Forum
»
Long COVID is associated with severe cognitive slowing
01-28-2024, 09:47 AM
-
#1
Long COVID is associated with severe cognitive slowing
Long COVID is associated with severe cognitive slowing: a multicentre cross-sectional study
"The No-COVID group, i.e., healthy controls with no COVID-19 history, and the No-PCC group, i.e., people who had COVID-19 12 weeks ago but were not experiencing PCC at the time of testing."
"Together, these results robustly demonstrate pronounced cognitive slowing in people with PCC, which distinguishes them from age-matched healthy individuals who previously had symptomatic COVID-19 but did not manifest PCC. This might be an important factor contributing to some of the cognitive impairments reported in patients with PCC."
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/e...013-0/fulltext
"The No-COVID group, i.e., healthy controls with no COVID-19 history, and the No-PCC group, i.e., people who had COVID-19 12 weeks ago but were not experiencing PCC at the time of testing."
"Together, these results robustly demonstrate pronounced cognitive slowing in people with PCC, which distinguishes them from age-matched healthy individuals who previously had symptomatic COVID-19 but did not manifest PCC. This might be an important factor contributing to some of the cognitive impairments reported in patients with PCC."
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/e...013-0/fulltext
01-28-2024, 09:51 AM
-
#2
01-28-2024, 09:52 AM
-
#3
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
-
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,385
- Rep Power: 316746
-
-
With an estimated 20 million dead globally and 2.2 billion injured by Covid “vaccines”, a number significantly greater than those supposedly killed by Covid 19, perhaps it is time to re-evaluate “The Covid” as part of an on-going eugenics and debilitation program on the population using vaccines including vaccines distributed by the World Health Organization in foreign countries that have been secretly manufactured with abortifacients and sterilization chemicals in them
https://artofliberty.substack.com/p/...id-19-eugenics
https://artofliberty.substack.com/p/...id-19-eugenics
01-28-2024, 09:54 AM
-
#4
- N0rds
- "7'7" Norwegian chad with blonde hair blue eyes immigrant and a btc billionaire" -Tranny Maria
-
- N0rds
- "7'7" Norwegian chad with blonde hair blue eyes immigrant and a btc billionaire" -Tranny Maria
- Join Date: May 2012
- Location: AntiTranny Aktion
- Height: 6'6"
- Posts: 32,192
- Subscribers: 8
- Rep Power: 444426
-
-
Originally Posted By volleys⏩
No, its probably real, just has an incorrect name... Its vaccine damage. And people who claim they never got injected with the experimental gene modification, are most likely catching some of the shedding from a vaxxed person...Long covid is a ****ing scam lmao
"Boss not feel good please use sick day" - low IQ tranny.
"Send him to Phaggy_Cholo"
01-28-2024, 09:54 AM
-
#5
Originally Posted By Paul
Age matched controls thoWith an estimated 20 million dead globally and 2.2 billion injured by Covid “vaccines”, a number significantly greater than those supposedly killed by Covid 19, perhaps it is time to re-evaluate “The Covid” as part of an on-going eugenics and debilitation program on the population using vaccines including vaccines distributed by the World Health Organization in foreign countries that have been secretly manufactured with abortifacients and sterilization chemicals in them
https://artofliberty.substack.com/p/...id-19-eugenics
https://artofliberty.substack.com/p/...id-19-eugenics
01-28-2024, 09:56 AM
-
#6
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
-
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,385
- Rep Power: 316746
-
-

01-28-2024, 09:57 AM
-
#7
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
-
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
- Join Date: Jan 2005
- Location: Ill.
- Posts: 120,479
- Rep Power: 316531
-
-
And if you ask the ****ing retard if he agrees with the article, he responds with, "What do you mean?"
01-28-2024, 10:02 AM
-
#8
- TheJimmyRustler
- Shhh, no tears
-
- TheJimmyRustler
- Shhh, no tears
- Join Date: May 2012
- Posts: 7,686
- Rep Power: 16305
-
-
Sample size of only a few hundred? Eh, not gonna take this to mean anything.
Just like I'm sure others wouldn't take it to mean much that the only person I know of with long-Covid is my vaccinated and boosted mum - meanwhile, having had it twice but being unvaxxed, I have no health issues, nor does my unvaxxed brother, his unvaxxed girlfriend, other unvaxxed people I know who've had it. Conversely, there's my vaxxed mum who regularly gets tired, two of her friends who had heart attacks, another diagnosed with blood clots, a teenager in my brother's neighbourhood who died suddenly from a heart attack, a friend's sister-in-law who died suddenly and was proudly vaxxed and a vaxxed co-worker who was diagnosed with angina (ie heart arterial blockage) a year or so after getting vaxxed.
But hey, supposed to be concerned that a couple hundred people had slightly slower reactions and worse number memory than others.
Good thing that Omicron's confirmed to be less severe than Delta, at least!
Just like I'm sure others wouldn't take it to mean much that the only person I know of with long-Covid is my vaccinated and boosted mum - meanwhile, having had it twice but being unvaxxed, I have no health issues, nor does my unvaxxed brother, his unvaxxed girlfriend, other unvaxxed people I know who've had it. Conversely, there's my vaxxed mum who regularly gets tired, two of her friends who had heart attacks, another diagnosed with blood clots, a teenager in my brother's neighbourhood who died suddenly from a heart attack, a friend's sister-in-law who died suddenly and was proudly vaxxed and a vaxxed co-worker who was diagnosed with angina (ie heart arterial blockage) a year or so after getting vaxxed.
But hey, supposed to be concerned that a couple hundred people had slightly slower reactions and worse number memory than others.
Good thing that Omicron's confirmed to be less severe than Delta, at least!
01-28-2024, 10:05 AM
-
#9
- yabbayabba
- Join Date: Jun 2005
- Location: Burning down the belt warehouse
- Posts: 19,040
- Subscribers: 2
- Rep Power: 157908
-
-
Still defending a rushed clot shot over two years on certainly demonstrates falling cognitive ability.
01-28-2024, 10:06 AM
-
#10
01-28-2024, 10:07 AM
-
#11
Originally Posted By TheJimmyRustler⏩
Pretty big effects for a sample of 100 though, eh?Sample size of only a few hundred? Eh, not gonna take this to mean anything.
Just like I'm sure others wouldn't take it to mean much that the only person I know of with long-Covid is my vaccinated and boosted mum - meanwhile, having had it twice but being unvaxxed, I have no health issues, nor does my unvaxxed brother, his unvaxxed girlfriend, other unvaxxed people I know who've had it. Conversely, there's my vaxxed mum who regularly gets tired, two of her friends who had heart attacks, another diagnosed with blood clots, a teenager in my brother's neighbourhood who died suddenly from a heart attack, a friend's sister-in-law who died suddenly and was proudly vaxxed and a vaxxed co-worker who was diagnosed with angina (ie heart arterial blockage) a year or so after getting vaxxed.
But hey, supposed to be concerned that a couple hundred people had slightly slower reactions and worse number memory than others.
Good thing that Omicron's confirmed to be less severe than Delta, at least!
Just like I'm sure others wouldn't take it to mean much that the only person I know of with long-Covid is my vaccinated and boosted mum - meanwhile, having had it twice but being unvaxxed, I have no health issues, nor does my unvaxxed brother, his unvaxxed girlfriend, other unvaxxed people I know who've had it. Conversely, there's my vaxxed mum who regularly gets tired, two of her friends who had heart attacks, another diagnosed with blood clots, a teenager in my brother's neighbourhood who died suddenly from a heart attack, a friend's sister-in-law who died suddenly and was proudly vaxxed and a vaxxed co-worker who was diagnosed with angina (ie heart arterial blockage) a year or so after getting vaxxed.
But hey, supposed to be concerned that a couple hundred people had slightly slower reactions and worse number memory than others.
Good thing that Omicron's confirmed to be less severe than Delta, at least!
It's not like it's overpowered to find tiny effects with a huge n.
01-28-2024, 10:11 AM
-
#12
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
-
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,385
- Rep Power: 316746
-
-
October 3rd, 2022 – The Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) obtains adverse effects data for Covid “vaccines” tracked by a CDC smartphone-based tracking tool called V-Safe after a lawsuit and court order forced its release. The data reveals shocking information that should have caused the CDC to immediately shut down its Covid-19 vaccine program. Among numerous alarming results, out of the approximately 10 million individuals that registered and submitted data to v-safe, 782,913 individuals, or over 7.7% of v-safe users, had a health event requiring medical attention, emergency room intervention, and/or hospitalization. Over 25% had an event that required them to miss school or work and/or prevented normal activities.
There were also 71 million reports of symptoms in the pre-populated fields from approximately 10 million users. This is an average of over seven symptoms reported per v-safe registrant. Reported symptoms include, for example, over 4 million reports of joint pain, a very concerning immune reaction. While around 2 million of these joint pain reports were mild, over 1.8 million of the reports were for moderate joint pain, and over 400,000 were for severe joint pain. Since V-safe only included less than 4 percent of people that received a Covid-19 vaccine, tens of millions of Americans likely had an immune reaction to the Covid-19 vaccine in their joints that resulted in debilitating pain and potential long-term harm.

There were also 71 million reports of symptoms in the pre-populated fields from approximately 10 million users. This is an average of over seven symptoms reported per v-safe registrant. Reported symptoms include, for example, over 4 million reports of joint pain, a very concerning immune reaction. While around 2 million of these joint pain reports were mild, over 1.8 million of the reports were for moderate joint pain, and over 400,000 were for severe joint pain. Since V-safe only included less than 4 percent of people that received a Covid-19 vaccine, tens of millions of Americans likely had an immune reaction to the Covid-19 vaccine in their joints that resulted in debilitating pain and potential long-term harm.

01-28-2024, 10:14 AM
-
#13
Originally Posted By Paul
No link and seemingly unrelated to this study.October 3rd, 2022 – The Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) obtains adverse effects data for Covid “vaccines” tracked by a CDC smartphone-based tracking tool called V-Safe after a lawsuit and court order forced its release. The data reveals shocking information that should have caused the CDC to immediately shut down its Covid-19 vaccine program. Among numerous alarming results, out of the approximately 10 million individuals that registered and submitted data to v-safe, 782,913 individuals, or over 7.7% of v-safe users, had a health event requiring medical attention, emergency room intervention, and/or hospitalization. Over 25% had an event that required them to miss school or work and/or prevented normal activities.
There were also 71 million reports of symptoms in the pre-populated fields from approximately 10 million users. This is an average of over seven symptoms reported per v-safe registrant. Reported symptoms include, for example, over 4 million reports of joint pain, a very concerning immune reaction. While around 2 million of these joint pain reports were mild, over 1.8 million of the reports were for moderate joint pain, and over 400,000 were for severe joint pain. Since V-safe only included less than 4 percent of people that received a Covid-19 vaccine, tens of millions of Americans likely had an immune reaction to the Covid-19 vaccine in their joints that resulted in debilitating pain and potential long-term harm.
There were also 71 million reports of symptoms in the pre-populated fields from approximately 10 million users. This is an average of over seven symptoms reported per v-safe registrant. Reported symptoms include, for example, over 4 million reports of joint pain, a very concerning immune reaction. While around 2 million of these joint pain reports were mild, over 1.8 million of the reports were for moderate joint pain, and over 400,000 were for severe joint pain. Since V-safe only included less than 4 percent of people that received a Covid-19 vaccine, tens of millions of Americans likely had an immune reaction to the Covid-19 vaccine in their joints that resulted in debilitating pain and potential long-term harm.
Lol at the mix and match technique to avoid discussing anything that counters the narrative

01-28-2024, 10:14 AM
-
#14
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
-
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
- Join Date: Jan 2005
- Location: Ill.
- Posts: 120,479
- Rep Power: 316531
-
-
Hey OP is Omicron more or less severe than Delta?
01-28-2024, 10:24 AM
-
#15
- jtaylor2010
- Join Date: Mar 2010
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,185
- Rep Power: 441422
-
-
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn⏩
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showt...hp?t=184307613And if you ask the ****ing retard if he agrees with the article, he responds with, "What do you mean?"
The researchers found that consumption of red meat, including processed and unprocessed red meat, was strongly associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes. Participants who ate the most red meat had a 62% higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes compared to those who ate the least. Every additional daily serving of processed red meat was associated with a 46% greater risk of developing type 2 diabetes and every additional daily serving of unprocessed red meat was associated with a 24% greater risk.
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Did you read the study or the summary?
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
The study was linked in the article. I have the pdf, but thanks!
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
"We calculated each individual’s person-years from the date of returning the baseline questionnaire to the date of T2DM diagnosis, death, or the end of the follow-up (January 31, 2006, for the HPFS; June 30, 2006, for the NHS; and June 30, 2007, for the NHS II), whichever came first.
We used change in red meat consumption updated every 4 years as a time-varying exposure, and time-dependent Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) for T2DM risk in the subsequent 4 years.
For example, we used changes in red meat consumption between the 1986 and 1990 questionnaires to predict T2DM risk from 1990 through 1994, changes between the 1990 and 1994 questionnaires to predict T2DM risk from 1994 through 1998, and so forth.
In the multivariate analysis, in addition to age and calendar time, we simultaneously controlled for various potential confounding factors, including race (white or nonwhite), family history of T2DM (yes or no), marital status (with spouse, yes or no; updated every 4 years), history of hypertension and hypercholesterolemia (yes or no; updated every 4 years), and simultaneous changes in other lifestyle factors: smoking status (never to never, never to current, past to past, past to current, current to past, current to current, or missing indicator), as well as initial and changes (all in quintiles) in alcohol intake, physical activity, total energy intake, and diet quality (Alternative Healthy Eating Index score). "
We used change in red meat consumption updated every 4 years as a time-varying exposure, and time-dependent Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) for T2DM risk in the subsequent 4 years.
For example, we used changes in red meat consumption between the 1986 and 1990 questionnaires to predict T2DM risk from 1990 through 1994, changes between the 1990 and 1994 questionnaires to predict T2DM risk from 1994 through 1998, and so forth.
In the multivariate analysis, in addition to age and calendar time, we simultaneously controlled for various potential confounding factors, including race (white or nonwhite), family history of T2DM (yes or no), marital status (with spouse, yes or no; updated every 4 years), history of hypertension and hypercholesterolemia (yes or no; updated every 4 years), and simultaneous changes in other lifestyle factors: smoking status (never to never, never to current, past to past, past to current, current to past, current to current, or missing indicator), as well as initial and changes (all in quintiles) in alcohol intake, physical activity, total energy intake, and diet quality (Alternative Healthy Eating Index score). "
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
"baseline history of hypertension, dietary glycemic index, poultry, fish, egg, total dairy, nuts and legumes, fruits, vegetables, whole grain, and refined grain intakes"
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩

"4 Model 2 was additionally adjusted for race/ethnicity (white adults, non-white adults),smoking status(never, past, current: 1-14 cigs/d, current: >15-24 cigs/d,current: >24 cigs/d),alcohol intake(non-alcohol drinker, 0-4.9 grams/d, 5-9.9 grams/d, 10-14.9 grams/d, 15-29.9 grams/d, >30 g/d), physical activity (<3, 3-9, 9-18, 18-27, 27 METs-h/week), multivitamin use, menopausal status and hormone use (if NHS or NHS II), family history of type 2 diabetes, antihypertensive drug use, cholesterol-lowering drug use, history of hypertension, glycemic index, poultry, fish, egg, total dairy, nuts and legumes, fruits, vegetables, whole grain, and refined grain intakes, socioeconomic status, and BMI (<21, 21-23, 23-25, 25-27, 27-30, 30-33, 33-35, 35-40, 40 kg/m2).


"4 Model 2 was additionally adjusted for race/ethnicity (white adults, non-white adults),smoking status(never, past, current: 1-14 cigs/d, current: >15-24 cigs/d,current: >24 cigs/d),alcohol intake(non-alcohol drinker, 0-4.9 grams/d, 5-9.9 grams/d, 10-14.9 grams/d, 15-29.9 grams/d, >30 g/d), physical activity (<3, 3-9, 9-18, 18-27, 27 METs-h/week), multivitamin use, menopausal status and hormone use (if NHS or NHS II), family history of type 2 diabetes, antihypertensive drug use, cholesterol-lowering drug use, history of hypertension, glycemic index, poultry, fish, egg, total dairy, nuts and legumes, fruits, vegetables, whole grain, and refined grain intakes, socioeconomic status, and BMI (<21, 21-23, 23-25, 25-27, 27-30, 30-33, 33-35, 35-40, 40 kg/m2).
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
You said they didn't include confounders.

Could the additional calories be from red meat?
Your other claims don't appear to be supported.

Could the additional calories be from red meat?
Your other claims don't appear to be supported.
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
I disagree with use of the term "control" and prefer "conditioned".
In my view,controlvariables are things taken into account and stratified in design. In observational regression models, I think it's better to describe the mechanics asconditioningon the data.
The data show that those variables were available and conditioned upon in the regression modelling.
I dunno what you mean by "adjust", but including those indices for conditioning the model seems akin toadjusting. Kind of like: "after we condition on (adjust for, predict with) how much they smoke, drink, and how many calories and vegetables they consume, what additional variance is explained by red meat consumption?"
In my view,controlvariables are things taken into account and stratified in design. In observational regression models, I think it's better to describe the mechanics asconditioningon the data.
The data show that those variables were available and conditioned upon in the regression modelling.
I dunno what you mean by "adjust", but including those indices for conditioning the model seems akin toadjusting. Kind of like: "after we condition on (adjust for, predict with) how much they smoke, drink, and how many calories and vegetables they consume, what additional variance is explained by red meat consumption?"
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Did you interrogate your suspicion by reading the study?
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Wat


Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
I see.
Those are the grants.
You wouldn't be the first to suggest scientific pursuit is more left than right
Those are the grants.
You wouldn't be the first to suggest scientific pursuit is more left than right

Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
How are they lucrative?
Grants fund projects (supplies, participant payments, grad students).
I dunno which research facilities you're referencing, but this work was done at a university.
Grants fund projects (supplies, participant payments, grad students).
I dunno which research facilities you're referencing, but this work was done at a university.
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
I have no idea what you're talking about. Do you not know scientific journals predate the internet?
I was responding to Kraken's claim that academics conduct intentionally bad studies to get rich. Silliness.
I was responding to Kraken's claim that academics conduct intentionally bad studies to get rich. Silliness.
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Wat?


Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩

Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
The study in the OP is about type 2 diabetes and red meat consumption. Neither covid nor BLM are mentioned in the paper.
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Concession?
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
I was just wondering if you were gonna follow up on how academics do intentionally bad research to get rich, with some kind of support/evidence

Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
But this thread is about type 2 diabetes and red meat consumption

Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
If you wanna relate things to covid, that's cool. Just please don't try to put it on me

Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
This is the type of conversation he likes to have when discussing studies that he thinks are horsesh!t and when he thinks the conclusions are ridiculous. Just lmfao at ruining over three years of work trolling just by overplaying your hand in a thread about a study that links red meat to diabetes.Nobody read the study tho

01-28-2024, 10:25 AM
-
#16
- frankdtank20
- Registered User
-
- frankdtank20
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2020
- Posts: 27,464
- Rep Power: 171374
-
-
My sister who was visiting me and my family for a week and left last night just texted me she tested positive this morning. I sipped off her margarita on Friday. She was sweating as I dropped her off at the airport last night. My wife thinks she has the Coof now too, and we drank from the same beer last night. So I've been infected again. One of my kids has had a runny nose for a few days. Lawd wut iz we gon do? I have no symptoms but I'll be updating from my death bed next week.
2+2 = 7, right?
2+2 = 7, right?
Yeah Buddyyy! Light weight! Light weight baby!!!!
01-28-2024, 10:25 AM
-
#17
Originally Posted By jtaylor2010⏩
And you've decided to just retreat to the sidelines and peanut gallery because you can't participate.This is the type of conversation he likes to have when discussing studies that he thinks are horsesh!t and when he thinks the conclusions are ridiculous. Just lmfao at ruining over three years of work trolling just by overplaying your hand in a thread about a study that links red meat to diabetes.
Just lol

01-28-2024, 10:27 AM
-
#18
Originally Posted By frankdtank20⏩
Solid critique of these age-matched results?My sister who was visiting me and my family for a week and left last night just texted me she tested positive this morning. I sipped off her margarita on Friday. She was sweating as I dropped her off at the airport last night. My wife thinks she has the Coof now too, and we drank from the same beer last night. So I've been infected again. One of my kids has had a runny nose for a few days. Lawd wut iz we gon do? I have no symptoms but I'll be updating from my death bed next week.
Just lol
01-28-2024, 10:27 AM
-
#19
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
-
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,385
- Rep Power: 316746
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
it's from the substack..it breaks it down..with links.No link and seemingly unrelated to this study.
Lol at the mix and match technique to avoid discussing anything that counters the narrative
Lol at the mix and match technique to avoid discussing anything that counters the narrative

https://medicalcrisisdeclaration.com/
Cheers
01-28-2024, 10:35 AM
-
#20
Originally Posted By Paul
That does seem to support narrative.Hardly reviewable, tho

01-28-2024, 10:39 AM
-
#21
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
-
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,385
- Rep Power: 316746
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
really..their (presented and proven) narrative is that the jab is causing an unprecedented amount of vaccine injuries, effects and deaths..what exactly did you think the narrative was?That does seem to support narrative.
Hardly reviewable, tho
Hardly reviewable, tho

"We are currently witnessing an excess in mortality in those countries where the majority of the population has received the so called “COVID-19 vaccines”. To date, this excess mortality has neither been sufficiently investigated nor studied by national and international health institutions.
The large number of sudden deaths in previously healthy young people who were inoculated with these “vaccines”, is particularly worrying, as is the high incidence of miscarriages and perinatal deaths which have not been investigated.
A large number of adverse side effects, including hospitalisations, permanent disabilities and deaths related to the so-called “COVID-19 vaccines”, have been reported officially.
The registered number has no precedent in world vaccination history.
Examining the reports on CDC’s VAERS, the UK’s Yellow Card System, the Australian Adverse Event Monitoring System, Europe’s EudraVigilance System and the WHO’s VigiAccess Database, to date there have been more than 11 million reports of adverse effects and more than 70,000 deaths co-related to the inoculation of the products known as “covid vaccines”.
We know that these numbers just about represent between 1% and 10% of all real events.
Therefore, we consider that we are facing a serious international medical crisis, which must be accepted and treated as critical by all states, health institutions and medical personnel worldwide.
Therefore, the following measures must be undertaken on an urgent basis:
A worldwide ‘stop’ to the national inoculation campaigns with the products known as “COVID-19 vaccines”.
Investigation of all sudden deaths of people who were healthy previous to the inoculation.
Implementation of early detection programmes of cardiovascular events which could lead to sudden deaths with analysis such as D-dimer and Troponin, in all those that were inoculated with the products known as “COVID-19 vaccines”, as well as the early detection of serious tumours.
Implementation of research and treatment programmes for victims of adverse effects after receiving the so called “COVID-19 vaccine”.
Undertaking analyses of the composition of vials of Pfizer, Moderna, Astra Zeneca, Janssen, Sinovac, Sputnik V and any other product known as “COVID-19 vaccines”,
by independent research groups with no affiliation to pharmaceutical companies, nor any conflict of interest.
Studies to be conducted on the interactions between the different components of the so called “COVID-19 vaccines” and their molecular, cellular and biological effects.
Implemention of psychological help and compensation programmes for any person that has developed a disease or disability as a consequence of the so called “COVID-19 vaccines”.
Implemention and promotion of psychological help and compensation programmes for the family members of any person who died as a result of having been inoculated with the product known as “Covid-19 vaccines”.
Consequently we declare that we find ourselves in an unprecedented international medical crisis in the history of medicine, due to the large number of diseases and deaths associated with the “vaccines against Covid-19”.
01-28-2024, 10:45 AM
-
#22
Originally Posted By Paul
It's a position statement from an anti vaccine group.Copy/paste?
It's obvious why it would be well received here and why folks would prefer to discuss it than any study that counters the narrative.
But it is what it is

01-28-2024, 10:50 AM
-
#23
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
-
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,385
- Rep Power: 316746
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Oh so if you are against the vaccine, any data presented is incorrect, gotcha.It's a position statement from an anti vaccine group.
It's obvious why it would be well received here and why folks would prefer to discuss it than any study that counters the narrative.
But it is what it is
It's obvious why it would be well received here and why folks would prefer to discuss it than any study that counters the narrative.
But it is what it is

Yea, I think most here of sound made and are opposed to this jab, but if you want to label them all "anti-vaccine", I'm sure your handlers would be pleased
01-28-2024, 10:53 AM
-
#24
Originally Posted By Paul
The study in OP is about the association between long covid, from infection, and cognitive deficits.Oh so if you are against the vaccine, any data presented is incorrect, gotcha.
Yea, I think most here of sound made and are opposed to this jab, but if you want to label them all "anti-vaccine", I'm sure your handlers would be pleased
Yea, I think most here of sound made and are opposed to this jab, but if you want to label them all "anti-vaccine", I'm sure your handlers would be pleased
01-28-2024, 10:55 AM
-
#25
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
-
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,385
- Rep Power: 316746
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
I don't trust the studies you postThe study in OP is about the association between long covid, from infection, and cognitive deficits.
01-28-2024, 10:58 AM
-
#26
01-28-2024, 10:58 AM
-
#27
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
-
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
- Join Date: Jul 2003
- Location: Greenville, South Carolina, United States
- Posts: 68,355
- Subscribers: 2
- Rep Power: 698308
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
You really do.. don't you.I HEART Covid!

It's a hot night. The mind races. You think about your knife: the only friend who hasn't betrayed you, the only friend who won't be dead by sunup. Sleep tight mates, in your quilted chambray night shirts.
01-28-2024, 10:59 AM
-
#28
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
-
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,385
- Rep Power: 316746
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Studies are easily manipulated, and not represented correctly.. I can post how this is done if you likeObviously.They do the opposite of confirming biases
No need to trust them tho. The full text is right there.

No need to trust them tho. The full text is right there.

01-28-2024, 10:59 AM
-
#29
- HaiMeesk
- Jive Azz Turkey
-
- HaiMeesk
- Jive Azz Turkey
- Join Date: Dec 2014
- Location: United States
- Age: 11
- Posts: 11,242
- Rep Power: 49990
-
-
Originally Posted By yabbayabba⏩
OP's a paid shill - either Big Pharma or Canadian govt or both. As long as he's getting paid and as long as miscers keep interacting with him, he'll keep doing it. Whatever pays the rent.Still defending a rushed clot shot over two years on certainly demonstrates falling cognitive ability.
Boston sports crew
Live Free or Die 603 crew
Ex-Howard Stern crew
1974 crew
***Connoisseur: Les Derrieres de Femmes ***
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts