Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » Would you give your children your full inheritance?
  1. Results 1 to 19 of 19
  2. Page 1 of 1

Thread: Would you give your children your full inheritance?

post 1697997173 02-17-2024, 03:54 PM
-
#1
  1. DolphinPilot
  1. DolphinPilot
  3. Join Date: May 2015
  4. Posts: 49,469
  5. Rep Power: 367822

Would you give your children your full inheritance?

I saw this on Twitter/****ter



I mean it does make sense to me; the notion of giving your children your full inheritance. Your kids are a part of your legacy and they should continue to be better off because of you long after you are gone. I heard about that Jackie Chan story where his kids won't get any of his money because he wants them to work for what they eventually have. If you raised your kids to not be spoiled (it is possible even if you're worth 100 million) then they should still be hard-working.

Take a look at Hulk Hogan's kids. He did spoil his whole family and now they are incapable of hard work. Don't be like The Hulkster.

What's your take?
post 1697997303 02-17-2024, 03:56 PM
-
#2
  1. Unstumpable
  2. Registered User
  1. Unstumpable
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2016
  4. Age: 34
  5. Posts: 26,131
  6. Rep Power: 219983
Yeah. Nobody else to give it to when you're gone. If your kids are royal fk ups and you don't communicate for years I guess I get it though.
post 1697997323 02-17-2024, 03:57 PM
-
#3
  1. dingler
  2. Registered User
  1. dingler
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2012
  4. Location: District Of Columbia, United States
  5. Posts: 8,920
  6. Rep Power: 53570
Originally Posted By DolphinPilot⏩
I saw this on Twitter/****ter



I mean it does make sense to me; the notion of giving your children your full inheritance. Your kids are a part of your legacy and they should continue to be better off because of you long after you are gone. I heard about that Jackie Chan story where his kids won't get any of his money because he wants them to work for what they eventually have. If you raised your kids to not be spoiled (it is possible even if you're worth 100 million) then they should still be hard-working.

Take a look at Hulk Hogan's kids. He did spoil his whole family and now they are incapable of hard work. Don't be like The Hulkster.

What's your take?
I will give my oldest son my farm. The rest can fight over whatever money I havnt spent on hookers and blow.
no crew crew
post 1697997393 02-17-2024, 03:58 PM
-
#4
  1. Muzzlrpress
  1. Muzzlrpress
  3. Join Date: Jan 2011
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 104,332
  6. Rep Power: 993953
Who the fuk else would I give it to?!
I'm back, bitches!
post 1697997533 02-17-2024, 04:02 PM
-
#5
  1. ClivesTriceps
  2. Indian troll farm bot
  1. ClivesTriceps
  2. Indian troll farm bot
  3. Join Date: Nov 2019
  4. Posts: 19,776
  5. Rep Power: 330918
Is Sting going to have that money buried with him or something? What an absolute tard.
Wort ew in th wold.
post 1697997583 02-17-2024, 04:02 PM
-
#6
  1. Legz422
  1. Legz422
  3. Join Date: Sep 2017
  4. Age: 57
  5. Posts: 45,713
  6. Subscribers: 2
  7. Rep Power: 625880
I think it's kind of ridiculous to not leave your kids anything. You could set it up in trusts that they don't get until a certain age or only get an allowance each year. I would donate some to charities but my kid(s) would get the bulk of it.
~ In a world where you can be anything, be kind ~
post 1697997813 02-17-2024, 04:07 PM
-
#7
  1. kimm4
  1. kimm4
  3. Join Date: May 2008
  4. Location: Massachusetts, United States
  5. Age: 57
  6. Posts: 56,753
  7. Subscribers: 7
  8. Rep Power: 1200221
I think there are quite a few celebrities out there that do this.
National Level Competitor (Female BB)
post 1697997863 02-17-2024, 04:08 PM
-
#8
  1. gmenfan40
  1. gmenfan40
  3. Join Date: Mar 2007
  4. Location: Fuck Israel
  5. Posts: 37,491
  6. Subscribers: 5
  7. Rep Power: 156637
Absolutely. I'd split everything into a trust for each one. Only a retard would want their offspring to struggle. The majority of the elites have inherited their wealth. (Super Ded fkn Srs)
post 1697998103 02-17-2024, 04:14 PM
-
#9
  1. DuracellBunny
  2. Has new batteries!
  1. DuracellBunny
  2. Has new batteries!
  3. Join Date: Nov 2005
  4. Posts: 15,594
  5. Rep Power: 201320
I've already started. The farms/farmland I own are on 20 year leases in my daughter's name and I will add to that over time.

Everythng else goes to my wife.
Screw nature; my body will do what I DAMN WELL tell it to do!

The only dangerous thing about an exercise is the person doing it.

They had the technology to rebuild me. They made me better, stronger, faster......
post 1697998893 02-17-2024, 04:30 PM
-
#10
  1. aranadiscoteca
  2. Registered User
  1. aranadiscoteca
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2015
  4. Posts: 10,200
  5. Rep Power: 40578
Of course. But since I don't plan on having kids it'll go to my brother and his kids, if he has none it'll go to my cousins kids.
post 1697999023 02-17-2024, 04:34 PM
-
#11
  1. DolphinPilot
  1. DolphinPilot
  3. Join Date: May 2015
  4. Posts: 49,469
  5. Rep Power: 367822
Originally Posted By Muzzlrpress⏩
Who the fuk else would I give it to?!
Originally Posted By ClivesTriceps⏩
Is Sting going to have that money buried with him or something? What an absolute tard.
Originally Posted By kimm4⏩
I think there are quite a few celebrities out there that do this.
from what I've read so far I think a lot of them are giving most of it to charities. Charities can be known to misappropriate funds... Also putting on my tinfoil hat I wonder if some of those "charities" are shell companies for the world elite, so it goes right back into their pockets in a roundabout way. If you want to be a star you gotta play by their rules...
post 1697999163 02-17-2024, 04:38 PM
-
#12
  1. nothingshocking
  1. nothingshocking
  3. Join Date: Jan 2017
  4. Location: Uranus, Gambia
  5. Posts: 36,359
  6. Subscribers: 5
  7. Rep Power: 949125
I'll probably set up college funds for my grandkids.

Assuming I die in my late seventies/early eighties, my kids will be middle aged. I'll be a failure as a father if they need an inheritance from me at that age.
post 1697999183 02-17-2024, 04:39 PM
-
#13
  1. LogicalLifts
  2. Registered User
  1. LogicalLifts
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2022
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 13,157
  6. Rep Power: 204849
I have already started structuring for my infant daughter, wife is more than covered.

Annually I give decent amounts to "effective charities" - it's crucial to choose a charity that can actually make a difference, and not use significant portions of donations received to get fat off of.
post 1697999413 02-17-2024, 04:45 PM
-
#14
  1. DolphinPilot
  1. DolphinPilot
  3. Join Date: May 2015
  4. Posts: 49,469
  5. Rep Power: 367822
Originally Posted By nothingshocking⏩
I'll probably set up college funds for my grandkids.

Assuming I die in my late seventies/early eighties, my kids will be middle aged. I'll be a failure as a father if they need an inheritance from me at that age.
Well to me inheritance isn't just for your kids, it's for your grandkids and they can pass it along to their kids and grandkids as well. It would be nice to help my descendants mitigate any bull**** in the coming shoebox apartment era of Chinese 9-9-6 work schedules. It's bound to happen sometime..
post 1697999693 02-17-2024, 04:52 PM
-
#15
  1. DuracellBunny
  2. Has new batteries!
  1. DuracellBunny
  2. Has new batteries!
  3. Join Date: Nov 2005
  4. Posts: 15,594
  5. Rep Power: 201320
Originally Posted By DolphinPilot⏩
Well to me inheritance isn't just for your kids, it's for your grandkids and they can pass it along to their kids and grandkids as well. It would be nice to help my descendants mitigate any bull**** in the coming shoebox apartment era of Chinese 9-9-6 work schedules. It's bound to happen sometime..
Be thankful that the US inheritance tax threshold isn't silly. The UK is 300 and something or 500k if it includes property.

There are several ways to dodge some, or all, of it, the easiest of which is gifting it to them before you die. As long as you live 7 years after the gift, it becomes tax free.
Screw nature; my body will do what I DAMN WELL tell it to do!

The only dangerous thing about an exercise is the person doing it.

They had the technology to rebuild me. They made me better, stronger, faster......
post 1698000133 02-17-2024, 05:06 PM
-
#16
  1. aranadiscoteca
  2. Registered User
  1. aranadiscoteca
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2015
  4. Posts: 10,200
  5. Rep Power: 40578
Originally Posted By DuracellBunny⏩
Be thankful that the US inheritance tax threshold isn't silly. The UK is 300 and something or 500k if it includes property.

There are several ways to dodge some, or all, of it, the easiest of which is gifting it to them before you die. As long as you live 7 years after the gift, it becomes tax free.
UK IHT is £325k anything above that is taxed at 40%

The property threshold is only if you're giving it to your kids/grandkids and it's your primary residence.

Punitive af.

Royal family of course has an exemption.

Imagine you have more than one kid and do no estate planning. The government gets more than your kids. Absolutely disgusting.
post 1698000493 02-17-2024, 05:16 PM
-
#17
  1. JackyChin
  2. Registered User
  1. JackyChin
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2023
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 3,042
  6. Rep Power: 14673
IMO inheritance tax should be 100%, and use that revenue to eliminate the income tax.

Imagine showing up to a game of monopoly 2 hours late and every property is already owned with a hotel on it.

That's what it's like being born with no inheritance.

You simply cannot compete with people who inherit $100M+ dollars. They're collecting $4-7M per year passively, you're breaking your back for $300k. You will never, ever, catch up.
post 1698000583 02-17-2024, 05:18 PM
-
#18
  1. Destor
  2. Registered User
  1. Destor
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2012
  4. Location: Alberta, Canada
  5. Age: 41
  6. Posts: 43,481
  7. Rep Power: 254906
Give your kids enough so they can do anything, but not so much that they'll do nothing.

The goal is to make kids who are hungry and driven af, granted the goal is also to live long enough until it becomes apparent whether they are or aren't
post 1698000993 02-17-2024, 05:34 PM
-
#19
  1. DolphinPilot
  1. DolphinPilot
  3. Join Date: May 2015
  4. Posts: 49,469
  5. Rep Power: 367822
Originally Posted By JackyChin⏩
IMO inheritance tax should be 100%, and use that revenue to eliminate the income tax.

Imagine showing up to a game of monopoly 2 hours late and every property is already owned with a hotel on it.

That's what it's like being born with no inheritance.

You simply cannot compete with people who inherit $100M+ dollars. They're collecting $4-7M per year passively, you're breaking your back for $300k. You will never, ever, catch up.
Imagine thinking the government should get all of your money and property, rather than your progeny......... to help fix income inequality.
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts