The Second coup in the USA's history:


"I am a brazilian historian who does research into the history of coups both in Brazil and the rest of Latin America. I can confidently say that the process of Biden's inauguration — from the identification and following deplatforming of Trump's supporters in the government and private sector to the actual change in voting policy without appropriate excuse or transparency — qualifies as a coup d'état.

>coups vs revolution

A revolution is performed by the people, often brings in a change in the nation's elite and thus, the economic and political systems. A coup is performed by the elites (like the USSR's coup against Kruschev) is always performed exclusively by the elites, with or without public support, against a rogue element of the elite itself. The most common public excuse for a coup is the defense of democracy, while the most common result of the coup is dictatorship. Coups are mostly peaceful, revolutions always have violence.

>why is Biden's inauguration so absurd

Extensive deplatforming and alternative media silencing allow a possibly fraudulent and very unjustifiably held election, which sees to the supposed election of a very unpopular president with no passion behind him. Few days before a catastrophic inauguration, the Capitol is attacked by what is likely mostly government agents. Before election results are put into the question, the capital is seized and the inauguration of the rogue president who spends 40% of his term not working takes place.

As expected from coups, what comes after is a continued effort to find and arrest all elements that allowed the previous government to take place. Agents were mobilized even in Canada to help identify the elements that could denounce Jan 6th as a coup.

All allegations of fraud were extensibly denied and shrugged off by the government apparatus in defense of democracy.



>what are the american elites that partook in the coup

The coup was performed by the technical-managerial elites of the government, mostly public workers in public safety and internal affairs. In order to legitimatize itself, however, these elites heavily relied upon support from America's financial elite, which is the owner of media outlets. Coups win by gaining recognition, thus media recognition of the Covid-19 election was truly the domino that started the cascade. January 6th and the seizing of D.C further solidified the new regime and bred the political apathy and nihilism required for a coup to succeed. As a expected from coups, most of the population was left alienated, wondering if they even hold any grip on the government anymore.

>who suffered the coup and why

Coups only happen when the elites feel threatened somehow. The problem of Trump was not Trump himself, but the fact that he represented the unreliability of the democratic process. The american people that so strongly came in support of his election in 2016 would have again come in support of him or someone "worse" in 2020 and 2024. Trump himself was a figurehead of an american people that were enamoured with politics, enamoured with alternative media, and that passionately despised illegal immigration, environmentalism and american imperialism. The coup against Trump was not much against him (as he retained political rights — at least until deciding to use them again recently), but against public participation in democracy.

>why a coup not a revolution

There were no changes in the american elites or the american economy. The former government did not need to be arrested, but they were silenced and set aside in defense of democracy.

>was the coup sucessful?

Coups always spark apathy when sucessful. Ask yourself: have americans ever been this apathetic and nihilistic towards their own nation?"



This was the first coup:

Bump to the top

Just LOL at Biden: