Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» strong 9.5/10 actress you probably never heard of
  1. Results 1 to 11 of 11
post 1697069793 01-28-2024, 09:23 AM
-
#1
  1. TokenV
  2. I ❤ TECHNO
  1. TokenV
  2. I ❤ TECHNO
  3. Join Date: Feb 2012
  4. Location: Belgium
  5. Posts: 41,404
  6. Rep Power: 442514

strong 9.5/10 actress you probably never heard of

watching For All Mankind, hngggg af cuz and she's already late 30s here



hnggggg











++
post 1697069883 01-28-2024, 09:28 AM
-
#2
  1. freeburn
  1. freeburn
  2. Join Date: Nov 2010
  3. Posts: 40,709
  4. Subscribers: 2
  5. Rep Power: 326524
Hot little space slut
post 1697069923 01-28-2024, 09:29 AM
-
#3
  1. BrooksKoepka
  1. BrooksKoepka
  2. Join Date: May 2021
  3. Posts: 37,962
  4. Rep Power: 0
But Katy mogs her and she’s a 6/10
post 1697070203 01-28-2024, 09:37 AM
-
#4
  1. TappingTheZen
  2. Everettian
  1. TappingTheZen
  2. Everettian
  3. Join Date: Jan 2014
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 12,774
  6. Rep Power: 173816
She's hot

Strong 9.5 tho? lol, more like a 7.5

She looks much better in the gif than the other pictures
post 1697070243 01-28-2024, 09:39 AM
-
#5
  1. theory816
  2. G-Unit
  1. theory816
  2. G-Unit
  3. Join Date: May 2012
  4. Posts: 19,458
  5. Rep Power: 43425
Damn she looks white af.
🤴Supreme Self Esteem Crew
5'5 110lb(MIL Spec) Asian Master Race Crew
Yacht/Boat Crew
post 1697070353 01-28-2024, 09:41 AM
-
#6
  1. XcelerateNYC
  2. Registered User
  1. XcelerateNYC
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2015
  4. Age: 35
  5. Posts: 3,388
  6. Rep Power: 71577
Originally Posted By TappingTheZen
She's hot

Strong 9.5 tho? lol, more like a 7.5
I never understand people's rating systems. 7.5 going by what standard? Hollywood actresses? If so, even by that standard you are underrating her.

The way I use the rating system is going by the general public. Take 1000 random sloots and how many of them are hotter than this girl? Maybe 10? 20?

By that logic she's a 9.8

Am I wrong?
Isaiah 45:22-23. Look unto me, and be ye saved, all the ends of the earth: for I am God, and there is none else.

I have sworn by myself, the word is gone out of my mouth in righteousness, and shall not return, That unto me every knee shall bow, every tongue shall swear.

Catholicism debunked
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=179267571

Pure blood
post 1697070453 01-28-2024, 09:43 AM
-
#7
  1. BrooksKoepka
  1. BrooksKoepka
  2. Join Date: May 2021
  3. Posts: 37,962
  4. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By XcelerateNYC
I never understand people's rating systems. 7.5 going by what standard? Hollywood actresses? If so, even by that standard you are underrating her.

The way I use the rating system is going by the general public. Take 1000 random sloots and how many of them are hotter than this girl? Maybe 10? 20?

By that logic she's a 9.8

Am I wrong?
Normal distribution
post 1697070473 01-28-2024, 09:43 AM
-
#8
  1. OffwhiteBrah
  1. OffwhiteBrah
  2. Join Date: Apr 2015
  3. Location: Florida, United States
  4. Posts: 50,218
  5. Rep Power: 545472
never heard of her but she look mad good
post 1697070943 01-28-2024, 09:54 AM
-
#9
  1. TappingTheZen
  2. Everettian
  1. TappingTheZen
  2. Everettian
  3. Join Date: Jan 2014
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 12,774
  6. Rep Power: 173816
Originally Posted By XcelerateNYC
I never understand people's rating systems. 7.5 going by what standard? Hollywood actresses? If so, even by that standard you are underrating her.

The way I use the rating system is going by the general public. Take 1000 random sloots and how many of them are hotter than this girl? Maybe 10? 20?

By that logic she's a 9.8

Am I wrong?
Nobody ranks like that though, otherwise every girl who isn't overweight or hideously ugly would basically be a 7, since we have an unhealthy, fat population. It also means that rating would have to be tied to time, because the standard distribution of all people change. This would mean we could not compare a 7 now, to a 7 in say 1980, if we ranked according to standard distribution because the standard becomes the 'backdrop' of other people, which is dynamic not static.

Ultimately it's subjective, but i'll say how i rate, essentially someone who is pretty hot but not absoloutly exceptional i rate a 7. To me, this woman is hot, but there's still at least a couple of tiers of women above her, who if you put them in a room with her would absoloutly mog her, this is why i rate her a 7.5, but she could never be a 9 or in that territory from my perspective.

If we start ranking by normal distribution, then i would not find a 7.5 attractive, because if i go and look at the general public, i find less than 25% of women attractive, and i think the same is likely true of a lot of miscers. Yet most people seem to see 7.5 as quite attractive, so clearly most peopleare notrating against a 'standard distribution'. For me, rating someone between a 7 and 8 probably actually puts them into the top 5% of all women, but probably only in the top 30% or so of women i actually find attractive. So again, if people really rated according to a standard distribution, they would probably only find 9+'s hot, but clearly that's not the case.

Also, while she looks good in the gif and in a couple of pics, she looks pretty bad in a couple of them to me. (the curly hairstyle doesnt work for me)

Again, i think you're looking far too deeply into something that will never be nailed down and has a largely subjective element.. but regardless hopefully my answer helps clear up your confusion regarding my personal rating, but no i do not rank according to the standard distribution because of the problems outlined above, and considering most men would claim a 7 is attractive, yet most men probably find significantly less than 30% of all women attractive, i'd argue almost nobody actually ranks according to a standard distribution.
post 1697071533 01-28-2024, 10:03 AM
-
#10
  1. XcelerateNYC
  2. Registered User
  1. XcelerateNYC
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2015
  4. Age: 35
  5. Posts: 3,388
  6. Rep Power: 71577
Originally Posted By TappingTheZen
Nobody ranks like that though, otherwise every girl who isn't overweight or hideously ugly would basically be a 7, since we have an unhealthy, fat population. It also means that rating would have to be tied to time, because the standard distribution of all people change. This would mean we could not compare a 7 now, to a 7 in say 1980, if we ranked according to standard distribution because the standard becomes the 'backdrop' of other people, which is dynamic not static.

Ultimately it's subjective, but i'll say how i rate, essentially someone who is pretty hot but not absoloutly exceptional i rate a 7. To me, this woman is hot, but there's still at least a couple of tiers of women above her, who if you put them in a room with her would absoloutly mog her, this is why i rate her a 7.5, but she could never be a 9 or in that territory from my perspective.

If we start ranking by normal distribution, then i would not find a 7.5 attractive, because if i go and look at the general public, i find less than 25% of women attractive, and i think the same is likely true of a lot of miscers. Yet most people seem to see 7.5 as quite attractive, so clearly most peopleare notrating against a 'standard distribution'. For me, rating someone between a 7 and 8 probably actually puts them into the top 5% of all women, but probably only in the top 30% or so of women i actually find attractive. So again, if people really rated according to a standard distribution, they would probably only find 9+'s hot, but clearly that's not the case.

Also, while she looks good in the gif and in a couple of pics, she looks pretty bad in a couple of them to me.

Again, i think you're looking far too deeply into something that will never be nailed down and has a largely subjective element.. but regardless hopefully my answer helps clear up your confusion regarding my personal rating, but no i do not rank according to the standard distribution because of the problems outlined above, and considering most men would claim a 7 is attractive, yet most men probably find significantly less than 30% of all women attractive, i'd argue almost nobody actually ranks according to a standard distribution.
I'll agree with you that most people rank the way you do, and I'm ab outlier. But I think my way is more realistic because it includes everyone. If you have a wife that is in the top 85% of looks compared the the general population then you're going to mogg the vast majority of your male counterparts.

Not a big deal but I just thot I'd bring that up because I never hear anyone talking about it.
Isaiah 45:22-23. Look unto me, and be ye saved, all the ends of the earth: for I am God, and there is none else.

I have sworn by myself, the word is gone out of my mouth in righteousness, and shall not return, That unto me every knee shall bow, every tongue shall swear.

Catholicism debunked
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=179267571

Pure blood
post 1697072373 01-28-2024, 10:23 AM
-
#11
  1. TokenV
  2. I ❤ TECHNO
  1. TokenV
  2. I ❤ TECHNO
  3. Join Date: Feb 2012
  4. Location: Belgium
  5. Posts: 41,404
  6. Rep Power: 442514
Originally Posted By theory816
Damn she looks white af.
hngggggggggg
++
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts