In Utero Exposure to Maternal COVID-19 Vaccination and Offspring Neurodevelopment at 12 and 18 Months


" Results suggest that maternal vaccination against COVID-19 during pregnancy was safe from the perspective of offspring neurodevelopment up to age 18 months."

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jam...rticle/2814106

But the mice!

Autism.

****ing retard.

With an estimated 20 million dead globally and 2.2 billion injured by Covid “vaccines”, a number significantly greater than those supposedly killed by Covid 19, perhaps it is time to re-evaluate “The Covid” as part of an on-going eugenics and debilitation program on the population using vaccines including vaccines distributed by the World Health Organization in foreign countries that have been secretly manufactured with abortifacients and sterilization chemicals in them

https://artofliberty.substack.com/p/...id-19-eugenics

Still, looks like infants born to vaccinated moms are alright.

Bad news for the narrative, but good news otherwise

except for all the miscarriages the jabbed moms had

I know 3 personally..

Time will tell. ****ing retard.

JLC, is one of those.."it's not a person yet", so if the child dies in the mothers womb, it's no loss

Which line reports that result?

"A total of 2487 pregnant individuals (mean [SD] age, 33.3 [4.2] years) enrolled at less than 10 weeks’ gestation and completed research activities, yielding a total of 2261 and 1940 infants aged 12 and 18 months, respectively, with neurodevelopmental assessments. In crude analyses, 471 of 1541 exposed infants (30.6%) screened abnormally for developmental delay at 12 months vs 203 of 720 unexposed infants (28.2%; χ2 = 1.32; P = .25); the corresponding prevalences at 18 months were 262 of 1301 (20.1%) vs 148 of 639 (23.2%), respectively (χ2 = 2.35; P = .13)."

which quote of mine states the substack did...but sure, we can look at the data..one sec

BTW..what do you mean the infants born after are okay..?

No.

Where are deaths in vaccine exposed infants reported in the study we're discussing?

I'm discussing the substack I posted, I have no care for your "study"

I see. That tracks

I'm not an author on this one tho.



Lol

Oh..you are an author of the study you posted?

UhJust lol at the representatives

uh..that quote was in response to my substack post ...strong self-aware lol

You wrote that substack article?

Is OP anti-Covid vax and reverse trolling? If so, he’s doing an amazing job

"the corresponding prevalences at 18 months were 262 of 1301 (20.1%) vs 148 of 639 (23.2%), respectively (χ2 = 2.35; P = .13)"

It means the rates aren't different between exposed and unexposed groups.

For sure. It runs very counter to the narrative - therefore bad and readily dismissed

Such sophistication in review

Three covid threads on the first page alone.

You need help.

Given the concerns raised by folks on this forum over a mouse study, I would say the effects of prenatal exposure to covid vaccines on neurodevelopment is a pretty relevant and contemporary topic for the JAMA readership.

It's a fairly lengthy list of authors. It looks like all have post-secondary degrees:

Eleni G. Jaswa, MD, MSc1; Marcelle I. Cedars, MD1; Karla J. Lindquist, PhD2; Somer L. Bishop, PhD3; Young-Shin Kim, MD, MS, MPH, PhD3; Amy Kaing, MD1; Mary Prahl, MD4; Stephanie L. Gaw, MD, PhD5; Jamie Corley, BS1; Elena Hoskin, MS1; Yoon Jae Cho, MD3; Elizabeth Rogers, MD6; Heather G. Huddleston, MD1

1 Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco
2 Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco
3 Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco
4 Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Infectious Disease and Global Health, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco
5 Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco
6 Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco

Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) may have been from vaccines all along

Far from witnessing a disaster, however, observers by June 2020 had begun noticing a wonderful silver lining — a “surprising” pandemic effect on the death rate among infants, in particular, with 200-plus fewer infants dying per week, amounting to a 30% reduction in expected child deaths within a few months.

To explain the “something mysterious” saving the lives of infants, these analysts, along with Children’s Health Defense (CHD) Chief Scientific Officer Brian Hooker, pointed out how the missed infant vaccines coincided with a “precipitous drop” in reports of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

SIDS deaths — which by definition affect children who are normal and healthy — and sudden unexplained deaths in children over age 1 typically occur in close temporal proximity to vaccination, with nine out of 10 SIDS deaths following two- and four-month “well-baby” visits.

An analysis of three decades of VAERS data found 75% of reported post-vaccination SIDS cases occurred within seven days of childhood shots.

Japanese pathologists who identified SIDS cases taking place within a week of vaccination agree that “suspicious cases do exist,” leading them to encourage forensic pathologists to “devote more attention to vaccination” in SIDS events.

https://patrick.net/post/1347021/202...drome-sids-may

RFK Jr. 2024!

Not just anti-covid vaccine, but anti-vaccine

#based

Every person I know that has never had any vaccines is doing pretty damn good, so that's a start

https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showt...hp?t=184307613
This is the type of conversation he likes to have when discussing studies that he thinks are horsesh!t and when he thinks the conclusions are ridiculous. Just lmfao at ruining over three years of work trolling just by overplaying your hand in a thread about a study that links red meat to diabetes.

Folks arguing that what's written wasn't written nor done and lacking even a basic understanding of regression analysis.

Not even a little embarassed?

58% of Infant Deaths Reported to VAERS Occurred Within 3 Days of Vaccination, Research Shows

In a new research paper published in the journal Toxicology Reports, author Neil Z. Miller reports on the relationship between sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) death and the timing of vaccination, based on the Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) database.

SIDS is defined as the sudden and unexpected death of an infant that remains unexplained after a thorough investigation. Although there are no specific symptoms associated with SIDS, an autopsy often reveals congestion and edema of the lungs and inflammatory changes in the respiratory system, according to the National Center for Health Statistics Vital Statistics of the United States 1988, Volume II, Mortality, Part A, Public Health Service, 1991.

Prior to contemporary vaccination programs, SIDS — sometimes referred to as “crib death” — was so infrequent it was not mentioned in infant mortality statistics.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...21475002100126





Higher Infant Mortality Rates Linked to Higher Number of Vaccine Doses, New Study Confirms..

A new peer-reviewed study found a positive statistical correlation between infant mortality rates (IMRs) and the number of vaccine doses received by babies — confirming findings made by the same researchers a decade ago.

In “Reaffirming a Positive Correlation Between Number of Vaccine Doses and Infant Mortality Rates: A Response to Critics,” published Feb. 2 in Cureus, authors Gary S. Goldman, Ph.D., an independent computer scientist, and Neil Z. Miller, a medical researcher, examined this potential correlation.

Their findings indicate a “positive correlation between the number of vaccine doses and IMRs is detectable in the most highly developed nations.”

https://www.cureus.com/articles/1342...-to-critics#!/

The more doses, the higher the infant mortality rate

In 2011, Miller and Goldman published a peer-reviewed study in Human and Experimental Toxicology, which first identified a positive statistical correlation between IMRs and number of vaccine doses.

The researchers wrote:

“The infant mortality rate (IMR) is one of the most important indicators of the socio-economic well-being and public health conditions of a country. The U.S. childhood immunization schedule specifies 26 vaccine doses for infants aged less than 1 year — the most in the world — yet 33 nations have lower IMRs.

“Using linear regression, the immunization schedules of these 34 nations were examined and a correlation coefficient of r = 0.70 (p < 0.0001) was found between IMRs and the number of vaccine doses routinely given to infants.”

In the above figures, “r” refers to the correlation coefficient, a number that ranges from -1 to 1. Any figure above zero is understood as a positive correlation, with figures between 0.6 and 0.79 considered a “strong” positive correlation, and 0.8 and above a “very strong” positive correlation.

The “p-value” indicates the extent to which the predictor’s value, in a linear regression analysis, is related to changes in the response variable.

A p-value of 0.05 or below is considered statistically significant, and indicative that the predictor and the response variable are related to each other and move in the same direction.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10....111407644#con1

Yes.

RFK Jr. owns his position - anti-vaccine.

One doesn't have to agree with the position to respect that he at least owns it