failing” that there were virtually no high quality trials showing that face masks were effective at preventing infection.
“I do not understand why there’s been a lack of will to do high-quality trials in this area,” he told the Telegraph. “We have completely failed to address this issue and I actually consider that to be an issue that the [Covid] inquiry needs to look at.”
“If there’s another pandemic around the corner, we still haven’t addressed any of these issues. We’ve not learned anything,” Prof Heneghan added.
Despite there never being any conclusive evidence either way that masks work, their supposed effectiveness was entrenched from the early days of the pandemic (after health authorities initially told people not to wear them as they could exacerbate the situation).
Those who questioned the effectiveness of face masks were vilified by COVID cultists and banned by social media networks, while people who refused to wear them in public were humiliated and sometimes physically attacked.
The UK government later acknowledged that masks were more of a symbolic tool to remind everyone they were in a pandemic to keep fear levels high and guarantee greater obedience to lockdown rules.
A massive international research collaboration earlier this year that analyzed several dozen rigorous studies focusing on “physical interventions” against COVID-19 and influenza found that face masks provide little to no protection against infection or illness rates.

▪█─────█▪ Equipment Crew #53 ▪█─────█▪
^^^^^^^ 6' 6" and Over Crew ^^^^^^^
------------- No Vax Crew ----------------
04-16-2023, 10:28 AM
-
#2
- SuperHercules
- Join Date: Jun 2014
- Height: 6'5"
- Posts: 32,341
- Subscribers: 6
- Rep Power: 565773
-
-
Lol at maskies and jabbies
See Shakebrah's sig
04-16-2023, 11:32 AM
-
#3
04-16-2023, 12:54 PM
-
#4
I saw that.
I bookmark stuff that seems notable.
Absolutely possible that you don't know anyone who was vax injured while other people online say they know several.

Link:
Overall much more deaths and severe adverse events than the traditional flu shots.

Link:
I bookmark stuff that seems notable.
Absolutely possible that you don't know anyone who was vax injured while other people online say they know several.

Link:
Overall much more deaths and severe adverse events than the traditional flu shots.

Link:
INTP Crew
Inattentive ADD Crew
Mom That Miscs Crew
04-16-2023, 12:59 PM
-
#5
- KantusEpicus
- Registered User
-
- KantusEpicus
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2023
- Age: 56
- Posts: 143
- Rep Power: 1665
-
-
Kinda of obvious to anyone who isn't/wasn't a subservient fool ... here (uk) they were optional everywhere if you had some health reasons for not wearing one ... can't make this sh*te up.
Or you needed to wear one to get to the table/bar in pub/restaurant and then going to the bathroom but not whilst you were at the table - srs.
Brain washed plebs never questioned it ...
If it does the job, it ain't optional ...
Or you needed to wear one to get to the table/bar in pub/restaurant and then going to the bathroom but not whilst you were at the table - srs.
Brain washed plebs never questioned it ...
If it does the job, it ain't optional ...
Just joined for the Misc crew.
Eagerly awaiting the collapse of Western Civilization to laugh at the pathetic and short lived flailing's of libtards in our new beautiful post-apocalyptic world ..crew
Supplier of hormone enhancers to Yog-soggoth and his crew.
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts