I would say that "I was just thinking", but really, most of the thoughts I'm about to detail below are thoughts I've had for 7 or 8 years or more.

Say, for example, you have someone upon whom a number of people are extremely, extremely dependent upon for...some bizarre reason.

Well, in order to ensure that person's "compliance" and "reliability" for that bizarre reason, it would be "smart" to make sure that they are...isolated, helpless, etc etc.

If you also want this person to be someone who doesn't do anything that might be "costly", also make sure that they're physically weak so that they're afraid of their own shadow.

Also, in making sure that they truly are isolated, make sure that there's nobody who could actually get close to them and might actually care about them, share information with them, help them stand up for themselves. Don't allow anybody to "get too close" to them because you don't WANT anybody to counteract the at-large interests of that person actually being isolated and unable to stand up for themselves. Don't let anybody actually start to "fall in love" with them. Both the "bad guys" and maybe even the "good guys" will see to this.

On one level, if you want to ensure someone's extreme reliability for this bizarre reason, it is "smart" to make sure that they are isolated, helpless, powerless, have no money friends or money, are physically weak, etc etc etc.

On the other hand, if you need this person to be important and actually not do anything that could be "costly", then, really, it's NOT actually smart to leave them in a position for so long that THERE IS ACTUALLY NOT REALLY A SINGLE PERSON LEFT ON EARTH THAT THEY ACTUALLY LIKE, relative or not, beyond anything like a "pleasant acquaintance". To them, anybody could drop dead and they might not actually care very much for very long, if at all, really.

If that person comes to believe, at least in certain states of mind, that there is NOBODY, who "the powers that be" have "gotten to", who will actually be loyal to this person, instead of "what they are directed to do", then, really, what is their motivation to keep on living?

Say, for example, they want to physically transform themselves from always having been skinny and weak to someone who has a very desirable physique, is strong, and can defend themselves. And in the process not actually feel like they are, figuratively speaking, wearing a miniskirt and high heels in any sort of gym and like they can essentially be, figuratively speaking, "raped" by *anybody*, without actually having a hand laid on them. Well, say that such a person can eschew those feelings of being 100% had 100% of the time. Well, still, they have to feel that the specialized help they're going to need to in order to transform themselves because they're no longer young and they can't really afford, for a number of reasons, to sustain much in the way of injury...how can they make sure that they actually have a person, like a physical trainer, who won't actually mistrain them or put them on a track to "accidental" self-injury, because, well, that would "serve certain purposes"? Because, really, without anybody who actually is AFRAID of the consequences of mistreating you, they will almost assuredly align their loyalty with other interests (on EITHER the "bad guys" team OR the "good guys" team) that will display good reason to actually fear them.

I mean, if you ask me, this is a situation that is actually unintelligent in the extreme. When a person doesn't actually feel respected or that they will ever again have any actual freedom or real desire to actually go on living for any actual amount of time...what is the point? How can you really depend upon such a person?

When such evil has become so completely collective, assuming that there is a "God", well, maybe God will somehow put a monkey wrench in there ever actually being any sort of improvement. Because when it comes to one certain particular issue, when NOBODY actually any truly and directly avows any sort of penitence, well, there will be no rightful or righteous change for the better for anyone.

I can appreciate your point of view OP, however, I would say that "I was just thinking", but really, most of the thoughts I'm about to detail below are thoughts I've had for 7 or 8 years or more.

Say, for example, you have someone upon whom a number of people are extremely, extremely dependent upon for...some bizarre reason.

Well, in order to ensure that person's "compliance" and "reliability" for that bizarre reason, it would be "smart" to make sure that they are...isolated, helpless, etc etc.

If you also want this person to be someone who doesn't do anything that might be "costly", also make sure that they're physically weak so that they're afraid of their own shadow.

Also, in making sure that they truly are isolated, make sure that there's nobody who could actually get close to them and might actually care about them, share information with them, help them stand up for themselves. Don't allow anybody to "get too close" to them because you don't WANT anybody to counteract the at-large interests of that person actually being isolated and unable to stand up for themselves. Don't let anybody actually start to "fall in love" with them. Both the "bad guys" and maybe even the "good guys" will see to this.

On one level, if you want to ensure someone's extreme reliability for this bizarre reason, it is "smart" to make sure that they are isolated, helpless, powerless, have no money friends or money, are physically weak, etc etc etc.

On the other hand, if you need this person to be important and actually not do anything that could be "costly", then, really, it's NOT actually smart to leave them in a position for so long that THERE IS ACTUALLY NOT REALLY A SINGLE PERSON LEFT ON EARTH THAT THEY ACTUALLY LIKE, relative or not, beyond anything like a "pleasant acquaintance". To them, anybody could drop dead and they might not actually care very much for very long, if at all, really.

If that person comes to believe, at least in certain states of mind, that there is NOBODY, who "the powers that be" have "gotten to", who will actually be loyal to this person, instead of "what they are directed to do", then, really, what is their motivation to keep on living?

Say, for example, they want to physically transform themselves from always having been skinny and weak to someone who has a very desirable physique, is strong, and can defend themselves. And in the process not actually feel like they are, figuratively speaking, wearing a miniskirt and high heels in any sort of gym and like they can essentially be, figuratively speaking, "raped" by *anybody*, without actually having a hand laid on them. Well, say that such a person can eschew those feelings of being 100% had 100% of the time. Well, still, they have to feel that the specialized help they're going to need to in order to transform themselves because they're no longer young and they can't really afford, for a number of reasons, to sustain much in the way of injury...how can they make sure that they actually have a person, like a physical trainer, who won't actually mistrain them or put them on a track to "accidental" self-injury, because, well, that would "serve certain purposes"? Because, really, without anybody who actually is AFRAID of the consequences of mistreating you, they will almost assuredly align their loyalty with other interests (on EITHER the "bad guys" team OR the "good guys" team) that will display good reason to actually fear them.

I mean, if you ask me, this is a situation that is actually unintelligent in the extreme. When a person doesn't actually feel respected or that they will ever again have any actual freedom or real desire to actually go on living for any actual amount of time...what is the point? How can you really depend upon such a person?

When such evil has become so completely collective, assuming that there is a "God", well, maybe God will somehow put a monkey wrench in there ever actually being any sort of improvement. Because when it comes to one certain particular issue, when NOBODY actually any truly and directly avows any sort of penitence, well, there will be no rightful or righteous change for the better for anyone.

OP is a ph@ggit. I would say that "I was just thinking", but really, most of the thoughts I'm about to detail below are thoughts I've had for 7 or 8 years or more.

Say, for example, you have someone upon whom a number of people are extremely, extremely dependent upon for...some bizarre reason.

Well, in order to ensure that person's "compliance" and "reliability" for that bizarre reason, it would be "smart" to make sure that they are...isolated, helpless, etc etc.

If you also want this person to be someone who doesn't do anything that might be "costly", also make sure that they're physically weak so that they're afraid of their own shadow.

Also, in making sure that they truly are isolated, make sure that there's nobody who could actually get close to them and might actually care about them, share information with them, help them stand up for themselves. Don't allow anybody to "get too close" to them because you don't WANT anybody to counteract the at-large interests of that person actually being isolated and unable to stand up for themselves. Don't let anybody actually start to "fall in love" with them. Both the "bad guys" and maybe even the "good guys" will see to this.

On one level, if you want to ensure someone's extreme reliability for this bizarre reason, it is "smart" to make sure that they are isolated, helpless, powerless, have no money friends or money, are physically weak, etc etc etc.

On the other hand, if you need this person to be important and actually not do anything that could be "costly", then, really, it's NOT actually smart to leave them in a position for so long that THERE IS ACTUALLY NOT REALLY A SINGLE PERSON LEFT ON EARTH THAT THEY ACTUALLY LIKE, relative or not, beyond anything like a "pleasant acquaintance". To them, anybody could drop dead and they might not actually care very much for very long, if at all, really.

If that person comes to believe, at least in certain states of mind, that there is NOBODY, who "the powers that be" have "gotten to", who will actually be loyal to this person, instead of "what they are directed to do", then, really, what is their motivation to keep on living?

Say, for example, they want to physically transform themselves from always having been skinny and weak to someone who has a very desirable physique, is strong, and can defend themselves. And in the process not actually feel like they are, figuratively speaking, wearing a miniskirt and high heels in any sort of gym and like they can essentially be, figuratively speaking, "raped" by *anybody*, without actually having a hand laid on them. Well, say that such a person can eschew those feelings of being 100% had 100% of the time. Well, still, they have to feel that the specialized help they're going to need to in order to transform themselves because they're no longer young and they can't really afford, for a number of reasons, to sustain much in the way of injury...how can they make sure that they actually have a person, like a physical trainer, who won't actually mistrain them or put them on a track to "accidental" self-injury, because, well, that would "serve certain purposes"? Because, really, without anybody who actually is AFRAID of the consequences of mistreating you, they will almost assuredly align their loyalty with other interests (on EITHER the "bad guys" team OR the "good guys" team) that will display good reason to actually fear them.

I mean, if you ask me, this is a situation that is actually unintelligent in the extreme. When a person doesn't actually feel respected or that they will ever again have any actual freedom or real desire to actually go on living for any actual amount of time...what is the point? How can you really depend upon such a person?

When such evil has become so completely collective, assuming that there is a "God", well, maybe God will somehow put a monkey wrench in there ever actually being any sort of improvement. Because when it comes to one certain particular issue, when NOBODY actually any truly and directly avows any sort of penitence, well, there will be no rightful or righteous change for the better for anyone.

mate why can't you just cliff your post

bump