Forum
»
Trial set for for dominion vote flipping case
- Results 1 to 16 of 16
-
Page 1 of 1
11-17-2023, 12:18 PM
-
#1
- Stizzel
- Rothbardian
-
- Stizzel
- Rothbardian
- Join Date: Apr 2008
- Location: Your Mom
- Posts: 83,747
- Subscribers: 1
- Rep Power: 384419
-
-
Trial set for for dominion vote flipping case
Maybe you're not aware but there has been ongoing litigation against dominion flipping the result of a 2018 election.
If you're wondering how this case has gone on so long without the lawyers censured, sued for defamation and investigated by the fbi for terrorism, the answer is simple: these are dems challenging a reoublican win.
https://www.ajc.com/politics/georgia...BPBGSFRRNV2MM/
If you're wondering how this case has gone on so long without the lawyers censured, sued for defamation and investigated by the fbi for terrorism, the answer is simple: these are dems challenging a reoublican win.
https://www.ajc.com/politics/georgia...BPBGSFRRNV2MM/
“It’s the bill of rights, not the bill of requests. Rights are not up for negotiations.” Thomas Massie, MAGA enemy #1
11-17-2023, 12:21 PM
-
#2
- bluebeltATT
- Registered User
-
- bluebeltATT
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2009
- Posts: 26,943
- Rep Power: 141774
-
-
BaSeLeSs ClAiM Of FrAuD!
Brazilian Jiu Jitsu purple belt
guns
god
jiu jitsu
11-17-2023, 12:28 PM
-
#3
11-17-2023, 01:27 PM
-
#4
- Jasonw1178
- 5'3" 300lbs Fudge Rounds
-
- Jasonw1178
- 5'3" 300lbs Fudge Rounds
- Join Date: Dec 2012
- Posts: 44,104
- Rep Power: 271274
-
-
If dominiion looses there could be consequences and more trials. They are suing people and companies for questioning their integrity so if they lose this case it would validate the other side.
11-17-2023, 02:21 PM
-
#5
Originally Posted By Stizzel⏩
Are you sure what your brain was doing while typing out this thread matches the lawsuit you referred to?Maybe you're not aware but there has been ongoing litigation against dominion flipping the result of a 2018 election.
If you're wondering how this case has gone on so long without the lawyers censured, sued for defamation and investigated by the fbi for terrorism, the answer is simple: these are dems challenging a reoublican win.
https://www.ajc.com/politics/georgia...BPBGSFRRNV2MM/
If you're wondering how this case has gone on so long without the lawyers censured, sued for defamation and investigated by the fbi for terrorism, the answer is simple: these are dems challenging a reoublican win.
https://www.ajc.com/politics/georgia...BPBGSFRRNV2MM/
Article says the lawsuit has been ongoing since 2017, and it isn't against Dominion specifically, but against the state of GA for using electronic voting systems in general.
I somewhat agree with the lawsuit. Whatever the system that is used, it should be at least as robust and verifiable as paper ballots.
The other point I'd make is many people seem to think anything less than instant election results is an indication of fraud.
That means you want electronic voting machines.
But electronic machines can't be trusted.
Which means you want paper ballots.
But they take too long to count, time that can be used to commit fraud.
So you want electronic machines...
11-17-2023, 02:31 PM
-
#6
- stevebec
- Unregistered User
-
- stevebec
- Unregistered User
- Join Date: Aug 2015
- Location: United States
- Posts: 6,542
- Rep Power: 57623
-
-
Originally Posted By Seatard⏩
Or you could just do what Texas does - the electronic machine prints out a paper ballot. Instant tally with a paper trail.Are you sure what your brain was doing while typing out this thread matches the lawsuit you referred to?
Article says the lawsuit has been ongoing since 2017, and it isn't against Dominion specifically, but against the state of GA for using electronic voting systems in general.
I somewhat agree with the lawsuit. Whatever the system that is used, it should be at least as robust and verifiable as paper ballots.
The other point I'd make is many people seem to think anything less than instant election results is an indication of fraud.
That means you want electronic voting machines.
But electronic machines can't be trusted.
Which means you want paper ballots.
But they take too long to count, time that can be used to commit fraud.
So you want electronic machines...
Article says the lawsuit has been ongoing since 2017, and it isn't against Dominion specifically, but against the state of GA for using electronic voting systems in general.
I somewhat agree with the lawsuit. Whatever the system that is used, it should be at least as robust and verifiable as paper ballots.
The other point I'd make is many people seem to think anything less than instant election results is an indication of fraud.
That means you want electronic voting machines.
But electronic machines can't be trusted.
Which means you want paper ballots.
But they take too long to count, time that can be used to commit fraud.
So you want electronic machines...
"Bones heal, pain is temporary, and chicks dig scars" - Evel Knievel
11-17-2023, 03:16 PM
-
#7
- Stizzel
- Rothbardian
-
- Stizzel
- Rothbardian
- Join Date: Apr 2008
- Location: Your Mom
- Posts: 83,747
- Subscribers: 1
- Rep Power: 384419
-
-
Originally Posted By Seatard⏩
CringeAre you sure what your brain was doing while typing out this thread matches the lawsuit you referred to?
Article says the lawsuit has been ongoing since 2017, and it isn't against Dominion specifically, but against the state of GA for using electronic voting systems in general.
I somewhat agree with the lawsuit. Whatever the system that is used, it should be at least as robust and verifiable as paper ballots.
The other point I'd make is many people seem to think anything less than instant election results is an indication of fraud.
That means you want electronic voting machines.
But electronic machines can't be trusted.
Which means you want paper ballots.
But they take too long to count, time that can be used to commit fraud.
So you want electronic machines...
Article says the lawsuit has been ongoing since 2017, and it isn't against Dominion specifically, but against the state of GA for using electronic voting systems in general.
I somewhat agree with the lawsuit. Whatever the system that is used, it should be at least as robust and verifiable as paper ballots.
The other point I'd make is many people seem to think anything less than instant election results is an indication of fraud.
That means you want electronic voting machines.
But electronic machines can't be trusted.
Which means you want paper ballots.
But they take too long to count, time that can be used to commit fraud.
So you want electronic machines...
“It’s the bill of rights, not the bill of requests. Rights are not up for negotiations.” Thomas Massie, MAGA enemy #1
11-17-2023, 04:35 PM
-
#8
Originally Posted By stevebec⏩
That's what the Georgia machines do too, but it's not good enough because Trump lost.Or you could just do what Texas does - the electronic machine prints out a paper ballot. Instant tally with a paper trail.
Let's be honest, the lawsuits are brought by people like Stizzle who are upset at the results and will never be satisfied with the methods no matter what they are.
11-17-2023, 05:08 PM
-
#9
- Stizzel
- Rothbardian
-
- Stizzel
- Rothbardian
- Join Date: Apr 2008
- Location: Your Mom
- Posts: 83,747
- Subscribers: 1
- Rep Power: 384419
-
-
Originally Posted By Seatard⏩
CringeThat's what the Georgia machines do too, but it's not good enough because Trump lost.
Let's be honest, the lawsuits are brought by people like Stizzle who are upset at the results and will never be satisfied with the methods no matter what they are.
Let's be honest, the lawsuits are brought by people like Stizzle who are upset at the results and will never be satisfied with the methods no matter what they are.
“It’s the bill of rights, not the bill of requests. Rights are not up for negotiations.” Thomas Massie, MAGA enemy #1
11-17-2023, 05:17 PM
-
#10
- Derplington
- Registered User
-
- Derplington
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2018
- Age: 56
- Posts: 5,799
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By Seatard⏩
Well, you've official broken stizzel. The smooth brain has no logical retort, so he's responding with garbage.That's what the Georgia machines do too, but it's not good enough because Trump lost.
Let's be honest, the lawsuits are brought by people like Stizzle who are upset at the results and will never be satisfied with the methods no matter what they are.
Let's be honest, the lawsuits are brought by people like Stizzle who are upset at the results and will never be satisfied with the methods no matter what they are.
11-17-2023, 05:19 PM
-
#11
11-17-2023, 05:36 PM
-
#12
I assume they will be granted permission where the republicans were not?
One party system; Most Republicans are Democrats, but no Democrats are Republicans.
Hayek and Mises were right; they're all socialists.
"To Call something fair or unfair is a subjective value judgment and not liable to any verification" Ludwig Von Mises
11-17-2023, 06:26 PM
-
#13
- Stizzel
- Rothbardian
-
- Stizzel
- Rothbardian
- Join Date: Apr 2008
- Location: Your Mom
- Posts: 83,747
- Subscribers: 1
- Rep Power: 384419
-
-
Wow libs sue dominion for stealing an election and resident groomers rage at me over it
The mental illness is so funny
The mental illness is so funny
“It’s the bill of rights, not the bill of requests. Rights are not up for negotiations.” Thomas Massie, MAGA enemy #1
11-17-2023, 07:09 PM
-
#14
11-22-2023, 06:21 AM
-
#15
- Stizzel
- Rothbardian
-
- Stizzel
- Rothbardian
- Join Date: Apr 2008
- Location: Your Mom
- Posts: 83,747
- Subscribers: 1
- Rep Power: 384419
-
-
Federal judge ruled that dominion machines are unconstitutional, must use paper ballots

“It’s the bill of rights, not the bill of requests. Rights are not up for negotiations.” Thomas Massie, MAGA enemy #1
11-22-2023, 08:48 AM
-
#16
Originally Posted By Stizzel⏩
Cringe.Federal judge ruled that dominion machines are unconstitutional, must use paper ballots
Literally everything Schitzzel ever posts is pathetically fraudulent.
First, the headline of the article is "Mike Lindell Cheers Judge's 'Historic' Ruling as Vindication" so we know why it showed up in whatever news feed for retards you use.

https://www.newsweek.com/mike-lindel...piracy-1844815
Second, the actual ruling is: "The judge found there to be "material facts in dispute" that must be decided at a bench trial, which she set to begin January 9, 2024."
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts