Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» Why isn't anyone comparing today's homeless camping issue to Hoovervilles?
  1. Results 1 to 2 of 2
post 1691099983 10-04-2023, 02:30 AM
-
#1
  1. ClivesTriceps
  2. Indian troll farm bot
  1. ClivesTriceps
  2. Indian troll farm bot
  3. Join Date: Nov 2019
  4. Posts: 19,776
  5. Rep Power: 330918

Why isn't anyone comparing today's homeless camping issue to Hoovervilles?

Shouldn't we be calling these homeless encampments Bidenvilles? They're awfully reminiscent of the Hoovervilles that were present during the Great Depression.







Wort ew in th wold.
post 1691100193 10-04-2023, 02:40 AM
-
#2
  1. ParsleyTea
  2. Registered User
  1. ParsleyTea
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2009
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 13,588
  6. Rep Power: 50203
It isn't a common mention, but I have seen some conservative articles calling the illegal alien homeless camps Bidenvilles. One example ~


Our open border is creating Bidenvilles of homelessness

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/r...f-homelessness

A year ago, I wrote about the obvious connection between illegal immigration and homelessness in U.S. cities. Since then, encounters with inadmissible aliens at the border have remained at more than 150,000 a month, often over 200,000. Of these, perhaps half are being released into the country, either under the charade of a “removal process” under U.S. immigration law or one of President Joe Biden’s many made-up parole-a-palooza programs.

In July 2022, I predicted that some of the released illegal immigrants would “end up on the streets, compounding already dire problems of homelessness.” Without a federal commitment to enforcing immigration law at the border, I argued, “more Bidenvilles are coming to a city near you.”

So, how are things going a year later?

“Eventually, this is going to come to a neighborhood near you,” New York City Mayor Eric Adams told reporters on July 29 after visiting a makeshift migrant shelter at the Roosevelt Hotel in Manhattan.

Sounds familiar.

Adams was apparently surprised to see people sleeping on the sidewalk because there were no beds inside — “people lined up around the block, hurting the businesses there.” The inadmissible aliens he saw had likely been processed hastily at the border and then released by the Department of Homeland Security before being bused or flown to New York by charities using federal grants.

New York’s dense population and high rents make it harder to hide the homeless than in cities more spread out. With his city’s shelters full, Adams has rented hundreds of hotels and opened dozens of emergency facilities, from churches to parking lots , to house supposed asylum-seekers. He’s even tried to pay private homeowners to put them up. It’ll never be enough, as he now seems to understand.

In Massachusetts, a liberal state with the same “sanctuary” philosophy on illegal immigration, “makeshift hotels and motels being used as emergency shelters continue to fill up .” At least one Massachusetts state representative figured it out, observing: “Either we have had a massive spike of homelessness, or the vast majority of these people are illegal immigrants.” Just as in New York, the Massachusetts governor is also hoping that locals will put inadmissible aliens in immigration limbo up in their homes.

Meanwhile, in Chicago, locals have complained of migrants in one high-capacity shelter “loitering, engaging in late-night partying, prostitution, littering, and even fighting with community members.” Residents are organizing to block a former school from being repurposed as a migrant “respite center,” saying they “are extremely dismayed by the city of Chicago’s inability to control and develop safe parameters around housing migrants that have been transported here from the border.”

Los Angeles, another sanctuary city , is also discovering the costs of open borders. “We do not have infinite resources,” said Mayor Karen Bass’ spokesman. “The city will continue to work with our county, nonprofit and faith partners in the case that Texas continues to send buses.”

California would like to blame Texas for sending a few buses, but the truth is that many of the illegal immigrants being hastily processed and released at the border are from Latin America and the Caribbean, and they want to go where they have networks of countrymen, family, or job prospects. That means they make it to places like New York, Chicago, Miami, Houston, and Los Angeles, one way or another.

Like most blue state sanctuary city officials, Bass would obviously prefer that Texas keep all the people being released into the country under Biden’s policies, but that’s not how it works.....
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts