Forum
»
Joe Rogan RFK #1999 is out
- Results 1 to 16 of 16
-
Page 1 of 1
Thread: Joe Rogan RFK #1999 is out
06-15-2023, 03:31 PM
-
#1
- HateLiberals
- Registered User
-
- HateLiberals
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2022
- Age: 56
- Posts: 14,808
- Rep Power: 129650
-
-
Joe Rogan RFK #1999 is out
Climate prisoners? Undying support for Israel? Listening now
06-15-2023, 03:36 PM
-
#2
Cucker has been begging Rogan to let him on his show, and Rogan told him to get fuk'd lmao.
"I am a rational animal who occupies the intermediary position between angel and beast"
"The upper class is afforded their position by the collective burden the underclass must carry for them"
**Summer Walker Crew**
06-15-2023, 03:44 PM
-
#3
- ohiostate124
- Pure-blood
-
- ohiostate124
- Pure-blood
- Join Date: Sep 2010
- Location: Virginia, United States
- Posts: 31,403
- Rep Power: 325469
-
-
Originally Posted By OPGenesis⏩
Source?Cucker has been begging Rogan to let him on his show, and Rogan told him to get fuk'd lmao.
06-15-2023, 03:46 PM
-
#4
- TaeBoNinja
- Vagina Whisperer
-
- TaeBoNinja
- Vagina Whisperer
- Join Date: Sep 2009
- Location: United States
- Posts: 46,748
- Rep Power: 174067
-
-
Originally Posted By ohiostate124⏩
anonymous Daily Mail sourceSource?
6'3 Master Race
GOATCal Crew
No Pillow Crew
Pureblood Crew
06-15-2023, 03:47 PM
-
#5
- DeshaunWatson
- Verified
-
- DeshaunWatson
- Verified
- Join Date: Jun 2014
- Posts: 19,647
- Rep Power: 135286
-
-
Originally Posted By ohiostate124⏩
Same sources as the Russia collusionSource?
06-15-2023, 03:54 PM
-
#6
Originally Posted By DeshaunWatson⏩
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...rview-Fox.htmlSame sources as the Russia collusion
"I am a rational animal who occupies the intermediary position between angel and beast"
"The upper class is afforded their position by the collective burden the underclass must carry for them"
**Summer Walker Crew**
06-15-2023, 04:00 PM
-
#7
- JUSA
- No Agony, No Bragony
-
- JUSA
- No Agony, No Bragony
- Join Date: Nov 2004
- Location: Texas
- Posts: 50,517
- Rep Power: 458793
-
-
Originally Posted By OPGenesis⏩
Dude, how does any of this add up?On his show, Rogan said he'd have him on. Tucker himself casually reaches 70-90M people with tweets. Rogan might have more reach overall, being the #1 Podcast, but if Tucker promoted actually telling his side to the story, something I'm betting legally he can not for the time being, he would probably get well over 100M views.
So, in order for this 'source say!' to be true:
- Tucker would be able to freely speak about this, despite ongoing lawsuits
- Rogan would have to be lying about being open to having Tucker on
- Tucker would have to be desperate to get to Rogan's audience, despite having 100M or more of his own
Does any of that add up?
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
06-15-2023, 04:05 PM
-
#8
Originally Posted By JUSA⏩
I don't know tbh. I don't like either. Cucker lost me with the unhinged rant about aliens. Dudes a kook. And Rogan said Obama was the best president of his time.Dude, how does any of this add up?
On his show, Rogan said he'd have him on. Tucker himself casually reaches 70-90M people with tweets. Rogan might have more reach overall, being the #1 Podcast, but if Tucker promoted actually telling his side to the story, something I'm betting legally he can not for the time being, he would probably get well over 100M views.
So, in order for this 'source say!' to be true:
- Tucker would be able to freely speak about this, despite ongoing lawsuits
- Rogan would have to be lying about being open to having Tucker on
- Tucker would have to be desperate to get to Rogan's audience, despite having 100M or more of his own
Does any of that add up?
On his show, Rogan said he'd have him on. Tucker himself casually reaches 70-90M people with tweets. Rogan might have more reach overall, being the #1 Podcast, but if Tucker promoted actually telling his side to the story, something I'm betting legally he can not for the time being, he would probably get well over 100M views.
So, in order for this 'source say!' to be true:
- Tucker would be able to freely speak about this, despite ongoing lawsuits
- Rogan would have to be lying about being open to having Tucker on
- Tucker would have to be desperate to get to Rogan's audience, despite having 100M or more of his own
Does any of that add up?
I'm just going off the story that was published.
"I am a rational animal who occupies the intermediary position between angel and beast"
"The upper class is afforded their position by the collective burden the underclass must carry for them"
**Summer Walker Crew**
06-15-2023, 04:11 PM
-
#9
- ohiostate124
- Pure-blood
-
- ohiostate124
- Pure-blood
- Join Date: Sep 2010
- Location: Virginia, United States
- Posts: 31,403
- Rep Power: 325469
-
-
Originally Posted By OPGenesis⏩
So it’s complete bullchit? Got it.
06-15-2023, 04:11 PM
-
#10
Originally Posted By ohiostate124⏩
Sorry, I don't get my news from Gateway Pundit, son.So it’s complete bullchit? Got it.
"I am a rational animal who occupies the intermediary position between angel and beast"
"The upper class is afforded their position by the collective burden the underclass must carry for them"
**Summer Walker Crew**
06-15-2023, 04:12 PM
-
#11
- Barteh
- Registered User
-
- Barteh
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2012
- Location: -, -, Netherlands
- Age: 36
- Posts: 20,781
- Rep Power: 125767
-
-
Originally Posted By JUSA⏩
"Begging" to be on his podcast sounds just stupid. I'm sure he'd love to be on there though.Dude, how does any of this add up?
On his show, Rogan said he'd have him on. Tucker himself casually reaches 70-90M people with tweets. Rogan might have more reach overall, being the #1 Podcast, but if Tucker promoted actually telling his side to the story, something I'm betting legally he can not for the time being, he would probably get well over 100M views.
So, in order for this 'source say!' to be true:
- Tucker would be able to freely speak about this, despite ongoing lawsuits
- Rogan would have to be lying about being open to having Tucker on
- Tucker would have to be desperate to get to Rogan's audience, despite having 100M or more of his own
Does any of that add up?
On his show, Rogan said he'd have him on. Tucker himself casually reaches 70-90M people with tweets. Rogan might have more reach overall, being the #1 Podcast, but if Tucker promoted actually telling his side to the story, something I'm betting legally he can not for the time being, he would probably get well over 100M views.
So, in order for this 'source say!' to be true:
- Tucker would be able to freely speak about this, despite ongoing lawsuits
- Rogan would have to be lying about being open to having Tucker on
- Tucker would have to be desperate to get to Rogan's audience, despite having 100M or more of his own
Does any of that add up?
06-15-2023, 04:16 PM
-
#12
06-15-2023, 04:19 PM
-
#13
Originally Posted By DomMJr⏩
Dudes a climate change freak, which entails many other things.He needs a handler who stops him spending most of his interviews on vaccines and the people who offed his dad / uncle
Funny seeing people idolize him tbh.
"I am a rational animal who occupies the intermediary position between angel and beast"
"The upper class is afforded their position by the collective burden the underclass must carry for them"
**Summer Walker Crew**
06-15-2023, 04:30 PM
-
#14
- JUSA
- No Agony, No Bragony
-
- JUSA
- No Agony, No Bragony
- Join Date: Nov 2004
- Location: Texas
- Posts: 50,517
- Rep Power: 458793
-
-
Originally Posted By Barteh⏩
Maybe not right now -- Tucker is in the middle of what could be a massive lawsuit. He could easily say something wrong or that could hurt that. Even if they agreed not to talk about Fox, and that would be the only way (and sour Tucker being there in the first place)."Begging" to be on his podcast sounds just stupid. I'm sure he'd love to be on there though.
People want Tucker on to talk about his (rich) childhood, his wealthy privileged life and other things I'm sure Tucker would not want overly advertised? Guy is part of a very wealthy family, I don't hold this against him, but he wants to be portrayed as an Everyman, not the Chicken Heir Prince.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
06-15-2023, 04:35 PM
-
#15
- JUSA
- No Agony, No Bragony
-
- JUSA
- No Agony, No Bragony
- Join Date: Nov 2004
- Location: Texas
- Posts: 50,517
- Rep Power: 458793
-
-
Originally Posted By OPGenesis⏩
Yeah, and you know I don't care about who you like or dislike -- one thing, and I think I said this recently to Sillie or someone (so don't hold that against me, I hate to parallel you to him in any way)... but with this story? It doesn't matter if I like or dislike someone.I don't know tbh. I don't like either. Cucker lost me with the unhinged rant about aliens. Dudes a kook. And Rogan said Obama was the best president of his time.
I'm just going off the story that was published.
I'm just going off the story that was published.
I actually do hold a mostly-positive opinion of Tucker. He says interesting things and has a political opinion I tend to see merit in. And that means nothing -- because all that could be true and he could have spit in a little girl's face this morning for not shining his shoes right or be a lousy tipper or maybe has really bad breath. Who knows - because none of those traits are linked to being able to get in front of a camera and say right-libertarian-leaning things that random bodybuilding.com poster who goes by the stupid handle JUSA thinks about him.
Same here -- whether you like or dislike Rogan or Tucker, that has no bearing on this story. It certainly *does* with the 'sometimes' biased authors of these "SOURCES CLOSE TO HIM SAY" stories, though. Sometimes it seems like they just make **** up about people they are told to smear by their bosses.
Objectively, the story makes zero sense and doesn't add up - and it's not because I think Rogan is okay or I mostly like Tucker, it's because none of it makes sense.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
06-15-2023, 04:38 PM
-
#16
Originally Posted By JUSA⏩
I could definitely see Rogan blowing Cucker off, but that's just me.Yeah, and you know I don't care about who you like or dislike -- one thing, and I think I said this recently to Sillie or someone (so don't hold that against me, I hate to parallel you to him in any way)... but with this story? It doesn't matter if I like or dislike someone.
I actually do hold a mostly-positive opinion of Tucker. He says interesting things and has a political opinion I tend to see merit in. And that means nothing -- because all that could be true and he could have spit in a little girl's face this morning for not shining his shoes right or be a lousy tipper or maybe has really bad breath. Who knows - because none of those traits are linked to being able to get in front of a camera and say right-libertarian-leaning things that random bodybuilding.com poster who goes by the stupid handle JUSA thinks about him.
Same here -- whether you like or dislike Rogan or Tucker, that has no bearing on this story. It certainly *does* with the 'sometimes' biased authors of these "SOURCES CLOSE TO HIM SAY" stories, though. Sometimes it seems like they just make **** up about people they are told to smear by their bosses.
Objectively, the story makes zero sense and doesn't add up - and it's not because I think Rogan is okay or I mostly like Tucker, it's because none of it makes sense.
I actually do hold a mostly-positive opinion of Tucker. He says interesting things and has a political opinion I tend to see merit in. And that means nothing -- because all that could be true and he could have spit in a little girl's face this morning for not shining his shoes right or be a lousy tipper or maybe has really bad breath. Who knows - because none of those traits are linked to being able to get in front of a camera and say right-libertarian-leaning things that random bodybuilding.com poster who goes by the stupid handle JUSA thinks about him.
Same here -- whether you like or dislike Rogan or Tucker, that has no bearing on this story. It certainly *does* with the 'sometimes' biased authors of these "SOURCES CLOSE TO HIM SAY" stories, though. Sometimes it seems like they just make **** up about people they are told to smear by their bosses.
Objectively, the story makes zero sense and doesn't add up - and it's not because I think Rogan is okay or I mostly like Tucker, it's because none of it makes sense.
I guess it's a subjective thing.
"I am a rational animal who occupies the intermediary position between angel and beast"
"The upper class is afforded their position by the collective burden the underclass must carry for them"
**Summer Walker Crew**
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts