Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» Largest Covid Vaccine Study Yet Finds Links to Health Conditions
  1. Results 1 to 30 of 68
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Last
post 1698054733 02-18-2024, 10:24 PM
-
#1
  1. gachase21
  1. gachase21
  2. Join Date: Dec 2010
  3. Location: Georgia, United States
  4. Posts: 31,767
  5. Subscribers: 4
  6. Rep Power: 389233

Largest Covid Vaccine Study Yet Finds Links to Health Conditions




https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...lth-conditions



Must be pretty deep for msm to head down this path now...
post 1698054953 02-18-2024, 10:31 PM
-
#2
  1. Stizzel
  2. Rothbardian
  1. Stizzel
  2. Rothbardian
  3. Join Date: Apr 2008
  4. Location: Your Mom
  5. Posts: 83,747
  6. Subscribers: 1
  7. Rep Power: 384419
Never forget they pushed this on children
“It’s the bill of rights, not the bill of requests. Rights are not up for negotiations.” Thomas Massie, MAGA enemy #1
post 1698059643 02-19-2024, 03:36 AM
-
#3
  1. SillieBazzillie
  2. Md, Misc, Old-Brah
  1. SillieBazzillie
  2. Md, Misc, Old-Brah
  3. Join Date: Jul 2011
  4. Location: Maryland, United States
  5. Age: 58
  6. Posts: 46,410
  7. Rep Power: 219352
The actual takeaway from the study.

“Both things can be true,” Krumholz said in an interview. “They can save millions of lives, and there can be a small number of people who’ve been adversely affected.”

Any reasonable person understands that all vaccines have a tiny element of adverse reactions. But the good they do far outweighs these infrequent adverse reactions.

Any reasonable person understands this which is why anti-science, anti-vaxxers do not.
Early AM workout crew.
Holy crap dude, Satan's huge crew.
post 1698060023 02-19-2024, 04:01 AM
-
#4
  1. OPGenesis
  1. OPGenesis
  2. Join Date: Mar 2015
  3. Posts: 34,772
  4. Subscribers: 3
  5. Rep Power: 305834
Fear mongering.
"I am a rational animal who occupies the intermediary position between angel and beast"

"The upper class is afforded their position by the collective burden the underclass must carry for them"


**Summer Walker Crew**
post 1698060113 02-19-2024, 04:06 AM
-
#5
  1. jtaylor2010
  1. jtaylor2010
  2. Join Date: Mar 2010
  3. Location: United States
  4. Posts: 33,185
  5. Rep Power: 441422
Originally Posted By Stizzel
Never forget they pushed this on children
Pushed?? Theystillrecommend boosters for people aged 6 MONTHS and above in this country.




Originally Posted By SillieBazzillie
The actual takeaway from the study.

“Both things can be true,” Krumholz said in an interview. “They can save millions of lives, and there can be a small number of people who’ve been adversely affected.”

Any reasonable person understands that all vaccines have a tiny element of adverse reactions. But the good they do far outweighs these infrequent adverse reactions.

Any reasonable person understands this which is why anti-science, anti-vaxxers do not.
Lmfao at thinking those things saved millions of lives. But that’s not the point I want to make. My point is that you don’t get boosters which the doctors and scientists in our country recommend(along with all the usual agencies) so that makes you an anti-science, anti-vaxxer. Welcome to the club!
post 1698060183 02-19-2024, 04:11 AM
-
#6
  1. SillieBazzillie
  2. Md, Misc, Old-Brah
  1. SillieBazzillie
  2. Md, Misc, Old-Brah
  3. Join Date: Jul 2011
  4. Location: Maryland, United States
  5. Age: 58
  6. Posts: 46,410
  7. Rep Power: 219352
Originally Posted By jtaylor2010
Pushed?? Theystillrecommend boosters for people aged 6 MONTHS and above in this country.









Lmfao at thinking those things saved millions of lives. But that’s not the point I want to make. My point is that you don’t get boosters which the doctors and scientists in our country recommend(along with all the usual agencies) so that makes you an anti-science, anti-vaxxer. Welcome to the club!
It's called having independent thought boyo. I make choices based on a multiple of variables. The variables changed bigly between getting the jab in early '21 to a year plus later.

I guess being able to think and evaluate for myself without just following blindly what a specific person or party or expert tells me is unusual these days.

Bully for me.
Early AM workout crew.
Holy crap dude, Satan's huge crew.
post 1698060343 02-19-2024, 04:27 AM
-
#7
  1. jtaylor2010
  1. jtaylor2010
  2. Join Date: Mar 2010
  3. Location: United States
  4. Posts: 33,185
  5. Rep Power: 441422
Originally Posted By SillieBazzillie
It's called having independent thought boyo. I make choices based on a multiple of variables. The variables changed bigly between getting the jab in early '21 to a year plus later.

I guess being able to think and evaluate for myself without just following blindly what a specific person or party or expert tells me is unusual these days.

Bully for me.
So you’re doing the same thing I did when I decided I didn’t need the original injection(and correctly I might add since I’ve never had Covid).


But again, you’re saying you know better than the countless doctors and scientists who say you should be getting boosters. You’re an anti-science anti-vaxxer. Welcome to the club. How does it feel thinking for yourself??
post 1698060533 02-19-2024, 04:43 AM
-
#8
  1. SillieBazzillie
  2. Md, Misc, Old-Brah
  1. SillieBazzillie
  2. Md, Misc, Old-Brah
  3. Join Date: Jul 2011
  4. Location: Maryland, United States
  5. Age: 58
  6. Posts: 46,410
  7. Rep Power: 219352
Originally Posted By jtaylor2010
So you’re doing the same thing I did when I decided I didn’t need the original injection(and correctly I might add since I’ve never had Covid).


But again, you’re saying you know better than the countless doctors and scientists who say you should be getting boosters. You’re an anti-science anti-vaxxer. Welcome to the club. How does it feel thinking for yourself??
You were well within your right to do exactly what you did. I choose to get the original vaxx because it worked so well against getting and transmitting covid against the OG strain. Plus I have old parents/in laws and I myself am more at risk than most.

These variables changed as covid mutated and became weaker and the vaxx became less effective at getting and transmitting covid.

And experts put forth broad recommendations. I thought everyone knew that individuals should make decisions based on their own circumstances. Is this some kind of new concept for most people?
Early AM workout crew.
Holy crap dude, Satan's huge crew.
post 1698062653 02-19-2024, 06:11 AM
-
#9
  1. gachase21
  1. gachase21
  2. Join Date: Dec 2010
  3. Location: Georgia, United States
  4. Posts: 31,767
  5. Subscribers: 4
  6. Rep Power: 389233
Originally Posted By OPGenesis
Fear mongering.
Yes, I normally don't give a F about the vaccine one way or the other- it's off to see a msm site with this article headline.

What do you think shifted?
post 1698064003 02-19-2024, 06:42 AM
-
#10
  1. jtaylor2010
  1. jtaylor2010
  2. Join Date: Mar 2010
  3. Location: United States
  4. Posts: 33,185
  5. Rep Power: 441422
Originally Posted By SillieBazzillie
You were well within your right to do exactly what you did. I choose to get the original vaxx because it worked so well against getting and transmitting covid against the OG strain. Plus I have old parents/in laws and I myself am more at risk than most.

These variables changed as covid mutated and became weaker and the vaxx became less effective at getting and transmitting covid.

And experts put forth broad recommendations. I thought everyone knew that individuals should make decisions based on their own circumstances. Is this some kind of new concept for most people?
No, that concept is one that many people used to decide they didn’t want to take the original injection. And ftr I And those who rejected it were ridiculed endlessly by the media, health officials, and government leaders. Glad you and the vast majority of others in this country have come around to our way of thinking, but it doesn’t change the way many people treated us in 2021.


post 1698064423 02-19-2024, 06:53 AM
-
#11
  1. gachase21
  1. gachase21
  2. Join Date: Dec 2010
  3. Location: Georgia, United States
  4. Posts: 31,767
  5. Subscribers: 4
  6. Rep Power: 389233
Originally Posted By miscinformation
Shiet bro. I'm gonna get a tranny 5g turbo cancer heart attack from my quintuple boosted ass. Fuark. I should have listened to faith healers and chugged horse paste. If only I had the foresight of C students with no medical training or education. Instead, I listened to prestigious and accomplished board certified doctors with decades of experience and relied on the plethora of scientific evidence available to me to make my decision. SO STUPID!
What do you think shifted for a msm site to headline like that.
post 1698064453 02-19-2024, 06:54 AM
-
#12
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Location: Ill.
  5. Posts: 120,479
  6. Rep Power: 316531
Originally Posted By SillieBazzillie
The actual takeaway from the study.

“Both things can be true,” Krumholz said in an interview. “They can save millions of lives, and there can be a small number of people who’ve been adversely affected.”

Any reasonable person understands that all vaccines have a tiny element of adverse reactions. But the good they do far outweighs these infrequent adverse reactions.

Any reasonable person understands this which is why anti-science, anti-vaxxers do not.
And yet you're anti-science for refusing to get the booster shots, especially since you're high risk.
post 1698064593 02-19-2024, 06:57 AM
-
#13
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Location: Ill.
  5. Posts: 120,479
  6. Rep Power: 316531
Originally Posted By miscinformation
Nothing. It was always known there were mild risks. As the news article stated, the benefits outweighed the risks.
Like the benefits of not being obese to increase your chances of survival?

Oh wait, you believe being healthy made no difference when it came to living or dying....
post 1698064663 02-19-2024, 06:59 AM
-
#14
  1. gachase21
  1. gachase21
  2. Join Date: Dec 2010
  3. Location: Georgia, United States
  4. Posts: 31,767
  5. Subscribers: 4
  6. Rep Power: 389233
Originally Posted By miscinformation
Nothing. It was always known there were mild risks. As the news article stated, the benefits outweighed the risks.
You never saw headlines like this from major sites though.

Why do you think they feel inclined to do so?
post 1698064843 02-19-2024, 07:03 AM
-
#15
  1. TheFornicator1
  2. Wall Investor & Developer
  1. TheFornicator1
  2. Wall Investor & Developer
  3. Join Date: Feb 2015
  4. Posts: 9,555
  5. Rep Power: 78353
Originally Posted By SillieBazzillie
It's called having independent thought boyo. I make choices based on a multiple of variables. The variables changed bigly between getting the jab in early '21 to a year plus later.

I guess being able to think and evaluate for myself without just following blindly what a specific person or party or expert tells me is unusual these days.

Bully for me.
Translation: I took the jab, and I regret it. However, misery loves company. It's totally reasonable to take it.
“The life of man is solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.” – Thomas Hobbes, 1588 – 1679

*Never Respond To RSM3 Threads crew*
post 1698064993 02-19-2024, 07:07 AM
-
#16
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
"OE ratios with LBCI > 1.5 were observed for Guillain-Barré syndrome (2.49, 95 % CI: 2.15, 2.87) and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (3.23, 95 % CI: 2.51, 4.09) following the first dose of ChAdOx1 vaccine. Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis showed an OE ratio of 3.78 (95 % CI: 1.52, 7.78) following the first dose of mRNA-1273 vaccine. The OE ratios for myocarditis and pericarditis following BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, and ChAdOx1 were significantly increased with LBCIs > 1.5.".
post 1698066613 02-19-2024, 07:51 AM
-
#17
  1. gachase21
  1. gachase21
  2. Join Date: Dec 2010
  3. Location: Georgia, United States
  4. Posts: 31,767
  5. Subscribers: 4
  6. Rep Power: 389233
Originally Posted By miscinformation
This was a major study that established some links.
You think that's why Michael Bloomberg's site allowed that election year headlined in this 144 character headline read only culture?
post 1698066733 02-19-2024, 07:55 AM
-
#18
  1. phaginator
  2. Ayyy lmao
  1. phaginator
  2. Ayyy lmao
  3. Join Date: Apr 2013
  4. Posts: 36,761
  5. Rep Power: 122033
Originally Posted By SillieBazzillie
You were well within your right to do exactly what you did. I choose to get the original vaxx because it worked so well against getting and transmitting covid against the OG strain. Plus I have old parents/in laws and I myself am more at risk than most.

These variables changed as covid mutated and became weaker and the vaxx became less effective at getting and transmitting covid.

And experts put forth broad recommendations. I thought everyone knew that individuals should make decisions based on their own circumstances.Is this some kind of new concept for most people?
Problem is that it got pushed and could even lose your job in same cases if refused.
post 1698066843 02-19-2024, 07:58 AM
-
#19
  1. gachase21
  1. gachase21
  2. Join Date: Dec 2010
  3. Location: Georgia, United States
  4. Posts: 31,767
  5. Subscribers: 4
  6. Rep Power: 389233
Here's what I expect to see over the next 120 days / a slow increase in negative observations about the vaccine, and a slow increase in quotes - and videos of Trump supporting and advocating for the vaccine.
post 1698066893 02-19-2024, 08:00 AM
-
#20
  1. DeshaunWatson
  2. Verified
  1. DeshaunWatson
  2. Verified
  3. Join Date: Jun 2014
  4. Posts: 19,647
  5. Rep Power: 135286
Originally Posted By Stizzel
Never forget they pushed this on children
Metroins is still jabbing up his kids
post 1698067023 02-19-2024, 08:04 AM
-
#21
  1. Stizzel
  2. Rothbardian
  1. Stizzel
  2. Rothbardian
  3. Join Date: Apr 2008
  4. Location: Your Mom
  5. Posts: 83,747
  6. Subscribers: 1
  7. Rep Power: 384419
Originally Posted By DeshaunWatson
Metroins is still jabbing up his kids
I mean metroins is informed, if he still decides to give his kids myocarditis thats his decision. But for people that are unaware of what these studies are finding, this is pure evil
“It’s the bill of rights, not the bill of requests. Rights are not up for negotiations.” Thomas Massie, MAGA enemy #1
post 1698067033 02-19-2024, 08:05 AM
-
#22
  1. jtaylor2010
  1. jtaylor2010
  2. Join Date: Mar 2010
  3. Location: United States
  4. Posts: 33,185
  5. Rep Power: 441422
Originally Posted By miscinformation
Shiet bro. I'm gonna get a tranny 5g turbo cancer heart attack from myquintuple boostedass. Fuark. I should have listened to faith healers and chugged horse paste. If only I had the foresight of C students with no medical training or education. Instead, I listened to prestigious and accomplished board certified doctors with decades of experience and relied on the plethora of scientific evidence available to me to make my decision. SO STUPID!
Retard detected. Less than 10% of the population has gotten the most recent booster. Look around at how dumb the average person is in America today…….then realize you’re in the bottom 10%. Just lmao at potatocels.



All those people you’re talking about have concluded that we should recommend boosters to 6 month old babies. Imagine all of the information readily available about the corruption of big Pharma and govt. yet still falling for it. Fukkin lmmfao.
post 1698067103 02-19-2024, 08:06 AM
-
#23
  1. gachase21
  1. gachase21
  2. Join Date: Dec 2010
  3. Location: Georgia, United States
  4. Posts: 31,767
  5. Subscribers: 4
  6. Rep Power: 389233
Originally Posted By DeshaunWatson
Metroins is still jabbing up his kids
This absolutely baffles me.
post 1698067143 02-19-2024, 08:08 AM
-
#24
  1. kcadrenalin
  2. Permanent Vacation
  1. kcadrenalin
  2. Permanent Vacation
  3. Join Date: Jun 2007
  4. Posts: 24,727
  5. Rep Power: 349124
________

MFC

________
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote. -Benjamin Franklin
Tits and Beer
post 1698067433 02-19-2024, 08:15 AM
-
#25
  1. Stizzel
  2. Rothbardian
  1. Stizzel
  2. Rothbardian
  3. Join Date: Apr 2008
  4. Location: Your Mom
  5. Posts: 83,747
  6. Subscribers: 1
  7. Rep Power: 384419
Originally Posted By kcadrenalin
Lmao

No refunds! And no suing for damages!
“It’s the bill of rights, not the bill of requests. Rights are not up for negotiations.” Thomas Massie, MAGA enemy #1
post 1698068503 02-19-2024, 08:34 AM
-
#26
  1. Bushmaster
  2. Masculine Toxicity
  1. Bushmaster
  2. Masculine Toxicity
  3. Join Date: Jul 2003
  4. Location: Greenville, South Carolina, United States
  5. Posts: 68,354
  6. Subscribers: 2
  7. Rep Power: 698086
Originally Posted By DeshaunWatson
Metroins is still jabbing up his kids
Originally Posted By gachase21
This absolutely baffles me.
It's metroins ffs.. Dude has more broken body parts and ailments than my 95yr old grandmother ever had before she died, and who was "concerned about" DOMS.. A herd of elephants wouldn't keep him or his kids from that hot delicious Fauci Fluid.
It's a hot night. The mind races. You think about your knife: the only friend who hasn't betrayed you, the only friend who won't be dead by sunup. Sleep tight mates, in your quilted chambray night shirts.
post 1698069153 02-19-2024, 08:46 AM
-
#27
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Stizzel
I mean metroins is informed, if he still decides to give his kids myocarditis thats his decision. But for people that are unaware of what these studies are finding, this is pure evil
Doesn't seem like anyone ITT is interested in what the study found
post 1698069203 02-19-2024, 08:47 AM
-
#28
  1. JUSA
  2. No Agony, No Bragony
  1. JUSA
  2. No Agony, No Bragony
  3. Join Date: Nov 2004
  4. Location: Texas
  5. Posts: 50,517
  6. Rep Power: 458793
Originally Posted By SillieBazzillie
The actual takeaway from the study.

“Both things can be true,” Krumholz said in an interview. “They can save millions of lives, and there can be a small number of people who’ve been adversely affected.”

Any reasonable person understands that all vaccines have a tiny element of adverse reactions. But the good they do far outweighs these infrequent adverse reactions.

Any reasonable person understands this which is why anti-science, anti-vaxxers do not.
I haven't read this, so I don't know how negative the sides they are suggesting might be.

Taking a step back, though -- the greater the benefit of the vaccines, the more they are to be considered and weighed against the negative sides. Correct?

So, the converse is also true, that the less of the benefit of the vaccines, the more these negative sides begin to outweigh their benefit.

With that in mind, since Covid does not represent the same level of threat to everyone, you probably want to look at this as I have all along (often being misrepresented as 'anti-science' or as an anti-vaxxer for being right). That populations where covid is not a significant threat are far less likely to get benefit from it. Sick people, elderly, obese individuals, those with co-morbidities have far greater risk when getting covid than healthy, younger and non-fat people. Children in particular seem to be all but immune to covid.

Any reasonable person (now) understands this which is why the shills do not.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.

- Arthur Schopenhauer
post 1698069343 02-19-2024, 08:49 AM
-
#29
  1. gachase21
  1. gachase21
  2. Join Date: Dec 2010
  3. Location: Georgia, United States
  4. Posts: 31,767
  5. Subscribers: 4
  6. Rep Power: 389233
Originally Posted By J.L.C.
Doesn't seem like anyone ITT is interested in what the study found
The thread topic is about the headline reasoning
post 1698069353 02-19-2024, 08:49 AM
-
#30
  1. 5x10
  2. Banned
  1. 5x10
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Apr 2007
  4. Age: 47
  5. Posts: 49,580
  6. Rep Power: 0
Came in for some denial
‘Leaving satisfied
Dallas Cowboys

Lifted for 30 years

Ass > tits
No Debt Crew
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts