Studies:

Male circumcision causes terrible damage to the male penis, and psychological problems that can last a lifetime.

It's no surprise circumcision for purely frivolous reasons in confined to the USA and a few other countries.

In western Europe there is now a growing movement to outlaw it as genital mutilation, on a par with FGM.

Note: The vast majority of these links from reputable scientific journals, with peer-reviewed research.

1: Women prefer intact penises. And elsewhere you can find men do as well!

Source:http://www.healthcentral.com/drdean/408/60750.html

http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/ohara/

2: Masturbation feels better.

Source:http://www.cirp.org/pages/anat/

3: Circumcision significantly reduces sensitivity.

Source:http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/1...6.06685.x/epdf

http://www.livescience.com/1624-stud...ive-parts.html

4: Despite the reduced sensitivity, there is no change to lasting longer during sex.

Source:http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/1...d=E233A9E106A9A6D724B4E3606446784E.d03t01

5: Cut men have a more difficult time fapping.

Source:http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/1...d=E233A9E106A9

Which was the reason it was promoted in the USA in the first place.

http://english.pravda.ru/science/hea...ircumcision-0/

6: Circumcision increases risk of erectile dysfunctions.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/en...14979200&dopt=Abstract|

7: If too much skin is removed in circumcision, it can make the penis smaller since the dong needs some skin to expand during an erection:

http://www.altermd.com/Penisand Scrotal Surgery/buried_penis.htm

http://www.drgreene.com/azguide/inconspicuous-penis

8: Circumcision does not lower the risk of AIDS.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22096758/

9: Circumcision is more hygienic. Who the heck doesn't clean their penis? It's a three second job you do when you shower so this is not a valid argument. Women produce 10 times as much smegma as men - so it's OK to amputate an infant girls' labia lips so she doesn't have to wash them??

10: Circumcised foreskin sold to cosmetic manufacturers for profit:

http://voices.yahoo.com/human-foresk...cs-201840.html

11: Erectile dysfunction 4.5 times more likely to occur if you're circumcised

http://www.thewholenetwork.org/14/po...sfunction.htmletc

12: Stanford's school of medicine list of circumcision complications (including infection, haemorraging, skin-bridging, phimosis, amputation and death):

http://newborns.stanford.edu/CircComplications.html

13: Cut infants get long-term changes in pain response from the trauma of being circumcised

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9057731

14: Circumcision decreases penile sensitivity

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2...?dopt=Abstract

15: Circumcision associated with sexual difficulties

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21672947

16: Circumcision linked to alexithymia

http://www.mensstudies.com/content/2...4dc1e19fb&pi=4

17: The exaggeration of the benefits of circumcision in regards to HIV/AIDS transmission

http://jme.bmj.com/content/36/12/798.abstract

18: Circumcision/HIV claims are based on insufficient evidence

http://www.4eric.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/MC.pdf

19: There is no case for the widespread implementation of circumcision as a preventative measure to stop transmission of AIDS/HIV

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/1...1.00761.x/full

20: Circumcision decreases sexual pleasure

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17155977

21: Circumcision decreases efficiency of nerve response in the glans of the penis

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17378847

22: Circumcision policy is influenced by psychosocial factors rather than alleged health benefits

http://www.circumcision.org/policy.htm

23: Circumcision linked to pain, trauma, and psychosexual sequelae

http://www.cirp.org/library/psych/boyle6/

24: Circumcision results in significant loss of erogenous tissue

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8800902

25: Circumcision has negligible benefit

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9091693

26: Neonatal circumcision linked to pain and trauma

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9057731

27: Circumcision may lead to need for increased care and medical attention in the first 3 years of life

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9393302

28: Circumcision linked to psychological trauma

http://www.cirp.org/library/psych/goldman1/

29: Circumcision may lead to abnormal brain development and subsequent deviations in behaviour

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10657682

30: CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the importance of the foreskin for penile sensitivity, overall sexual satisfaction, and penile functioning: Furthermore, this study shows that a higher percentage of circumcised men experience discomfort or pain and unusual sensations as compared with the uncircumcised population.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2...?dopt=Abstract

31: CONCLUSIONS: Circumcision was associated with frequent orgasm difficulties in Danish men and with a range of frequent sexual difficulties in women, notably orgasm difficulties, dyspareunia and a sense of incomplete sexual needs fulfilment.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21672947

32: CONCLUSION: There was a decrease in masturbatory pleasure and sexual enjoyment after circumcision, indicating that adult circumcision adversely affects sexual function in many men, possibly because of complications of the surgery and a loss of nerve endings.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17155977

33: CONCLUSIONS: The glans of the circumcised penis is less sensitive to fine touch than the glans of the uncircumcised penis. The transitional region from the external to the internal prepuce is the most sensitive region of the uncircumcised penis and more sensitive than the most sensitive region of the circumcised penis. Circumcision ablates the most sensitive parts of the penis.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17378847

got any good news brah...........im unvaxxed and uncut........ Pure and unmutilated

Circumcision is Associated with Adult Difficulty in Identifying and Expressing Feelings

http://mensstudies.metapress.com/con...2r13175400432/

Circumcision Associated with Sexual Difficulties in Men and Women


http://ije.oxfordjournals.org/conten...04.short?rss=1


Circumcision is Associated with Premature Ejaculation

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/1...1.02280.x/full


Circumcision Decreases Sexual Pleasure

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/1...646.x/abstract


Circumcision Removes the Most Sensitive Parts of the Penis

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17378847


Circumcision Results in Significant Loss of Erogenous Tissue

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8800902


Researchers Demonstrate Traumatic Effects of Circumcision

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9057731

Male Circumcision Affects Female Sexual Enjoyment

A survey ofwomen who have had sexual experience with circumcised and anatomically complete partners showed that the anatomically complete penis was preferred over the circumcised penis.Without the foreskin to provide a movable sleeve of skin, intercourse with a circumcised penis resulted in female discomfort from increased friction, abrasion, and loss of natural secretions. Respondents overwhelmingly concurred that the mechanics of coitus were different for the two groups of men. Unaltered men tended to thrust more gently with shorter strokes

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/1...830s1079.x/pdf

Circumcision/HIV Claims are Based on Insufficient Evidence

An article endorsed by thirty-two professionals questions the results of three highly publicized African circumcision studies. The studies claim that circumcision reduces HIV transmission, and they are being used to promote circumcisions. Substantial evidence in this article refutes the claim of the studies. Examples in the article include the following: Circumcision is associated with increased transmission of HIV to women. Conditions for the studies were unlike conditions found in real-world settings. Other studies show that male circumcision is not associated with reduced HIV transmission. The U.S. has a high rate of HIV infection and a high rate of circumcision. Other countries have low rates of circumcision and low rates of HIV infection. Condoms are 95 times more cost effective in preventing HIV transmission. Circumcision removes healthy, functioning, unique tissue, raising ethical considerations.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20965388

circumcision should be made illegal in the US

Should be banned everywhere in the world, only in rare cases like phismosis should it be allowed.


Hell even female genital mutilation was allowed until the 90's in the US...just a matter of time

Sorry, OP, I'm rolling with Rabbi Shekelberg on this one: a circumcised cawk looks much more aesthetic.

Thank God my Catholic father got me the proceedure.

Reps for fellow aesthetic wiener bro.

Maybe anteaters can suck each others smegma off as I know no woman is going near one

It's kind of amazing how much attention this topic has gotten over the past 15 years or so.

Visually there's zero difference between a mutilated cawk and intact cawk when erect.


By objective metrics the mutilated cawk actually looks worse because of the scar tissue, etc.



The "it looks better" argument doesn't make any sense.

straight up facts

now let's see the cut copers come in and defend it.

anteater crew checking in

imagine hating yourself & your son so much you mutilate his cawk for life

How can they defend the irrational? It will be pure cope and denial like always but they know they're fooked, it's just too painful to accept.

Feel like such a ******* for even saying this but its not really true. Not all foreskins are created equal and some of the filthy euro trash pron stars have the chit where it covers their whole dink even when hard. ****ing nasty.

Also, you think most girls can't tell the difference when its in their mouth? Most sloots are dumb but pretty sure they can tell the difference between suking a smooth pole vs. a slimy worm where the skin moving up and down in their mouths LOL

I agree that infant circumcision is stupid but the cold hard facts are that many sloots at least in the US who have had both prefer it clean cut. Source: I actually get laid IRL and have spoken to numerous sloots about this subject and that was before they ever touched my penor.


Inb4 basement dwelling anteaters say "who cares what sloots think" I guess thats true in their case bc they too busy fapping in the basement.

Really all trolling aside, do you not consider the whole cutting parts of your baby's cock off thing, to be insane? I know its common in USA due to jews etc, but objectively with all given facts at hand, surely you think its fuking bonkers?

circumcision should only be legal for men over the age of 18.

Doing it to be babies should be a felony for the parents and all medical staff involved.

Another great coping post from a circumcel that ignores the facts. If a dude still has their foreskin over their tip when erect he has a medical issue and it's probably phismosis.

Talking about what women prefer, let's look at an actual study instead of your cope anecdote:

Male Circumcision Affects Female Sexual Enjoyment

A survey ofwomen who have had sexual experience with circumcised and anatomically complete partners showed that the anatomically complete penis was preferred over the circumcised penis.Without the foreskin to provide a movable sleeve of skin, intercourse with a circumcised penis resulted in female discomfort from increased friction, abrasion, and loss of natural secretions. Respondents overwhelmingly concurred that the mechanics of coitus were different for the two groups of men. Unaltered men tended to thrust more gently with shorter strokes

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/1...830s1079.x/pdf

For the record, I will not be having it done to any sons I have. Just looking at the bright side of being Circed of which there are a few benefits. If that's cope then whatever but I'm smart enough to know its wrong and it shouldn't be done.

Do you actually have any real life experience? Or just gonna keep posting dink studies like the incel you surely are

Lots of girls in the USA say this bro. Not sure where you are from but yea it is a thing. Sure, some may not be able to tell but even a dumb sloot will know the difference when they jerking a brah off and the skin sliding up and down. Some don't care or even prefer it but many more just think its weird.

Also, many girls have told me unless the brah is straight out the shower, giving him head will be unpleasant. Brb the sloot having to hold her nose for a morning blowjob to keep from dying LOL

Not aesthetic, boyo... that uncut cawk looks like a hotdog wearing a hoodie.

So a couple of low value american sloots u fooked are the metric for getting your dink mutilated or not?

Just lol

Bro you're redpilled about many things but why is it so hard to accept the facts on your mutilation at birth and it's long list of negative effects?

Will you also mutilate your sons?

I wouldn't, because I don't like making decisions for other people.... but I'm glad my dad made that decision for me so that I didn't have to.

Lmfao, you serious bro? Strong cope.

The truth is you wouldn't be snipping your dink like 99.9% of intact men if you had the choice because it makes no sense unless you like cucking yourself.

Anyway, great posts by circumcels to understand the psychology behind their coping process. Cognitive dissonance at work to accept the massive injustice they experienced.

You're at stage 4 of grief; bargaining process. Keep it up bro, one day you will accept the horrible act that has been done to you at birth.

I care about what sloots think because I like fuking them, yes. If I had a small dink I'd probably want to rope bc most of them wouldn't like it.

I guess if you are a basement dwelling incel you don't care about what sloots think. You never answered my question if you had actual sexual experience so am assuming my original theory is correct: You are an incel or at best seldom lay who autistically posts dink studies and obsesses about this topic instead of actually using ur dink IRL. SAD!

So seems you're at stage 3 of the grieving process; anger.

It's your low IQ parents that mutilated you and destroyed your sex life, not me bro, I'm just the messenger. I only care about facts.

Incel confirmed

Imagine having millions of random penis's living in your head. Crazy

It's sad to see but interesting to watch how they try and cope their way out of the horrible realization they're mutilated and tortured at birth without any solution to fix their disfigured dink.

I agree OP, but you’re never gonna get a cut person to agree.

To do so would mean accepting that they were mutilated at birth, for no reason, by their parents and doctors. It would take immense emotional intelligence to accept and admit this, which is not what the misc is known for.

The smegma argument is no argument at all. Who doesn’t clean their body properly when showering? I’d wager more miscers have swamp ass because they won’t clean their ass properly because they view it as gay.

Edit: Cleaning properly prevents any build up, it’s not meant to wipe away stuff. Smegma can happen to women who don’t lift their clitoral hood back too btw.