Forum
»
why didn't the space shuttle take off like a normal airplane?
- Results 1 to 7 of 7
-
Page 1 of 1
01-09-2024, 07:49 AM
-
#1
- HMFIC_BROWSIN
- Buy high, sell higher.
-
- HMFIC_BROWSIN
- Buy high, sell higher.
- Join Date: Feb 2009
- Location: Arizona, United States
- Posts: 73,524
- Rep Power: 348838
-
-
why didn't the space shuttle take off like a normal airplane?
what was the point of doing a dangerous lift-off method? Was it just for show?
Why put the pilots under 7g's of force and endanger them with massive tanks of explosive fuel when you could just zip them horizontally down a runway and gain altitude at a slower pace? You wouldn't need all the reinforced materials anymore, either.
brb, emailing NASA.
Why put the pilots under 7g's of force and endanger them with massive tanks of explosive fuel when you could just zip them horizontally down a runway and gain altitude at a slower pace? You wouldn't need all the reinforced materials anymore, either.
brb, emailing NASA.
01-09-2024, 08:06 AM
-
#2
- stevebec
- Unregistered User
-
- stevebec
- Unregistered User
- Join Date: Aug 2015
- Location: United States
- Posts: 6,542
- Rep Power: 57623
-
-
Originally Posted By HMFIC_BROWSIN⏩
Because the wings didn't have enough lift to get it off the ground, and you can't fly into space after the air gets thin enough.what was the point of doing a dangerous lift-off method? Was it just for show?
Why put the pilots under 7g's of force and endanger them with massive tanks of explosive fuel when you could just zip them horizontally down a runway and gain altitude at a slower pace? You wouldn't need all the reinforced materials anymore, either.
brb, emailing NASA.
Why put the pilots under 7g's of force and endanger them with massive tanks of explosive fuel when you could just zip them horizontally down a runway and gain altitude at a slower pace? You wouldn't need all the reinforced materials anymore, either.
brb, emailing NASA.
"Bones heal, pain is temporary, and chicks dig scars" - Evel Knievel
01-09-2024, 08:36 AM
-
#3
- SaviorSelfJT
- clownslayer
-
- SaviorSelfJT
- clownslayer
- Join Date: Aug 2010
- Posts: 12,855
- Rep Power: 166618
-
-
It was supposed to but the shuttle did a 360 and flew away
Best lifts:
Bench press: 315x5
Squat: 465x1
Strict press: 205x5
Deadlift: 405x13 (conv tap'n'go with straps)
01-09-2024, 08:39 AM
-
#4
01-09-2024, 08:45 AM
-
#5
- BullittEV
- Registered User
-
- BullittEV
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2012
- Location: San Diego, California, United States
- Age: 40
- Posts: 27,652
- Rep Power: 261167
-
-
Originally Posted By buwbs⏩
Youre prob trolling but I dont think you can exits Earth's gravitational pull without a certain level of thrust and exit trajectoryyeah lets use massive amounts of power instead of just gliding into space with a slight incline
its because the earth is flat and they would be miles away from the destination
its because the earth is flat and they would be miles away from the destination
USMC 0311
*Ice Hockey/Lacrosse Crew*
*fukkin zeezbrah when pickin up chicks but do one thing to fuk it up/cant sustain after that night crew*
*C7 GS Vette Crew*
01-09-2024, 08:46 AM
-
#6
airplanes need the air for lift and for their engines. the higher you get, you start running out of air. the escape velocity of earth is around 25,000 mph. you need a rocket with an internal fuel supply, not a 747. got to be all thrust.
01-09-2024, 09:03 AM
-
#7
- LateShow
- smashing and dashing
-
- LateShow
- smashing and dashing
- Join Date: Dec 2013
- Location: Minnesota, United States
- Posts: 5,433
- Rep Power: 56450
-
-
Don’t worry bro, they had it all figured out back in the 60s and 70s. No need to go back or to try and recreate the technology. Besides, the original files were accidentally deleted
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts