Forum
ยป
Srs question and leaves room for a decent debate conversation
- Results 1 to 9 of 9
-
Page 1 of 1
11-19-2023, 04:59 PM
-
#1
- latverian41
- Registered User
-
- latverian41
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2016
- Age: 51
- Posts: 28,227
- Rep Power: 123665
-
-
Srs question and leaves room for a decent debate conversation
In 1945 when the United States was the only power in the world to hold an atomic bomb do you think the world would have been better off if we just used that muscle to wipe out communism and make a one world order?
No conspiracy crap about how this already is one but just a hypothetical question.
What say you?
No conspiracy crap about how this already is one but just a hypothetical question.
What say you?
"it takes a wise man to know when he is in error and a noble man to admit to it"
11-19-2023, 05:05 PM
-
#2
- JackyChin
- Registered User
-
- JackyChin
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2023
- Age: 56
- Posts: 3,042
- Rep Power: 14673
-
-
We couldn't have ended the Soviet Union even with nukes but I've had similar thoughts if it wouldn't have been better if we'd used them in Korea rather than allow a hostile authoritarian dictatorship to torture their people for decades and develop their own nuclear weapons.
We had 2 chances now first during the Korean war second immediately after they tested their first nuke.
A short story in a similar vein to what you propose:
https://metallicman.com/laoban4site/...obert-heinlein
We had 2 chances now first during the Korean war second immediately after they tested their first nuke.
A short story in a similar vein to what you propose:
https://metallicman.com/laoban4site/...obert-heinlein
11-19-2023, 05:06 PM
-
#3
11-19-2023, 05:07 PM
-
#4
- swolefnatic
- Swole Fanatic
-
- swolefnatic
- Swole Fanatic
- Join Date: Apr 2016
- Posts: 5,601
- Rep Power: 29212
-
-
Originally Posted By latverian41⏩
That would clearly cause the US to be the bad guy and literally every country in the world would invade us.In 1945 when the United States was the only power in the world to hold an atomic bomb do you think the world would have been better off if we just used that muscle to wipe out communism and make a one world order?
No conspiracy crap about how this already is one but just a hypothetical question.
What say you?
No conspiracy crap about how this already is one but just a hypothetical question.
What say you?
"It is easier to find men who will volunteer to die, than to find those who are willing to endure pain with patience."
- Julius Caesar
11-19-2023, 05:10 PM
-
#5
- LinuxJon
- Join Date: Apr 2014
- Location: California, United States
- Posts: 49,073
- Rep Power: 325966
-
-
No way you could have conquered the Soviet Union with the tiny fission bombs we had at the time.
480s / 370b / 495d / 235 x 2 SOHP
Trump 2020
DeSantis 2024
Catbrah 2032
Misc Firearms Crew
Misc Wristwatch Crew
Will sell wife's foot pics for watch/gun money crew
Definitely not a fed crew
11-19-2023, 05:11 PM
-
#6
- latverian41
- Registered User
-
- latverian41
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2016
- Age: 51
- Posts: 28,227
- Rep Power: 123665
-
-
Originally Posted By JackyChin⏩
Yes, truman should have listened to McArthur .We couldn't have ended the Soviet Union even with nukes but I've had similar thoughts if it wouldn't have been better if we'd used them in Korea rather than allow a hostile authoritarian dictatorship to torture their people for decades and develop their own nuclear weapons.
We had 2 chances now first during the Korean war second immediately after they tested their first nuke.
A short story in a similar vein to what you propose:
https://metallicman.com/laoban4site/...obert-heinlein
We had 2 chances now first during the Korean war second immediately after they tested their first nuke.
A short story in a similar vein to what you propose:
https://metallicman.com/laoban4site/...obert-heinlein
It's a terrible thing to drop that bomb but in the long run it would have saved.killons of lives and prevented millions from suffering..
Why do you think the soviet union. Would not have been beaten with the atomic bomb?
Germany had stallin defeated and all military historians agree with that right up till he halted the 1st army's drive . To Moscow and split it up to go for the oil fields Moscow was ready to fall. Stallin at that time was ready to cut a separate peace. If it had not been for the United States lend lease stalli. Would have sill been defeated. Same for england..
Gen Patton would vocally say we should have went after the soviets.
Sad thing is we took the benevolent road and did the right thing by not taking over with the atomic weapon but does anyone think for one minute of the roles had been reversed and the soviets passed it they would not have used to take what they wanted?
"it takes a wise man to know when he is in error and a noble man to admit to it"
11-19-2023, 05:12 PM
-
#7
- latverian41
- Registered User
-
- latverian41
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2016
- Age: 51
- Posts: 28,227
- Rep Power: 123665
-
-
Originally Posted By LinuxJon⏩
Bro the soviets were beaten. England was beaten. America saved both of them. France too for that matterNo way you could have conquered the Soviet Union with the tiny fission bombs we had at the time.
"it takes a wise man to know when he is in error and a noble man to admit to it"
11-19-2023, 05:38 PM
-
#8
- JackyChin
- Registered User
-
- JackyChin
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2023
- Age: 56
- Posts: 3,042
- Rep Power: 14673
-
-
Originally Posted By latverian41⏩
The Soviets were not beaten. They were racing us to Berlin.Bro the soviets were beaten. England was beaten. America saved both of them. France too for that matter
Originally Posted By swolefnatic⏩
1) NK was the aggressorThat would clearly cause the US to be the bad guy and literally every country in the world would invade us.
2) How would they invade the world's only nuclear power, that had won WW2 less than a decade earlier?
11-19-2023, 05:40 PM
-
#9
- latverian41
- Registered User
-
- latverian41
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2016
- Age: 51
- Posts: 28,227
- Rep Power: 123665
-
-
Originally Posted By JackyChin⏩
Yeah towards the end of the war after lend lease and the United States were giving them almost every thing they needed. They were at the Brink of defeat . This is all fact you can vet bro.The Soviets were not beaten. They were racing us to Berlin.
1) NK was the aggressor
2) How would they invade the world's only nuclear power, that had won WW2 less than a decade earlier?
1) NK was the aggressor
2) How would they invade the world's only nuclear power, that had won WW2 less than a decade earlier?
"it takes a wise man to know when he is in error and a noble man to admit to it"
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts