https://open.substack.com/pub/alexbe..._campaign=post


How scary is a new paper showing mRNA Covid shots accidentally cause our bodies to make many different proteins and not just the Covid spike, as the shot’s promoters have claimed for three years?

Scary enough the paper’s authors began spinning their work as soon as they put it out. University of Cambridge professor Anne Willis, the study’s co-senior author, told reporters that mRNA “technology is amazing and it’s going to be revolutionary… but we’ve just made it a whole lot safer going forward.”

Yep, mRNA shots are great.They’re “amazing”! And they’re not exactly unsafe. But

How reassuring! Too bad over 1 billion people have already received them.

When the Covid jabs were introduced, scientists and regulators made two crucial assumptions about them.

First, that the mRNA in them would quickly be destroyed, so they would not continuously produce spike protein for weeks or months. As a Reuters “fact-check” in April 2021 explained:
Dr Daniel Kuritzkes, chief of the infectious diseases division at Brigham and Women's Hospital, one of the world’s top teaching hospitals and part of Harvard Medical School… pointed out that the mRNA vaccines are degraded within 24 to 48 hours… that means they disappear from the shot recipients’ bodies within a day or two.

The eminent Dr. Kuritzkes was wrong.

In early 2022, scientists reported in Cell,one of the world’s top journals, they had found vaccine mRNA for at least 60 days in germinal centers, which are crucial parts of the immune system. Other studies have had similar findings.
The modified vaccine RNA appears to be too good at tamping down the immune response, and thus lasts far longer than expected. In turn, the overly persistent mRNA may cause the autoimmune disorders that have been reported after Covid jabs - and possibly other immune system changes too.

The second assumption was that the jabs would produce only spike protein.

This issue wasn’t discussed as often, because the mRNA in the shots essentially copied the portion of the coronavirus’s RNA that “encoded” for the spike. What else could it make?

The answer turns out to be lots of other proteins.
The reason, as the authors of Wednesday’s bombshell paper demonstrate, is thatthe modified mRNA confuses ribosomes - the “machines” in our cells that read RNA and convert it into amino acids that then build themselves into proteins.

The confusion isn’t enough to stop the ribosome from working, but it does cause “frameshifting” - essentially a stutter.*

There are 64 possible codons (four times four times four), ranging from AAA to UUU. Confusingly, ribosomes can make only 20 different amino acids, so three codons translate to each kind of amino acid. The other four codons tell the ribosome to start and stop working.
The modified base in mRNA is the uracil, or “U,” base.The researchers found that ribosomes will sometimes stumble over codons that begin with that modified U base, and produce an amino acid for the next three bases.

For example, suppose the RNA chain reads U-G-C-A-G. The ribosome should produce the amino acid cystine, which U-G-C encodes, and then move to the next codon, beginning with A. Instead it skips the U and makes alanine, which G-C-A encodes.

The frameshifting will continue into the next codon, which will improperly begin with G and not A. As the errors accumulate, the result will be a protein which has little in common with the intended spike protein.)






The authors also reported they could find a biological response to the wrong proteins in mice and in humans.They warned that these proteins “could activate T cells that target host cells,” and that their other effects “could include increased production of new B cell antigens.”
T and B cells form the core of our immune system. In other words, the mRNA jabs may accidentally cause the body to attack its own tissues, as well as make antibodies that don’t work against the spike protein.


These warnings come not from me, but directly from the paper.

Once again, we’re learning far too late of the risks of moving a novel biotechnology from the lab to human beings in months.

The fact that this novel biotechnology was given to (or forced on) not thousands or even millions of people but billions - and that most of them faced little risk from the disease it was meant to (but does not) prevent - is only the icing on the cake.

It doesn't matter what comes out, the Jabcels and Ronahaulics will never admit they were wrong about anything.

intredesding

1. Astra Seneca
2. 10 percent did this while 90% did not.
3. I can't find the part that explains why amino acids and proteins, the same 2 things I take after and during a workout, are harmful..
4. Help us understand OP.
5. I heard bad things about Astra Z from European friends, bad reactions.

Thanks, Alex.

While, these data increase our understanding of how modified ribonucleotides affect the fidelity of mRNA translation, there is no adverse outcomes reported from mistranslation of mRNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in humans. Frame shifting isn't unique to mRNA vaccines, mistranslation occurs normally with our mRNA.

The results and conclusions aren't all that exciting. Basically, in the future, we could design vaccines to minimize the possibility of this occurring.

NBD, end of story.

1.) Astra Zeneca didn’t cause creation of unintended proteins…only mRNA injections did

2.) it doesn’t say that 90% did not lead to creation of unintended proteins, it says that 10% of the proteins generated due to the injections are different than the ones intended to be created

3.) just because you take a protein shake after your workout that doesn’t mean spike proteins in viruses or caused from other things aren’t harmful to the body.


“ They warned that these proteins “could activate T cells that target host cells,” and that their other effects “could include increased production of new B cell antigens.”
T and B cells form the core of our immune system. In other words, the mRNA jabs may accidentally cause the body to attack its own tissues, as well as make antibodies that don’t work against the spike protein.”

They also state: "Although there is no evidence that frameshifted products in humans generated from BNT162b2 vaccination are associated with adverse outcomes, for future use of mRNA technology it is important that mRNA sequence design is modified to reduce ribosome frameshifting events, as this may limit its future use for applications that require higher doses or more frequent dosing, such as the in vivo production of hormones."

Lmao….”don’t worry guys it’s totally no big deal!!

But this is great because it helps us prevent it in the future!”




- it’s safe because the remnants of the injection are very rapidly removed from the body. Generally in about 24-49 hours

- so what if they stay in the body for over 90 days? It isn’t hurting anything!!






- it’s safe because the injections stay local to the infection site

- so what if they travel all over the body with no mechnanism to regulate what tissue they enter and attack? It isn’t hurting anything!






- it’s safe because we can finely tune the body for creation and response to a very specific protein to boost immune response against that threat

- so what if 10% of the proteins generated are mistranslations and result in unintended proteins being created and responded to? It isn’t hurting anything!!

Frameshifts happen occasionally, and the resulting protein is generally useless, it is extremely rare for it to be harmful. An mRNA vaccine adds one more strand of mRNA to the hundreds of other mRNA’s already existing in a cell that might occasionally produce a worthless protein in a single cell out of the billions of cells in your body.

Transfected cells are destroyed.

You and/or Alex seem to have some fundamental misunderstandings.

Skeptics seem to engage in a public version of the telephone game

Thanks for the explanations. When reading these detailed papers it is hard to figure out what is a realistic scary issue and what is a small percentage chance of a negative outcome. It is never clear, so if life is about.gambles, no medical product is not without risk. The issue for me is always, what percentage risk makes is worthwhile.
No one loves or wanted to take these shots, it was a.risk vs reward situation.

Agreed. All of life is a risk v reward calculation and I think everyone should act accordingly. I just didn’t like all the propaganda that went along with societal programming around the pandemic. I also don’t like that we continue to recommend these injections for our children even as many countries only recommend(or in some cases only offer) them to the old and/or fragile.

Keep in mind, Alex glosses over important details, context for reference, and writes for his audience with little understanding of the source material.

LMAO, are you fuking serious?

Genocide
e
n
o
c
i
d
e

It was definitely a risk vs. reward situation. That's why the EMA (European Medical Association) never even approved the use of the injection for the general public in Europe. It was only approved for the use in high risk patients with pre-existing medical conditions.

Because the risks were so high.

Yet in many places(like America) the rewards of injections were greatly exaggerated while the risks were downplayed or outright ignored(see also; lied about). Meanwhile the risks from the virus were greatly exaggerated. And this continues still today. Luckily many people have realized the bullsh!t and are no longer lining up for shots.

Benny being Benny like usual, his mind must be going, or he's trying to rewrite history on purpose......

Thanks to the efforts of those like Alex, general vaccination rates for everything are down.

Congrats?

Then why did so many European countries Mandate that people get the jab?

You didn't say anything here, what is your point?
It certainly is not.clear.
When you type out a sentence, have a poimt.

Thanks in large part to people like you who repeatedly lied about things for years.


When people are lied to so blatantly, they become skeptical of other things being claimed by the liars.


Congrats?

Exactly, of course there will always be the ignorant ones who will believe everything they're told.

Hell, you STILL see people wearing masks here and there......

A good read.

Not everyone is okay with (repeated) infection. Others are. Everybody's different

Masks won't protect you from getting a virus, it even says so on the back of the box. And if you're that afraid, than maybe you should stay indoors.

Like I said, some folks are okay with repeated infections, others aren't and may take steps to reduce the chance. Everybody's different

No, it's pretty clear what my point was.

It's that you're either full of chit or incredibly dumb. Which is it?