Forum
»
Is the Supreme Court acting Politically?
- Results 1 to 16 of 16
-
Page 1 of 1
07-02-2023, 07:08 PM
-
#1
- Bigbuster1
- 41oz King
-
- Bigbuster1
- 41oz King
- Join Date: Aug 2013
- Posts: 10,571
- Rep Power: 86766
-
-
Is the Supreme Court acting Politically?
Is the Supreme Court making rulings based on precedent or are they acting politically?
Has the Court always been politically motivated or do you even care if they are?
Has the Court always been politically motivated or do you even care if they are?
07-02-2023, 07:12 PM
-
#2
- GreatOldOne
- Cthulhu fhtagn
-
- GreatOldOne
- Cthulhu fhtagn
- Join Date: Jan 2013
- Posts: 39,712
- Rep Power: 210947
-
-
They always act on precedent.
Until they don't.
Until they don't.
07-02-2023, 07:49 PM
-
#3
07-02-2023, 08:01 PM
-
#4
- TrueTruth
- Registered User
-
- TrueTruth
- Registered User
- Join Date: May 2018
- Age: 56
- Posts: 5,766
- Rep Power: 67869
-
-
You should ask Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson who always vote for whatever Democrats tell them to vote. Might as well put Schumer or Pelosi in the robes and you'll get the same voting pattern as from these 3.
07-02-2023, 08:49 PM
-
#5
07-02-2023, 09:01 PM
-
#6
- x-trainer ben
- Registered User
-
- x-trainer ben
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2005
- Location: United States
- Posts: 62,386
- Rep Power: 451180
-
-
only 53% say yes in a recent poll on abc news this week sunday show
There is an unspoken thing, we are iron brothers and sisters, we are to support each other and...It is our duty to support our brothers and sisters in the iron game!
07-02-2023, 09:03 PM
-
#7
07-02-2023, 09:37 PM
-
#8
- freeheeler
- Registered User
-
- freeheeler
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2002
- Location: United States
- Age: 65
- Posts: 11,675
- Rep Power: 83841
-
-
Originally Posted By Bigbuster1⏩
Ask RBGIs the Supreme Court making rulings based on precedent or are they acting politically?
Has the Court always been politically motivated or do you even care if they are?
Has the Court always been politically motivated or do you even care if they are?
She was extremely liberal
And every case she decided for the left
Scubastevo :-What percentage of women have STDs? (serious) If I just wanted to go bareback with any girl that I could get with, what are my chances of ending up bed ridden with STDs?
07-02-2023, 11:04 PM
-
#9
- Irezumi
- Graveyard of Empires
-
- Irezumi
- Graveyard of Empires
- Join Date: Jul 2007
- Location: Yorba Linda, California, United States
- Posts: 13,130
- Rep Power: 80291
-
-
The judicial branch is the only part of our government I put stock in because of the fact that they are not political
LE6920CA Magpul
DDM4 V7
Glock 19 Gen 3
07-03-2023, 12:05 AM
-
#10
- Bodhy
- Paddling to New Zealand
-
- Bodhy
- Paddling to New Zealand
- Join Date: Mar 2020
- Posts: 17,326
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Fuk no, breh. At least not with their recent decision.
The major questions doctrine is the most BS Supreme Court doctrine that exists. It's an ideological weapon. And there's a reason it came into existence recently.
And it's not because the court as it exists has some sort of brilliant insight into legal analysis their predecessors lacked. It's partisan politics.
Congress forgave PPP loans without a second thought and these were balances sometimes into the millions! That's hypocritical AF, and it shows they want to stay rich and they want this generation to stay poorer. Way to mogg their own country.
The major questions doctrine is the most BS Supreme Court doctrine that exists. It's an ideological weapon. And there's a reason it came into existence recently.
And it's not because the court as it exists has some sort of brilliant insight into legal analysis their predecessors lacked. It's partisan politics.
Congress forgave PPP loans without a second thought and these were balances sometimes into the millions! That's hypocritical AF, and it shows they want to stay rich and they want this generation to stay poorer. Way to mogg their own country.
Back off, Warchild.
Seriously.
07-03-2023, 12:22 AM
-
#11
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
-
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,385
- Rep Power: 316746
-
-
Originally Posted By Bodhy⏩
Yet again showing your stupidity. PPP loans were forgiven because state Governments took away a citizens ability to work & provide. Not comparable to Student loans. When you take away one’s ability/right to work, they have to be compensated. There is a reason those that took PPP had to show proof of business expenses dum dum.Fuk no, breh. At least not with their recent decision.
The major questions doctrine is the most BS Supreme Court doctrine that exists. It's an ideological weapon. And there's a reason it came into existence recently.
And it's not because the court as it exists has some sort of brilliant insight into legal analysis their predecessors lacked. It's partisan politics.
Congress forgave PPP loans without a second thought and these were balances sometimes into the millions! That's hypocritical AF, and it shows they want to stay rich and they want this generation to stay poorer. Way to mogg their own country.
The major questions doctrine is the most BS Supreme Court doctrine that exists. It's an ideological weapon. And there's a reason it came into existence recently.
And it's not because the court as it exists has some sort of brilliant insight into legal analysis their predecessors lacked. It's partisan politics.
Congress forgave PPP loans without a second thought and these were balances sometimes into the millions! That's hypocritical AF, and it shows they want to stay rich and they want this generation to stay poorer. Way to mogg their own country.
07-03-2023, 12:38 AM
-
#12
Originally Posted By Paul
This guy's wife collected like 3k in PPP loans when she really doesn't need or deserve it at all fyi. 3k for a "Beauty Salon" lol...employee count of 1. What a joke. Probably paid for Paul's new PC.Yet again showing your stupidity. PPP loans were forgiven because state Governments took away a citizens ability to work & provide. Not comparable to Student loans. When you take away one’s ability/right to work, they have to be compensated. There is a reason those that took PPP had to show proof of business expenses dum dum.
07-03-2023, 01:05 AM
-
#13
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
-
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,385
- Rep Power: 316746
-
-
Originally Posted By Putinist⏩
State shut the salon down, employee count of 5..try again.This guy's wife collected like 3k in PPP loans when she really doesn't need or deserve it at all fyi. 3k for a "Beauty Salon" lol...employee count of 1. What a joke. Probably paid for Paul's new PC.
07-03-2023, 01:12 AM
-
#14
07-03-2023, 01:20 AM
-
#15
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
-
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,385
- Rep Power: 316746
-
-
Originally Posted By Putinist⏩
No, and it was paid back..so what’s the problem?LOL @ 3k for 5 people
Says here jobs retained: 1
u admitting to fraud brah? did ur wife lie on ur PPP loan app?
Says here jobs retained: 1
u admitting to fraud brah? did ur wife lie on ur PPP loan app?
Notice how it’s the leftists always trying to DOX people. What a POS
07-03-2023, 05:42 AM
-
#16
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts