Forum
»
Why hasn't the MSM attacked RFK Jr. for claiming HIV doesn't cause AIDs?
Why hasn't the MSM attacked RFK Jr. for claiming HIV doesn't cause AIDs?
- Results 1 to 4 of 4
-
Page 1 of 1
08-14-2023, 06:18 PM
-
#1
Why hasn't the MSM attacked RFK Jr. for claiming HIV doesn't cause AIDs?
Yet they attacked him for saying covid doesn't target Jews?
Doesn't it sound equally ridiculous to claim that Fauci was killing people who had HIV with AZT, and blaming it on AIDS?
Doesn't it sound equally ridiculous to claim that Fauci was killing people who had HIV with AZT, and blaming it on AIDS?
"I am a rational animal who occupies the intermediary position between angel and beast"
"The upper class is afforded their position by the collective burden the underclass must carry for them"
**Summer Walker Crew**
08-14-2023, 06:20 PM
-
#2
- coast2coastam
- Join Date: Jun 2009
- Location: United States
- Posts: 11,323
- Rep Power: 138587
-
-
There was a German guy on Rogan years ago that talked about that. He claimed no one was willing to debate him, let me see if I can find it. The interview was kinda annoying because of Rogan's cohost, but it was still interesting.
Edit: was able to find it:
https://open.spotify.com/episode/09V4RttjR7mpqwgy2Ie9yT
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Duesberg
Edit: was able to find it:
https://open.spotify.com/episode/09V4RttjR7mpqwgy2Ie9yT
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Duesberg
08-14-2023, 06:30 PM
-
#3
Originally Posted By coast2coastam⏩
"One of Duesberg’s central claims was that the disease known as “AIDS” didn’t actually exist, but was merely the official label attached to a group of more than two dozen different illnesses, all of which had a variety of different causes, with only some of these being infectious agents. Indeed, most of these illnesses had been known and treated for many decades, but they were only designated “AIDS” if the victim was also found to test positive for the HIV virus, which probably had nothing to do with the condition.There was a German guy on Rogan years ago that talked about that. He claimed no one was willing to debate him, let me see if I can find it. The interview was kinda annoying because of Rogan's cohost, but it was still interesting.
Edit: was able to find it:
https://open.spotify.com/episode/09V4RttjR7mpqwgy2Ie9yT
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Duesberg
Edit: was able to find it:
https://open.spotify.com/episode/09V4RttjR7mpqwgy2Ie9yT
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Duesberg
In support of their contrary position, the authors noted that the various groups at high risk for “AIDS” only tended to get particular versions of the disease, with the “AIDS” suffered by hemophiliacs usually being very different from the “AIDS” of African villagers and only slightly overlapping with the diseases of gay men or intervenous drug addicts. Indeed, the pattern of “AIDS” in Africa seemed utterly divergent from that in the developed world. But if all these different illnesses were actually caused by a single HIV virus, such completely disparate syndromes would seem puzzling anomalies, difficult to explain from a scientific perspective."
"I am a rational animal who occupies the intermediary position between angel and beast"
"The upper class is afforded their position by the collective burden the underclass must carry for them"
**Summer Walker Crew**
08-14-2023, 06:35 PM
-
#4
- coast2coastam
- Join Date: Jun 2009
- Location: United States
- Posts: 11,323
- Rep Power: 138587
-
-
Originally Posted By OPGenesis⏩
I think the video was scrubbed from youtube, this is a copy of it:"One of Duesberg’s central claims was that the disease known as “AIDS” didn’t actually exist, but was merely the official label attached to a group of more than two dozen different illnesses, all of which had a variety of different causes, with only some of these being infectious agents. Indeed, most of these illnesses had been known and treated for many decades, but they were only designated “AIDS” if the victim was also found to test positive for the HIV virus, which probably had nothing to do with the condition.
In support of their contrary position, the authors noted that the various groups at high risk for “AIDS” only tended to get particular versions of the disease, with the “AIDS” suffered by hemophiliacs usually being very different from the “AIDS” of African villagers and only slightly overlapping with the diseases of gay men or intervenous drug addicts. Indeed, the pattern of “AIDS” in Africa seemed utterly divergent from that in the developed world. But if all these different illnesses were actually caused by a single HIV virus, such completely disparate syndromes would seem puzzling anomalies, difficult to explain from a scientific perspective."
In support of their contrary position, the authors noted that the various groups at high risk for “AIDS” only tended to get particular versions of the disease, with the “AIDS” suffered by hemophiliacs usually being very different from the “AIDS” of African villagers and only slightly overlapping with the diseases of gay men or intervenous drug addicts. Indeed, the pattern of “AIDS” in Africa seemed utterly divergent from that in the developed world. But if all these different illnesses were actually caused by a single HIV virus, such completely disparate syndromes would seem puzzling anomalies, difficult to explain from a scientific perspective."
https://www.bitchute.com/video/FMEczxqpqWrI/
For people who don't have a spotify account.
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-
- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts