Forum
»
Biden Admin: Let us groom your kids, or we'll starve them
12-02-2023, 10:17 AM
-
#1
- fitnessislife
- Registered User
-
- fitnessislife
- Registered User
- Join Date: Aug 2006
- Location: Michigan, United States
- Age: 37
- Posts: 27,183
- Rep Power: 223047
-
-
Biden Admin: Let us groom your kids, or we'll starve them
So compassionate!


"At the core of liberalism is the spoiled child - miserable, as all spoiled children are, unsatisfied,
demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic and useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats."
- PJ O'Rourke
12-02-2023, 10:21 AM
-
#2
- Stizzel
- Rothbardian
-
- Stizzel
- Rothbardian
- Join Date: Apr 2008
- Location: Your Mom
- Posts: 83,747
- Subscribers: 1
- Rep Power: 384419
-
-
Give fed gov power and money because they promise to keep you free
Money and power used to starve children that don't cut their diks off instead
Just statist things
Money and power used to starve children that don't cut their diks off instead
Just statist things
“It’s the bill of rights, not the bill of requests. Rights are not up for negotiations.” Thomas Massie, MAGA enemy #1
12-02-2023, 10:25 AM
-
#3
12-02-2023, 10:29 AM
-
#4
Originally Posted By fitnessislife⏩
This was on the house floor a few months ago and I’m surprised that it didn’t come up anywhere sooner.So compassionate!


Of course there was a lot of deception by leftist media and Dems. They claimed that Republicans were voting against school lunches for the poor, when in reality, they were against tying the leftist agenda together with school lunches.
I think it’s important to clarify a particular position that the federal government should not be involved in a lot of these programs. When it comes to school lunches, it should be a local decision, not a state, and not the fed. This allows individuals to have more of a choice in the taxes that they want to pay. At the state level, it becomes a very corrupt and tyrannical way to force people to pay taxes that they don’t want to. This was the way that our forefathers had intended. They never intended for the federal government to get involved in this, and the Democrats are proving exactly why
One party system; Most Republicans are Democrats, but no Democrats are Republicans.
Hayek and Mises were right; they're all socialists.
"To Call something fair or unfair is a subjective value judgment and not liable to any verification" Ludwig Von Mises
12-02-2023, 10:32 AM
-
#5
12-02-2023, 10:38 AM
-
#6
A year old now. The media was largely silent on this.
Its very clearly what they are trying to do here; a complete federal takeover of schools
One party system; Most Republicans are Democrats, but no Democrats are Republicans.
Hayek and Mises were right; they're all socialists.
"To Call something fair or unfair is a subjective value judgment and not liable to any verification" Ludwig Von Mises
12-02-2023, 10:39 AM
-
#7
- illriginalized
- Registered User
-
- illriginalized
- Registered User
- Join Date: Dec 2006
- Posts: 44,327
- Rep Power: 46892
-
-
Originally Posted By Stizzel⏩
Democracy is an illusion. Here’s this freedom to do whatever but we’re gonna fk with your lives while we rule over you.Give fed gov power and money because they promise to keep you free
Money and power used to starve children that don't cut their diks off instead
Just statist things
Money and power used to starve children that don't cut their diks off instead
Just statist things
أشهد أن لا إله إلاَّ الله و أشهد أن محمد رسول الله
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
🚷 Anti-Degeneracy League 🚷
https://www.twitter.com/eyeonpalestine
Mossad acronym: ISIS AKA Israeli Secret Intelligence Service
12-02-2023, 11:09 AM
-
#8
12-02-2023, 11:15 AM
-
#9
- freeheeler
- Registered User
-
- freeheeler
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2002
- Location: United States
- Age: 65
- Posts: 11,675
- Rep Power: 83841
-
-
Originally Posted By fitnessislife⏩
NolibsSo compassionate!


Kingfabian
Z2.3
NYpat
Bodhy
Sillie
Winced
We signed off on this and approve of this Biden policy
Scubastevo :-What percentage of women have STDs? (serious) If I just wanted to go bareback with any girl that I could get with, what are my chances of ending up bed ridden with STDs?
12-02-2023, 11:18 AM
-
#10
This is aboutkids getting free lunches.
It's not about bathrooms, or sports, or cutting kids dicks off. School lunches.
It's saying that you have to promise to feed all the kids equally, regardless of whether they're trannies or not, if you want funding.
For school lunches.
It's not okay to give tranny kids less lunch, or no lunch, or spit in their lunch etc.
Same goes for black kids, Jew kids, disabled kids etc.
What's the problem?
It's not about bathrooms, or sports, or cutting kids dicks off. School lunches.
It's saying that you have to promise to feed all the kids equally, regardless of whether they're trannies or not, if you want funding.
For school lunches.
It's not okay to give tranny kids less lunch, or no lunch, or spit in their lunch etc.
Same goes for black kids, Jew kids, disabled kids etc.
What's the problem?
GO LOCAL SPORTSBALL TEAM
*** Pureblood Master Race ***
*** Official Misc Photography Crew ***
12-02-2023, 11:44 AM
-
#11
Originally Posted By dakensta⏩
Oh, I'm sure you have sources for that claim?This is aboutkids getting free lunches.
It's not about bathrooms, or sports, or cutting kids dicks off. School lunches.
It's saying that you have to promise to feed all the kids equally, regardless of whether they're trannies or not, if you want funding.
For school lunches.
It's not okay to give tranny kids less lunch, or no lunch, or spit in their lunch etc.
Same goes for black kids, Jew kids, disabled kids etc.
What's the problem?
It's not about bathrooms, or sports, or cutting kids dicks off. School lunches.
It's saying that you have to promise to feed all the kids equally, regardless of whether they're trannies or not, if you want funding.
For school lunches.
It's not okay to give tranny kids less lunch, or no lunch, or spit in their lunch etc.
Same goes for black kids, Jew kids, disabled kids etc.
What's the problem?
12-02-2023, 11:53 AM
-
#12
- freeheeler
- Registered User
-
- freeheeler
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2002
- Location: United States
- Age: 65
- Posts: 11,675
- Rep Power: 83841
-
-
Originally Posted By dakensta⏩
Were Republicans saying that mentally ill kids were going to get less on their plate at lunch time than normal kids?This is aboutkids getting free lunches.
It's not about bathrooms, or sports, or cutting kids dicks off. School lunches.
It's saying that you have to promise to feed all the kids equally, regardless of whether they're trannies or not, if you want funding.
For school lunches.
It's not okay to give tranny kids less lunch, or no lunch, or spit in their lunch etc.
Same goes for black kids, Jew kids, disabled kids etc.
What's the problem?
It's not about bathrooms, or sports, or cutting kids dicks off. School lunches.
It's saying that you have to promise to feed all the kids equally, regardless of whether they're trannies or not, if you want funding.
For school lunches.
It's not okay to give tranny kids less lunch, or no lunch, or spit in their lunch etc.
Same goes for black kids, Jew kids, disabled kids etc.
What's the problem?
Scubastevo :-What percentage of women have STDs? (serious) If I just wanted to go bareback with any girl that I could get with, what are my chances of ending up bed ridden with STDs?
12-02-2023, 11:55 AM
-
#13
Originally Posted By dakensta⏩
You now confirmed that you are a paid shill.This is aboutkids getting free lunches.
It's not about bathrooms, or sports, or cutting kids dicks off. School lunches.
It's saying that you have to promise to feed all the kids equally, regardless of whether they're trannies or not, if you want funding.
For school lunches.
It's not okay to give tranny kids less lunch, or no lunch, or spit in their lunch etc.
Same goes for black kids, Jew kids, disabled kids etc.
What's the problem?
It's not about bathrooms, or sports, or cutting kids dicks off. School lunches.
It's saying that you have to promise to feed all the kids equally, regardless of whether they're trannies or not, if you want funding.
For school lunches.
It's not okay to give tranny kids less lunch, or no lunch, or spit in their lunch etc.
Same goes for black kids, Jew kids, disabled kids etc.
What's the problem?
Who is paying you? What is your source?
I've been following this for almost a year now, and what you just said is an untruth. It is disinformation. Based on your other posts on the forum, it's leading me to believe that you have a single source of information. I'm curious as to who it is
One party system; Most Republicans are Democrats, but no Democrats are Republicans.
Hayek and Mises were right; they're all socialists.
"To Call something fair or unfair is a subjective value judgment and not liable to any verification" Ludwig Von Mises
12-02-2023, 12:05 PM
-
#14
- ButWhoWasNoodz
- Registered User
-
- ButWhoWasNoodz
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2015
- Age: 46
- Posts: 1,779
- Rep Power: 16969
-
-
But I was told that right wingers wanted to starve kids. Huh. Rachel Maddow lied again.
12-02-2023, 12:11 PM
-
#15
- Irezumi
- Graveyard of Empires
-
- Irezumi
- Graveyard of Empires
- Join Date: Jul 2007
- Location: Yorba Linda, California, United States
- Posts: 13,130
- Rep Power: 80291
-
-
Originally Posted By Mercworx⏩
Genesis 19...Sodom..yeah we deserve that again.At this point I hope we are. Miserable wicked place needs to be burnt to the ground.
LE6920CA Magpul
DDM4 V7
Glock 19 Gen 3
12-02-2023, 12:13 PM
-
#16
- CCFD2466
- Permacut brah
-
- CCFD2466
- Permacut brah
- Join Date: Dec 2012
- Location: United States
- Posts: 3,368
- Rep Power: 29225
-
-
Originally Posted By Irezumi⏩
We actually do. This Earth deserves annihilation.Genesis 19...Sodom..yeah we deserve that again.
☆ Brave 767 crew ☆
☆ USA vs Germany crew ☆
☆ Exodus 15:2 ☆
___The poster formerly known as Motiviert___
Easy choices, hard life. Hard choices, easy life.
12-02-2023, 12:14 PM
-
#17
Originally Posted By Kraken⏩
Google.You now confirmed that you are a paid shill.
Who is paying you? What is your source?
I've been following this for almost a year now, and what you just said is an untruth. It is disinformation. Based on your other posts on the forum, it's leading me to believe that you have a single source of information. I'm curious as to who it is
Who is paying you? What is your source?
I've been following this for almost a year now, and what you just said is an untruth. It is disinformation. Based on your other posts on the forum, it's leading me to believe that you have a single source of information. I'm curious as to who it is
I'll admit Imayhave got the wrong end of the stick here, but that's easily remedied. Just show me the bill.
GO LOCAL SPORTSBALL TEAM
*** Pureblood Master Race ***
*** Official Misc Photography Crew ***
12-02-2023, 12:16 PM
-
#18
Originally Posted By freeheeler⏩
I dunno? Were republicans complaining that they're not allowed to discriminate against tranny kids? Yes.Were Republicans saying that mentally ill kids were going to get less on their plate at lunch time than normal kids?
GO LOCAL SPORTSBALL TEAM
*** Pureblood Master Race ***
*** Official Misc Photography Crew ***
12-02-2023, 12:19 PM
-
#19
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
-
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
- Join Date: Jan 2005
- Location: Ill.
- Posts: 120,479
- Rep Power: 316531
-
-
Originally Posted By dakensta⏩
Saying trannies shouldn't play female sports is discrimination? Saying children shouldn't be on puberty blockers is discrimination?I dunno? Were republicans complaining that they're not allowed to discriminate against tranny kids? Yes.
12-02-2023, 12:20 PM
-
#20
- fitnessislife
- Registered User
-
- fitnessislife
- Registered User
- Join Date: Aug 2006
- Location: Michigan, United States
- Age: 37
- Posts: 27,183
- Rep Power: 223047
-
-
Originally Posted By dakensta⏩
How is taking porn out of school libraries or telling teachers to stop openly promoting genital mutilation to 1st graders discriminating against tranny kids?I dunno? Were republicans complaining that they're not allowed to discriminate against tranny kids? Yes.
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn⏩
Also this.Saying trannies shouldn't play female sports is discrimination? Saying children shouldn't be on puberty blockers is discrimination?
"At the core of liberalism is the spoiled child - miserable, as all spoiled children are, unsatisfied,
demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic and useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats."
- PJ O'Rourke
12-02-2023, 12:22 PM
-
#21
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn⏩
This isn't about sports or puberty blockers, FFS. Or bathrooms.Saying trannies shouldn't play female sports is discrimination? Saying children shouldn't be on puberty blockers is discrimination?
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...ition-programs
President Joe Biden said he would veto Senate Republican efforts to overturn Department of Agriculture rules it says willprotect LGBT people from discrimination in federally funded nutrition programs.
GO LOCAL SPORTSBALL TEAM
*** Pureblood Master Race ***
*** Official Misc Photography Crew ***
12-02-2023, 12:24 PM
-
#22
Originally Posted By fitnessislife⏩
It isn't.How is taking porn out of school libraries or telling teachers to stop openly promoting genital mutilation to 1st graders discriminating against tranny kids?
It also has **** all to do with school lunches.
GO LOCAL SPORTSBALL TEAM
*** Pureblood Master Race ***
*** Official Misc Photography Crew ***
12-02-2023, 12:29 PM
-
#23
12-02-2023, 12:33 PM
-
#24
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
-
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
- Join Date: Jan 2005
- Location: Ill.
- Posts: 120,479
- Rep Power: 316531
-
-
Originally Posted By dakensta⏩
You and Biden are claiming that trans people are being denied lunch?This isn't about sports or puberty blockers, FFS. Or bathrooms.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...ition-programs
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...ition-programs
12-02-2023, 12:39 PM
-
#25
Originally Posted By dakensta⏩
Google is not a source. It is a search engine for sources, whose algorithm is designed to give you leftist sources.Google.
I'll admit Imayhave got the wrong end of the stick here, but that's easily remedied. Just show me the bill.
I'll admit Imayhave got the wrong end of the stick here, but that's easily remedied. Just show me the bill.
My sources are the congressional proceedings where they present the bill, and have the debates.
Essentially what the bill says, is that schools cannot be an adversary against boys who want to compete in girl's sports. Schools cannot remove materials from the library that contain sexual content regarding trans, gay etc. the schools cannot be active, nor proactive, against the leftist agenda. They are required to just go along with it.
The Democrats argued that the Republicans just didn't want the students to have school lunches, but the bill holds children and school lunches hostage over the far left agenda.
Lastly, we must also understand that it is important to separate state, local, and federal authority. This boils down to his federal overreach into state and local policies. Why is the federal government getting involved in state in local issues? Perhaps this is why the federal government should not be involved in socialist policies at all.
One party system; Most Republicans are Democrats, but no Democrats are Republicans.
Hayek and Mises were right; they're all socialists.
"To Call something fair or unfair is a subjective value judgment and not liable to any verification" Ludwig Von Mises
12-02-2023, 12:42 PM
-
#26
- Irezumi
- Graveyard of Empires
-
- Irezumi
- Graveyard of Empires
- Join Date: Jul 2007
- Location: Yorba Linda, California, United States
- Posts: 13,130
- Rep Power: 80291
-
-
Originally Posted By dakensta⏩
Call me outdated but I'm one who's always believed in the concept of traditional utilitarianism. It's my personal opinion that we now have to give complete obedience to less than 1% of the population of this country. Regardless of what the situation is...be it school lunches, women's sports, bathrooms, etc...it's not enough to just abide by the live and let live policy. I personally don't care about trans people and I'll fight for any constitutional rights they deserve. However, I don't agree with them, I will never support them, and don't even want to associate with them. Would you consider that discrimination? I'm not going to deny that there are people on the right who would rather they never existed but for the most part, folks have the same mindset as I do. Do what you want but just keep it away from me and my family.This isn't about sports or puberty blockers, FFS. Or bathrooms.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...ition-programs
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...ition-programs
LE6920CA Magpul
DDM4 V7
Glock 19 Gen 3
12-02-2023, 12:44 PM
-
#27
- Derplington
- Registered User
-
- Derplington
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2018
- Age: 56
- Posts: 5,799
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By Kraken⏩
Coming from the retard who claimed that certain major airports would be testing EVERY passenger for the flu. You're a lying POS.You now confirmed that you are a paid shill.
Who is paying you? What is your source?
I've been following this for almost a year now, and what you just said is an untruth. It is disinformation. Based on your other posts on the forum, it's leading me to believe that you have a single source of information. I'm curious as to who it is
Who is paying you? What is your source?
I've been following this for almost a year now, and what you just said is an untruth. It is disinformation. Based on your other posts on the forum, it's leading me to believe that you have a single source of information. I'm curious as to who it is
12-02-2023, 12:47 PM
-
#28
Originally Posted By Kraken⏩
Okay then. Can you confirm that the bill makes no mention of any other protected group, e.g. race or religion. Or does it also threaten no free school meals for e.g. racist or antisemitic schools as well?Google is not a source. It is a search engine for sources, whose algorithm is designed to give you leftist sources.
My sources are the congressional proceedings where they present the bill, and have the debates.
Essentially with the bill says, is that schools cannot be an adversary against boys who want to compete in girl's sports. Schools cannot remove materials from the library that contain sexual content regarding trans, gay etc. the schools cannot be active, nor proactive, against the leftist agenda. They are required to just go along with it.
The Democrats argued that the Republicans just didn't want the students to have school lunches, but the bill holds children and school lunches hostage over the far left agenda.
Lastly, we must also understand that it is important to separate state, local, and federal authority. This boils down to his federal overreach into state and local policies. Why is the federal government getting involved in state in local issues? Perhaps this is why the federal government should not be involved in socialist policies at all.
My sources are the congressional proceedings where they present the bill, and have the debates.
Essentially with the bill says, is that schools cannot be an adversary against boys who want to compete in girl's sports. Schools cannot remove materials from the library that contain sexual content regarding trans, gay etc. the schools cannot be active, nor proactive, against the leftist agenda. They are required to just go along with it.
The Democrats argued that the Republicans just didn't want the students to have school lunches, but the bill holds children and school lunches hostage over the far left agenda.
Lastly, we must also understand that it is important to separate state, local, and federal authority. This boils down to his federal overreach into state and local policies. Why is the federal government getting involved in state in local issues? Perhaps this is why the federal government should not be involved in socialist policies at all.
Better still, point me to a source of the bill itself and I'll find out myself.
GO LOCAL SPORTSBALL TEAM
*** Pureblood Master Race ***
*** Official Misc Photography Crew ***
12-02-2023, 01:02 PM
-
#29
- illriginalized
- Registered User
-
- illriginalized
- Registered User
- Join Date: Dec 2006
- Posts: 44,327
- Rep Power: 46892
-
-
Originally Posted By Irezumi⏩
Word.Call me outdated but I'm one who's always believed in the concept of traditional utilitarianism. It's my personal opinion that we now have to give complete obedience to less than 1% of the population of this country. Regardless of what the situation is...be it school lunches, women's sports, bathrooms, etc...it's not enough to just abide by the live and let live policy. I personally don't care about trans people and I'll fight for any constitutional rights they deserve. However, I don't agree with them, I will never support them, and don't even want to associate with them. Would you consider that discrimination? I'm not going to deny that there are people on the right who would rather they never existed but for the most part, folks have the same mindset as I do. Do what you want but just keep it away from me and my family.
أشهد أن لا إله إلاَّ الله و أشهد أن محمد رسول الله
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
🚷 Anti-Degeneracy League 🚷
https://www.twitter.com/eyeonpalestine
Mossad acronym: ISIS AKA Israeli Secret Intelligence Service
12-02-2023, 01:32 PM
-
#30
Originally Posted By dakensta⏩
Do you know how rule making works? The legislators pass a bill, and the federal agencies interpret those laws and make rules. What has become clear over the last decade is how corrupt the agencies have become in their rule making, and the SCOTUS has been shooting down rules lately as unconstitutional. When the word “dictatorship” is used, it’s not just a reference to the president, it’s also a reference to bureaucracies. In the earlier days of political theory, monarchies were referred to as bureaucracies, if that gives you some perspective.Okay then. Can you confirm that the bill makes no mention of any other protected group, e.g. race or religion. Or does it also threaten no free school meals for e.g. racist or antisemitic schools as well?
Better still, point me to a source of the bill itself and I'll find out myself.
Better still, point me to a source of the bill itself and I'll find out myself.
So, now that is established, here is where the dictatorship and corruption comes in to play. A bill gets passed, and then the bureaucrats decide how to apply and carry out those laws with rules. In the case of school lunches, it’s not whats specifically in the bill, but how the bill was written in a manner that allows the far left bureaucrats to decide the how, who, and what. It’s essentially what’s NOT in the bill that makes it dangerous. When you watch the congressional hearings and proceedings, this becomes very clear.
Another example is in the ATF cases. The ATF defined compressors as “firearms”, so that they were able to regulate them like an actual firearm. They also defined the use of a pistol brace as a conversion of a pistol in to a short barreled rifle (SBR). None of the bills gave them the authority to do this, but they have been doing this stuff for many years. They get away with it because they have no accountability. No one gets fired. No one gets charged. They refuse to answer questions from congress, even though they are accountable to congress. Dictatorship.
Here it is an example of evidence of this corruption.
Is has become abundantly clear that bureaucracies are fundamentally leftist, or statist. They will always advocate for the side of the state, not the people. These are not elected positions, but rather appointed positions, so they are not accountable to the people, or anyone, except the state itself. Whichever position gives them more authority and power, that’s the position they will take.
One party system; Most Republicans are Democrats, but no Democrats are Republicans.
Hayek and Mises were right; they're all socialists.
"To Call something fair or unfair is a subjective value judgment and not liable to any verification" Ludwig Von Mises
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts

