Film made 3x its budget in a week, even while getting review bombed by the mainstream groomer media.

Rolling stone

Rolling Stone's Miles Klee gave a more critical review, writing, "[Sound of Freedom] is a stomach-turning experience, fetishizing the torture of its child victims and lingering over lush preludes to their sexual abuse. At times I had the uncomfortable sense that I might be arrested myself just for sitting through it ... To know thousands of adults will absorb ... this vigilante fever dream, and come away thinking themselves better informed on a hidden civilizational crisis ... well, it's profoundly depressing. Worse still, they'll want to spread the word."[37] RogerEbert.com's Nick Allen was also negative: "Sound of Freedom is a solemn, drawn-out bore with a not particularly bold narrative stance—caring about the safety of children is roughly the easiest cause for any remotely decent human being... But while being so committed to such solemnity and suffering, the truncated storytelling by co-writers Monteverde and Rod Barr neglects to flesh out its ideas or characters or add any more intensity to Ballard's slow-slow-slow burn search for two kids in particular (Lucás Ávila's Miguel and Cristal Aparicio's Rocío) whose faces haunt him."


CNN's Rothschild, focusing on the attitudes of people who will watch it

He said people going to see the film are attracted to it in a way that is "participatory." As if they feel that "only people like Tim Ballard and only people like Jim Caviezel, and by extension, only people like the ticket buyer can help bring these trafficking rings down."

Rothschild said people feel as if they are "helping [to] bring down these ****phile rings and save children" when they see the movie, and that feeling is "comforting" but "not true."

CNN and Rolling Stone both had very high profile paedophile cases recently.

Article in summary-

"Oy vey gevalt it's anuddah shoah!!!"