Forum
»
Path to Remove Prosecutors Signed Into Law by Kemp
- Results 1 to 5 of 5
-
Page 1 of 1
08-15-2023, 10:35 PM
-
#1
- gachase21
- Join Date: Dec 2010
- Location: Georgia, United States
- Posts: 31,767
- Subscribers: 4
- Rep Power: 389233
-
-
Path to Remove Prosecutors Signed Into Law by Kemp
Thought this might be relevant, as we may see October 1st
https://aboutblaw.com/7OF
What does Fani Willis say?
Path to Remove Prosecutors Signed Into Law by Georgia Governor
Georgia will create a commission with the power to remove prosecutors who refuse to enforce certain crimes, under legislation signed into law Friday by Republican Gov. Brian Kemp.
The legislation passed the Georgia House and Senate along party line votes. Democrats and other critics have said the measure aims to strip power from locally elected officials who make prosecutorial decisions that reflect their communities, such as district attorneys refusing to prosecute marijuana crimes, pledges not to enforce abortion restrictions, investigations into whether former President Donald Trump interfered in the state’s 2020 election.
Republicans say the law will enhance public safety and rein in rogue prosecutors. Previous legislative proposals targeting Georgia’s district attorneys failed, but supporters have said changes made in this year’s bill add oversight to the position. They cite a need for the measure with district attorneys who chose which laws to prosecute, and recent cases of prosecutors being indicted on criminal charges.
The law is the latest escalation of tension between local district attorneys and GOP-led state legislatures nationwide, where Republican officials aim to rein in progressive-leaning prosecutors who say they’ll opt out of enforcing crimes such as personal possession of cannabis, low-level shoplifting, or abortion restrictions.
In Florida, a state attorney suspended for refusing to enforce anti-abortion laws has asked a federal appeals court to revive a lawsuit arguing Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) violated the elected Democratic prosecutor’s First Amendment rights.
Georgia’s new law (S.B. 92) establishes an eight-member oversight commission with “the power to discipline, remove, and cause involuntary retirement of appointed or elected district attorneys or solicitors-general.”
It also adds an explicit mandate for district attorneys to “review every individual case for which probable cause for prosecution exists, and make a prosecutorial decision available under the law based on the facts and circumstances of each individual case under oath of duty.”
It lists grounds for a prosecutor’s removal as mental or physical incapacity, “willful misconduct in office,” “willful and persistent failure” to carry out their duties, conviction of a crime involving “moral turpitude,” and “conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice which brings the office into disrepute.”
Any district attorney or solicitor general removed by the commission will be disqualified from being appointed or elected to a similar office anywhere in Georgia for 10 years. A prosecutor could appeal a disciplinary order from the commission to Georgia’s appellate courts.
The commission will begin accepting complaints Oct. 1.
The commission’s members will be attorneys appointed by the governor, lieutenant governor, and Georgia’s legislative leaders. Five members will comprise an investigative panel, and three will form a hearing panel responsible for issuing disciplinary orders.
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law...orgia-governorGeorgia will create a commission with the power to remove prosecutors who refuse to enforce certain crimes, under legislation signed into law Friday by Republican Gov. Brian Kemp.
The legislation passed the Georgia House and Senate along party line votes. Democrats and other critics have said the measure aims to strip power from locally elected officials who make prosecutorial decisions that reflect their communities, such as district attorneys refusing to prosecute marijuana crimes, pledges not to enforce abortion restrictions, investigations into whether former President Donald Trump interfered in the state’s 2020 election.
Republicans say the law will enhance public safety and rein in rogue prosecutors. Previous legislative proposals targeting Georgia’s district attorneys failed, but supporters have said changes made in this year’s bill add oversight to the position. They cite a need for the measure with district attorneys who chose which laws to prosecute, and recent cases of prosecutors being indicted on criminal charges.
The law is the latest escalation of tension between local district attorneys and GOP-led state legislatures nationwide, where Republican officials aim to rein in progressive-leaning prosecutors who say they’ll opt out of enforcing crimes such as personal possession of cannabis, low-level shoplifting, or abortion restrictions.
In Florida, a state attorney suspended for refusing to enforce anti-abortion laws has asked a federal appeals court to revive a lawsuit arguing Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) violated the elected Democratic prosecutor’s First Amendment rights.
Georgia’s new law (S.B. 92) establishes an eight-member oversight commission with “the power to discipline, remove, and cause involuntary retirement of appointed or elected district attorneys or solicitors-general.”
It also adds an explicit mandate for district attorneys to “review every individual case for which probable cause for prosecution exists, and make a prosecutorial decision available under the law based on the facts and circumstances of each individual case under oath of duty.”
It lists grounds for a prosecutor’s removal as mental or physical incapacity, “willful misconduct in office,” “willful and persistent failure” to carry out their duties, conviction of a crime involving “moral turpitude,” and “conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice which brings the office into disrepute.”
Any district attorney or solicitor general removed by the commission will be disqualified from being appointed or elected to a similar office anywhere in Georgia for 10 years. A prosecutor could appeal a disciplinary order from the commission to Georgia’s appellate courts.
The commission will begin accepting complaints Oct. 1.
The commission’s members will be attorneys appointed by the governor, lieutenant governor, and Georgia’s legislative leaders. Five members will comprise an investigative panel, and three will form a hearing panel responsible for issuing disciplinary orders.
https://aboutblaw.com/7OF
What does Fani Willis say?
Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis has also decried the measure, calling it a racist attack after voters elected 14 nonwhite DAs in the state. Some have viewed the law as Republican retribution against Willis, who is considering criminal charges against former President Donald Trump over interference in Georgia’s 2020 election. Willis declined further comment Friday.
The law was born from frustrations involving a white Republican prosecutor in suburban Atlanta who was indicted for bribery related to sexual harassment claims. He lingered in office until he pleaded guilty to unprofessional conduct and resigned in 2022.
https://apnews.com/article/brian-kem...ae4d2b2aec32b#The law was born from frustrations involving a white Republican prosecutor in suburban Atlanta who was indicted for bribery related to sexual harassment claims. He lingered in office until he pleaded guilty to unprofessional conduct and resigned in 2022.
08-16-2023, 01:03 AM
-
#2
- Weightaholic
- Join Date: Nov 2005
- Location: Australia
- Age: 54
- Posts: 34,904
- Rep Power: 82209
-
-
Prosecutors have generally had a fair amount of discretion wrt prosecuting cases, but handing more power over to the politicians is a good thing, I suppose....
My personal pronouns are: Don't talk to me/Fck off
08-16-2023, 02:04 AM
-
#3
- AlfBundy
- Undocumented User
-
- AlfBundy
- Undocumented User
- Join Date: Sep 2021
- Posts: 14,517
- Rep Power: 96372
-
-
Originally Posted By Weightaholic⏩
Location: AustraliaProsecutors have generally had a fair amount of discretion wrt prosecuting cases, but handing more power over to the politicians is a good thing, I suppose....
08-16-2023, 07:30 AM
-
#4
- Jasonw1178
- 5'3" 300lbs Fudge Rounds
-
- Jasonw1178
- 5'3" 300lbs Fudge Rounds
- Join Date: Dec 2012
- Posts: 44,104
- Rep Power: 271274
-
-
Whenever they say "communities" then mean areas full of joggers.
Joggers in jogger communities elected prosecutors that don't enforce the law on joggers and that's a failure to fulfill their job duties and the state can remove them.
Joggers in jogger communities elected prosecutors that don't enforce the law on joggers and that's a failure to fulfill their job duties and the state can remove them.
08-16-2023, 07:51 AM
-
#5
- macmoney
- Registered User
-
- macmoney
- Registered User
- Join Date: May 2005
- Location: Hopkins, Minnesota, United States
- Posts: 4,298
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By Weightaholic⏩
I think some states/counties still don't vote in their DA's so this would actually make sense to allow the person that is voted in to have the power to do so if they're not enriching peoples safety from criminals. (feel free to fact check)Prosecutors have generally had a fair amount of discretion wrt prosecuting cases, but handing more power over to the politicians is a good thing, I suppose....
It does sound like a good idea to also start prosecuting Judges and Attorney's that are easy on individuals that commit crimes, to hold them accountable for the peoples actions that they let go early, or soft on. Obviously if you get biased people I feel like that could be a determent too but, I think the end goal of all this is
A) tax payer safety
B) reform of criminal
in that order, I can see going after attorney's and judges being a good choice.
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts