New Law Passed In France. Opposition Of The Mrna Injections As A Sectarian Aberration = Upto 3 Yrs Prison + €45,000 Fine

A new criminal offense in France could in future land people in prison who encourage people to withhold appropriate medical treatment (according to “science”). The law was pushed through the National Assembly on Wednesday. Critics call the law “Article Pfizer.”

Without much attention, a law was passed in France on Wednesday that could criminalize resistance to mRNA treatment. Anyone who advises against mRNA or other “medical treatments” that are “ obviously suitable” for treatment based on the current state of medical knowledge can in future be imprisoned in France for up to three years or receive a fine of up to 45,000 euros.

Repression against medical critics

It was a hard-fought issue, but the Macron regime ultimately got its way. Article 4 is central to the new law, which was first deleted but then reinstated. This creates a new criminal offense and criminalizes the “ request to stop or refrain from therapeutic or prophylactic medical treatment” as well as “the request to use practices that are presented as therapeutic or prophylactic ”. This means that any resistance to mRNA treatment (and other corporate medical methods) can be criminalized in the future.

Biologist Annelise Bocquet, for example, is correspondingly shocked. She writes on Wednesday evening: “ To my international friends and colleagues: Today a law was passed in France that describes any opposition to mRNA-LNP injections as a “sectarian aberration.” It is punished with a penalty of up to three years in prison and 45,000 euros.”

The most explosive wording in the law that can be applied to the mRNA critics can be found in paragraph 2:

“ The request to give up or refrain from therapeutic or prophylactic medical treatment is punishable by one year in prison and 15 . 000 euros fine if this task or omission is presented as beneficial to the health of the target persons , although , according to the current state of medical knowledge , it is obviously likely to have serious consequences for them on their physical or physical level , given the illness from which they suffer to have mental health .”

Anti-democratic maneuver

Most opposition factions - with the exception of the Social Democratic Group - saw the law as a prejudgment of so-called “alternative medicine” and a threat to whistleblowers. “ The sincerity of this fight against dangerous sectarian developments must not consist in punishing complementary care practices or the consumption of phytotherapeutic products by law ,” said Jean-François Coulomme from the left-wing alliance “La France insoumise”. Thomas Ménagé from Le Pen’s “Rassemblement national” simply called the law “a development hostile to freedom.”

Originally Posted By TugOfPeace⏩

Originally Posted By jimbob007⏩